Scinovex
article

Studies on physico - chemical attributes of gulabjamun incorporated with barley (Hordeum vulgare) flour

International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science · 2025 · Vol. 7(12) · pp. 607–611

Abstract

The present study investigated the preparation of gulabjamun incorporated with barley (Hordeum vulgare) flour as a partial substitute for maida, with the aim of optimizing its level of inclusion and evaluating the resultant product’s physicochemical, sensory, textural, and cost characteristics. Preliminary trials were conducted to determine the suitable form (raw or roasted barley flour) and stage of addition, after which roasted barley flour was incorporated at 10%, 15%, and 20% levels and compared with a control. Barley incorporation led to a significant increase in moisture (32.18-33.19%), protein (10.07-11.44%), fiber (0.55-3.81%), ash (1.56-1.85%), carbohydrates (41.32-44.60%), and total solids (73.19-74.65%) compared to the control, while fat content showed a slight reduction. Production cost increased marginally with higher barley inclusion. Overall, the study concluded that roasted barley flour can be incorporated up to 15% in gulabjamun to enhance nutritional quality without compromising sensory acceptability.

Full Text

Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.

Introduction

India is the largest milk-producing country in the world with an annual growth rate of 6.4 per cent. The total milk production stands at 239.3 MT with per capita availability of 471 g/day, whereas in Maharashtra it is 329 g/day (NDDB, 2023-24). Among different species, buffalo milk contributes about 55 per cent of the total production, followed by cow milk at 40.5 per cent. Owing to its higher fat, SNF and protein contents, buffalo milk is preferred for khoa manufacture, resulting in a soft -bodied, smooth-textured, and nutritionally superior product (Basaragi, 2025) [6] . Khoa is a heat-desiccated indigenous milk product that serves as a base for numerous sweets such as peda, burfi, kalakand and gulabjamun. Nearly 7 per cent of milk produced in India is converted into khoa annually Khoa prepared from buffalo milk is superior in yield (21-23%) compared to et al cow milk (17-19%) and provides desirable texture and flavour in sweetmeats (Rasane, et al 2015) [26] . Gulabjamun is one of the most popular khoa-based confections consumed across India. Traditionally made from khoa and refined wheat flour (maida), gulabjamun is characterized by its golden-brown colour, soft body, smooth texture and pleasant flavour of rose water. It is commonly prepared using Dhapkhoa (40-45% moisture) and widely consumed during festivals, marriages, and celebrations. Despite its popularity, gulabjamun production is still dominated by small-scale, unorganized sectors (Devrani, 2018) [7] . Although milk is recognized as a nearly complete food, it lacks certain micronutrients such as dietary fiber, iron, copper and vitamins (Rasane, et al. 2015) [26] . Thus, there is a need to incorporate suitable cereal-based ingredients to enhance nutritional quality of dairy-based sweets. Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is one of the oldest cultivated cereals and is widely grown across the world. It is rich in proteins, carbohydrates, β-glucans, resistant starch, vitamins, and minerals such as calcium, phosphorus, iron, zinc and magnesium (Abebaw, 2021) [2] . Βglucan from barley have been reported to reduce cholesterol, regulate blood glucose, improve gut health, and lower the risk of cardiovascular diseases (Kaur, 2024) [14] . The high dietary fiber content of barley also improves satiety, relieves constipation, and supports weight management.

Barley flour can be used in bakery and confectionery preparations, enhancing fermentation, texture, and flavour of products (Geng et al., 2022) [9] . Malted barley flour, in particular, improves dough quality and is already utilized in breads, cookies, and snacks (Kaur, 2024) [14] . Its incorporation in dairy-based products may provide additional nutritional and functional benefits.

Materials and Methods

Raw Materials

Fresh buffalo milk used for khoa preparation was obtained from the Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, College of Agriculture, VNMKV, Parbhani. Barley flour of food-grade quality was procured from the local market, whereas refined wheat flour (maida), sugar, baking powder, cardamom powder and vegetable oil were purchased from retail outlets in Parbhani, India. All chemicals and reagents employed for analytical work were of analytical grade.

Preparation of khoa

Khoa was prepared by concentrating buffalo milk in a traditional iron karahi (capacity: 2 L; diameter: 31 cm; depth: 8.5 cm) on a domestic gas stove. The milk was continuously stirred using a flat-edged metal scraper (kunthi) to prevent scorching and ensure uniform evaporation until a semisolid khoa consistency was obtained. Mixing and grinding operations were performed using an electric mixer-grinder.

Analytical instruments and measurements

Physico-chemical analyses of the prepared samples were conducted using standard laboratory glassware and equipment available in the Departmental laboratory. Textural properties of the Gulabjamun samples were evaluated using an Instron Texture Analyzer at the College of Food Technology, VNMKV, Parbhani.

Selection of form of barley flour

Among the three forms of barley flour evaluated, raw barley flour, roasted barley flour, and sprouted barley flour, roasted barley flour was selected for further experimentation based on its superior sensory acceptability in the preliminary gulabjamun trials.

Treatment details

Fat

The total fat content of the gulabjamun sample was determined using the Soxhlet Extraction Method (Gravimetric Analysis), a highly reliable technique widely applied in food science and consistent with Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) principles for dairy-based sweets (IS 4079:1967)

Protein

Protein content in gulabjamun sample was determined by estimating the per cent nitrogen by micro Kjeldhal method as recommend in ISI: 1479 (Part II) 1961 Ash Ash content in gulabjamun determined by method described in ISI: 1479 (part II), 1961

Sensory evaluation

Sensory evaluation of gulabjamun was carried out by the panel of judges. The product was evaluated by using 9 points hedonic scale. The product was evaluated for flavour, colour and appearance, body and texture, taste and overall acceptability attributes.

Cost estimation of gulabjamun

The cost per kilogram of the newly formulated products was calculated by considering the current market prices of the ingredients and including any additional expenses incurred during the manufacturing of gulabjamun.

Statistical analysis

Completely randomized design (CRD) was used for data analysis. The entire data of the experiment has been properly tabulated, analyzed and interpreted as described by Panse and Sukhatme (1985) [22] .

Results and Discussion

Physico-chemical analysis of gulabjamun by using barley flour Moisture

The moisture content of gulabjamun prepared with varying levels of roasted barley flour is presented in Table 1. The control sample (T₁) recorded a mean moisture content of 32.18%, while treatments incorporating barley flour exhibited significant differences (P<0.05). The lowest moisture value was observed in T₂ (31.22%), whereas T₄ showed the highest moisture content (33.19%). The gradual increase in moisture from T₂ to T₄ may be attributed to the enhanced water-binding capacity of the dietary fiber present in roasted barley flour, which helps retain more moisture during mixing and frying. These findings are consistent with earlier reports by Matkar (2006) [19] and Sirsat (2012) [31] , who also noted increased moisture levels in burfi and peda with the inclusion of fig and ash gourd, respectively.

Fat

The fat content of Gulabjamun varied significantly among treatments (Table 4.36). The control sample (T₁) exhibited the highest fat content (16.06%), while the incorporation of roasted barley flour resulted in slightly lower yet significantly different values in T₂ (15.42%), T₃ (15.66%), and T₄ (15.89%). The observed trend may be attributed to the fiber-rich nature of barley flour, which can influence oil absorption during frying. The swelling and porous structure of dietary fiber can facilitate moderate oil uptake, thereby affecting the fat content of the final product. These findings are in line with earlier reports, where Shikalgar (1996) [28] documented an increase in fat content in gulabjamun with the addition of lesser yam powder, and Mahale et al. (2011) observed a significant rise in fat content when coconut milk was blended with cow milk during gulabjamun preparation.

Protein

The protein content of gulabjamun increased significantly with the incorporation of roasted barley flour (Table 1). The control treatment (T₁) exhibited the lowest protein content (10.07%), while the values increased progressively in T₂ (10.83%), T₃ (11.11%), and T₄, which recorded the highest level (11.44%). This upward trend is attributed to the comparatively higher protein content of barley flour (11-13%) than that of maida, leading to an overall improvement in the protein profile of the product. These results are consistent with the observations of Javiya et al. (2025) [13] , who reported an increase in protein levels in pearl milletbased gulabjamun as millet incorporation increased. Similar enhancement in protein content was noted by Shikalgar (1996) [28] in gulabjamun prepared with lesser yam powder and by Singh et al. (2009) [30] , who documented significant protein enrichment when defatted soy flour was used at varying inclusion levels.

Ash

The ash content of gulabjamun showed a significant rise with increasing levels of roasted barley flour incorporation (Table 1). The control sample (T₁) recorded the lowest ash content (1.56%), while the highest value (1.85%) was observed in T₄, which contained 20% barley flour. This upward trend can be attributed to the naturally higher mineral concentration in barley flour compared to maida, as barley is rich in essential minerals such as potassium, phosphorus, magnesium and iron, which contribute to elevated ash levels. The present findings align with those of Sahana and Vijayalaxmi (2024) [27] , who reported an increase in ash content (1.19-1.28%) in gulabjamun with higher levels of foxtail millet incorporation. Similar results were documented by Javiya et al. (2025) [13] , where ash content rose from 1.31 to 2.20% as pearl millet substitution increased from 25% to 100%.

Crude fiber

The fiber content of gulabjamun prepared with roasted barley flour is shown in Table 1. A significant increase (P<0.05) was observed across treatments, with values rising from 0.55% in the control (T₁) to 1.52% (T₂), 2.68% (T₃), and 3.81% (T₄). This progressive increase corresponds to the higher dietary fiber content of barley flour, which contributes both soluble and insoluble fiber fractions to the formulation. Similar trends were reported by Sakate (2000) [29] , who observed increased dietary fiber levels in wood apple-based burfi with higher fruit incorporation. The present findings confirm the effectiveness of roasted barley flour in enhancing the fiber content of gulabjamun.

Carbohydrate

The carbohydrate content of gulabjamun samples is presented in Table 1. The control (T₁) recorded 41.32%, while treatments containing roasted barley flour showed a significant and progressive increase, with values of 42.66% (T₂), 43.37% (T₃) and 44.60% (T₄). This rise in carbohydrate content corresponds to the higher levels of complex carbohydrates present in barley flour compared to maida. Similar increasing trends with millet incorporation in gulab Jamun were reported by Javiya (2025) [13] and by Sahana and Vijayalaxmi (2022). Conversely, reductions in carbohydrate levels with high-moisture ingredients such as bottle gourd and coconut were noted by Waghmare (2012) [35] and Talekar (2015) [32] . The present results confirm that roasted barley flour effectively enhances the carbohydrate content of gulabjamun.

Total solid

The total solid content (%) of gulabjamun samples incorporated with roasted barley flour, along with the control, is shown in Table 1. The control treatment (T₁) recorded a total solid content of 73.19%, while treatments supplemented with roasted barley flour exhibited progressively higher values: 74.16% (T₂), 74.40% (T₃), and 74.65% (T₄). This consistent increase in total solids with increasing incorporation levels of roasted barley flour may be attributed to its higher dry matter contribution, as barley flour contains substantial amounts of dietary fibre and complex carbohydrates that enhance water absorption and solid retention compared to refined wheat flour (maida). Similar trends have been reported by Patel et al. (2020) [21] , who observed an increase in total solids (66.15-71.29%) in Amaranthus-based gulabjamun. Conversely, earlier studies by Wakchaure (1998) [36] , Waghmare (2012) [35] and Talekar (2013) [32] reported reductions in total solids in products such as burfi prepared with sapota pulp, bottle gourd, and coconut, respectively, which were attributed to increased moisture content. The present findings therefore confirm the role of roasted barley flour in enhancing the total solid content of Gulab Jamun.

Syrup Absorption

The syrup absorption capacity of gulabjamun varied significantly across treatments (P<0.05). The control sample (T₁) exhibited the highest absorption (136.31 g/100 g), which may be attributed to the finer texture and superior moisture-holding ability of maida. Substitution with roasted barley flour resulted in reduced syrup absorption, with values ranging from 127.33 g/100 g (T₂) to 130.00 g/100 g (T₄). The lower absorption in barley-incorporated treatments is likely due to the presence of higher fiber and β-glucans, which alter the product's internal structure and limit syrup uptake. However, the slight increase from T₂ to T₄ suggests that, at higher levels, the water-binding properties of barley components partially compensate for reduced porosity, leading to moderate syrup retention. Overall, barley addition influenced syrup absorption but remained within acceptable functional limits for gulabjamun quality.

Beta glucan

The β-glucan content of gulabjamun samples prepared with varying levels of roasted barley flour is presented in Table 1. As expected, the control treatment (T₁) showed no detectable β-glucan (0.00%), as khoa and maida do not naturally contain this soluble dietary fibre. Incorporation of roasted barley flour resulted in a significant and progressive increase in β-glucan levels across treatments, with T₂, T₃, and T₄ recording mean values of 3.75%, 4.45%, and 5.13%, respectively. This linear increase reflects the contribution of barley flour, which is inherently rich in β-glucan, thereby enhancing the functional value of the product. These findings are consistent with those reported by Kaur et al. (2020) [14] , who observed a significant rise in β-glucan content in yoghurt with increasing barley flour substitution, and by Khorshidian et al. (2017) [16] , who noted improved functional properties in cereal-fortified dairy sweets. Ahmad et al., similarly reported β-glucan yields ranging between 3.74% and 5.14% from oat extractions, supporting the values observed in the present study. Given the recognized health benefits of β-glucan including cholesterol reduction, attenuation of postprandial glycemic response, and improved gut health the incorporation of roasted barley flour effectively enhances the nutritional profile of gulab Jamun without adversely affecting its quality. These results demonstrate the potential for developing value-added functional dairy products enriched with β-glucan.

Cost of Production

The cost of production of gulabjamun prepared using different levels of roasted barley flour showed a gradual increase from T₁ to T₄ due to the progressive incorporation of barley flour and the corresponding reduction of maida. Among the treatments, the control sample T₁ recorded the lowest production cost (Rs. 257.36 per kg), as it did not include barley flour. The cost increased slightly in T₂ (Rs. 259.46 per kg) and T₃ (Rs. 260.52 per kg), reflecting the additional expense of barley flour at 10% and 15% levels, respectively. The highest production cost was observed in T₄ (Rs. 262.22 per kg), where barley flour substitution was maximum (20%).

Conclusion

The incorporation of barley flour in gulabjamun significantly affected its physicochemical, sensory, and textural qualities. Moisture, ash, protein, carbohydrate, and fat contents increased with barley addition due to its βglucan, soluble fibers, minerals, and higher carbohydrate levels, while syrup absorption also improved, making the product softer, juicier, and visually appealing.

References

  1. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 12th ed. Washington (DC): Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1975.
  2. Abebaw G. Review on structure, functional and nutritional composition of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Nutr Food Process. 2021;4(2):1-8.
  3. 1→3)(1→4)-β-D-glucan in barley and oats. In: Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. Gaithersburg (MD): AOAC International; 2005. p. 1-5.
  4. Adhikari AK. Microstructure and texture of khoa and gulabjamun made from cow's milk: heat-induced changes during processing and frying. J Sci Food Agric. 1993;61(1):7-15.
  5. Bureau of Indian Standards. Specification for canned rasogolla. IS 4079:1967. New Delhi: BIS; 1967.
  6. Basaragi A, Kadam RN. Comparative analysis of cow and buffalo milk production trends in India. Int J Multidiscip Res. 2025;7(4):1-10.
  7. Devrani M, Patani D, Barot A, Pal M. Gulabjamun: a highly delicious Indian milk sweet. Dairy Ice Cream Bakery Food. 2018;34(2):45-49.
  8. Dewani PP, Jayaprakasha HM. Effect of preconcentration of milk quality of khoa and gulabjamun. Indian J Dairy Biosci. 2002;13(2):53-59.
  9. Geng L, Li M, Zhang G, Ye L. Barley: a potential cereal for producing healthy and functional foods. Food Qual Saf. 2022;6:1-12.
  10. Indian Standards Institution. Specification for icecream. IS 2785:1964. New Delhi: ISI; 1964.
  11. Indian Standards Institution. Chemical analysis of milk. IS 1479 (Part II):1961. New Delhi: ISI; 1961.
  12. Indian Standards Institution. Handbook of food analysis. Part XI. New Delhi: ISI; 1981.
  13. Javiya RN, Patel AC, Prajapati RJ, Pandya HH, Shendurse AM. Process optimization of gulabjamun utilizing pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.). Int J Adv Biochem Res. 2025;9(Spec Issue 3):1-8.
  14. Kaur A, Purewal SS, Phimolsiripol Y, Bangar SP. Unraveling the hidden potential of barley (Hordeum vulgare): an important review. Plants. 2024;13:24212445.
  15. Kaur R, Riar CS. Sensory, rheological and chemical characteristics during storage of set-type full-fat yoghurt fortified with barley β-glucan. J Food Sci Technol. 2020;57(1):41-51.
  16. Khorshidian N, Yousefi M, Shadnoush M, Mortazavian AM. An overview of β-glucan functionality in dairy products. Curr Nutr Food Sci. 2017;13:1-13.
  17. Londhe S. Comparative studies on the use of different binder flours on the quality of gulabjamun [master's thesis]. Parbhani (India): Marathwada Agricultural University; 1995.
  18. Mahale PS, Shelke RR, Thakre VM, Nage SP. Studies on quality of gulabjamun prepared from cow milk blended with coconut milk. J Anim Husb Dairy Sci. 2011;2(1-2):10-14.
  19. Matkar SP. Studies on preparation of fig burfi [master's thesis]. Parbhani (India): Marathwada Agricultural University; 2006.
  20. National Dairy Development Board. Milk production in India. Gujarat: NDDB; 2023.
  21. Patel AC, Pandya AJ, Gopikrishna G, Priyanka S, Patel RA, Shendurse AM, et al. Development of gulabjamun by incorporating Amaranthus hypochondriacus L. (Rajgara). J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(3):19131918.
  22. Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. 4th ed. New Delhi: ICAR; 1985.
  23. Patel HA, Salunke P, Thakar PN. Chemical, microbiological, rheological and sensory characteristics of peda made by traditional mechanized methods. J Food Sci Technol. 2006;43(2):196-199.
  24. Patil HS. Studies on formulation of gulabjamun from goat milk [master's thesis]. Parbhani (India): Marathwada Agricultural University; 2002.
  25. Raj R, Shams R, Pandey VK, Dash KK, Singh P, Bashir O. Barley phytochemicals and health-promoting benefits: a comprehensive review. J Agric Food Res. 2023;14:100677-100690.
  26. Rasane P, Tanwar B, Dey A. Khoa: a heat-desiccated indigenous Indian dairy product. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci. 2015;6(5):39-46.
  27. Sahana HS, Vijayalaxmi KG. Development of gulabjamun with incorporation of foxtail millet. Asian J Dairy Food Res. 2024;43(2):85-92.
  28. Dapoli (India): Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth; 1996.
  29. Sakate RJ. Studies on preparation of wood apple burfi [master's thesis]. Rahuri (India): MPKV; 2000.
  30. Singh AK, Kadam DM, Saxena M, Singh RP. Efficacy of defatted soy flour supplement in gulabjamun. Afr J Biochem Res. 2009;3(4):130-135.
  31. Sirsat AB. Studies on preparation of ash gourd peda [master's thesis]. Parbhani (India): MKV; 2012.
  32. Talekar SS. Preparation of coconut burfi [master's thesis]. Parbhani (India): VNMKV; 2015.
  33. Dapoli (India): Dr. B.S. Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth; 2011.
  34. Vasava NM, Paul P, Pinto S. Effect of storage on physico-chemical, sensory and microbiological quality of gluten-free gulabjamun. Pharma Innov J. 2018;7(6):612-619.
  35. Waghmare VK. Studies on preparation of bottle gourd burfi [master's thesis]. Parbhani (India): MKV; 2012.
  36. Wakchaure SK. Studies on preparation of sapota pulp burfi [master's thesis]. Parbhani (India): Marathwada Agricultural University; 1998.
  37. Yawale PA, Rao JK. Development of khoa powderbased gulabjamun mix. Indian J Dairy Sci. 2012;65(5):361-367.
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
65%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.