Scinovex
article Open Access

Effect of feeding graded levels of coriander seed powder on carcass traits and sensory evaluation of meat of broiler chickens

International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research · 2026 · Vol. 10(4S) · pp. 400–404

Abstract

The present study was carried out to examine the incorporation of coriander seed powder (CSP) in broiler ration on carcass traits and organoleptic evaluation of broiler meat. A total of 240 broiler chicks (day old, Cobb strain) were randomly divided to five dietary groups (48 birds/group). The control group (C) was fed basal diet, whereas in treatment groups, CSP was incorporated @ 1%, 2%, 3% and 4% levels and designated as T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively. The diets formulated were isocaloric and isonitrogenous. Results of carcass traits revealed significantly higher (p<0.05) values in terms of bled weight (g), defeathered weight (g), viscera weight (g) and eviscerated weight (g) in T2 group as compared to control (C), while the carcass traits on% live weight basis revealed no significant difference (p>0.05) between groups. The outcome of sensory traits in terms of flavour and acceptability were significantly (p<0.05) improved in CSP fed groups, while results of colour, texture and juiciness revealed non-significant difference (p>0.05) between treatments. Therefore, it could be concluded that dietary incorporation of CSP in broiler ration has no negative effect on the carcass characteristics and overall sensory attributes of broiler chicken meat, moreover it enhances the quality of carcass and the flavour of meat.

Full Text

Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.

Introduction

Coriander (Coriandrum sativum) is a widely recognized aromatic and medicinal plant which is found not only in wild, but also cultivated across India (Taha et al., 2019) [22] . It belongs to the Umbelliferae family, has a broad geographical presence, with its origins traced back to the Mediterranean and Middle Eastern regions (Samojlik et al., 2010) [15] . It is widely cultivated in various regions, including Netherlands, Central and Eastern Europe, the Mediterranean countries (such as Morocco, Malta and Egypt), as well as in South-Asian countries (China, India and Bangladesh) (Pathak et al., 2011; Laribi et al., 2015) [13,9] . This herb harnessed the label "spice of happiness" in Egyptian culture, which is attributed to its aphrodisiac property (Burdock and Carabin, 2009) [2] . In India, coriander is primarily found in states like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Bihar (Shivanand, 2010) [18] . Over millennia, coriander has been well-known in Asian nations for its various applications and uses (Masood et al., 2006) [10] . These coriander seed powder (CSP) act as appetite enhancer, digestive stimulant and carminative, in addition to their other bioactive properties. Thus, it has gained attention for its potential benefits in poultry diets. It is rich in vitamins (niacin, riboflavin and thiamine) and minerals (iron, calcium and magnesium) in addition to valuable essential oils and polyunsaturated fatty acids (Sahib et al., 2013) [14] . The leaves, seeds and essential oils of coriander have demonstrated a significant antimicrobial effect against both gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms (Silva and Domingues, 2017) 19] . The use of coriander seed powder as an alternative to antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) has been recommended for feeding broilers in past studies (Taha et al., 2019; Gazwi et al., 2022; Siyag et al., 2024) [22,5,20] . These studies have indicated that dietary coriander can lead to improvements in growth and carcass traits. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of feeding graded levels of CSP on the carcass traits and sensory evaluation of meat of broiler chickens.

Materials and Methods

Experimental birds, design and ethics approval: The trial was carried out at the Poultry Shed of the Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, SKUAST-J, Jammu & Kashmir, India. A total of 240 unsexed, day-old broiler chicks (Cobb-400 commercial strain) of uniform hatch were procured from a reputed commercial hatchery (Venkys™). Chicks were allocated to five groups (48 chicks/group) namely C, T 1 , T 2 , T 3 , and T 4 groups, which were reared under standard brooding and management conditions. The experiment was conducted using a Completely Randomized Design. The birds were handled as per approved trial protocol regulations of Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC), SKUAST-Jammu.

Feeding of experimental birds:

On arrival of chicks, the birds were offered electrolytes through oral route (drinking water) to check the transportation stress and dehydration. Also, to facilitate the early feed intake as well as recognition, a weighed quantity of familiar feed was scattered over the newspapers in addition to chick feeders and chick feeding trays. The nutrient requirement of broilers were met as per the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR, 2013) [7] guidelines. The C group was fed a standard basal diet without CSP, whereas in T 1 , T 2 , T 3 , and T 4 groups, basal diet was incorporated with 1%, 2%, 3%, and 4% CSP, respectively. The ingredients used in preparation of basal diet are maize flakes, soybean meal, meat-cumbone meal, soybean oil, mineral and vitamin premixes, common salt, sodium bicarbonate, DL-methionine and Llysine hydrochloride.

Carcass traits: A total of 40 birds (8 birds/group) were randomly chosen for slaughter. The birds were off fed for whole night (12-14 hours) prior to slaughter. After taking the live weight, the birds were humanely sacrificed following the Halal procedure, allowing the blood to drain for 1-2 minutes. The carcasses were defeathered and again weighed. It was followed by decapitation, removal of legs at the hock joint, and evisceration. Measurements were taken for various carcass traits, including live weight, bled weight (post-jugular severing), carcass weight, and viscera weight (internal organs), with all values recorded in grams and expressed as a percentage of live weight. Dressing percentage was computed by dividing the sum of the eviscerated carcass weight and giblet weight by the live weight and expressing the result as a percentage.

Sensory evaluation: For the organoleptic evaluation, the dressed meat obtained post-slaughter (same cuts) was thoroughly cleaned and cooked in boiling water for 10-15 minutes. Sensory attributes were judged by a semi-trained panel of experienced evaluators from the Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, comprising Assistant and Associate Professors. The assessment followed an eight-point descriptive scale (Semen et al., 1987) [16] , where a score of eight indicated extremely desirable quality and a score of one reflected highly unsatisfactory quality. Each panellist received a selfexplanatory individual proforma for scoring and was seated in a well-lit, odour-free, and quiet faculty room. The evaluated sensory parameters included appearance, flavour, juiciness, texture, and overall acceptability.

Statistical analysis:

The data generated in the experiment were statistically analysed using one-way ANOVA as per the procedure outlined by Snedecor and Cochran (1994) [21] . Treatment means were compared through Duncan's multiple range test (DMRT), with statistical significance considered at p<0.05.

Results

Carcass characteristics:

The carcass traits of adult broiler chicken (assessed at 42 days age) are depicted in Table 1, while the carcass traits as% live weight is presented in Figure 1. The live weight (g; LW) was found higher (p<0.05) in T 1 and T 2 than C, but T 3 has no difference with T 1 , T 2 and T 4 , whereas the LW of T 4 birds lies in between C and T 3 . The dressing percentage for groups C, T 1 , T 2 , T 3 and T 4 were assessed and remained statistically comparable (p>0.05) across the treatments. The bled weight (kg) was recorded significantly higher (p<0.05) in T 1 , T 2 and T 3 groups in comparison to C and T 4 groups. But bled weight (as% LW) showed no difference. Like bled weight trend, defeathered weight (kg) was observed higher up to 3% CSP fed groups, but its computation as% LW showed similar values. The weight of viscera (g) was found higher (p<0.05) in CSP fed groups T 1 , T 2 , T 3 and T 4 compared to control. Whereas the eviscerated weight (g) was observed higher in T 1 and T 2 than C and T 4 , however T 3 group had intermediate eviscerated weight. The giblet weight (g) was found significantly higher (p<0.05) in T 1 and T 2 than C, however intermediate weights were seen in T 3 and T 4 groups. But no difference was seen when the above-mentioned traits are expressed as% LW. Also, the weight of immunological organs in grams as well as% LW showed no change irrespective of different dietary treatments. Mean with different superscript within row differs significantly (p<0.05) C, T1, T2, T3 and T4 groups: Coriander seed powder was incorporated in broiler ration @ 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4%, respectively

International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research https://www.biochemjournal.com C, T1, T2, T3 and T4 groups: Coriander seed powder was incorporated in broiler ration @ 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4%, respectively Sensory evaluation: At the end of the trial, meat samples from all broiler groups were uniformly boiled for 20 minutes without the use of any spices and assessed for various sensory attributes including colour, flavour, texture, juiciness, and overall acceptability. The results, presented in Table 2, showed sensory scores ranging between 6.60 to 7.20 for colour, 7.00 to 7.40 for texture and 6.60 to 7.40 for juiciness, with no statistically significant differences observed. However, flavour score was observed statistically higher in T 3 and T 4 than C, but T 1 and T 2 had intermediate flavour scores. Likewise, a similar trend was seen in overall acceptability in which C had the lowest score while as T 3 and T 4 had the highest score, however T 1 and T 2 had in between scores. These findings suggest that the inclusion of CSP in broiler diets, up to a level of 4%, did not negatively influence the sensory quality of the meat. C, T1, T2, T3 and T4 groups: Coriander seed powder was incorporated in broiler ration @ 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4%, respectively.

Discussion

The carcass traits of broiler chickens were assessed after the trial completion to evaluate the effect of feeding graded levels of CSP on the dressing percentage and different carcass characteristics. In agreement with the present results, earlier authors documented no viable change in carcass traits on feeding CSP at varying inclusion levels (El- [4,12,1,6,11,3] . Similarly, Khubeiz and Shirif, (2020) [8] also reported no change in dressing percentage (%) with skin, heart, liver and gizzard weights (g) on feeding different levels of CSP. No change in relative weight of carcass traits signifies proportional growth with overall body size rather than disproportionate organ development. Also, the weight of immunological organs in grams as well as% LW showed no change irrespective of different dietary treatments. The lengths of duodenum, jejunum and ileum also showed no viable difference (p>0.05). It was inferred that CSP feeding had no effect on above mentioned carcass traits. No change in relative weights of spleen and bursa was reported by El-Gogary et al. (2024) [3] on 3, 5 and 7% CSP feeding to broilers. Likewise, Gurram et al. (2022) [6] noticed no change in bursa and thymus weights on feeding broilers with diet containing 0.5 and 1.0% CSP, but in 2% CSP fed group, higher bursa and thymus weights were noted. But Taha et al. (2019) [22] noted a significant increase in bursa and thymus weights in 0.4% CSP fed group. But these results depicted that CSP inclusion had no negative influence on the carcass traits. The sensory attributes of broiler meat viz. color, texture and juiciness exhibited no adverse effects on CSP inclusion in broiler diet. However, flavour and overall acceptability were positively influenced with the graded increase in CSP inclusion. The results of the present study corroborate the findings of Shitole et al. (2023) [17] , who detected significant improvements in juiciness and overall acceptability in CSPfed broilers. The improvement in sensory perception in CSP-fed groups may be attributed to bioactive phytochemicals (essential oils) present in CSP, which have antioxidant and antimicrobial properties (Silva et al., 2020) [19] . Furthermore, these compounds also maintain meat freshness, halt oxidative deterioration, and modulate flavor profile, which adds up to improving consumer acceptability. The literature pertaining to sensory traits evaluation on CSP feeding is not available, so the results cannot be discussed. The enhancement in overall acceptability at higher CSP levels suggests a probable synergistic effect of flavorenhancing volatiles and improved meat quality traits.

Conclusion

The incorporation of coriander seed powder up to 4% in broiler ration had no adverse effect on carcass traits, however, the results were best at 2% inclusion. Moreover, the inclusion of coriander seed powder also improved the organoleptic attributes of broiler meat. Thus, it could be concluded that inclusion of 2% coriander seed powder in the diet of broiler chicken is beneficial to improve the quality of carcass and also to enhance the flavour of broiler meat.

References

  1. Al Zuhairi ZAJ, Abdullah WS, Majal RK. Effect of dietary supplementation of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) and fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) seed powder and their mixture on the production and physiological performance of broiler chickens. AlQadisiyah Journal of Veterinary Medicine Sciences. 2017;17(2):143-148.
  2. Burdock GA, Carabin IG. Safety assessment of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) essential oil as a food ingredient. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2009;47(1):22-34.
  3. El-Gogary MR, Tork M, Dorra, Khalil HR. Effect of dietary supplementation of coriander seed powder on growth performance, carcass characteristics, blood parameters, microbiological traits and physiological status of broiler chicks. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production. 2024;15(2):9-18.
  4. El Shoukary RDM, Darwish MHA, Abdel Rahman MAM. Behavioral, performance, carcass traits and hormonal changes of heat stressed broilers feeding black and coriander seeds. Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research. 2014;4(3):97-101.
  5. Gazwi HSS, Mahmoud ME, Toson EMA. Analysis of the phytochemicals of Coriandrum sativum and Cichorium intybus aqueous extracts and their biological effects on broiler chickens. Scientific Reports. 2022;12:6399-6399.
  6. Gurram S, Chinni Preetam V, Vijaya Lakshmi K, Raju MVLN, Venkateshwarlu M. Effect of dietary supplementation of coriander seed powder on performance, nutrient digestibility, immunity, antioxidant activity and serum parameters of broilers. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2022;92(3):341346.
  7. ICAR. Nutrient requirement of animals-poultry (ICAR-NIANP). Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi; 2013.
  8. Khubeiz MM, Shirif AM. Effect of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) seed powder as feed additives on performance and some blood parameters of broiler chickens. Open Veterinary Journal. 2020;10(2):198205.
  9. Laribi B, Kouki K, M'Hamdi M, Bettaieb T. Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) and its bioactive constituents. Fitoterapia. 2015;103:9-26.
  10. Masood N, Chaudhry A, Tariq P. Bactericidal activity of black pepper, bay leaf, aniseed and coriander against oral isolates. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2006;19(3):214-218.
  11. Meradi S, Messaï A, Aouachria M. The effect of spices Coriandrum sativum L., Trigonella foenum-graecum L., Pimpinella anisum L., and their combinations on growth performance, carcass trait, and hematobiochemical parameters in broiler chicken. Veterinary World. 2022;15(7):1821-1826.
  12. Naeemasa M, Qotbi AAA, Seidavil A, Norri D, Brown D, Ginindza M. Effects of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) seed powder and extract on performance of broiler chickens. South African Journal of Animal Science. 2015;45(4):371-378.
  13. Pathak NL, Kasture SB, Bhatt NM, Rathod JD. Phytopharmacological properties of Randia dumetorum as a potential medicinal tree: An overview. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 2011;(10):24-26.
  14. Sahib NG, Anwar F, Gilani AH, Hamid AA, Saari N, Alkharfy KM. Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.): A potential source of high-value components for functional foods and nutraceuticals-A review. Phytotherapy Research. 2013;27(10):1439-1456.
  15. Samojlik I, Lakic N, Mimica-Dukic K, Dakovic-Svajce, Bozin B. Antioxidant and hepatoprotective potential of essential oils of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) and caraway (Carum carvi L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2010;58:8848-8853.
  16. Semen DL, Moody WG, Fox JD, Gay N. Influence of hot and cold deboning on the palatability, textural and economic traits of restructured beef steaks. Journal of Food Science. 1987;52:879-882.
  17. Shitole RB, Poul SP, Desale RJ, More MR, Vasave VM. Impact of feeding powdered coriander (Coriandrum sativum) seeds on broiler chicken growth and sensory attributes. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2023;12(12):754-757.
  18. Shivanand P. Coriandrum sativum: A biological description and its uses in the treatment of various diseases. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Life Sciences. 2010;1(3):119-126.
  19. Silva F, Domeño C, Domingues FC. Coriandrum sativum L.: Characterization, biological activities, and applications. In: Nuts and seeds in health and disease prevention. Academic Press; 2020. p. 497-519.
  20. Siyag SS, Prakash, Dhuria RK, Nehra R. Effect of gradual addition of black pepper and coriander seed powder on body weight (g) of broilers at different weeks. International Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry. 2024;9(1):544-548.
  21. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods. 8th ed. Iowa State University Press, Iowa, USA; 1994.
  22. Taha AE, Hassan SS, Shewita RS, El-Seidy AA, Abd El-Hack ME, Hussein ESO, et al. Effects of supplementing broiler diets with coriander seed powder on growth performance, blood haematology, ileum microflora and economic efficiency. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2019;103(5):14741483.
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
20%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.