Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration

Annals of Internal Medicine · 2007 · Vol. 147(8) · pp. W–163
Jan P. VandenbrouckeErik von ElmDouglas G. AltmanPeter C. GøtzscheCynthia D. MulrowStuart J. PocockCharles PooleJames J. SchlesselmanMatthias Eggerfor the STROBE initiative

Abstract

Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalizability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies, and 4 are specific to each of the 3 study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors, and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, 1 or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (www.strobe-statement.org) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research.

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsReliability and Agreement in MeasurementHealthcare cost, quality, practicesStrengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiologyObservational studyChecklistGeneralizability theoryCritical appraisalConsolidated Standards of Reporting TrialsMedicineQuality (philosophy)Statement (logic)MEDLINE

MeSH terms

Cross-Sectional StudiesPublishingCohort StudiesEpidemiologic Research DesignCase-Control StudiesGuidelines as TopicObservation
Citations
3,466
FWCI
87.02
field-weighted impact
References
227
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.