Scinovex

Research article · 2026 · Full text

International Journal of Agriculture and Nutrition

Effectiveness of below-the-line marketing touchpoints on consumer awareness, engagement and dairy product preferences in Bengaluru, India

Kasina BhavithaDilip Rasiklal VahoniyaBhautik Bagda

Volume 8(7) · Pages 41–46 · DOI: 10.33545/26646064.2026.v8.i7a.703 ↗

Research areasMarketing and Advertising StrategiesConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Below-the-line (BTL) marketing has emerged as an effective promotional strategy for enhancing consumer awareness, engagement, and purchase behaviour in the premium dairy sector. The study evaluates the socio-economic profile of consumers, assesses their awareness of the company’s dairy products, examines the effectiveness of BTL touchpoints and analyses consumer preferences in Bengaluru city. Primary data were collected from 200 consumers using a structured questionnaire through purposive sampling. The collected data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Likert scale analysis, and Garrett ranking technique. The findings revealed that the majority of respondents were middle-aged (35-50 years), graduates, and belonged to higher-income households. Overall, consumer awareness regarding the company’s products was moderate, with 52.00 per cent of respondents being aware of the brand. Community events (21.00%) and product sampling (19.00%) were identified as the major sources of brand awareness, while product sampling (23.00%) emerged as the most effective BTL activity in enhancing consumer engagement. Milk was the most frequently purchased and preferred dairy product, with A2/Desi cow milk being the most preferred milk variant. Garrett ranking indicated that product quality, freshness, and trust and transparency were the primary factors influencing consumer preference for premium dairy brands, whereas quality testing, freshness and taste, and doorstep delivery were the leading reasons for preferring the company. The study concludes that experiential BTL activities, supported by superior product quality, transparency, and convenient delivery services, play a significant role in strengthening consumer awareness, engagement, preference, and long-term brand loyalty in Bengaluru's premium dairy market.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Milk is a critical part of the Indian diet and India is the world's largest producer, providing 25% of the global output. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Milk is a critical part of the Indian diet and India is the world's largest producer, providing 25% of the global output.

      In the paper's own words

      “Milk is integral to Indian diets, providing essential protein, calcium, and vitamins (FAO, 2025). India is the world's largest milk producer, contributing 25% of global output through improved productivity and infrastructure (PIB, 2024).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Urbanization and increased health awareness have led consumers to prefer branded, packaged dairy products that prioritize safety and quality. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Urbanization and increased health awareness have led consumers to prefer branded, packaged dairy products that prioritize safety and quality.

      In the paper's own words

      “Urbanization and health awareness have shifted preferences toward packaged, branded products, with consumers prioritizing safety, quality, and transparency (Ali & Kapoor, 2010; FSSAI, 2019).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Below-the-line (BTL) marketing is valuable for premium brands because it allows consumers to experience quality directly, which reduces perceived risk and builds trust. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Below-the-line (BTL) marketing is valuable for premium brands because it allows consumers to experience quality directly, which reduces perceived risk and builds trust.

      In the paper's own words

      “These strategies allow consumers to experience product quality directly, reducing purchase risk and strengthening trust. Such personalized approaches are highly effective for premium brands where customer experience influences decisions.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aims to analyze the socio-economic profile of consumers in Bengaluru and evaluate how BTL promotional touchpoints influence their awareness, engagement, and preferences for a specific company's dairy products. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aims to analyze the socio-economic profile of consumers in Bengaluru and evaluate how BTL promotional touchpoints influence their awareness, engagement, and preferences for a specific company's dairy products.

      In the paper's own words

      “this study aims to analyse the socio-economic profile of consumers in Bengaluru city and examine their awareness, engagement and preferences towards the company's dairy products. It further evaluates the effectiveness of below-the-line promotional touchpoints in influencing consumer behaviour.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The researchers collected primary data from 200 consumers in Bengaluru using purposive sampling and structured questionnaires. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers collected primary data from 200 consumers in Bengaluru using purposive sampling and structured questionnaires.

      In the paper's own words

      “Primary data were collected through personal interaction with respondents by using a structured questionnaire from 200 consumers selected through purposive sampling in residential societies and apartment complexes.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methodology

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Data analysis was performed using frequency and percentage analysis, cross-tabulation, Likert scale weighted mean scores, and the Garrett ranking technique. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Data analysis was performed using frequency and percentage analysis, cross-tabulation, Likert scale weighted mean scores, and the Garrett ranking technique.

      In the paper's own words

      “Analytical tools Frequency & Percentage analysis, Cross-tabulation, weighted mean score (Likert scale), Garrett’s ranking technique and Graphical methods (bar chart/pie chart)”

      Page 2

      Found in: Table 1

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • The sample consisted of a balanced age distribution, with the largest group being 35-50 years (34.5%), and 55.0% of respondents coming from higher-income households earning above ₹4,00,000 annually. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The sample consisted of a balanced age distribution, with the largest group being 35-50 years (34.5%), and 55.0% of respondents coming from higher-income households earning above ₹4,00,000 annually.

      In the paper's own words

      “Age distribution was balanced: 35-50 years (34.5%), above 50 (33.0%), and below 35 (32.5%)”

      Page 2

      “With 55.0% reporting annual incomes above ₹4,00,000, the sample represents higher-income households.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Consumer awareness of the company's brand was moderate, with 52.0% of respondents being aware and 48.0% unaware. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Consumer awareness of the company's brand was moderate, with 52.0% of respondents being aware and 48.0% unaware.

      In the paper's own words

      “Slightly over half (52.0%) knew the brand, while 48.0% were unaware, suggesting visibility needs improvement.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Consumer Preference Towards Company Products

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Community events/stalls (21.0%) and product sampling (19.0%) were the most effective sources of brand awareness, performing better than posters (11.0%) and Google searches (8.0%). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Community events/stalls (21.0%) and product sampling (19.0%) were the most effective sources of brand awareness, performing better than posters (11.0%) and Google searches (8.0%).

      In the paper's own words

      “Community-based activities were the most effective, with events and stalls (21.0%) and product sampling (19.0%) outperforming digital channels like Google (8.0%) and posters (11.0%).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Product sampling was the most effective BTL activity for enhancing engagement (23.0%), followed by stall promotions (19.0%) and kids' engagement events (17.0%). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Product sampling was the most effective BTL activity for enhancing engagement (23.0%), followed by stall promotions (19.0%) and kids' engagement events (17.0%).

      In the paper's own words

      “Percentage analysis reveals product sampling ranked first, accounting for 23.0 per cent of respondents, indicating it as the most effective BTL activity. Followed by stall promotions (19.0%) and kids' engagement events (17.0%).”

      Page 4

      Found in: Consumer Preference Towards Company Products

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • Milk was the most preferred (72.0%) and frequently purchased (48.5%) product, with A2/Desi cow milk being the most preferred variant (32.0%). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Milk was the most preferred (72.0%) and frequently purchased (48.5%) product, with A2/Desi cow milk being the most preferred variant (32.0%).

      In the paper's own words

      “Milk emerged as both the most frequently purchased (48.5%) and the most preferred (72.0%) product”

      Page 4

      “A2/Desi cow milk was the most preferred milk type (32.0%), followed by regular cow milk (28.0%) and buffalo milk (21.0%).”

      Page 4

      Found in: Consumer Preference Towards Company Products

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The primary drivers for selecting dairy brands were quality and freshness (21.0%), followed by price/value (19.0%), doorstep delivery (17.0%), and trust/transparency (16.0%). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The primary drivers for selecting dairy brands were quality and freshness (21.0%), followed by price/value (19.0%), doorstep delivery (17.0%), and trust/transparency (16.0%).

      In the paper's own words

      “Consumers primarily selected dairy brands based on quality and freshness (21.0%), followed by price/value (19.0%), doorstep delivery (17.0%), and trust and transparency (16.0%)”

      Page 4

      Found in: Consumer Preference Towards Company Products

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The top reasons for preferring the specific company were quality testing (61.74), freshness and taste (56.35), and doorstep delivery (54.33). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The top reasons for preferring the specific company were quality testing (61.74), freshness and taste (56.35), and doorstep delivery (54.33).

      In the paper's own words

      “when evaluating the reasons for preferring the company, quality testing received the highest Garrett score (61.74), followed by freshness and taste (56.35) and doorstep delivery (54.33).”

      Page 5

      Found in: Factors influencing consumer preference for premium dairy brands and the company

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 5 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that dairy companies can improve market performance by using regular sampling, community engagement, and interactive events to build awareness. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that dairy companies can improve market performance by using regular sampling, community engagement, and interactive events to build awareness.

      In the paper's own words

      “Dairy companies can enhance their market performance by increasing consumer awareness through regular sampling activities, community engagement programmes, and interactive promotional events.”

      Page 5

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 5 ↗
    • The study's findings may not be generalizable to all consumer groups because it was limited to purposively selected respondents in Bengaluru city. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The study's findings may not be generalizable to all consumer groups because it was limited to purposively selected respondents in Bengaluru city.

      In the paper's own words

      “The study is limited to Bengaluru city and purposively selected respondents. Therefore, the findings may not be generalized to all consumer groups.”

      Page 5

      Found in: Limitations

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 5 ↗

Visual summary

2 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Percentage (%): Community event/stall vs Sampling activity vs Friends/Referral vs Social media vs Community posters/ads
Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Percentage (%): Community event/stall vs Sampling activity vs Friends/Referral vs Social media vs Community posters/ads

Replotted from Table 3 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 4 (page 5) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Mean Garrett Score: Quality testing vs Freshness and taste vs Doorstep delivery vs Transparency/Trust vs Price/Value
Replotted from Table 4 (page 5) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 4 (page 5) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Mean Garrett Score: Quality testing vs Freshness and taste vs Doorstep delivery vs Transparency/Trust vs Price/Value

Replotted from Table 4 (page 5) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Research methodology adopted for the studyTable 1Page 2Socio-economic profile of the sample consumers (n = 200)Table 2Page 3Consumer awareness regarding the company's products (n = 200)Table 3Page 3Most Effective BTL ActivityFigure 1Page 4Garrett's ranking of factors influencing premium dairy brand preference and preference for the companyTable 4Page 5Consumer Preferences Towards Company Dairy Products in Bengaluru (n = 200)Figure 2Page 5
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Milk is integral to Indian diets, providing essential protein, calcium, and vitamins (FAO, 2025). India is the world's largest milk producer, contributing 25% of global output through improved productivity and infrastructure (PIB, 2024). The dairy sector is vital to the rural economy, supporting small farmers and national growth. Initiatives like the White Revolution and Operation Flood strengthened cooperative networks and distribution (NDDB, 2023; PIB, 2024). Urbanization and health awareness have shifted preferences toward packaged, branded products, with consumers prioritizing safety, quality, and transparency (Ali & Kapoor, 2010;FSSAI, 2019). Purchasing decisions now hinge on quality, freshness, and brand credibility (Tamilchelvi & Lavanya, 2019). Advances in food processing and quality preservation have further reinforced consumer demand for premium dairy and functional food products, highlighting the importance of maintaining physicochemical quality, bioactive compounds, and nutritional attributes throughout processing and distribution (Sen et al., 2026). Satisfaction depends on product attributes and service factors like timely delivery, which drive brand loyalty (Grunert, 2005;Kotler & Keller, 2016). Direct-to-Consumer (D2C) models have transformed supply chains by enabling direct producer-consumer interaction, reducing intermediary dependence, and enhancing convenience via digital subscription services (CARE Ratings, 2020; IBEF, 2024) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 17, 18, 19] . Premium brand success requires effective marketing to build long-term relationships. Below-the-Line (BTL) activities, such as product sampling and community campaigns, are increasingly important. These strategies allow consumers to experience product quality directly, reducing purchase risk and strengthening trust. Such personalized approaches are highly effective for premium brands where customer experience influences decisions. Recent agricultural advances show that technological innovation, quality assurance, and consumer confidence are interconnected. Research on hydroinformatics, AI, and climate-resilient systems emphasizes data-driven decisionmaking and efficient resource management for productivity (Kumar et [8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16] . These factors are fundamental to market competitiveness in premium agri-food sectors. While studies examine dairy consumption, research on the effectiveness of Below-the-Line (BTL) promotional activities in the premium dairy segment is limited. Moreover, integrated studies on socio-economic characteristics, brand preferences, and brand-switching under a Direct-to-Consumer (D2C) model are scarce, particularly in cities like Bengaluru. Despite increasing adoption of experiential marketing by premium dairy brands, empirical evidence regarding the effectiveness of BTL touchpoints on consumer awareness, engagement and purchase preference remains limited, particularly in urban D2C dairy markets. Therefore, this study aims to analyse the socio-economic profile of consumers in Bengaluru city and examine their awareness, engagement and preferences towards the company's dairy products. It further evaluates the effectiveness of below-theline promotional touchpoints in influencing consumer behaviour.

Methodology

Primary data were collected through personal interaction with respondents by using a structured questionnaire from 200 consumers selected through purposive sampling in residential societies and apartment complexes. The responses obtained from the consumers were carefully analysed using appropriate statistical and analytical tools. The study focused on examining the socio-economic profile, consumption patterns, effectiveness of BTL promotional activities, and key factors influencing consumer purchase decisions towards premium dairy products.

Results and discussion

In line with the objectives of the study, this chapter presents and discusses the findings of the research titled "Evaluation of below-the-line touchpoints and dairy products preference in Bengaluru city." The results are based on primary data collected directly from consumers through personal interviews, providing a clear understanding of their awareness, preferences, and responses to BTL promotional activities in the dairy sector.

Socio-economic profile of consumers

The socio-economic profile ( Overall, these educated, stable, urban consumers are ideal for assessing preferences and BTL promotional effectiveness in the premium dairy sector.

Level of consumer awareness regarding the Company's products

Level of consumer awareness regarding the Company's products

Consumer Preference Towards Company Products

Figure 2 presents the consumer preference pattern for the company's dairy products. Milk emerged as both the most frequently purchased (48.5%) and the most preferred (72.0%) product, indicating its dominant position in the product portfolio. Traditional dairy products such as curd and paneer also recorded moderate consumer preference. In contrast, value-added products, including butter, sweet lassi, breakfast cereals, and buttermilk, received comparatively lower preference, suggesting greater acceptance of staple dairy products over processed alternatives. With respect to milk preference, A2/Desi cow milk was the most preferred milk type (32.0%), followed by regular cow milk (28.0%) and buffalo milk (21.0%). Similarly, among the company's milk variants, the A2/Desi cow milk variant ranked first (21.0%), followed by cow milk (17.0%) and toned milk (15.5%), reflecting increasing consumer inclination towards premium and health-oriented dairy products. The purchasing pattern showed that daily and occasional purchases each accounted for 28.0%, while 24.5% of respondents purchased products weekly, indicating regular consumer engagement with dairy products. However, 19.5% of respondents had never purchased the company's products, highlighting potential opportunities for customer acquisition. Among dairy brands, Nandini (22.0%) was the most widely used brand, followed by Akshayakalpa Organic (19.0%), while the company ranked third (18.0%), demonstrating strong competition in Bengaluru's organized dairy market. Consumers primarily selected dairy brands based on quality and freshness (21.0%), followed by price/value (19.0%), doorstep delivery (17.0%), and trust and transparency (16.0%), indicating that product quality and convenience were the major determinants of purchase decisions. Furthermore, 56.0% of respondents reported having switched dairy brands, suggesting that consumers are willing to change brands when they perceive better quality, freshness, value for money, convenience, or trust. Overall, the findings reveal that consumer preference in the premium dairy segment is primarily driven by product quality, health benefits, convenience, and brand reliability, while premium milk variants, particularly A2/Desi cow milk, are gaining increasing acceptance among urban consumers.

Figure 2. Consumer Preferences Towards Company Dairy Products in Bengaluru (n = 200)
Consumer Preferences Towards Company Dairy Products in Bengaluru (n = 200)↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Consumer Preferences Towards Company Dairy Products in Bengaluru (n = 200)

Consumer Preferences Towards Company Dairy Products in Bengaluru (n = 200)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 5 ↗

Factors influencing consumer preference for premium dairy brands and the company

The Garrett ranking analysis presented in Table 4 highlights the key factors influencing consumers' preference for premium dairy brands and the specific reasons for preferring the company. For premium dairy brands in general, quality of the product emerged as the most influential factor with the highest mean Garrett score (57.26), followed by freshness (53.21) and trust/transparency (52.33).

Table 4. Garrett's ranking of factors influencing premium dairy brand preference and preference for the company
Factors influencing premium dairy brand preferenceMean Garrett ScoreRankReasons for preferring the companyMean Garrett ScoreRank
Quality of product57.26IQuality testing61.74I
Freshness53.21IIFreshness and taste56.35II
Trust/Transparency52.33IIIDoorstep delivery54.33III
Doorstep delivery51.28IVTransparency/Trust50.84IV
Price48.32VPrice/Value46.36V
Brand image47.05VICustomer service44.25VI
Offers/Discounts42.57VIIOffers39.13VII

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Garrett's ranking of factors influencing premium dairy brand preference and preference for the company↗ Enlarge
Table 4
Garrett's ranking of factors influencing premium dairy brand preference and preference for the company

Garrett's ranking of factors influencing premium dairy brand preference and preference for the company

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 5 ↗

preference, while price/value (46.36), customer service (44.25), and offers (39.13) were ranked lower. The similarity in rankings across both analyses demonstrates that consumers consistently prioritize quality assurance, product freshness, trust, and convenience over promotional benefits. Overall, the findings suggest that maintaining superior product quality, ensuring rigorous quality testing, enhancing transparency, and providing reliable doorstep delivery are the most effective strategies for strengthening consumer preference and brand loyalty in the premium dairy market.

Conclusion

The study revealed that the majority of consumers were middle-aged, well-educated, and belonged to moderate to high-income groups, reflecting typical urban household characteristics. Consumers showed moderate awareness and familiarity with dairy brands, indicating scope for improvement in deeper brand understanding. The findings highlight that consumers generally prefer fresh and highquality dairy products, with milk, curd, and paneer being the most commonly consumed items. However, despite the growing preference for premium dairy products, consumer decisions are influenced by multiple factors such as price, quality, convenience, and trust. The study also identified that while awareness exists, gaps remain in effective communication and understanding of certain product practices. These findings suggest that although the market potential is strong, improvements are required in awareness-building and consumer engagement strategies. Dairy companies can enhance their market performance by increasing consumer awareness through regular sampling activities, community engagement programmes, and interactive promotional events. These initiatives can help improve brand familiarity and build stronger connections with consumers. Efforts should also be made to communicate product benefits, quality standards, and practices more clearly to enhance consumer understanding and trust.

Limitations

The study is limited to Bengaluru city and purposively selected respondents. Therefore, the findings may not be generalized to all consumer groups. Future studies may employ probability sampling across multiple metropolitan cities.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. Research methodology adopted for the study
Type of ResearchDescriptive research
Sampling methodNon-Probability Method
Sampling techniquePurposive Sampling
Sample unitConsumers/residents in selected apartment communities
Sample size200
Sample areaCentral part of Bengaluru city
Timing of survey90 days
Research instrumentPre-tested Structured Schedule
Analytical toolsFrequency & Percentage analysis, Cross-tabulation, weighted mean score (Likert scale), Garrett’s ranking technique and Graphical methods (bar chart/pie chart)

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Research methodology adopted for the study↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Research methodology adopted for the study

Research methodology adopted for the study

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 2. Socio-economic profile of the sample consumers (n = 200)
CharacteristicsCategoryFrequencyPercentage (%)
AgeLess than 35 years6532.50
35-50 years6934.50
Above 50 years6633.00
GenderFemale11256.00
Male8844.00
EducationIlliterate126.00
Primary school2814.00
High school2211.00
Intermediate4623.00
Graduate5427.00
Postgraduate3819.00
OccupationBusiness/Self-employed4221.00
Government employee3316.50
Private employee2914.50
Homemaker3216.00
Student2613.00
Others3819.00
Annual household incomeBelow ₹1,00,000105.00
₹1,00,000-₹2,00,000157.50
₹2,00,000-₹3,00,0002512.50
₹3,00,001-₹4,00,0004020.00
Above ₹4,00,00011055.00
Family typeJoint10653.00
Nuclear9447.00
ResidenceGated villa community6432.00
Apartment community5829.00
Individual house4824.00
Hostel/PG3015.00
Purchase decision makerParents6231.00
Spouse5125.50
Self4623.00
Joint decision4120.50
Primary milk purchase sourceRetail milk brands5628.00
Other premium D2C brands4623.00
The Company3819.00
Mixed sources3216.00
Local milk vendor2814.00

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Socio-economic profile of the sample consumers (n = 200)↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Socio-economic profile of the sample consumers (n = 200)

Socio-economic profile of the sample consumers (n = 200)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Table 3. Consumer awareness regarding the company's products (n = 200)
ParameterCategoryFrequencyPercentage (%)
Heard about the brandYes10452.00
No9648.00
Source of awarenessCommunity event/stall4221.00
Sampling activity3819.00
Friends/Referral3015.00
Social media2814.00
Community posters/ads2211.00
Google/Online search168.00
Level of familiarityExtremely familiar3316.50
Very familiar4522.50
Moderately familiar5125.50
Slightly familiar3417.00
Not familiar3718.50
Awareness of subscription-based deliveryYes9246.00
No10854.00
Awareness of pre-delivery quality testingYes10351.50
No9748.50
Awareness of transparency in sourcingYes10452.00
No9648.00
Product awarenessMilk8040.00
Paneer2814.00
Curd2211.00
Ghee189.00
Buttermilk178.50
Sweet lassi157.50
Butter126.00
Breakfast cereals84.00
Seen the company promotionYes9949.50
No10150.50
Experience with company productsYes10150.50
No9949.50

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Consumer awareness regarding the company's products (n = 200)↗ Enlarge
Table 3
Consumer awareness regarding the company's products (n = 200)

Consumer awareness regarding the company's products (n = 200)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 1. Most Effective BTL Activity
Most Effective BTL Activity↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Most Effective BTL Activity

Most Effective BTL Activity

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗

References

20 in the original paper
  1. Ali J, Kapoor S. Buying behaviour of consumers for food products in an emerging economy. Br Food J. 2010;112(2):109-124.
  2. CARE Ratings. Indian dairy & dairy products industry. Special report. Mumbai: CARE Ratings; 2020.
  3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Per capita supply of milk (excluding butter). Rome: FAO; 2025.
  4. Food Safety and Standards Authority of India. National milk safety and quality survey 2018. New Delhi: FSSAI; 2019.
  5. Grunert KG. Food quality and safety: Consumer perception and demand. Eur Rev Agric Econ. 2005;32(3):369-391. DOI:10.1093/eurrag/jbi011.
  6. India Brand Equity Foundation. Dairy industry in India. New Delhi: IBEF; 2024.
  7. Kotler P, Keller KL. Marketing management. 15th ed. Noida: Pearson Education; 2016.
  8. Kumar N, Kumar D, Kumar R, Prajapati GV. Hydroinformatics-driven strategies for drought mitigation in agricultural systems. Dev Environ Sci. 2026;21:663-683.
  9. Kumar N, Kumar D, Kumar R, Prajapati GV, Kumari K. Assessing the impacts of climate and urban dynamics on peri-urban watershed vulnerability. Dev Environ Sci. 2026;21:13-34.
  10. Kumar N, Kumar D, Kumar R, Prajapati GV, Vadalia D. Integrating explainable AI with advanced learning models for groundwater management in semi-arid areas. In: Groundwater Depletion and Sustainability: A Methodology Utilizing Artificial Intelligence and Earth Observation Systems. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2026. p. 41-66.
  11. Kumar N, Kumar D, Kumar R, Prajapati GV, Vadalia D. Innovative AI and ML solutions for groundwater contamination and sustainable management. In: Groundwater Depletion and Sustainability: A Methodology Utilizing Artificial Intelligence and Earth Observation Systems. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2026. p. 29-52.
  12. Kumar N, Prajapati GV, Pandya PA, Kumar D. Leveraging drone technology to optimize irrigation practices through comprehensive soil and water monitoring. Plant Arch. 2025;25(Special Issue ICTPAIRS-JAU):211-216. DOI:10.51470/PLANTARCHIVES.2025.v25.SP.ICTP AIRS-033.
  13. Kumar N, Prajapati GV, Pandya PA, Das P, Bhargav AM, Parmar SH, et al. Comparative analysis of temporal spectral profiles of cumin and coriander using Sentinel2 imagery. Int J Agric Invent. 2026;11(1):293-299.
  14. Kumar N, Prajapati GV, Pandya P, Vadalia D, Parmar SH, Ranjan A. Integrated water resources management and hydrological innovations for climate resilience. In: Building Resilient Water and Food Systems under Climate Change. Academic Press; 2026. p. 161-174.
  15. Kumar N, Rai V, Kumar M, Chandra R, Aggarwal P, Jain SK. Assessing soil water dynamics and wheat growth under different irrigation and planting strategies using HYDRUS 2D. Hydrol Res. 2025;56(9):878-901.
  16. Kumari K, Dubey LR, Vahoniya DR, Bagda B, Sen S, Kumar N. A comparative analysis of socio-economic empowerment among tribal women SHG members and non-members in Gujarat, India. Arch Curr Res Int. 2026;26(4):633-645.
  17. National Dairy Development Board. NDDB and Operation Flood (White Revolution). Anand: NDDB; 2023.
  18. Press Information Bureau. India's milk production statistics. New Delhi: Government of India; 2024.
  19. Sen S, Chhetri PO, Tripathi AD, Singh GP, Agarwal A, Hooda A, et al. Physicochemical and metabolomic characterization of custard apple (Annona squamosa L.) pulp powder obtained by different drying methods. LWT. 2026;119:295.
  20. Tamilchelvi N, Lavanya M. A study on consumers awareness and consumption pattern of milk brands in Coimbatore city. J Emerg Technol Innov Res. 2019;6(2):585-590.