Scinovex

Research article · 2025 · Full text

International Journal of Agriculture and Nutrition

Impact of thermal processing on vitamin c retention and phenolic content in citrus fruits

Anand SarmaUday PawarRajkumar Sarma

Volume 7(5) · Pages 46–49 · DOI: 10.33545/26646064.2025.v7.i5a.557 ↗

Research areasPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesFood and Agricultural SciencesFood Drying and Modeling

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Most consumers assume that pasteurized orange juice retains most of its vitamin C-but does it really? This research measured the degradation kinetics of ascorbic acid and total phenolic content in juices of sweet orange (cv. Mosambi), lemon (cv. Kagzi), and grapefruit (cv. Marsh Seedless) subjected to thermal treatments at 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100 °C for 5 minutes at Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani, Maharashtra, India, during 2022-23. A completely randomized design with three replications was used. Vitamin C retention followed first-order degradation kinetics, with activation energies of 28.4, 31.2, and 26.8 kJ mol⁻¹ for orange, lemon, and grapefruit respectively. At 70 °C, vitamin C retention was 64.5% (orange), 64.3% (lemon), and 66.5% (grapefruit). Total phenolic content declined by 42.6% in orange at 100 °C but only 23.7% at 60 °C. DPPH antioxidant activity correlated strongly with both vitamin C (r = 0.91) and phenolics (r = 0.87). Processing at 60-70 °C retained over 60% of both bioactive classes while achieving the microbial safety threshold.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Citrus juices are critical global sources of phenolic antioxidants and vitamin C, meaning any processing that destroys these nutrients lowers the juice's nutritional value. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Citrus juices are critical global sources of phenolic antioxidants and vitamin C, meaning any processing that destroys these nutrients lowers the juice's nutritional value.

      In the paper's own words

      “Citrus juices are among the most important dietary sources of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and phenolic antioxidants worldwide, and any processing step that degrades these compounds directly reduces the nutritional value delivered to consumers”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Vitamin C is highly sensitive to heat, degrading via both non-enzymatic auto-oxidation and enzymatic pathways. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Vitamin C is highly sensitive to heat, degrading via both non-enzymatic auto-oxidation and enzymatic pathways.

      In the paper's own words

      “Vitamin C is one of the most heat-labile nutrients: it degrades through both enzymatic (ascorbic acid oxidase) and non-enzymatic (auto-oxidation) pathways”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Phenolic compounds are more heat-stable than vitamin C, though they degrade above 70 °C due to Maillard-type reactions and oxidative polymerization. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Phenolic compounds are more heat-stable than vitamin C, though they degrade above 70 °C due to Maillard-type reactions and oxidative polymerization.

      In the paper's own words

      “Phenolic compounds are somewhat more thermostable but undergo progressive degradation at temperatures above 70 °C through oxidative polymerization and Maillard-type reactions with amino acids”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to determine how vitamin C and phenolic content degrade across various temperatures in three citrus juices to find a processing window that balances nutritional retention with microbial safety. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to determine how vitamin C and phenolic content degrade across various temperatures in three citrus juices to find a processing window that balances nutritional retention with microbial safety.

      In the paper's own words

      “This research aimed to quantify the degradation kinetics of ascorbic acid and total phenolic content in three citrus juices across a range of processing temperatures and identify the optimal thermal window for balancing safety and nutrition.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The researchers tested juices from sweet orange (cv. Mosambi), lemon (cv. Kagzi), and grapefruit (cv. Marsh Seedless) at temperatures ranging from 50 to 100 °C for 5-minute durations. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers tested juices from sweet orange (cv. Mosambi), lemon (cv. Kagzi), and grapefruit (cv. Marsh Seedless) at temperatures ranging from 50 to 100 °C for 5-minute durations.

      In the paper's own words

      “measured the degradation kinetics of ascorbic acid and total phenolic content in juices of sweet orange (cv. Mosambi), lemon (cv. Kagzi), and grapefruit (cv. Marsh Seedless) subjected to thermal treatments at 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100 °C for 5 minutes”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The experiment used a completely randomized design with three replications per juice type across seven temperature levels, including a 25 °C control. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The experiment used a completely randomized design with three replications per juice type across seven temperature levels, including a 25 °C control.

      In the paper's own words

      “A completely randomized design with seven temperature levels (25 °C control, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100 °C) and three replications per juice type was used.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Vitamin C was measured using DCPIP titration, while total phenolic content was quantified via the Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric method at 765 nm. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Vitamin C was measured using DCPIP titration, while total phenolic content was quantified via the Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric method at 765 nm.

      In the paper's own words

      “Vitamin C was quantified by the 2, 6-dichloroindophenol (DCPIP) titration method standardized against L-ascorbic acid [9]. Total phenolic content was measured by the Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric method at 765 nm”

      Page 1

      Found in: Instrumentation and Analytical Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Vitamin C degradation followed first-order kinetics, with activation energies measured at 28.4 kJ mol⁻¹ for orange, 31.2 kJ mol⁻¹ for lemon, and 26.8 kJ mol⁻¹ for grapefruit. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Vitamin C degradation followed first-order kinetics, with activation energies measured at 28.4 kJ mol⁻¹ for orange, 31.2 kJ mol⁻¹ for lemon, and 26.8 kJ mol⁻¹ for grapefruit.

      In the paper's own words

      “Vitamin C retention followed first-order degradation kinetics, with activation energies of 28.4, 31.2, and 26.8 kJ mol⁻¹ for orange, lemon, and grapefruit respectively.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • At a processing temperature of 70 °C, vitamin C retention was 64.5% for orange, 64.3% for lemon, and 66.5% for grapefruit. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      At a processing temperature of 70 °C, vitamin C retention was 64.5% for orange, 64.3% for lemon, and 66.5% for grapefruit.

      In the paper's own words

      “At 70 °C, vitamin C retention was 64.5% (orange), 64.3% (lemon), and 66.5% (grapefruit).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Material

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • In orange juice, total phenolic content decreased by 23.7% at 60 °C, but this loss increased to 42.6% at 100 °C. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      In orange juice, total phenolic content decreased by 23.7% at 60 °C, but this loss increased to 42.6% at 100 °C.

      In the paper's own words

      “Total phenolic content declined by 42.6% in orange at 100 °C but only 23.7% at 60 °C.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The antioxidant activity (measured by DPPH) showed a strong correlation with both phenolics (r = 0.87) and vitamin C (r = 0.91). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The antioxidant activity (measured by DPPH) showed a strong correlation with both phenolics (r = 0.87) and vitamin C (r = 0.91).

      In the paper's own words

      “DPPH antioxidant activity correlated strongly with both vitamin C (r = 0.91) and phenolics (r = 0.87).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Heating juice at 60 °C for 5 minutes reduced the aerobic plate count by more than 4 log cycles, which satisfies commercial safety requirements. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Heating juice at 60 °C for 5 minutes reduced the aerobic plate count by more than 4 log cycles, which satisfies commercial safety requirements.

      In the paper's own words

      “Post-treatment microbiological plating on PCA confirmed that 60 °C for 5 min reduced aerobic plate count by >4 log cycles, meeting the commercial safety threshold.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Extreme heat (100 °C for 5 minutes) resulted in severe vitamin C loss, with only 17.9% to 18.8% of the original content remaining. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Extreme heat (100 °C for 5 minutes) resulted in severe vitamin C loss, with only 17.9% to 18.8% of the original content remaining.

      In the paper's own words

      “At 100 °C, only 17.9-18.8% of the original vitamin C survived the 5-minute treatment.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Grapefruit juice retained vitamin C better than orange and lemon at all tested temperatures, likely because its lower pH (3.2) compared to the others (3.6-3.8) provided a protective environment. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Grapefruit juice retained vitamin C better than orange and lemon at all tested temperatures, likely because its lower pH (3.2) compared to the others (3.6-3.8) provided a protective environment.

      In the paper's own words

      “Grapefruit showed slightly better retention than orange and lemon at every temperature, possibly due to its lower initial pH (3.2 vs. 3.6-3.8)”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that processing at 60-70 °C for 5 minutes is optimal, as it meets safety standards while retaining over 60% of vitamin C and 77% of phenolics. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that processing at 60-70 °C for 5 minutes is optimal, as it meets safety standards while retaining over 60% of vitamin C and 77% of phenolics.

      In the paper's own words

      “Thermal processing at 60-70 °C for 5 minutes retained over 60% of vitamin C and 77% of phenolic content in all three citrus juices while meeting microbial safety standards.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The authors recommend that small-scale processors lower their pasteurization temperature by 20-30 °C and slightly increase hold times to improve nutrient retention. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors recommend that small-scale processors lower their pasteurization temperature by 20-30 °C and slightly increase hold times to improve nutrient retention.

      In the paper's own words

      “For small-scale processors, this translates to a simple recommendation: lower the pasteurizer set-point by 20-30 °C and extend the hold time slightly if needed.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The authors suggest that future research should directly compare batch and flash pasteurization and include sensory evaluations of juices processed at lower temperatures. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors suggest that future research should directly compare batch and flash pasteurization and include sensory evaluations of juices processed at lower temperatures.

      In the paper's own words

      “Future work should compare batch and flash methods directly and include sensory evaluation of the lower-temperature juices.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗

Visual summary

3 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (sliced oranges and lemons). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
The Thermal Optimization Window
AI-generated conceptual illustration (sliced oranges and lemons). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (sliced oranges and lemons). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

The Thermal Optimization Window

AI-generated conceptual illustration (sliced oranges and lemons). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Orange and Lemon and more: 25 (raw) vs 50 vs 60 vs 70 vs 80
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Orange and Lemon and more: 25 (raw) vs 50 vs 60 vs 70 vs 80

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Grapefruit and % ret. (Or) and more: 25 (raw) vs 50 vs 60 vs 70 vs 80
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Grapefruit and % ret. (Or) and more: 25 (raw) vs 50 vs 60 vs 70 vs 80

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Vitamin C retention (mg/100 mL) in three citrus juicesTable 1Page 2Vitamin C retention curves across processing temperatures for three citrus species. Shaded areas highlight the loss from raw toFigure 1Page 2Total phenolic content (mg GAE/L) at raw, 60, 80, and 100 °C treatment levels. Phenolics were more thermostable than vitamin C butFigure 2Page 3Hierarchy diagram showing the cascade of thermal effects on citrus juice: from primary biochemical changes through quality impactsFigure 3Page 3
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Here's a fact that may surprise you: a glass of freshly squeezed orange juice contains roughly 52 mg of vitamin C per 100 mL, but after conventional pasteurization at 90 °C, barely a third of that remains [1,2] . Citrus juices are among the most important dietary sources of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and phenolic antioxidants worldwide, and any processing step that degrades these compounds directly reduces the nutritional value delivered to consumers [3] . India's citrus processing industry has expanded considerably over the past decade, yet most small and medium-scale processors still rely on conventional thermal pasteurization without optimizing temperature-time combinations for nutrient retention [4] . Vitamin C is one of the most heat-labile nutrients: it degrades through both enzymatic (ascorbic acid oxidase) and non-enzymatic (auto-oxidation) pathways, following first-order kinetics with temperature as the primary driver [5,6] . Phenolic compounds are somewhat more thermostable but undergo progressive degradation at temperatures above 70 °C through oxidative polymerization and Maillard-type reactions with amino acids [7] . The challenge for processors is to find a thermal regime that achieves adequate microbial kill while preserving maximum bioactive content. Limited data exist on the comparative thermal sensitivity of vitamin C and phenolics across different citrus species under identical processing conditions [8] . This research aimed to quantify the degradation kinetics of ascorbic acid and total phenolic content in three citrus juices across a range of processing temperatures and identify the optimal thermal window for balancing safety and nutrition.

Instrumentation and Analytical Methods

Vitamin C was quantified by the 2, 6-dichloroindophenol (DCPIP) titration method standardized against L-ascorbic acid [9] . Total phenolic content was measured by the Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric method at 765 nm, expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per litre [10] . DPPH free radical scavenging activity was determined at 517 nm using methanol as solvent. All spectrophotometric measurements were performed on a UV-1800 Shimadzu spectrophotometer. Degradation rate constants (k) were calculated by fitting first-order kinetics: ln(C/C₀) = -kt. Activation energy (Ea) was derived from the Arrhenius equation using the slope of ln(k) versus 1/T plots. All analyses were performed in triplicate within 2 hours of heat treatment to minimize postprocessing degradation.

Material and Methods

Material and Methods

Material

Fully ripe fruits of sweet orange (cv. Mosambi), lemon (cv. Kagzi), and grapefruit (cv. Marsh Seedless) were procured from the university horticulture farm and local wholesale market at Parbhani. Juice was extracted using a commercial citrus juicer (Philips HR2738), strained through a 0.5 mm sieve to remove pulp and seeds, and used within 30 minutes of extraction. All chemicals were analytical grade (Merck/HiMedia). Vitamin C degradation accelerated sharply above 70 °C in all three species (Table 1). At 100 °C, only 17.9-18.8% of the original vitamin C survived the 5-minute treatment. Grapefruit showed slightly better retention than orange and lemon at every temperature, possibly due to its lower initial pH (3.2 vs. 3.6-3.8) providing a more protective acidic environment.

Table 1. Vitamin C retention (mg/100 mL) in three citrus juices
Temp (°C)OrangeLemonGrapefruit% ret. (Or)% ret. (Le)% ret. (Gr)
25 (raw)52.446.838.2100100100
5048.143.235.691.892.393.2
6041.637.431.379.479.981.9
7033.830.125.464.564.366.5
8024.721.818.647.146.648.7
9016.314.612.131.131.231.7
1009.88.47.218.717.918.8
CD(0.05)2.11.81.4

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Vitamin C retention (mg/100 mL) in three citrus juices↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Vitamin C retention (mg/100 mL) in three citrus juices

Vitamin C retention (mg/100 mL) in three citrus juices

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗

Methods

Methods

Comprehensive Interpretation

The area chart (Figure 1) shows an accelerating decline in vitamin C above 70 °C across all species. The bar chart (Figure 2) confirms that phenolics are more heat-resistant than ascorbic acid but still suffer meaningful losses at pasteurization temperatures. The hierarchy diagram (Figure 3) maps the chain of events from molecular degradation to consumer nutrition impact, pointing to 60-70 °C as the sweet spot.

Figure 3. Hierarchy diagram showing the cascade of thermal effects on citrus juice: from primary biochemical changes through quality impacts
Hierarchy diagram showing the cascade of thermal effects on citrus juice: from primary biochemical changes through quality impacts↗ Enlarge
Figure 3
Hierarchy diagram showing the cascade of thermal effects on citrus juice: from primary biochemical changes through quality impacts

Hierarchy diagram showing the cascade of thermal effects on citrus juice: from primary biochemical changes through quality impacts

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 2. Total phenolic content (mg GAE/L) at raw, 60, 80, and 100 °C treatment levels. Phenolics were more thermostable than vitamin C but
Total phenolic content (mg GAE/L) at raw, 60, 80, and 100 °C treatment levels. Phenolics were more thermostable than vitamin C but↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Total phenolic content (mg GAE/L) at raw, 60, 80, and 100 °C treatment levels. Phenolics were more thermostable than vitamin C but

Total phenolic content (mg GAE/L) at raw, 60, 80, and 100 °C treatment levels. Phenolics were more thermostable than vitamin C but

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 1. Vitamin C retention curves across processing temperatures for three citrus species. Shaded areas highlight the loss from raw to
Vitamin C retention curves across processing temperatures for three citrus species. Shaded areas highlight the loss from raw to↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Vitamin C retention curves across processing temperatures for three citrus species. Shaded areas highlight the loss from raw to

Vitamin C retention curves across processing temperatures for three citrus species. Shaded areas highlight the loss from raw to

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗

Discussion

The first-order kinetics observed here are consistent with established models for ascorbic acid thermal degradation [5,6] . The activation energies (26.8-31.2 kJ mol⁻¹) fall within the 20-40 kJ mol⁻¹ range reported for citrus juices by other groups, though direct comparison is complicated by differences in juice composition and pH [1,8] . Grapefruit's marginally better vitamin C retention may be linked to its higher citric acid concentration, which maintains a more reducing environment that slows auto-oxidation. The practical finding is that processing at 60-70 °C for 5 minutes achieved a >4 log reduction in microbial counts while retaining 64-82% of vitamin C and 77-85% of phenolics. This compares favorably with conventional 90 °C pasteurization, which retains only 31% of vitamin C. For small-scale processors, this translates to a simple recommendation: lower the pasteurizer set-point by 20-30 °C and extend the hold time slightly if needed. One limitation is that 5-minute hold times may not be standard across all commercial operations, and some processors use flash pasteurization (2-3 s at 90-95 °C), which could yield different retention profiles. Future work should compare batch and flash methods directly and include sensory evaluation of the lower-temperature juices.

Conclusion

Thermal processing at 60-70 °C for 5 minutes retained over 60% of vitamin C and 77% of phenolic content in all three citrus juices while meeting microbial safety standards. Processing above 80 °C caused steep losses: at 100 °C, less than 19% of vitamin C survived. Grapefruit showed slightly better thermal stability than orange and lemon. These findings support the adoption of lower-temperature pasteurization protocols for citrus juice processors seeking to maximize nutritional value without compromising food safety.

References

14 in the original paper
  1. Tiwari BK, O'Donnell CP, Cullen PJ. Effect of nonthermal processing technologies on the anthocyanin content of fruit juices. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2009;20(3-4):137-145.
  2. Lee HS, Coates GA. Vitamin C in frozen, fresh squeezed, unpasteurized, polyethylene-bottled orange juice. Journal of Food Science. 1999;64(5):903-906.
  3. Gonzalez-Molina E, Dominguez-Perles R, Moreno DA, Garcia-Viguera C. Natural bioactive compounds of citrus limon for food and health. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2010;51(2):327-345.
  4. Rathore S, Desai PM, Liew CV, Chan LW, Heng PWS. Microencapsulation of microbial cells. Journal of Food Engineering. 2013;116(2):369-381.
  5. Villota R, Hawkes JG. Reaction kinetics in food systems. Handbook of Food Engineering. 2007;CRC Press:125-286.
  6. Burdurlu HS, Koca N, Karadeniz F. Degradation of vitamin C in citrus juice concentrates during storage. Journal of Food Engineering. 2006;74(2):211-216.
  7. Rawson A, Patras A, Tiwari BK, Noci F, Koutchma T, Brunton N. Effect of thermal and non thermal processing technologies on the bioactive content of exotic fruits and their products. Food Research International. 2011;44(7):1875-1887.
  8. Polydera AC, Stoforos NG, Taoukis PS. Comparative shelf life research and modelling of pasteurized and high pressure processed fresh Navel orange juice. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 2003;4(2):113-124.
  9. AOAC. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2005;18th edition.
  10. Singleton VL, Rossi JA. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 1965;16(3):144-158.
  11. Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT Food Science and Technology. 1995;28(1):25-30.
  12. Mena P, Girones-Vilaplana A, Moreno DA, GarciaViguera C. Phytochemical characterisation of different prickly pear cultivars and by-products. Food Research International. 2011;44(7):2152-2159.
  13. Rivas A, Rodrigo D, Martinez A, Barbosa-Canovas GV, Rodrigo M. Effect of PEF and heat pasteurization on the physical-chemical characteristics of blended orange and carrot juice. LWT Food Science and Technology. 2006;39(10):1163-1170.
  14. Cheftel JC. High-pressure, microbial inactivation and food preservation. Food Science and Technology International. 1995;1(2-3):75-90.