reviewTop 1% cited
Dangers of Using "Optimal" Cutpoints in the Evaluation of Prognostic Factors
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 1994 · Vol. 86(11) · pp. 829–835
D G Altman✉Berthold Lausen(Forschungsinstitut für Kinderernährung)Willi Sauerbrei(University of Fribourg)Marc Schumacher(Institut für Medizinische Biometrie, Informatik und Epidemiologie)
MeSH terms
Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNeoplasmsPrognosisSeverity of Illness IndexStatistics as TopicSurvival AnalysisS Phase
Citations
1,124
FWCI
16.57
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
An extent of resection threshold for newly diagnosed glioblastomas
Journal of neurosurgery · 2011 · 1,625 citations
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2007 · 3,466 citations
Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2015 · 5,044 citations
The influence of maximum safe resection of glioblastoma on survival in 1229 patients: Can we do better than gross-total resection?
Journal of neurosurgery · 2015 · 633 citations
X-Tile
Clinical Cancer Research · 2004 · 3,895 citations
Evaluating resource selection functions
Ecological Modelling · 2002 · 2,532 citations
Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea
Statistics in Medicine · 2005 · 2,163 citations
Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): Explanation and Elaboration
PLoS Medicine · 2012 · 1,021 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.