Advances in thermal and non-thermal preservation strategies for improving the storage stability of fruit juices

Introduction

Consumers highly value fruit juices for their sensory attributes and nutritional density, especially for their concentration of vitamins and bioactive compounds. However, their high moisture content and sugar profile, combined with their varying acidity levels, provide a favourable environment for microbial spoilage during storage. Integrated management of preparation and preservation treatments is essential to reduce microbial risk while preserving the organoleptic and nutritional quality of the product over time (Gómez-Gaete et al. 2024) [19] . One of the main causes of the quick deterioration of fruit juices is microbial multiplication, leading to the need for strong approaches to intervention. In particular, lowacid formulations and vegetable-based blends provide highly conducive substrates for pathogenic growth, resulting in accelerated quality loss and heightened safety risks. The kinetics of spoilage are influenced by a multifactorial matrix, including storage temperature, packaging specifications, and the thermal intensity applied during processing; consequently, the implementation of synergistic preservation techniques is critical for maintaining product stability (Guo et al. 2025) [20] . In addition to microbiological issues, basic biochemical elements like enzymatic activity play a major role in the degradation process. Shaik and Chakraborty's (2023) [42] study on sweet lime juice treated with pulsed light shows that leftover enzymes can hasten browning and quality degradation over time. This suggests that even when microbial loads are effectively decreased, enzyme stability is still strongly influenced by post-processing storage temperatures. The industry standard for lowering microbial loads and deactivating enzymes is still traditional thermal processing, such as pasteurisation using plate or tube heat exchangers.

Nevertheless, these treatments are linked to a number of detrimental effects on quality even though they guarantee microbiological safety. These include the degradation of vitamin C and various phytochemicals, a decrease in antioxidant capacity, colour deterioration, and the loss of sensory quality during subsequent storage. Long-term storage studies (180 days) of thermally treated tropical juice blends have reported significant vitamin losses and progressive flavour deterioration (Wurlitzer et al. 2019) [53] . Additionally, a range of thermally treated juices, such as grape, pomegranate, sour cherry, pomelo, and kinnow, have shown significant decreases in polyphenols, pigments, and free radical scavenging activity (Hooshyar et al. 2020; Kumar et al. 2023) [22,28] . Chemical degradation of essential nutrients significantly impacts storage stability, with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) identified as one of the most labile components in fruit juice matrices. Vitamin C undergoes oxidative degradation during storage, a process frequently correlated with adverse colour shifts and a reduction in total antioxidant capacity. Similar instability has been documented for folates and phenolic compounds under equivalent storage conditions. In coldplasma-treated kiwifruit juice, gradual losses of ascorbic acid were observed during storage, where the functional shelf life was found to be intrinsically linked to vitamin C retention and colour stability (Kumar et al. 2023) [28] . These results are in agreement with studies with pasteurised beetroot juice, where the optical characteristics of the packing (amber versus clear glass) and storage temperature had a significant impact on folate degradation. This study demonstrates that, in the absence of protective chemicals or efficient packing solutions, nutritional breakdown continues even under refrigeration (Mwaijibe and Vicent 2025) [33] . Advanced non-thermal preservation technologies are of great interest due to the growing consumer demand for minimally processed foods that maintain "fresh-like" qualities. These techniques seek to accomplish microbiological safety without the harmful consequences of high-temperature processing. One of the most successful methods for reducing microbial burdens and postponing quality degradation is ultrasound processing, or sonication. It was discovered that ultrasound therapy extended the microbiological stability of sweet lime juice to roughly 35-37 days when stored in a refrigerator. When combined with multilayer polyethylene terephthalate (PET) packaging, the effectiveness of this treatment was further increased, indicating a potential synergy between advanced barrier packaging and non-thermal processing (Shaik and Chakraborty 2023) [42] . In comparison to traditional heat treatment, pulsed light treatment has demonstrated significant microbial reduction with little thermal damage, resulting in improved vitamin C and sensory quality retention (Shaik & Chakraborty, 2023) [42] . According to Kumar et al. (2024) [27] , cold plasma technology has demonstrated great promise among new technologies by increasing the shelf life of kiwifruit juice to nearly 100 days at 5 °C while preserving low microbiological counts, colour stability, and nutrient retention. The efficiency of pulsed electric field treatment in enhancing the extraction of nutrients and reducing microbial load in Phyllanthusemblica (AMLA) juice also justifies the potential of the non-thermal methods (Shaik & Chakraborty, 2023) [42] . High-pressure homogenization and microfluidization are some of the physical stabilisation techniques that reduce the size of particles, limit enzymatic activity, and contribute to better cloud stability. Such techniques have shown better nutrient retention and improved storage stability in fruit juice systems (Waghmare 2024) [50] . Along with all these processing technologies, chemical preservatives like sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, sulphites, and nitrites remain widely used to control microbial growth in beverages and vegetable-based juices. The need for customers for clean-label products has led to interest in natural preservatives, including biopolymers and essential oils derived from plants. While chitosan has been found to be an effective natural stabiliser for citrus liquids, cinnamon, lemon, and clove oils have demonstrated potent antibacterial and antioxidant properties (Campolina et al. 2023; Shi et al. 2024) [11,43] . Juice stabilisation is a complementary function of packaging solutions, primarily controlled by light and oxygen during storage. Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol (EVOH) and multilayer Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) presented superior performance compared to conventional packaging for sweet lime juice subjected to pulsed light and ultrasound processing. Amber glass also presented improved maintenance of folate content in beetroot juice when compared to clear glass packaging during storage (Mwaijibe & Vicent, 2025) [33] . New approaches, like edible films, coatings, and encapsulation systems, enhance stability by protecting sensitive bioactive compounds; for instance, liposomal systems have been successfully applied for delivering and protecting vitamins C and E in fruit beverages (Chavan et al. 2023; Marsanasco et al. 2011) [13,32] . Considering the literature reviewed, it appears that fruit juice stability during storage is controlled by multiple interactions of microbial, enzymatic, chemical, physical, and packaging-associated factors. In spite of all the advances made by advanced techniques of processing and preservation strategies, nutrient retention, enzymatic stability, and practical storage conditions pose problems that call for integrated and optimised methods for juice stabilisation.

Deterioration of fruit juices during storage

Fruit juices are highly susceptible to rapid deterioration during storage due to their intrinsic composition, characterized by high water activity (a w ), fermentable sugars, endogenous enzymes, and labile micronutrients. This spoilage is a multi-factorial process involving microbial proliferation, oxidative vitamin degradation, and enzyme-mediated browning, which collectively result in cloud destabilization and the loss of characteristic flavor and aroma (Leizerson & Shimoni, 2005; Shaik & Chakraborty, 2023) [29,42] . Ultimately, the degradation of fruit juices during storage is the product of integrated biological, chemical, and physical pathways that progressively diminish the product's nutritional density, sensory profile, and visual integrity. Refrigeration significantly slows microbial growth, whereas storage at ambient or elevated temperatures (15-35 °C) accelerates spoilage, shortening shelf life. Research on citrus and associated juices shows that when microbial populations reach about 6 log CFU/mL, which is often utilized as an end-of-shelf-life indicator, spoilage becomes organoleptically undesirable. In addition to microbial spoiling, nutritional deterioration during storage, especially of heat-sensitive antioxidants, is a serious concern. Because of its extreme vulnerability to oxidative destruction, vitamin C has been examined in enormous depth. Vitamin C loss is accelerated by exposure to air, residual metal ions, high temperatures, and enzymatic activity. As a result, zero or first-order models are frequently used in shelf-life research to characterise the kinetics of vitamin C degradation. In addition to vitamin C, phenolic compounds, anthocyanins, carotenoids, and folates are reduced, which lowers nutritional quality and antioxidant activity. Both colour retention and flavour stability are impacted by these chemical alterations. Enzymatic activity also significantly influences juice deterioration during storage. Following processing, residual Polyphenol Oxidase (PPO) and Peroxidase (POD) activities encourage the oxidation of phenolic substances, which causes browning and the development of an off flavour. Juices that have undergone mild processing or goods that have been treated with non-thermal technologies that do not totally deactivate enzymes are more susceptible to these effects (Leizerson & Shimoni, 2005) [29] . In citrus juices, pectin methylesterase (PME) causes pectin demethoxylation, leading to particle aggregation and sedimentation, which manifests as cloud loss and reduced visual quality. Colour degradation is a visible indicator of quality loss during storage and arises from pigment oxidation, enzymatic browning reactions, and nonenzymatic interactions between sugars and proteins. In kiwifruit juice stored at 5, 15, and 25 °C, cold-plasma and thermally treated samples exhibited progressive increases in total colour change with storage time and temperature, accompanied by decreases in ascorbic acid content, total phenolic content, antioxidant capacity, and sensory acceptability (Kumar et al., 2024; Shaik & Chakraborty, 2023) [27,42] . Although microbial counts remained below detectable levels for extended periods, quality deterioration was driven primarily by chemical and enzymatic changes. Shelf life decreased markedly at higher storage temperatures, and kinetic modelling showed that zero-order reactions combined with temperature-dependent models adequately described quality degradation. Overall, microbial growth, nutrient degradation, enzymatic reactions, and colour changes collectively contribute to declining sensory quality during storage. Attributes such as aroma, taste, acidity, and overall freshness deteriorate due to loss of volatile compounds, oxidation reactions, and compositional changes (Kumar et al., 2024) [27] . Even when microbial safety limits are maintained, sensory degradation often determines consumer acceptability. These deterioration mechanisms highlight the importance of appropriate processing, packaging, and low-temperature storage to preserve the microbiological, chemical, and sensory stability of fruit juices.

Thermal processing and storage stability of fruit juices

Heat treatment remains one of the most widely used methods for fruit juice preservation, primarily because it effectively destroys microorganisms and inactivates deteriorative enzymes. The diversity of thermal processing methods, ranging from mild pasteurization to ultra-high temperature sterilization, significantly dictates the final quality and shelf-life of the juice matrix. The technical parameters and specific quality impacts of these methods are summarized in Table 1. The principal objective of thermal processing is to ensure microbiological safety while retaining flavour and nutritional quality for an extended storage period. Traditional methods, including hightemperature short-time (HTST) and low-temperature longtime (LTLT) processing, are frequently used. To apply controlled heating, these procedures usually make use of flat-plate, tubular, or multilayer heat exchangers. However, quality loss during future storage is frequently directly caused by the high temperatures needed to inactivate pathogenic bacteria and enzymes that limit shelf life. Heattreated fruit juices have routinely been shown to have better microbiological stability than untreated juices in storage trials, especially when kept in a refrigerator. By drastically lowering the initial microbial load, thermal processing lowers the chance of rapid spoiling and slows microbial regrowth during storage. However, over time, residual microbes may multiply, particularly at ambient or high storage temperatures, suggesting that storage conditions still affect product stability even after heat treatment (Leizerson & Shimoni, 2005; Kumar et al., 2024) [29,27] . As a result, post-processing storage management has a significant impact on the shelf life of thermally processed juices. In terms of nutrition, heat treatment mostly impacts substances that are susceptible to heat, especially ascorbic acid (vitamin C). When compared to their non-thermally processed counterparts, heat-treated juices typically show faster vitamin C breakdown during storage. Thermal processing affects phenolic chemicals, carotenoids, and folates in addition to vitamin C, which causes a progressive reduction in overall antioxidant capacity over extended storage (Jafari et al., 2017) [23] . Juice shelf life is directly impacted by enzyme inactivation, which is largely dependent on thermal treatment. By reducing the activity of enzymes such as Polyphenol Oxidase (PPO), Peroxidase (POD), and pectin methylesterase (PME), the appropriate temperature and holding duration combinations minimise browning reactions and cloud instability during storage. PME is one of these enzymes that is especially crucial for citrus juices because it encourages the breakdown of pectin and the production of sediment. Studies indicate that thermally treated orange juice maintains better cloud stability and exhibits less colour change during refrigerated storage compared with mildly processed juice (Aghajanzadeh et al., 2018; Anthon & Barrett, 2002) [3,6] . However, excessive thermal exposure can negatively affect flavour and mouthfeel, emphasizing the need for precise optimization of processing parameters. Ohmic heating represents an advanced thermal processing technique in which electric current is passed directly through the juice, generating rapid and uniform internal heating. This method minimizes temperature gradients and reduces the formation of localized hot spots commonly observed in conventional heat exchangers. Research has shown that fruit juices processed by ohmic heating retain superior sensory attributes, colour, and nutritional quality during storage, despite achieving microbial inactivation levels comparable to conventional thermal methods. These improvements are attributed to reduced overall thermal exposure, which limits chemical degradation reactions during shelf life (Leizerson & Shimoni, 2005; Achir et al., 2016) [29,1] . The design and performance evaluation of heat exchangers significantly influence the storage stability of thermally processed juices. Plate and tubular heat exchangers with improved flow patterns and enhanced mixing promote faster heat transfer, thereby reducing treatment time while preserving thermo labile nutrients. Combined experimental and simulation studies demonstrate that more uniform temperature distributions result in lower nutrient degradation during processing and subsequent storage. Nevertheless, irrespective of technological advancements, storage studies consistently report progressive quality deterioration due to oxidative reactions and thermal stress, particularly when juices are stored without refrigeration. [25] 3.

Carrot juice

Continuous ohmic sterilization; CFDmodelled heating & cooling simulations

The juice was heated more uniformly by Ohmic heating than conventional heating, and the results from the model indicated that conventional calculations were lower than the actual heating of the juice.

Rivera et al., (2024) [56] ,

Tomato juice paste

Shell-and-tube heat exchanger CFD simulation for industrial pasteurization

The CFD simulation was able to predict the heat transfer and the temperature and flow patterns, which aided in the design of heat exchangers for thick and viscous fluids.

Asadbeigi et al., (2023) [8] 5.

Beetroot juice Batch thermal pasteurisation (90 °C, 15 s); storage in amber and transparent glass bottles at 4 °C and ambient temperature Pasteurisation inactivated microbes but decreased folate, and folate was more stable during storage in amber bottles at 4 °C than at room temperature.

Mwaijibe & Vicent, (2025) [33] 6.

Orange beverage HTST (indirect heat treatment); timetemperature schedule used to calculate Fvalues

Describe F-values are used to balance microbial safety with nutrient loss, showing that higher heat improves safety but reduces vitamin C and folate.

Rouweler, (2015) [40] While heat treatment initially stabilizes sensory quality, prolonged storage especially at elevated temperatures leads to noticeable declines in flavour and appearance, potentially limiting consumer acceptability before microbial spoilage becomes evident (Shaik& Chakraborty, 2023) [42] . Overall, thermal processing remains indispensable for ensuring microbial safety and enzyme inactivation in fruit juices. However, the retention of nutritional and sensory quality during storage is highly dependent on the careful optimization of processing parameters and stringent control of storage conditions. Although emerging techniques such as ohmic heating and improved heat exchanger designs mitigate some quality losses, thermal damage remains a fundamental limitation. Consequently, increasing attention is being directed toward alternative preservation strategies that operate at lower temperatures to extend shelf life while maintaining fresh-like quality attributes.

Non-thermal processing technologies and storage stability of fruit juices

Non-thermal methods have drawn growing attention from researchers as viable substitutes for traditional heat-based processes when aiming to extend shelf life of fruit juices while keeping taste and nutrition close to fresh. The operational mechanisms and specific qualitative advantages of these advanced non-thermal techniques are comparatively analyzed in [15] . However, PEF can often also fail to completely inhibit enzyme activity, especially in the case of polyphenol oxidase and pectin met. As a result, colour darkening and cloudy particles settling may still happen over time unless cooling, slight heating, or extra preservatives are also applied (Terefe et al. 2015) [45] . Cold plasma shows strong potential for cleaning surfaces and liquids because it generates active compounds without heat, damaging microbes effectively. While stored, treated items often show reduced microbial re-growth provided the processing settings are well adjusted alongside preserved antioxidant properties. Yet excessive plasma contact triggers oxidation, speeding up loss of vitamin C and altering appearance (Kumar et al., 2024) [27] . Therefore, killing microbes must go hand-in-hand with maintaining substance integrity over time (Fernandes & Rodrigues, 2021; Pipliya & Srivastav, 2024) [18,27] . Ultrasound works mainly through tiny bubbles forming and collapsing, which helps destroy microbes while improving how substances move inside juice. [14] . High-pressure homogenization and micro-fluidization are being studied to boost shelf-life and maintain product consistency. These processes reduce droplet size, support even suspension, while improving hue stability via changes in internal structure.

Raspberry juice

Pulsed electric fields (PEF), High-pressure processing (HPP), and Thermal pasteurization (TT) High-intensity PEF achieves optimal nutrient and sensory retention compared to TT and HPP.

Truong et al., (2025) [48] 2.

Kiwi fruit juice

Cold plasma optimized (CPO)-(30 kV/5 mm/6.7 min) & Cold plasma Extreme (CPE), (30 kV/2 mm/10 min), thermally treated (TT) (90 °C/5 min) and untreated UT.

CPO showing the least disruption, lowest viscosity, highest ascorbic acid retention, and best sensory quality compared with CPE and TT Kumar et al., (2024) [27] 3. (2023) [42] 4

Sweet lime juice

Sweet lime juice

Pulsed Light (PL), (3000 J cm -2 ) vs thermal conditions (TT) (95°C/5 min); storage at 4, 15, and 25°C; EVOH vs ML-PET; Shelf-life for 46 days PL preserved sensory quality and nutrients better than TT, with shelf life extended to 46 days at 4 °C in ML-PET, while microbial growth limited stability at higher temperatures.

Shaik & Chakraborty, (2023) [42] 5. Orange juice High Hydrostatic pressure (HPP), (100-800 MPa, 30-60 °C); & Thermal treatment (TT), (50-80 °C)

High pressure and temperature worked together to inactivate PME and it followed first-order kinetics with minor residual activity.

Polydera et al., (2003) [37] 6 Various fruit juices ultrasound (US), pulsed electric field (PEF), cold plasma (CP), and high-pressure processing (HPP)

principles and applications of the technology; mechanisms of microbial inactivation and quality preservation; general trends in shelf-life extension and retention of sensory Safwa et al., (2024) [41] 7.

Applecranberry juice blend UV (5. (2010) [10] 8. Tomato juice High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) vs hightemperature short-time (HTST) thermal processing; cold storage study HHP preserved better than HTST; redness and specific volatiles ((E)-2-heptenal, hexanal, (E)-2-octanal) were identified as markers to distinguish HHP-treated from TT during storage Wang et al., (2026) [51] Research shows treated juices tend to show reduced settling, along with steadier taste and appearance over time. Moreover, applying these methods in capsule formation can shield fragile components such as vitamin C or E from breaking down during storage, contributing to retained nutrient levels (Marsanasco et al., 2011) [32] . Despite these benefits, non-thermal techniques are not necessarily always more effective than heat treatment methods. This depends on the juice's composition, initial microbial load, enzymes, and storage conditions. Usually, room-temperature shelf life stays limited without extra help from cooling, additives, or smart packaging solutions. Still, once fine-tuned, they preserve freshness and nutrients well over time making them key players in today's juice safety approaches.

Role of preservatives in enhancing storage stability of fruit juices

Preventing fruit juice from spoiling is a primary goal of food preservation, achieved by stopping microbial growth, preventing browning (oxidation), and deactivating natural enzymes that cause decay. While heat treatments kill off most bacteria early on, chemical preservatives like sodium benzoate and potassium sorbate are essential safeguards when consistent refrigeration isn't possible. The primary chemical agent utilized in the beverage industry, along with their specific regulatory limits and target organisms, are summarized in Table 3. These additives work best when they match the juice's specific acidity (pH) and storage temperature; for example, sodium benzoate is excellent at fighting molds, while potassium sorbate is better at stopping yeast. Research by Vignali et al. (2022) [57] and newer studies by Shi et al., 2024 [43] ; confirm that these treatments help juice stay safe and fresh-tasting even at room temperature. However, many modern shoppers prefer to avoid "labmade" ingredients, scientists are now looking for natural alternatives to replace these traditional chemicals. With rising consumer preference for clean labels, attention has turned toward naturally derived alternatives in recent years. Certain plant-based options such as essential oils, phenolic substances and extracts from various peels inhibit microbial growth while also limiting oxidative damage, contributing to extended freshness. Essential oils extracted from lemon and orange rinds effectively inhibit spoilage microbes and maintain stable antioxidant activity during storage (Shi et al., 2024) [43] . However, their practical application is limited by potent sensory profiles that can overpower or alter the juice's natural flavor, as well as unpredictable performance influenced by juice matrix composition and storage variables (Gyawali & Ibrahim, 2014) [21] . Product shelf life hinges greatly on how preservatives behave under different processing methods. [43] 7 Fruit beverages, jams Sodium benzoate (SB), potassium sorbate (PS) 200-1000 ppm Yeast/mould control SB-PS combinations extend shelf life but may affect sensory quality at high levels.

Leizerson & Shimoni (2005) [29] ; Shaik& Chakraborty (2023) [43] 8 Non-thermal techniques such as ultrasound, cold plasma, and pulsed electric fields usually fail to fully stop enzymes, so extra chemical agents often become necessary. When combined with these physical treatments, additives cut down surviving microbes while slowing oxidation effects, which helps retain freshness over time (Terefe et al., 2015) [45] .

Although preservation agents play a constant role, using them wisely matters to avoid harm, taste shifts, or health concerns. Too much additive alters smell, ruins mouth feel, since balance determines whether people will accept the food. Warmth reduces how well certain ingredients work, so cooling is needed alongside them to keep products fresh. Still, clever wrapping helps food last longer even when the surroundings are far from ideal.

Packaging materials and their influence on the storage stability of fruit juices

While chemical and natural additives provide internal stability, the choice of packaging is the final determinant of a product's shelf life, as categorized in Table 4. Effective containers protect juice by blocking oxygen, light, and moisture, preventing the nutrient loss and off-flavors that occur even in perfectly processed beverages. Research indicates that material selection significantly dictates quality; for instance, amber glass and multilayer PET (ML-PET) have been shown to superiorly retain color and vitamins like folate and Vitamin C by mitigating lightinduced and oxidative degradation (Shaik & Chakraborty, 2023; Mwaijibe & Vicent, 2025) [42,33] . (2023) [13] Beyond traditional barriers, industry standards are evolving to include Modified Atmosphere Packaging (MAP) to regulate gas transmission and biobased films to address sustainability concerns (Mangaraj et al., 2009; Nilsen-Nygaard et al., 2021) [31,34] . Furthermore, emerging "active" systems, such as marine biopolymer films and edible coatings, offer functional benefits by releasing antioxidants or creating semi-permeable shields that delay browning and dehydration (Chavan et al., 2023; Oliveira et al., 2025) [13,36] . Ultimately, these packaging advancements must be paired with consistent temperature control, as the protective

International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science https://www.agriculturaljournals.com benefits of even the most advanced materials are quickly compromised under harsh storage conditions.

Influence of storage conditions on fruit juice stability

Storage conditions often impact fruit juice quality more than the initial processing, with temperature being the most critical factor. Refrigeration (around 4 °C) is essential because it slows down the "clocks" of spoilage; it delays microbial growth, keeps enzymes from turning the juice brown or cloudy, and protects sensitive nutrients like Vitamin C. In contrast, room temperature or high heat (30-35 °C) acts as an accelerator, causing rapid loss of colour, flavour, and vitamins through oxidation and chemical reactions that even advanced processing cannot fully fix (Rawson et al., 2011) [38] . To predict exactly when a juice will expire, scientists use math models like the Arrhenius modelto calculate how fast Vitamin C disappears or how quickly browning occurs at different temperatures (Jafari et al., 2017) [23] . Ultimately, even the best-packaged juice requires a stable, cold environment to maintain its fresh taste and nutritional value until it reaches the consumer.

Comparative assessment of preservation strategies and future perspectives

No single approach is perfect for keeping fruit juice quality; therefore, there needs to be a balance between safety and taste. The industry standard for removal of harmful bacteria and inhibition of enzymes is thermal treatments. These not only make sure the juice has a long shelf life, but they can also break down heat-sensitive components like Vitamin C and change the juice's natural flavour. On the other hand, non-thermal methods like high-pressure processing or pulsed electric fields keep the juice closer to its fresh state. However, these juices can still turn brown or lose their texture if they are not kept strictly refrigerated (Shaik & Chakraborty, 2023) [42] . To get these problems resolved, recent research is looking toward hurdle technology, which combines processing with protective packaging and chemicals. Synthetic preservatives are efficient, but using natural antimicrobials like essential oils and improved packaging (like EVOH layers) that keep oxygen and light out without compromising the drink's "clean label" status is better. In the end, the temperature at which the juice is stored is the most important thing; even the best methods don't work if the juice is maintained in high heat. Scientists utilise kinetic models, such as the Arrhenius or Weibull models, to figure out these breakdown rates. This lets them guess how long the juice will last and ensure that the way it's processed, packaged, and cooled keeps it fresh until it arrives to the customer (Jafari et al., 2017) [23] .

Identified research gaps and future directions

There are still many practical and unsolved challenges with preserving fruit juices, especially the stability and shelf life of juices from citrus fruits like oranges and mosambis. One of the biggest gaps is that juices don't stay stable in storage following thermal and non-thermal processing, especially when they're stored at room temperature. Many of the reports on rapid quality deterioration have been driven by microbial growth, enzymatic activity, and oxidation, which suggests that processing alone, can hardly assure an acceptable shelf life. One of the major pending issues is related to the role and necessity of preservatives in stabilized juices. While preservatives are commonly used with the objective of prolonging shelf life, some agreement on the type of preservative (chemical versus natural) that is most appropriate for different juice matrices and storage conditions remains limited. Furthermore, the interaction between preservatives and processing methods is still not well known, particularly for non-thermally processed juices where inactivation of enzymes may not be fully achieved. This makes the selection and dosing of the right preservatives that will confer stability without affecting sensory quality quite complex. A key missing insight concerns how juices are handled prior to processing. Methods such as enzyme use, filtering, clearing, or spinning differ widely between experiments so it's hard to judge exactly how each affects shelf life when used alone. In particular, limited information exists on the impact of pretreatments on microbial load, enzymatic activity, cloud stability, and nutrient retention during storage in citrus juices. This call for the systematic evaluation of pretreatment strategies under controlled conditions of storage. What could be the specific function of homogenization in stabilizing juices remains understudied yet? While homogenization and micro-fluidization are reported to decrease particle size and enhance cloud stability, results with respect to microbial stability indicate that it increases the rate of oxidation by increasing the surface area of exposure. Clear guidelines on whether homogenization is required, at what stage it needs to be done, and the effect on shelf life are not available, particularly for orange and mosambi juices. Furthermore, most of the existing literature on microbial stability, enzyme activity, oxidation rate, and nutrient degradation during storage are not consistent among different works. In some cases, while homogenization may enhance physical stability, it may negatively influence chemical stability. Most studies investigate preservation strategies under optimal refrigerated storage, while realistic distribution conditions often involve temperature abuse or ambient storage. The interactions among pre-treatment, homogenization, preservatives, and storage temperature relative to the stability of juice are seldom investigated together; thus, research findings may hardly be applicable to commercial juice processing in a practical way. Future studies aim at combining several preservation methods together. Important work now links gentle heat or non-heat techniques with natural antimicrobials, better packaging, along with regulated storage to boost shelf life while keeping food's taste and nutrients intact. Researchers are focusing more on how these combined steps interact, finetuning settings using predictive models, besides creating simple-label options that match what buyers want.

Conclusion

Fruit juices remain difficult to stabilize due to their high moisture content, active enzymes, and sensitive nutrients like Vitamin C. This review concludes that quality loss is a system problem caused by the combined forces of microbial growth, enzyme activity, and oxidation. While traditional heat processing ensures safety, it often sacrifices taste and nutrition. Newer non-thermal methods preserve fresh-like quality much better, but they frequently fail to fully deactivate enzymes. This means that processing alone is rarely enough to guarantee a long shelf life, especially if the juice is not kept cold. To achieve a truly stable, premium product, an integrated "hurdle" strategy is required. This involves pairing optimized processing with essential pretreatments like homogenization for cloud stability alongside high-barrier packaging and suitable preservatives.

The study highlights that even the most advanced techniques are rendered useless by temperature abuse; therefore, refrigerated storage remains the most critical factor. Future progress in the industry depends on refining these combined methods to maintain high nutrient levels and fresh flavor while remaining practical for large-scale production and real-world handling.

References

1. Achir N, Mayer DC, Hadjal T, Madani K, Pain JP, Dornier M. Pasteurization of citrus juices with ohmic heating to preserve the carotenoid profile. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2016;33:397-404.
2. Ağagündüz D, Ayakdaş G, Katırcıoğlu B, Ozogul F. Advances in non-thermal food processing: A comprehensive approach to nutrient retention, food quality, and safety. Sustain Food Technol. 2025;3(5):1284-1308.
3. Aghajanzadeh S, Ziaiifar AM. A review of pectin methylesterase inactivation in citrus juice during pasteurization. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2018;71:1-12.
4. Ali MR, Hassan M, El-Mogy MM, Mohamed RM. Impact of blue-LED as a non-thermal preservation technology on bio-active compounds, quality parameters, microbial and enzymatic spoilage of guava juice. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2025;104092.
5. Annadurai G, Mangayarkarasi LSR, Sivakavinesan M, Jeyaprakash JS, Madasamy M, Jayapandi S, et al. Optimization of fruit juice preservation utilizing chitosan and chitosan nanoparticle: A central composite design. Food Sci Eng. 2024;187-99.
6. Anthon GE, Barrett DM. Kinetic parameters for the thermal inactivation of quality-related enzymes in carrots and potatoes. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50(14):4119-4125.
7. Arslan M, Zareef M, Afzal M, Tahir HE, Li Z, Aalim H, et al. Innovative non-thermal processing technologies for shelf life extension and retention of bioactive compounds in liquid foods. Foods. 2025;14(17):2953.
8. Asadbeigi S, Ahmadi E, Goodarzi M, Sagharichian A. Analyzing and simulating heat transfer and designing a shell and tube heat exchanger for the pasteurization process of tomato paste: A CFD study. Heliyon. 2023;9(11):e21593.
9. Barba FJ, Cortés C, Esteve MJ, Frígola A. Study of antioxidant capacity and quality parameters in an orange juice-milk beverage after high-pressure processing. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012;5(6):222232.
10. Caminiti IM, Noci F, Muñoz A, Whyte P, Morgan DJ, Cronin DA, et al. Impact of selected combinations of non-thermal processing technologies on the quality of an apple and cranberry juice blend. Food Chem. 2011;124(4):1387-92.
11. Campolina GA, Cardoso MG, Caetano ARS, Nelson DL, Ramos EM. Essential oil and plant extracts as preservatives and natural antioxidants applied to meat products. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2023;61(2):212225.
12. Cao X, Bi X, Huang W, Wu J, Hu X, Liao X. Changes of quality of high hydrostatic pressure processed strawberry juices during storage. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2011;12(1):41-47.
13. Chavan P, Singh S, Raghav PK. Recent advances in the preservation of postharvest fruits using edible films and coatings. Food Chem. 2023;405:134748.
14. Chemat F, Khan MK. Applications of ultrasound in food technology. Ultrason Sonochem. 2011;18(4):813835.
15. Chipley JR. Sodium benzoate and benzoic acid. In: Davidson PM, Sofos JN, Branen AL, editors. Antimicrobials in food. 3 rd Ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2020, p. 41-88.
16. Córcoles JI, Alarcón ME, Ibáñez AJA. Heat transfer performance of fruit juice in a heat exchanger tube using numerical simulations. Appl Sci. 2020;10(2):648.
17. Ewis A, Ghany AALAEG, Saber R, Sharaf AE, Sitohy M. Evaluation of chitosan as a new natural preservative in orange juice. J Product Dev. 2021;26(4):737-754.
18. Fernandes FA, Rodrigues S. Cold plasma processing on fruits and fruit juices. Processes. 2021;9(12):2098.
19. Gaete GC, Godoy AJ, Avello ED, Requena CVH, Castillo RC, Estevinho LM, et al. Encapsulation techniques for bioactive compounds in fruit juice. Food Prod Process Nutr. 2024;6(1):8.
20. Guo C, Xie Y, Zhang Y, Tu T, Wang L. Fate of foodborne pathogens in vegetable juice at different storage temperatures. Food Microbiol. 2025;132:104854.
21. Gyawali R, Ibrahim SA. Natural products as antimicrobial agents. Food Control. 2014;46:412-429.
22. Hooshyar L, Hesari J, Damirchi AS. Thermal and nonthermal preservation of fruit juices. J Food Sci Technol. 2020;57(5):1689-1697.
23. Jafari SM, Jabari SS, Dehnad D, Shahidi SA. Effects of thermal processing by nanofluids on tomato juice quality. J Food Sci Technol. 2017;54(3):679-686.
24. Jay JM, Loessner MJ, Golden DA. Modern food microbiology. 7 th ed. New York (NY): Springer; 2005.
25. Katsch L, Sokolowsky M, Gibson B, Schneider J. Influence of pasteurization conditions on cloudy apple juice. Appl Food Res. 2025;5(2):101471.
26. Kim HB, Tadini CC, Singh RK. Heat transfer in plate exchangers during orange juice pasteurization. J Food Eng. 1999;42(2):79-84.
27. Kumar S, Pipliya S, Srivastav PP, Srivastava B. Shelf life of cold plasma treated kiwifruit juice. Int J Food Prop. 2024;27(1):1-23.
28. Kumar V, Kohli D, Naik B, Ratore A, Gupta AK, Khan JM, et al. Effect of heat treatment on citrus juices. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2023;35(7):102819.
29. Leizerson S, Shimoni E. Stability and sensory shelf life of orange juice pasteurized by ohmic heating. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53(10):4012-4018.
30. Lewis MJ, Heppell N. Continuous thermal processing of foods: Pasteurization and UHT sterilization. Gaithersburg (MD): Aspen Publishers; 2000.
31. Mangaraj S, Goswami TK, Mahajan PV. Applications of plastic films for modified atmosphere packaging of fruits and vegetables: A review. Food Eng Rev. 2009;1(2):133-158.
32. Marsanasco M, Goyanes S, Castañeda D, García M. Liposomes as vehicles for vitamins E and C in orange juice. Food Res Int. 2011;44(9):3039-3049.
33. Mwaijibe S, Vicent V. Effects of pasteurisation and storage conditions on folate retention and microbiological quality of beetroot juice. Food Chem Adv. 2025;6:100939.
34. Nygaard NJ, Fernández EN, Radusin T, Rotabakk BT, Sarfraz J, Sharmin N, et al. Current status of biobased and biodegradable food packaging materials: impact on food quality and effect of innovative processing technologies. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2021;20(2):1333-1380.
35. Serrano OI, Fortuny SR, Belloso MO. Pulsed electric fields effects on health-related compounds and antioxidant capacity of tomato juice. In: Miklavčič D, editor. Handbook of electroporation. Cham: Springer; 2016, p. 1-14.
36. Oliveira I, Pinto T, Afonso S, Karaś M, Szymanowska U, Gonçalves B, et al. Sustainability in bio-based edible films, coatings, and packaging for small fruits. Appl Sci. 2025;15(3):1462.
37. Polydera AC, Stoforos NG, Taoukis PS. Comparative shelf life study and vitamin C loss kinetics in pasteurised and high pressure processed reconstituted orange juice. J Food Eng. 2003;60(1):21-29.
38. Rawson A, Patras A, Tiwari BK, Noci F, Koutchma T, Brunton N. Effect of thermal and non-thermal processing on fruit juices. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2011;22(10):505-516.
39. Massilia RRM, Melgar MJ, Belloso MO. Antimicrobial activity in fruit juices. J Food Prot. 2009;72(1):126-133.
40. Rouweler JWM. Heat process values F. 2 nd Ed. [Technical Report]; 2015.
41. Safwa SM, Ahmed T, Talukder S, Sarkar A, Rana MR. Applications of non-thermal technologies in food processing industries: A review. J Agric Food Res. 2024;18:100917.
42. Shaik L, Chakraborty S. Effect of different storage conditions on the quality attributes of sweet lime juice subjected to pulsed light and thermal pasteurization. Sustain Food Technol. 2023;1(5):722-737.
43. Shi J, Xu J, Liu X, Goda AA, Salem SH, Deabes MM, et al. Evaluation of some artificial food preservatives and natural plant extracts as antimicrobial agents for safety. Discover Food. 2024;4(1):89.
44. Silva FVM, Gibbs PA. Target selection in pasteurization of high-acid foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2004;44(5):353-360.
45. Terefe NS, Buckow R, Versteeg C. Quality-related enzymes in plant-based products: Effects of novel food processing technologies-Part 2: Pulsed electric field processing. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015;55(1):1-15.
46. Tiwari BK, Muthukumarappan K, O'Donnell CP, Cullen PJ. Effects of sonication on the kinetics of orange juice quality parameters. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56(7):2423-2428.
47. Tournas VH, Heeres J, Burgess L. Moulds and yeasts in fruit juices. Food Microbiol. 2006;23(7):684-688.
48. Truong NQA, Puzovic A, Vargas PD, Simkova K, Rabeeah I, Murray H, et al. Comparing the impact of high pressure, pulsed electric field and thermal treatments on the quality attributes of raspberry juice. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2025;104101.
49. Boekel VMAJS. Kinetic modeling of food quality. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2008;7(2):144-158.
50. Waghmare R. High pressure processing of fruit beverages: A recent trend. Food Humanity. 2024;2:100232.
51. Wang L, Li Y, Liu C, Shao P, Lin Y. Impact of hydrodynamic cavitation as a non-thermal processing strategy on the quality attributes and flavor properties of Huyou juice. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol; 2026, 107.
52. Wang X, Dong L, Ma C, Luo Y, Hu X, Chen F. Differentiating high-hydrostatic-pressure and thermal processed tomato juice samples based on their volatile markers and color. LWT. 2025;118912.
53. Wurlitzer NJ, Dionísio AP, Lima JR, Garruti DS, Araújo IMS, Rocha RFJ, et al. Tropical fruit juice: effect of thermal treatment and storage time on sensory and functional properties. J Food Sci Technol. 2019;56(12):5184-5193.
54. Yazdanfar N, Manafi L, Ebrahiminejad B, Mazaheri Y, Sadighara P, Basaran B, et al. Evaluation of sodium benzoate and potassium sorbate preservative concentrations in different sauce samples in Urmia, Iran. J Food Prot. 2023;86(8):100118.
55. Yu W, Cui J, Zhao S, Feng L, Wang Y, Liu J, et al. Effects of high-pressure homogenization on pectin structure and cloud stability of not-from-concentrate orange juice. Front Nutr. 2021;8:647748.
56. Rivera YJ, Badman ST, Stevens ML, Verniero JL, Stawarz JE, Shi C, et al. In situ observations of largeamplitude Alfvén waves heating and accelerating the solar wind. Science. 2024 Aug 30;385(6712):962-966.
57. Ford BR, Vignali PD, Rittenhouse NL, Scharping NE, Peralta R, Lontos K, et al. Tumor microenvironmental signals reshape chromatin landscapes to limit the functional potential of exhausted T cells. Science Immunology. 2022 Aug 5;7(74):eabj9123.