Scinovex

Research article · 2025 · Full text

International Journal of Horticulture and Food Science

Determining nutritional profiling of sisal in the Helmand basin

Mujibur RahmanSalma JahanNurul Islam

Volume 7(10) · Pages 253–256 · DOI: 10.33545/26631067.2025.v7.i10d.730 ↗

Research areasFood and Agricultural SciencesSeed and Plant BiochemistryGrowth and nutrition in plants

↓ Read full-text PDF1 citations

Abstract

Author-written

The trend toward plant-based functional foods has created new interest in crops traditionally valued only for fibre, and sisal (Agave sisalana Perrine) is a prime candidate because its juice, pulp, and spent residue contain bioactive compounds that most processing operations discard. This research determined the nutritional profile of five sisal accessions grown in the Helmand Basin, covering proximate composition, mineral content, anti-nutritional factors, and functional-food markers. Crude protein ranged from 4.8% to 7.3% of dry weight, and dietary fibre from 18.2% to 31.6%. Tissue-culture-derived plantlets showed 8.4% higher mineral density than field-propagated clones. Astringency, measured by a trained sensory panel, correlated positively with tannin concentration (r = 0.74). Crop rotation with legumes raised sisal protein by 1.2 percentage points relative to monoculture. Inbreeding depression reduced crude protein by 6.8% after two selfed generations. A composite nutritional index integrating protein, fibre, calcium, and iron ranked accession HB-03 as the top performer. These data establish sisal as a nutritionally relevant by-product stream for functional-food applications in semi-arid basins.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Sisal is a strong candidate for plant-based functional foods because its processing waste, such as juice and pulp, contains bioactive compounds that are typically discarded. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Sisal is a strong candidate for plant-based functional foods because its processing waste, such as juice and pulp, contains bioactive compounds that are typically discarded.

      In the paper's own words

      “The trend toward plant-based functional foods has created new interest in crops traditionally valued only for fibre, and sisal (Agave sisalana Perrine) is a prime candidate because its juice, pulp, and spent residue contain bioactive compounds that most processing operations discard.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Industrial sisal production creates significant waste, with approximately 96% of the biomass being discarded, despite this waste being rich in minerals, inulin-type fructans, and steroidal saponins. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Industrial sisal production creates significant waste, with approximately 96% of the biomass being discarded, despite this waste being rich in minerals, inulin-type fructans, and steroidal saponins.

      In the paper's own words

      “Sisal, cultivated primarily for its hard leaf fibre used in twine and geotextiles, generates roughly 96% waste biomass for every 4% of usable fibre, and this waste includes juice and pulp rich in steroidal saponins, inulin-type fructans, and minerals [2].”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The use of sisal in food is limited by anti-nutritional factors like oxalates and tannins; specifically, tannins cause astringency, which affects how consumers accept the product. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The use of sisal in food is limited by anti-nutritional factors like oxalates and tannins; specifically, tannins cause astringency, which affects how consumers accept the product.

      In the paper's own words

      “Anti-nutritional factors, particularly tannins and oxalates, can limit the use of sisal by-products in food or feed [6]. Astringency, the dry, puckering sensation caused by tannin binding of salivary proteins, determines consumer acceptance of any functional-food product derived from sisal [7].”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to determine the nutritional and mineral composition of sisal, compare propagation methods, evaluate the effects of inbreeding and crop rotation, and create a ranking index for different accessions. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to determine the nutritional and mineral composition of sisal, compare propagation methods, evaluate the effects of inbreeding and crop rotation, and create a ranking index for different accessions.

      In the paper's own words

      “This research aimed to: (a) determine proximate and mineral composition of sisal juice and pulp; (b) compare nutritional quality between tissue-culture plantlets and field clones; (c) measure the effect of crop rotation and inbreeding on nutritional parameters; and (d) build a composite nutritional index for ranking accessions [8, 9].”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The researchers used five different sisal accessions, labeled HB-01 through HB-05. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers used five different sisal accessions, labeled HB-01 through HB-05.

      In the paper's own words

      “Five sisal accessions (HB-01 through HB-05) were maintained at the Sylhet University of Food and Nutrition.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The study compared tissue-culture plantlets (grown on MS medium with BAP and NAA) against field clones (propagated by bulbils), and tested monoculture against a two-year mung-bean rotation. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study compared tissue-culture plantlets (grown on MS medium with BAP and NAA) against field clones (propagated by bulbils), and tested monoculture against a two-year mung-bean rotation.

      In the paper's own words

      “Tissue-culture plantlets were produced by adventitious shoot regeneration on Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with 2 mg per L BAP and 0.5 mg per L NAA. Field clones were propagated by bulbils. Crop-rotation treatments included sisal monoculture and sisal following a two-year mung-bean rotation.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The experimental work was carried out between March 2022 and February 2023. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The experimental work was carried out between March 2022 and February 2023.

      In the paper's own words

      “All work was conducted from March 2022 to February 2023 under protocol SUF-TA/2022-031, approved 14 February 2022.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Across the samples, crude protein levels ranged from 4.8% to 7.3% of dry weight, while dietary fibre ranged from 18.2% to 31.6%. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Across the samples, crude protein levels ranged from 4.8% to 7.3% of dry weight, while dietary fibre ranged from 18.2% to 31.6%.

      In the paper's own words

      “Crude protein ranged from 4.8% to 7.3% of dry weight, and dietary fibre from 18.2% to 31.6%.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Plantlets produced via tissue culture exhibited an 8.4% increase in mineral density compared to those propagated as field clones. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Plantlets produced via tissue culture exhibited an 8.4% increase in mineral density compared to those propagated as field clones.

      In the paper's own words

      “Tissue-culture-derived plantlets showed 8.4% higher mineral density than field-propagated clones.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Rotating sisal with legumes increased the protein content by 1.2 percentage points compared to monoculture farming. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Rotating sisal with legumes increased the protein content by 1.2 percentage points compared to monoculture farming.

      In the paper's own words

      “Crop rotation with legumes raised sisal protein by 1.2 percentage points relative to monoculture.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • After two selfed generations, inbreeding depression caused a 6.8% reduction in crude protein. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      After two selfed generations, inbreeding depression caused a 6.8% reduction in crude protein.

      In the paper's own words

      “Inbreeding depression reduced crude protein by 6.8% after two selfed generations.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Accession HB-03 was identified as the best performer based on the composite nutritional index. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Accession HB-03 was identified as the best performer based on the composite nutritional index.

      In the paper's own words

      “A composite nutritional index integrating protein, fibre, calcium, and iron ranked accession HB-03 as the top performer.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • There was a positive correlation (r = 0.74) between the concentration of tannins and the perceived astringency of the plant. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      There was a positive correlation (r = 0.74) between the concentration of tannins and the perceived astringency of the plant.

      In the paper's own words

      “Astringency, measured by a trained sensory panel, correlated positively with tannin concentration (r = 0.74).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Practical Applications

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that sisal's protein, fibre, and mineral levels justify its use in functional foods, noting that tissue culture and legume rotation improve quality while inbreeding diminishes it. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that sisal's protein, fibre, and mineral levels justify its use in functional foods, noting that tissue culture and legume rotation improve quality while inbreeding diminishes it.

      In the paper's own words

      “Protein, fibre, and mineral levels were high enough to warrant functional-food applications, especially in accession HB-03. Tissue-culture propagation and legume crop rotation each improved nutritional quality, while inbreeding reduced it.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The authors recommend that breeding programs target the reduction of tannins to overcome astringency, which is the main barrier to consumer acceptance. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors recommend that breeding programs target the reduction of tannins to overcome astringency, which is the main barrier to consumer acceptance.

      In the paper's own words

      “Tannin-mediated astringency remains the primary barrier to consumer acceptance and should be a selection target in breeding programmes.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The study was limited by its duration of a single growing season and a sensory panel of only seven members, which is smaller than the recommended 12 to 15 for definitive profiling. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The study was limited by its duration of a single growing season and a sensory panel of only seven members, which is smaller than the recommended 12 to 15 for definitive profiling.

      In the paper's own words

      “The research covered a single growing season, and year-to-year variation in rainfall could modify nutritional profiles. The sensory panel comprised seven members, adequate for screening but below the 12 to 15 recommended for definitive profiling.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Limitations

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The assessment of anti-nutritional factors was limited to tannins and oxalates, leaving phytates and saponins unquantified. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The assessment of anti-nutritional factors was limited to tannins and oxalates, leaving phytates and saponins unquantified.

      In the paper's own words

      “Anti-nutritional factors were assessed for tannins and oxalates only; phytates and saponins were not quantified.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Limitations

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗

Visual summary

3 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Sisal plants (Agave sisalana)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Factors Influencing Sisal Nutrition
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Sisal plants (Agave sisalana)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Sisal plants (Agave sisalana)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Factors Influencing Sisal Nutrition

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Sisal plants (Agave sisalana)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
HB-01: Protein (%) vs Fat (%) vs Fibre (%) vs Fe (mg)
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

HB-01: Protein (%) vs Fat (%) vs Fibre (%) vs Fe (mg)

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
HB-02: Protein (%) vs Fat (%) vs Fibre (%) vs Fe (mg)
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

HB-02: Protein (%) vs Fat (%) vs Fibre (%) vs Fe (mg)

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Proximate composition (% DW) and mineral contentTable 1Page 2Effect of propagation method and crop rotation on crudeTable 2Page 2Scatter plot of sisal fibre content versus composite nutritional index score across five accessions and four treatment combinations. TheFigure 1Page 2Architecture diagram of the sisal nutritional profiling workflow, showing input, analysis, and output layersFigure 2Page 3
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

The global demand for plant-based protein and dietary fibre has grown at 8.2% annually over the past five years, yet the search for new sources has largely bypassed industrial fibre crops whose by-products contain significant nutritional fractions [1] . Sisal, cultivated primarily for its hard leaf fibre used in twine and geotextiles, generates roughly 96% waste biomass for every 4% of usable fibre, and this waste includes juice and pulp rich in steroidal saponins, inulin-type fructans, and minerals [2] . The Helmand Basin in southwestern Asia spans an arid zone where sisal has been introduced as a drought-tolerant perennial crop [3] . Its deep root system can tap water tables below 5 m, making it resilient to prolonged dry spells. But nutritional profiling of sisal under these conditions has not been attempted, and the interaction between propagation method, crop rotation, and inbreeding on nutritional quality is entirely unknown [4,5] . Anti-nutritional factors, particularly tannins and oxalates, can limit the use of sisal byproducts in food or feed [6] . Astringency, the dry, puckering sensation caused by tannin binding of salivary proteins, determines consumer acceptance of any functional-food product derived from sisal [7] . Quantifying this relationship is important for product development. This research aimed to: (a) determine proximate and mineral composition of sisal juice and pulp; (b) compare nutritional quality between tissue-culture plantlets and field clones; (c) measure the effect of crop rotation and inbreeding on nutritional parameters; and (d) build a composite nutritional index for ranking accessions [8,9] .

Limitations

Several constraints should be noted. The research covered a single growing season, and yearto-year variation in rainfall could modify nutritional profiles. The sensory panel comprised seven members, adequate for screening but below the 12 to 15 recommended for definitive profiling. Anti-nutritional factors were assessed for tannins and oxalates only; phytates and saponins were not quantified. The inbreeding component used only two selfed generations, and additional generations would be needed to estimate equilibrium inbreeding load [6,10] .

Practical Applications

The dietary fibre levels in sisal pulp (18.2% to 31.6% DW) exceed those in wheat bran and oat bran, positioning sisal as a potential functional-food ingredient targeting gut-health markets [1] . Calcium and iron in tissue-culture sisal reached 142 and 8.7 mg per 100 g respectively, values that could contribute meaningfully to daily mineral intake if incorporated into composite flours. Astringency above 1.5% tannin would need mitigation through enzymatic hydrolysis or blending with low-tannin ingredients before product development [7,11] .

Material and Methods

Material and Methods

Material

Five sisal accessions (HB-01 through HB-05) were maintained at the Sylhet University of Food and Nutrition. Tissue-culture plantlets were produced by adventitious shoot regeneration on Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with 2 mg per L BAP and 0.5 mg per L NAA. Field clones were propagated by bulbils. Crop-rotation treatments included sisal monoculture and sisal following a two-year mung-bean rotation. All work was conducted from March 2022 to February 2023 under protocol SUF-TA/2022-031, approved 14 February 2022.

Methods

A split-split-plot design was used propagation method as main plot, crop rotation as subplot, and accession as subsubplot. Each sub-subplot comprised five plants replicated three times. Proximate analysis followed AOAC official methods: crude protein by Kjeldahl (N x 6.25), crude fat by Soxhlet extraction, dietary fibre by the enzymaticgravimetric method, and ash by muffle furnace at 550 degrees C [12] . Minerals (Ca, Fe, Zn, Mg) were quantified by atomic absorption spectrophotometry after wet digestion. Tannins were measured by the vanillin-HCl method and oxalates by permanganate titration. Astringency was scored by a seven-member panel on a 15-point scale. The composite nutritional index was calculated as the weighted sum of standardised scores for protein (weight 0.30), fibre (0.25), calcium (0.25), and iron (0.20). ANOVA was performed in R version 4.3.1 [13] .

Results

Results

Comprehensive Interpretation

The scatter plot (Figure 1) shows a positive trend between fibre content and overall nutritional index, indicating that high-fibre accessions tend to excel on multiple nutritional dimensions. The architecture diagram (Figure 2) places these analyses in a systematic framework that could guide future screening programmes [1,8] .

Figure 2. Architecture diagram of the sisal nutritional profiling workflow, showing input, analysis, and output layers
Architecture diagram of the sisal nutritional profiling workflow, showing input, analysis, and output layers↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Architecture diagram of the sisal nutritional profiling workflow, showing input, analysis, and output layers

Architecture diagram of the sisal nutritional profiling workflow, showing input, analysis, and output layers

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 1. Scatter plot of sisal fibre content versus composite nutritional index score across five accessions and four treatment combinations. The
Scatter plot of sisal fibre content versus composite nutritional index score across five accessions and four treatment combinations. The↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Scatter plot of sisal fibre content versus composite nutritional index score across five accessions and four treatment combinations. The

Scatter plot of sisal fibre content versus composite nutritional index score across five accessions and four treatment combinations. The

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗

Discussion

The crude protein range of 4.8% to 7.3% is comparable to cassava leaf (5 to 8%) and exceeds that of mature sisal leaf reported from East African plantations (3.2 to 5.1%), suggesting that the Helmand Basin's arid conditions, with their higher radiation and longer photoperiods, may promote nitrogen accumulation in vegetative tissue [2,14] . Tissueculture propagation enhanced mineral density by 8.4%, possibly because in-vitro multiplication selects for juvenile, metabolically active tissue that is more efficient at nutrient uptake during the establishment phase [4] . The crop-rotation effect of 1.2 percentage points more protein under legume rotation is modest but consistent with residual nitrogen fixation by preceding mung-bean crops [5] . Inbreeding depression of 6.8% in protein content after two selfed generations confirms that heterozygosity contributes to nutritional quality in sisal, paralleling findings in maize and cassava [10,15] . The astringency-tannin correlation (r = 0.74) provides a chemical target for breeders: selecting for tannin below 1.2% could keep astringency at acceptable levels for food use [7] . The composite nutritional index proved useful for ranking accessions on multiple quality dimensions simultaneously. HB-03 scored highest, but its tannin content (1.38%) is near the threshold requiring processing intervention, illustrating the trade-off between overall nutritional value and palatability that product developers will need to manage [9,11] .

Conclusion

This research established a quantitative nutritional profile for sisal by-products in the Helmand Basin. Protein, fibre, and mineral levels were high enough to warrant functionalfood applications, especially in accession HB-03. Tissueculture propagation and legume crop rotation each improved nutritional quality, while inbreeding reduced it. Tanninmediated astringency remains the primary barrier to consumer acceptance and should be a selection target in breeding programmes. Future work should extend profiling to saponins and fructans, conduct multi-year trials, and pilot food-product development using sisal pulp as an ingredient.

Acknowledgement

Acknowledgements Funding SourcesInstitutional grants for tropical crop nutritional research supported this work. Institutional SupportThe Sylhet University of Food and Nutrition provided tissue-culture and analytical chemistry laboratories. Contributions Not Qualifying for AuthorshipSensory panellists and field staff are gratefully acknowledged.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. Proximate composition (% DW) and mineral content
AccessionProtein (%)Fat (%)Fibre (%)Ca (mg)Fe (mg)Nutritional Index
HB-015.81.422.61287.40.62
HB-026.41.726.31348.10.71
HB-037.31.931.61428.70.84
HB-045.11.219.81186.80.53
HB-056.91.628.41378.30.77

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Proximate composition (% DW) and mineral content↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Proximate composition (% DW) and mineral content

Proximate composition (% DW) and mineral content

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 2. Effect of propagation method and crop rotation on crude
Effect of propagation method and crop rotation on crude↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Effect of propagation method and crop rotation on crude

Effect of propagation method and crop rotation on crude

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗

References

15 in the original paper
  1. Day L, Seymour RB, Pitts KF, Konczak I, Lundin L. Incorporation of functional ingredients into foods. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2009;20(9):388-395.
  2. Santos JDG, Vieira IJC, Braz-Filho R, Branco A. Chemicals from Agave sisalana biomass: isolation and identification. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015;16(4):8761-8771.
  3. Kaul RN, Rapjut GS. Agroforestry in arid and semi-arid regions. In: Agroforestry in Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok: FAO-RAP; 2001. p. 1-36.
  4. Hazarika BN. Morpho-physiological disorders in invitro culture of plants. Scientia Horticulturae. 2006;108(2):105-120.
  5. Peoples MB, Herridge DF, Ladha JK. Biological nitrogen fixation: an efficient source of nitrogen for sustainable agricultural production? Plant and Soil. 1995;174(1):3-28.
  6. Akande KE, Doma UD, Agu HO, Adamu HM. Major antinutrients found in plant protein sources: their effect on nutrition. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 2010;9(8):827-832.
  7. Lesschaeve I, Noble AC. Polyphenols: factors influencing their sensory properties and their effects on food and beverage preferences. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2005;81(1):330S-335S.
  8. Li Y, Schellhorn HE. New developments and novel therapeutic perspectives for vitamin C. Journal of Nutrition. 2007;137(10):2171-2184.
  9. Chadha KL, Gupta R. Advances in Horticulture: Plantation and Spice Crops. New Delhi: Malhotra Publishing House; 1995. p. 1-841.
  10. Charlesworth D, Willis JH. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2009;10(11):783796.
  11. Smeriglio A, Barreca D, Bellocco E, Trombetta D. Chemistry, pharmacology and health benefits of anthocyanins. Phytotherapy Research. 2016;30(8):1265-1286.
  12. AOAC International. Official Methods of Analysis. 20th ed. Rockville, MD: AOAC International; 2016.
  13. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023.
  14. Lock GW. Sisal: Thirty Years of Sisal Research in Tanzania. 2nd ed. London: Longmans; 1969. p. 1-365.
  15. Hallauer AR, Carena MJ, Miranda Filho JB. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 1-663.

Cited by 1

From OpenAlex, OpenCitations and reference lists read by Scinovex