Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea

Statistics in Medicine · 2005 · Vol. 25(1) · pp. 127–141
Patrick RoystonDouglas G. AltmanWilli Sauerbrei

Abstract

In medical research, continuous variables are often converted into categorical variables by grouping values into two or more categories. We consider in detail issues pertaining to creating just two groups, a common approach in clinical research. We argue that the simplicity achieved is gained at a cost; dichotomization may create rather than avoid problems, notably a considerable loss of power and residual confounding. In addition, the use of a data-derived 'optimal' cutpoint leads to serious bias. We illustrate the impact of dichotomization of continuous predictor variables using as a detailed case study a randomized trial in primary biliary cirrhosis. Dichotomization of continuous data is unnecessary for statistical analysis and in particular should not be applied to explanatory variables in regression models.

Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver Diseases and ImmunityStatistical Methods and InferenceCategorical variableEconometricsConfoundingRegressionStatisticsContinuous variableRegression analysisComputer scienceMathematicsMedicine

MeSH terms

Age FactorsAlbuminsAntimetabolitesAzathioprineBilirubinCholestasisData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLiver Cirrhosis, BiliaryRegression AnalysisRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Citations
2,163
FWCI
23.27
field-weighted impact
References
35
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Dangers of Using "Optimal" Cutpoints in the Evaluation of Prognostic Factors
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 1994 · 1,124 citations
Generalized Additive Models.
Biometrics · 1991 · 8,286 citations
Generalized Additive Models.
Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1991 · 7,687 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.