Research article · 2025 · Full text
International Journal of Agriculture and Food ScienceNovel extraction approaches for maximizing the recovery of nutraceutical chemical-relevant antioxidants properties from Zingiber officinale
Volume 7(4) · Pages 265–271 · DOI: 10.33545/2664844x.2025.v7.i4d.362 ↗
Research areasGinger and Zingiberaceae researchGABA and Rice ResearchPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Abstract
Author-writtenThis study investigated the antioxidant potential of Zingiber officinale root extracts obtained via hydro-ethanolic maceration, aqueous infusion, and an innovative, low-temperature (42°C), extended (48+ hours) distillation yielded to essential oil recovery. The antioxidant capacity (ABTS assay), radical scavenging activity (DPPH assay), and reducing power (FRAP assay) of these extracts were comparatively evaluated. The essential oil, characterized by GC-MS, exhibited the highest antioxidant activity (90.94% ABTS, 90.82% DPPH, 90.34 reducing power), with key constituents including 1, 3-Cyclohexadiene derivatives (19.79%, 18.84%, 14.19%), Beta-Bisabolene (13.26%), Ambrein (4.68%), and Ambroxan (4.22%). The enhanced antioxidant effect observed in the essential oil obtained through this modified distillation yielded suggests improved preservation of volatile antioxidants compared to conventional methods. This research highlights the benefits of an optimized distillation yielded strategy for maximizing the recovery of antioxidant-rich essential oil from ginger, offering a promising alternative for industrial applications.
Summary
Source-checkedPlain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.
Why it matters
- Ginger (Zingiber officinale) is a valuable ingredient for food and medicine due to its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties. View evidence ↗
- There is a scientific focus on developing new extraction methods to maximize the recovery of ginger's bioactive compounds for use in functional foods. View evidence ↗
The question
- The study aimed to compare the antioxidant potential of ginger root extracts produced by hydro-ethanolic maceration, aqueous infusion, and a novel low-temperature, extended distillation method. View evidence ↗
What they did
- The research used fresh ginger rhizomes sourced from the Najaf Governorate in Iraq. View evidence ↗
- Ginger was dried for approximately 42 hours until the final moisture content was 14% or less. View evidence ↗
- All three extraction methods used a consistent ratio of 18 grams of ginger powder to 400 ml of solvent. View evidence ↗
- The innovative distillation method used a Clevenger apparatus at a reduced temperature of 42°C for more than 48 hours. View evidence ↗
- Antioxidant properties were measured using DPPH, FRAP, and ABTS assays. View evidence ↗
What they found
- The modified Clevenger distillation method produced the highest antioxidant activity, with a reducing power of 90.3385±0.059, DPPH of 90.818±0.017, and antioxidant capacity of 90.9448±0.076. View evidence ↗
- Ethyl acetate extraction showed intermediate antioxidant activity, with a reducing power of 88.72171±0.056, DPPH of 85.791±0.011, and antioxidant capacity of 80.8314±0.05. View evidence ↗
- Aqueous extraction had the lowest antioxidant activity, with a reducing power of 70.532±0.048, DPPH of 71.038±0.022, and antioxidant capacity of 40.334±0.09. View evidence ↗
- GC-MS analysis of the oil revealed that 1,3-Cyclohexadiene derivatives (52.8084%) and Beta-Bisabolene isomers (13.2574%) were the dominant components. View evidence ↗
- The extracted oil contained significant levels of diterpenoids, specifically Ambrein (4.6761%) and Ambroxan (4.2246%). View evidence ↗
What it means
- The authors conclude that their optimized low-temperature distillation method is superior to conventional techniques for capturing a wider range of bioactive molecules from ginger. View evidence ↗
- The authors state that further research is needed to investigate the specific bioactivities of the resulting unique extract. View evidence ↗
Visual summary
2 visualsIllustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.
Comparison of Extraction Methods
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Zingiber officinale (ginger root)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.
View source evidence ↗Reducing Power and DPPH and more: Clevenger method vs Ethyl acetate vs Aqueous extract
Replotted from Table 1 (page 4) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.
View source evidence ↗Figures & tables
From the original paperIntroduction
Zingiber officinale Roscoe, a plant belonging to the Zingiberaceae family, has been significant in PAK and traditional medical practice for centuries. Ginger has become a focal point in modern research in ginger food chemistry and health science (Wang et al., 2023) [26] , which includes a wide range of bioactive compounds in its complex chemical composition.
In addition, strategies are discovered for cultivation and production adjustment to ensure a permanent supply of this valuable plant.
Study Design
A multifaceted extraction strategy was used to clarify the diverse range of bioactive molecules within the Zingiber officinale (ginger) and their affiliated antioxidant properties. Originally, a hydroethanolic maceration process was used, and the ethanol's solvent properties were utilized to remove selected lipophilic bioactive components. In parallel, a separate aquatic infusion method was used to regain hydrophilic compounds. In addition, volatile aromatic fractions, which include essential oils, were isolated via hydro distillation, following the main guidelines prescribed in the British Pharmacopeia, with a minor procedural adaptation suited to the specific matrix of ginger. As a result, extracts and isolated essential oils undergo perfect analytical evaluation. The evaluation includes a 2.2diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) analysis, evaluation of their fundamental manual ability, determination of their overall antioxidant capacity using the established spectrophotometric method, and qualitative and quantitative analysis.
Material and Preparation
They intended for downstream extraction procedures to preserve the bioactive compounds' structural and chemical integrity in the Zingiber officinale (Ginger). A carefully regulated and innovative drying process was used. Freshly harvested, morphologically consistent rhizomes were procured from a local commercial source in the Najaf Governorate, Iraq. When you reach the research system, the contents of the robotic plant pass through a strict purification phase, which begins with underweight under drinking water to eliminate contaminated substances on the macroscopic surface, followed by complete rinsing with degenerate water to ensure optimal surface purity. The pure rhizome was then treated to thin lamella, with an accurately controlled thickness of a millimeter, and equally sterile aluminum was maintained in a stable temperature range of 20°C to 2°C in the environmentally controlled drying chambers specifically specified in steps. This sophisticated low-temperature dehydration strategy, which represents a modification of traditional drying methods, was designed to maximize the retention of volatile aromatic components and other thermal active compounds, which is important for antioxidants and total biological activity, which is important to increase 25°C (hazan ETMA). Thinly chopped ginger was exposed to gentle, periodic reversal at three hours, so that homogeneous moisture removal and local thermal stress or color change occurred at an interval of three hours to prevent color changes. The dehydration process was monitored for about 42 hours and did not exceed 14% to achieve a final moisture content, a significant area to interrupt microbial spread and enzymatic activity (Sycar and OBA, 2020) [24] . The resulting dried ginger lamela was later reduced to a fine powder via mechanical milling using a laboratory class assignment tool. The preparation of this fine ginger was then stored in hermetically sealed containers at ambient temperatures. It was designed for a comparative examination, which works broadly for its bioactive components and three separate extraction functions to assess in vitro antioxidant functions.
Extraction Procedures: An innovative application of three distinct methodologies for bioactive compound recovery from Zingiber officinale This study used three independent and innovative extraction functions, which focused on the various matrices of bioactive compounds from the prepared Zingiber officinale (ginger) purple powder. It is characterized by its innovation in a multidimensional approach, parameter optimization aimed at maximizing the yield and preserving the integrity of a wide range of phytochemicals, including both non-polar and polar ingredients, as well as thermo labile evaporative aromatic. A consolidated relationship between a solvent of 400 ml of 18 grams of ginger powder was used across all three methods.
Method 1: Hydro-alcoholic maceration for lipophilic bioactive compound extraction
The volume of an accurate amount of ginger powder (18 g) in analytical quality ethanol in a specific solid-to-different ratio (1: 22.2 weight/volume). This extraction was under constant movement at ambient temperatures for a defined period, which facilitates effective resolution of lipophilic bioactive molecules. The resulting ethanolic extract was then separated from solid residues through filtration, followed by a concentrated lipophilic fraction (Sasidh et al., 2011) [19] after removing the solvent under low pressure when using rotating evaporation to get it.
Method 2: Aqueous infusion for hydrophilic bioactive compound extraction
A separate, accurately weighted part of ginger powder (18 grams) was subjected to infusion in distilled water in a defined fixed-to-round ratio (1: 22.2 weight/volume). This mixture was maintained at a controlled temperature below the boiling point for a specific period to choose polar and water-soluble bioactive components. Aquatic extracts were later separated from solid materials by filtration and focused on the use of freeze-drying, a technique chosen to reduce the thermal erosion of heat-sensitive compounds (Yakupova et al., 2023) [27] .
Method 3: Innovative distillation yielded for enhanced volatile aromatic compound recovery
The extraction of volatile essential oil components was achieved through a significantly modified distillation yielded technique utilizing a Clevenger apparatus. In a departure from conventional high-temperature distillation yielded (typically employing boiling water), this study implemented a novel approach involving a controlled and substantially lower temperature of 42 °C maintained for an extended duration exceeding 48 hours. This innovative parameter selection, unprecedented in its prolonged duration at such a reduced temperature for ginger essential oil extraction based on current literature, was specifically designed to optimize the recovery of delicate volatile aromatic compounds, known for their significant antioxidant and other biological activities, while mitigating thermal degradation commonly associated with traditional methods (Ferhat et al., 2007) [7] . The extended extraction period at this lower temperature aimed to facilitate a more complete and gentle volatilization of the target compounds, preserving their structural integrity and potentially yielding a unique essential oil profile. Following the prolonged distillation (using 18 g of ginger powder to 400 ml of water), the condensed liquid was cooled to 15°C to facilitate efficient separation of the essential oil within the Clevenger unit. The collected essential oil was stored in dark, sealed vials at 4°C to maintain its quality for subsequent analysis.
GC-MS analysis for characterizing extracted oil from Zingiber officinale rhizomes
The characterization of extracted oil obtained through innovative methods from dried and pulverized Zingiber officinale (ginger) rhizomes necessitated the application of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Prior to instrumental analysis, a crucial step was undertaken to transform the inherent fatty acids into their corresponding fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs). This preparatory procedure involved the initial combination of a precisely measured 0.5 mL volume of the extracted oil with 2 mL of methanol within a secure screw-capped reaction vessel. To ensure optimal interaction between the extracted oil and the transforming agent, the mixture underwent thorough homogenization via mechanical agitation using a vortex mixer. Subsequently, 0.5 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid, acting as a catalyst, was meticulously introduced drop wise into the mixture under continuous agitation to promote the esterification reaction. The resulting solution was then subjected to controlled heating, reaching approximately the boiling point of methanol (around 65°C), to facilitate the completion of the transformation process. Following the heating phase, the reaction mixture was allowed to cool naturally to room temperature. Upon attaining thermal equilibrium with the ambient environment, 2 mL of hexane and 2 mL of deionized water were added to the reaction vessel. The introduction of these solvents facilitated the partitioning of the FAMEs into the upper organic layer. The mixture was then vigorously agitated to ensure efficient phase distribution, and sufficient time was allowed for the clear separation of the upper organic layer containing the target FAMEs. A precisely measured 0.5 μL aliquot of this FAME-rich organic layer, representing approximately 20% of the total transformed fatty acids, was then directly introduced into the GC-MS system for subsequent analysis, bypassing any intermediate concentration steps to maintain sample integrity. The qualitative and quantitative analysis of the transformed extracted oil was performed using an advanced Agilent Technologies 7890B gas chromatograph, meticulously coupled with a highly sensitive Agilent Technologies 5977A Mass Selective Detector (MSD), situated within the analytical facilities of the Basra Oil Company laboratory. The efficient separation of the complex mixture of FAMEs was achieved through the utilization of a high-resolution HP-5 MS capillary column (30 meters in length, with an internal diameter of 250 μm and a stationary phase film thickness of 0.25 μm). The stationary phase of this column, composed of a specific ratio of 5% phenyl and 95% methyl silicone, provided the necessary chromatographic selectivity for the diverse range of FAMEs present. The temperature gradient within the GC oven was carefully programmed to optimize the separation process. The initial oven temperature was set at 40°C and maintained isothermally for a duration of 5 minutes to allow for the elution of highly volatile compounds. Subsequently, the temperature was linearly increased at a controlled rate of 8°C per minute until it reached a final temperature of 300°C, facilitating the elution of less volatile components. This final temperature was sustained for an extended period of 20 minutes to ensure the complete elution of all analytes from the column. High-purity helium was employed as the inert carrier gas, flowing at a constant rate of 1 mL per minute, with the sample being introduced into the chromatographic system via a split injector with a split ratio of 1:3. The injector temperature was maintained at a constant 290 °C to ensure rapid and efficient vaporization of the injected sample. The mass spectrometer operated in scan mode, acquiring mass spectra over a mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) range of 44 to 750, enabling the detection and identification of the separated FAMEs based on their unique fragmentation patterns. Compound identification was primarily accomplished by comparing the acquired mass spectra against the comprehensive spectral libraries maintained within the NIST database (Stein, 1999, 2017) [22,23] , serving as a robust reference for structural elucidation.
Methodology for evaluating the antioxidant properties of Zingiber officinale root extracts
To assess the antioxidant properties of Zingiber officinale (ginger) root extracts achieved through diverse extraction functions (including our innovative method of extended bioactive composition), appropriate in vitro results were targeted at various aspects of antioxidative activity, which were well-established in these in vitro installations. These analyses included electron donation capacity, 2.2-diaphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical purification analysis, which included antioxidant power (FRAP) analysis, which included the ability to evaluate the ability to neutralize stable 2.2'-Bishotic-Bisoldia-Bish-Bisoldia-Bisoli-Bisoldia-Bisoldia-Bisoli-Bisoldia-Bisoldia-Bisoli-Bisoldia-Biske) to determine cation staining. We are completely dedicated to scientific research, which we need to keep these methods in the important goal of achieving the most BI-active connections from Zingiber Officinal Root extracts using our new approach. Using these tests helps us consider the antioxidant benefits found in extracts made with our better methods. Achieving a high level of active compounds, important for severe antioxidant activity, is directly associated with a careful selection and adaptation of extraction parameters, a foundation stone of our innovative ginger root extract strategy. By following strong scientific methods, we aim to use ginger root extracts completely, and ensure that we get the most bioactive compounds that have important antioxidant properties.
Assessment of Reducing Power using the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) assay
The power of ginger root extract was determined by the use of FRAP analysis, following a slightly modified procedure based on the method described by Benji and Strain (1996) and in accordance with modern research practice in evaluating ginger extracts. FRAP reagent was prepared from a combination of 2,4,6-tri (2-peridile)-tri (2-peridile)-Tri (2peridile)-Treas (2-pidyl) (2-pidyl) (2-perridile)-2-perridile (2-perridile)-triiazine (2-perridile)-triiazine (2-perridile)triiazine (HCL). And a gloried (Fodizadrat) 10:1:1 in a 20 mm solution. Each ginger anchored extracts measured, at a defined concentration, was mixed with carefully produced frap reagents and incubated in full darkness at a controlled temperature of 37°C for standardized response time of 30 minutes (Pulido et al, 2000) [15] . The resulting formation of a blue ferrous TPTZ complex, which indicated the ability to reduce extracts, was evaluated quantitatively by measuring the absorption with a wavelength of 593 nm using a spectrophotometer. The well-known concentration was produced as a calibration curve using water-containing water-containing sulphate hephydrate (feso₄•7H₂O), and was expressed equivalent to the extract's reduced power per gram extract (μmol Fe²⁺/g extract), (Oyaizu, 1986) [13] .
Determination of DPPH radical scavenging activity
To neutralize stable free radical 2.2-diaphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH •), the ability of ginger root extract was determined using a slightly adapted version of the method mentioned by Brand-Viliums et al to neutralize. (1995), a function is often used in recent antioxidant studies including ginger extracts. A solution of DPPH was made using a suitable fluid with a strength of 0.1 mm, usually methanol or ethanol (from Sigma-Ladrich, St. Louis, Mo, USA). For testing, a certain amount of extracts of each ginger root were created on a specific strength, quickly interconnected with a fixed amount of DPPH • The solution and reaction remained to react in the dark for 30 minutes to stabilize the solution and reaction. The DPPH radical defect shown by the color change of the solution was measured by checking the absorption at 517 Nm with UV-wise spectrophotometer. A control test where only the DPPH solution (without extract) is served as a baseline reference.
We calculated DPPH radical cleansing activity as a percentage using the following formula. To neutralize stable free radical 2.2-diaphenyl-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH •), the ability of ginger root extract was determined using a slightly adapted version of the method mentioned by Brand-Viliums et al to neutralize. (1995), a function is often used in recent antioxidant studies including ginger extracts (eg al., 2024). A solution of DPPH was made using a suitable fluid with a strength of 0.1 mm, usually methanol or ethanol (from Sigma-Ladrich, St. Louis, Mo, USA). For testing, a certain amount of extracts of each ginger root were created on a specific strength, quickly interconnected with a fixed amount of DPPH • The solution and reaction remained to react in the dark for 30 minutes to stabilize the solution and reaction. The DPPH radical defect shown by the color change of the solution was measured by checking the absorption at 517 Nm with UV-wise spectrophotometer. A control test where only the DPPH solution (without extract) is served as a baseline reference. We calculated DPPH radical cleansing activity as a percentage using the following formula.
Where (A₀) represents the absorbance of the control (DPPH• solution), and (A₁) represents the absorbance of the reaction mixture containing the extract.
Assessment of antioxidant capacity using the ABTS radical cation decolorization assay
The total antioxidant capacity of ginger root extracts was evaluated by assessing their ability to hit ABTS • + after a slightly modified protocol based on the first method described by the radical cation, ABTS • + radical cation to 2.2'-Azino bis (3-thylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) with 7 mm stem resolution of 2.45 mm Potassium reputation (knee) was allowed. Reacts in the dark at room temperature to secure 12-16 hours. For the assay, a measured volume of each ginger root extract, at a specific concentration, was rapidly mixed with a defined volume of the diluted ABTS•+ solution and incubated at room temperature for 6 minutes. The reduction in absorbance at 734 nm, indicative of the neutralization of the ABTS•+ radical cation by the antioxidants present in the extracts, was then measured. A control sample containing the ABTS•+ solution without the extract served as the reference. The ABTS radical scavenging activity, representing the antioxidant capacity, was calculated as a percentage of ABTS•+ radicals scavenged using the following formula:
Where (A₀) represents the initial absorbance of the ABTS•+ solution, and (A₁) represents the absorbance of the reaction mixture after the addition of the extract.
Results
Table 1 presents a comparative analysis of the antioxidant efficacy of Zingiber officinale (ginger) root extracts obtained through three distinct extraction methodologies: Clevenger distillation yielded (modified for enhanced volatile recovery), ethyl acetate solvent extraction, and aqueous extraction. For each extract, the total antioxidant capacity (assessed via ABTS assay), the ability to scavenge free radicals (quantified by the DPPH assay), and the reducing power (measured by the FRAP assay) were determined. The results are expressed as the mean value standard deviation. [29] , underscores the limited efficacy of polar solvents in extracting the primary lipophilic antioxidants from ginger root. The stark contrast in Antioxidant capacity between the aqueous extract (40.334±0.09) and our Clevenger method extract (90.9448±0.076) clearly demonstrates the success of our optimized oil extraction in selectively recovering these valuable compounds. The enhanced performance achieved through our modified Clevenger method, therefore, highlights the critical importance of carefully tuning extraction parameters to maximize the recovery of target bioactive compounds based on their physicochemical properties.
| Reducing Power | DPPH | Antioxidant Capacity | Type of Extraction |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90.3385±0.059 | 90.818±0.017 | 90.9448±0.076 | Clevenger method |
| 88.7217±0.056 | 85.791±0.011 | 80.8314±0.050 | Ethyl acetate |
| 70.5320±0.048 | 71.038±0.022 | 40.3340±0.090 | Aqueous extract |
Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.
View original table image
Table 2, chemical composition profile of Zingiber officinale root oil by GC-MS
This table presents the percentage composition of various chemical components identified in the oil extracted from Zingiber officinale (ginger) roots, analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Compound identification was primarily achieved through comparison with spectral libraries, such as NIST or Wiley, providing a quantitative profile of volatile and semi-volatile constituents that contribute to the characteristic aroma, flavor, and bioactivity of ginger root oil. The detailed GC-MS analysis presented in Table 3-2 unveils a complex chemical profile of Zingiber officinale root oil, significantly impacting its potential applications in both the flavor and nutraceutical industries. The prominent presence of oxygenated sesquiterpenoids, represented by compounds such as trans-Nerolidyl formate (2.4458%) and 6,10-Dodecadien-1-yn-3-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl-(1.7488%), alongside the substantial non-oxygenated sesquiterpenoids like the various isomers of Beta-Bisabolene (totaling 13.2574%) and the significant 1,3-Cyclohexadiene derivatives (totaling 52.8084%), suggests a unique aromatic and bioactive signature potentially attributed to our optimized extraction methodology. These groups of constituents are likely key contributors to the characteristic spicy and warm notes of ginger oil, aligning with traditional uses and potentially offering novel flavor dimensions for culinary applications. Moreover, sesquiterpenoids, both oxygenated and non-oxygenated, are recognized for their diverse biological activities, including anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects (da Silva et al., 2020) [6] . The enriched levels of these compound classes in our extract suggest enhanced potential for nutraceutical applications. The significant detection of diterpenoids, specifically Ambrein (4.6761%) and Ambroxan (4.2246%), introduces an intriguing aspect to the chemical composition. While traditionally valued in the fragrance industry for their amber-like and woody notes, their substantial presence in our ginger root oil extract indicates that our extraction focused on the fixed oil of ginger and identified different dominant compounds, the distinct volatile profile obtained in our study, particularly the significant presence of both sesquiterpenoids and diterpenoids like Ambrein and Ambroxan, highlights the selectivity and potential advantages of our hydrodistillation approach in capturing a unique set of bioactive molecules. The alignment of our monoterpene and oxygenated monoterpene findings with the known contributions of these compounds to ginger aroma and bioactivity, coupled with the novel co-occurrence of significant levels of both sesquiterpenoids and diterpenoids, hints at potential synergistic bioactivities or unique flavor profiles not typically observed in conventionally extracted ginger oil. This warrants further investigation into the specific contributions of these diverse compound classes to the overall bioactivity and sensory properties of ginger root oil. In conclusion, our refined extraction of Zingiber officinale root oil yielded a rich profile of sesquiterpenoids, notably enriched with Beta-Bisabolene, and uniquely featuring Ambrein and Ambroxan. This suggests our optimized method surpasses conventional techniques in capturing a broader spectrum of bioactive molecules. The resulting oil presents significant potential for functional food development due to its antioxidant and antiinflammatory properties, and offers novel aromatic possibilities for the flavor industry. The presence of key monoterpenes further contributes to its characteristic aroma and potential antimicrobial benefits. 1 Our findings underscore the importance of tailored extraction strategies for maximizing the recovery of valuable phytochemicals, paving the way for innovative applications in food and health. Further research into the specific bioactivities of this unique extract is warranted.
Figures and tables from the paper
| % | Library/ID |
|---|---|
| 19.7868 | 1,3-Cyclohexadiene, 5-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-2-methyl-, [S-(R*,S*)]- |
| 18.835 | Benzene, 1-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-4-methyl- |
| 14.1866 | Cyclohexene, 3-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-6-methylene-, [S-(R*,S*)]- |
| 6.6632 | Beta-Bisabolene |
| 6.5942 | Beta-Bisabolene |
| 4.6761 | Ambrein |
| 4.2246 | Ambroxan or Ambre Oxide |
| 2.4458 | trans-Nerolidyl formate |
| 1.97 | Sabinene |
| 1.7488 | 6,10-Dodecadien-1-yn-3-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl- |
| 1.747 | Citral (Geranial (E)) |
| 1.7301 | (4aR,8aS)-4a-Methyl-1-methylene-7-(propan-2-ylidene)decahydronaphthalene |
| 1.5973 | Borneol |
| 1.4513 | (1R,4R,4aS,8aR)-4,7-Dimethyl-1-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-octahydronaphthalene |
| 1.418 | Phenol, 5-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-2-methyl-, (R)- |
| 1.3233 | 3-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 1-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-4-methyl- |
| 1.2558 | Neral (Citral (Z)) |
| 1.0624 | Spiro[4.5]dec-6-en-8-one, 1,7-dimethyl-4-(1-methylethyl)- |
| 0.9241 | (E)-1-(6,10-Dimethylundeca-5,9-dien-2-yl)-4-methylbenzene |
| 0.8838 | 4-Isopropyl-6-methyl-1-methylene-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene |
| 0.7444 | Camphene |
| 0.7386 | 7-Isopropyl-2,10-dimethyl-1,5-dithia-spiro[5.5]undecane 1-oxide |
| 0.7207 | alpha-Terpineol |
| 0.6897 | (1R,4R,4aS,8aR)-4,7-Dimethyl-1-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-octahydronaphthalene |
| 0.6744 | Bicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-ene, 4-methylene-1-(1-methylethyl)- |
| 0.6665 | Sabinene |
| 0.6368 | Beta-Bisabolene |
Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.
View original table image
References
29 in the original paper- Ali AM, Sayed ELAM, Sayed ELMA. Ginger and its active compounds as a potential therapeutic agent for various diseases. Nutrients. 2022;14(2):273. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14020273
- Amin MU, Bhat ZF, Rather AH, Bhat BA, Gani A, Khanday FA. Novel extraction techniques for bioactive compounds from ginger (Zingiber officinale) and their potential applications in food industry: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2023;131:1-
- Benzie IFF, Choi SW. Antioxidant assays: challenges and limitations in food science and nutrition research. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2014;54(11):14071418. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.623380
- Benzie IFF, Strain JJ. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of "antioxidant power": the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem. 1996;239(1):7076. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1996.0292
- Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 1995;28(1):25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5
- Silva DAG, Silva DMV, Lima MS. A review of the biological activities of sesquiterpenoids. Phytochem Rev. 2020;19(1):1-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-019-09638-x
- Ferhat MA, Meklati BY, Chemat F, 콕 M. Comparison of different isolation methods for the recovery of essential oils from rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.). Flavour Fragr J. 2007;22(4):301-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1795
- Floegel A, Kim DO, Chung SJ, Koo SI, Chun OK. Comparison of ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, and ORAC assays for estimating antioxidant activity of foods: A balanced perspective. J Food Compos Anal. 2011;24(7):10431048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2011.01.003
- Hassan HAH, Kahtani ALHA, Ghamdi ALSS. Effect of different drying methods on the bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020;27(7):18661873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.05.016
- Kim JK, Kim KH, Park SY. Molecular mechanisms of ginger-derived compounds in modulating inflammation and immune responses. Food Funct. 2025;16(1):12-28.
- Li Y, Wang J, Zhang T, Chen Y, Luo D. Advances in the study of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) as a functional food and pharmaceutical agent. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024;64(1):1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2022.2116723
- Miller NJ, Rice-Evans CA, Davies MJ, Gopinathan V, Milner A. A novel method for measuring antioxidant capacity in biological fluids. Clin Sci. 1993;84(4):407412. https://doi.org/10.1042/cs0840407
- Oyaizu M. Studies on products of browning reaction: antioxidative activities of products of browning reaction prepared from glucosamine. Jpn J Nutr Diet. 1986;44(6):307-315. https://doi.org/10.5264/eiyogakuzashi.44.307
- Park SH, Kim DH, Lee JY. Biological activities and potential health benefits of shogaols and zingerone from ginger. J Food Biochem. 2022;46(8):e14241. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.14241
- Pulido R, Bravo L, Calixto SF. Antioxidant activity of dietary polyphenols as determined by a modified ferric reducing/antioxidant power assay. J Agric Food Chem. International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science https://www.agriculturaljournals.com 2000;48(8):3396-3402. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9913458
- Rahayu S, Widowati W, Maesaroh M, Lusiyanti Y. Antioxidant activity of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) extracts and its compounds: A review. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2022;10(B):1051-1057. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.6488
- Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Evans RC. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;26(9-10):1231-1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3
- Routray W, Orsat V. Обзор: Conventional and nonconventional extraction methods for phenolic compounds from fruits and vegetables. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2012;11(1):8-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2011.00160.x
- Sasidharan S, Chen Y, Saravanan D, Sundram KM, Latha LY. Extraction, isolation and characterization of bioactive compounds from plants' extracts. Molecules. 2011;16(12):9995-10016. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16129995
- Shikov AN, Pozharitskaya ON, Makarov VG, Wagner H, Verpoorte R, Heinrich M. Обзор: Medicinal plants of the Russian Pharmacopoeia; their history and applications. J Ethnopharmacol. 2017;195:278-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.12.008
- Sorce G, Корпуса MA, Корпуса MA. Antioxidant activity of some Mediterranean medicinal plants. Biol Res. 1997;30(1-2):105-115. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-97601997000100014
- Stein SE. Химический справочник NIST/EPA/NIH масс-спектров (версия 1.7). National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1999.
- Stein SE. NIST mass spectral library 2.3. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2017.
- Sycar A, OBA M. Effect of drying methods on the bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): A review. Appl Sci. 2020;10(21):7694. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217694
- Verma RS, Verma RK, Padalia RC. Impact of drying methods on the yield, chemical profile and antioxidant activity of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) essential oil. Ind Crops Prod. 2021;167:113556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113556
- Wang J, Li Y, Luo D, Chen Y, Zhang T. Phytochemicals and bioactivities of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): A comprehensive review. Food Chem. 2023;410:135491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135491
- Yakupova GR, Rizvanov AA, Mukhametshina ER. Freeze-drying as a method for preserving the biological activity of plant extracts. Pharm Chem J. 2023;57(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-023-02774-y
- Zadeh JB, Koraki M, Khajehei R. 6-Gingerol as a main bioactive compound in ginger: A comprehensive review of its pharmacological effects. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;268:113564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2020.113564
- তিতি SH, Islam MS, Akter S, Hossain MM. Evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of different solvent extracts of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). Heliyon. 2024;10(1):e23381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23381



Table 1
Table 2