Perception of consumers on acceptance of Desi Chicken meat consumption in the Cauvery Delta region of Tamil Nadu
Abstract
The present study was made to evaluated consumer perceptions and utilization patterns of desi chicken meat among 605 rural households in the Cauvery Delta region of Tamil Nadu using structured interviews and descriptive statistical analysis. Universal prior consumption (100 per cent) indicated strong cultural acceptance of desi chicken meat among respondents. Awareness regarding its nutritional value was observed among 67.43% of consumers, while 89.58% preferred consumption throughout the year. Monthly consumption was the most common pattern (38.67%), followed by twice-weekly and once-weekly consumption. Most respondents (82.97%) preferred whole-carcass utilization and curry preparation was identified as the predominant culinary practice (69.91%). Premium market price and irregular supply were recognized as the major constraints affecting consumption. Overall, the findings highlight the increasing demand for native chicken meat because of its superior sensory qualities and perceived organic value, emphasizing the need to strengthen production systems, marketing infrastructure and supply chain management to meet changing consumer preferences.
Full Text
Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.
Introduction
Poultry meat is one of the major sources of animal protein in India because of its high nutritional value, affordability and wide consumer acceptance. Among poultry products, desi (native) chicken has gained a premium market due to its distinct flavour, lean meat characteristics, perceived medicinal value and suitability for traditional culinary preparations. Native chickens are primarily reared under extensive backyard or free-range production systems with minimal external inputs, thereby contributing significantly to rural livelihoods and regional food security. In recent years, increasing health consciousness and consumer preference for organic and traditionally raised livestock products have contributed to a substantial rise in native poultry production across India. Previous studies have reported that consumer preference for poultry meat is influenced by factors such as price, availability, cultural preferences and sensory attributes. Balusamy and Rajendran (2017) [2] identified taste and cooking convenience as important determinants influencing poultry consumption behaviour in South India, while Mahiuddin et al. (2008) [4] observed greater consumer preference for desi chicken products over broiler meat because of perceived health benefits and superior meat quality. In the Cauvery Delta region of Tamil Nadu, desi chicken occupies an important place in the regional food culture. However, limited scientific information is available regarding consumer perception and acceptance of native chicken meat in this region. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the perceptions, consumption habits and acceptance patterns of native chicken meat among rural households in the Cauvery Delta region.
Materials and Methods
Study area
The study was conducted in the Cauvery Delta region of Tamil Nadu, which predominantly consists of rural agricultural households where desi chicken meat forms an important component of traditional dietary practices.
Selection of respondents
A total of 605 rural households were selected randomly for the study. Respondents included household heads and family members actively involved in purchasing decisions and food preparation.
Data collection
Primary data were collected through direct personal interviews using a well-structured and pre-tested interview schedule. Information regarding awareness of nutritive value, seasonal preference, frequency of consumption, meat portion preference, utilization pattern and constraints faced by consumers was obtained.
Statistical analysis
The collected data were analyzed and tabulated using descriptive statistical methods such as percentages, frequencies and ratios.
Results and Discussion
Awareness regarding nutritive value of desi chicken meat
The results of the present study indicated that 67.43% of respondents were aware of the nutritional value of desi chicken meat, whereas 32.57% lacked such awareness. The comparatively higher level of awareness among rural consumers may be attributed to increasing health consciousness and long-standing cultural beliefs regarding the therapeutic and nutritional benefits of native chicken meat. These findings are consistent with the observations of Kathiravan and Chitrambigai (2024) [3] , who reported that consumer preference for native chicken meat was largely influenced by its perceived nutritional superiority and organic low-input production system. Similar findings were reported by Monisha et al. (2021) [7] , who observed an increasing consumer preference for free-range country chicken because of its perceived nutritional benefits and health-promoting properties. In addition, Anusha Bai et al.
(2022) [1] reported that consumer acceptance of native chicken meat was strongly associated with its carcass characteristics, particularly leanness, distinct flavour, and lower intramuscular fat content.
Seasonal preference for consumption
The majority of respondents (89.58%) preferred consuming desi chicken meat throughout the year, whereas only a small proportion consumed it mainly during festivals and special occasions. This consistent consumption pattern reflects the strong cultural integration and regular dietary importance of native chicken meat among rural households. These findings are consistent with the observations of Scudiero et al. (2023) [8] , who reported that poultry consumption in India has shown continuous growth due to changing lifestyles, improved market accessibility and increasing social acceptance. In addition, Balusamy and Rajendran (2017) [2] highlighted that poultry meat maintained strong consumer acceptance in South India because of the absence of major religious restrictions and its compatibility with regional culinary traditions.
Frequency of consumption
Regarding frequency of consumption, monthly consumption was the most common pattern (38.67%), followed by consumption twice a week (28.26%) and once a week (16.85%). This regular consumption pattern indicates strong consumer preference and sustained demand for desi chicken meat despite its comparatively higher market price. These findings are consistent with the observations of Manish et al. (2024) [5] , who reported that households in North Bengaluru maintained regular consumption of backyard [4] , who observed that desi chicken meat exhibited higher consumer preference and more frequent consumption than commercial broiler meat because of its perceived superior flavour and health benefits.
Preference for meat portions
The majority of respondents (82.97%) preferred purchasing or utilizing the whole carcass rather than specific cuts or portioned meat products. This preference reflects the traditional culinary practices commonly followed in rural households, where whole-bird preparation forms an important part of the local food culture. Such consumption behavior indicates the strong influence of traditional cooking practices on carcass utilization patterns and meat purchasing preferences at the retail level. These findings are consistent with the observations of Balusamy and Rajendran (2017) [2] , who reported that South Indian consumers generally preferred poultry products that suited regional cooking methods and culinary traditions. The authors further noted that whole-carcass utilization was particularly common during family gatherings, communal dining, and festive occasions.
Utilization pattern of desi chicken meat
With respect to culinary utilization, curry preparation was the predominant method of consumption (69.91%), followed by fried products and biryani preparation. The higher preference for curry-based preparations reflects traditional rural dietary practices, cultural familiarity, and consumer preference for the flavour characteristics developed through slow-cooking methods. These findings are consistent with the observations of Balusamy and Rajendran (2017) [2] , who reported that chicken curry and highly spiced meat preparations were the most preferred poultry dishes among South Indian consumers. The unique textural properties and flavour profile of native chicken meat may further contribute to its suitability for traditional simmering methods and regional spice-based culinary preparations, thereby enhancing overall consumer acceptance.
Constraints Faced by Consumers
Market premium and sporadic availability emerged as the primary structural constraints limiting the purchase and consumption of desi poultry. While consumer preference remains strongly anchored to the distinct flavor and premium perceived quality of native chicken, its regular dietary inclusion is restricted by retail affordability and a fractured supply chain. These economic barriers align closely with the data presented by Monisha et al. (2021) [7] , who identified retail pricing as the primary hurdle restricting consumer acquisition of free-range country chicken across Tamil Nadu. Kathiravan and Chitrambigai (2024) [3] reported that, localized pricing disparities and volatile market volumes actively undermine consumer accessibility and long-term market sustainability for native breeds. In addition, our observations reflect the macroeconomic analysis of Scudiero et al. (2023) [8] , which established that supply-side deficiencies specifically farm-gate price fluctuations, transport logistics and localized distribution barriers remain the definitive factors governing contemporary poultry consumption metrics throughout India.
Conclusion
The present study demonstrates a strong positive consumer consensus and a high level of acceptance toward desi chicken meat among rural households in the Cauvery Delta region of Tamil Nadu. Respondents widely associated native poultry meat with superior taste, desirable texture, high nutritional value, cultural preservation, and wholesome rearing environments. Preference for desi chicken was also strongly influenced by its suitability for traditional culinary preparations and its perceived health benefits. The consistent year-round demand for native chicken meat further reflects its deep cultural and dietary significance within rural communities. These findings highlight the considerable potential for promoting sustainable backyard poultry farming systems, which can contribute to improved rural livelihoods, enhanced nutritional security, and expanded market opportunities for indigenous poultry production.
References
- Anusha Bai, Ruban SW, Spandan PV, Barry AIG, Kumar SN, Nagaraja CS. Carcass and meat quality characteristics of native chicken reared under backyard and farm setting in Karnataka. Asian J Dairy Food Res. 2022;41(1):111-115.
- Balusamy P, Rajendran B. The preference and consumption of chicken likers in South Indian consumers with reference to cooking patterns of chicken meat in Chennai. Int J Appl Res. 2017;3(12):21-26.
- Kathiravan G, Chitrambigai K. Consumer preferences for native chicken meat in India: implications for sustainable production and household dynamics. Curr Res Nutr Food Sci. 2024;12(1):166-180.
- Mahiuddin M, Khanum H, Wadud MA, Howlider MAR, Hai MA. Consumer attitude towards poultry meat and eggs in Muktagacha Powroshava of Mymensingh district. J Agrofor Environ. 2008;2(1).
- Manish KL, Mamathagirish, Girish MR. The consumer preference for backyard poultry birds and eggs in North Bengaluru, Karnataka. Biol Forum Int J. 2024;16(8):188-191.
- Mantsho S, Hlongwane J. Consumer perception and preference between broiler and indigenous chicken meat in Limpopo Province, South Africa. In: Proceedings of the Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa Conference; 2018.
- Monisha K, Moghana Lavanya S, Mahendran K, Vasanthi R. A study on consumer preference towards purchase and consumption of free-range country chicken meat in Erode district. Pharma Innov J. 2021;10(11):2722-2726.
- Scudiero L, Tak M, Alarcón P, Shankar B. Understanding household and food system determinants of chicken and egg consumption in India. Food Secur. 2023;15:1231-1254.
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
