Effects of storage practices on nutritional biochemistry of sorghum grains
Abstract
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), a vital cereal crop cultivated predominantly in arid and semi-arid regions, plays a crucial role in ensuring food security and nutritional well-being. Despite its resilience to harsh climatic conditions, improper storage practices significantly impact the grain's nutritional biochemistry, leading to losses in macronutrients, bioactive compounds, and overall grain quality. This article examines the effects of various storage practices on the biochemical composition of sorghum grains, focusing on factors such as moisture content, temperature, pest infestation, and microbial contamination. Additionally, advanced storage strategies, including hermetic storage, low-temperature environments, and biopesticides, are discussed as effective methods to mitigate nutrient loss. This comprehensive review offers insights for researchers, policymakers, and stakeholders to enhance the post-harvest management of sorghum and ensure its contribution to global food security.
Full Text
Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.
Introduction
Sorghum is a drought-tolerant cereal crop cultivated widely across Asia, Africa, and parts of the Americas. It serves as a staple food for millions of people, particularly in regions with limited access to diverse food sources. Sorghum's nutritional composition, rich in carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, and dietary fiber, as well as essential micronutrients like iron, zinc, and calcium, underscores its importance in addressing malnutrition and food insecurity (Awika & Rooney, 2004; Beta et al., 2005) [1,2] . Furthermore, bioactive compounds such as phenolic acids and flavonoids contribute to its antioxidant properties and potential health benefits. However, sorghum grains are highly susceptible to quality degradation during storage. Factors such as moisture, temperature fluctuations, pest infestations, and microbial activity contribute to significant losses in nutritional value and safety. These challenges are exacerbated by inadequate storage infrastructure and reliance on traditional methods in many developing countries. This article explores the biochemical changes that occur in sorghum grains during storage, the impact of improper practices, and modern storage techniques that can preserve the grain's nutritional integrity.
Objective
The objective of this paper is to analyze the effects of various storage practices on the nutritional biochemistry of sorghum grains, a crucial cereal crop for food security in arid and semi-arid regions.
Nutritional Composition of Sorghum
Sorghum is composed of approximately 65-75% carbohydrates, 7-15% protein, 1.5-3% lipids, and 8-12% dietary fiber (Nusrat & Julie, 2018) [7] . It is a rich source of essential minerals, including calcium, magnesium, and iron, and vitamins such as thiamine, riboflavin, and niacin. Sorghum is also known for its high levels of bioactive compounds, including phenolics, flavonoids, and tannins, which are responsible for its strong antioxidant activity (Beta et al., 2005) [2] . These nutrients and bioactive compounds play a critical role in human health, supporting energy production, immune function, and chronic disease prevention. However, the stability of these components during storage is influenced by environmental and biological factors, necessitating proper storage techniques to maintain sorghum's nutritional value. [8] . High moisture also promotes the growth of fungi, particularly Aspergillus species, which produce aflatoxins-potent carcinogenic compounds that pose significant health risks. Aflatoxin contamination not only reduces the safety of sorghum grains but also depletes antioxidants and essential nutrients.
Temperature Effects
Temperature fluctuations during storage have a profound impact on sorghum's biochemical stability. High temperatures accelerate lipid oxidation, resulting in rancidity and the loss of essential fatty acids. Proteins are particularly sensitive to thermal stress, undergoing denaturation and enzymatic hydrolysis, which reduce their digestibility and nutritional quality (Park et al., 2012) [9] . Phenolic compounds, essential for antioxidant activity, are also degraded under prolonged exposure to high temperatures.
Pest Infestations
Pests such as weevils and grain borers cause physical and biochemical damage to sorghum grains. Pest activity reduces carbohydrate reserves, as insects consume starch, and also leads to losses in protein and lipid content (Tefera et al., 2011) [10] . Pest-damaged grains are more vulnerable to secondary microbial contamination, further exacerbating nutrient losses and compromising grain safety.
Microbial Contamination
Fungal and bacterial contamination is a major concern in sorghum storage, particularly in humid environments.
Aspergillus and Penicillium species are common culprits, producing mycotoxins that degrade grain quality and pose health risks (Hell & Mutegi, 2011) [5] . Microbial activity also depletes essential nutrients and diminishes the grain's antioxidant properties, reducing its nutritional and economic value.
Strategies to Mitigate Nutritional Losses during Storage 1. Hermetic Storage Systems
Hermetic storage technologies, including airtight containers and multilayer polyethylene bags, have proven highly effective in reducing post-harvest losses. These systems create an oxygen-deprived environment that inhibits pest activity and microbial growth, preserving both macronutrients and bioactive compounds (De Groote et al., 2013) [3] . Hermetic storage has been shown to retain the antioxidant properties of sorghum by minimizing oxidative stress.
Low-Temperature Storage
Low-temperature storage significantly reduces enzymatic activity and microbial growth, thereby preserving sorghum's nutritional and biochemical stability. Park et al. (2012) [9] reported that refrigeration minimizes lipid oxidation and protein denaturation, ensuring the grain's functional and nutritional quality. However, the high energy and infrastructure costs associated with cold storage limit its application in resource-poor settings.
Improved Drying Techniques
Proper drying before storage is essential to reduce moisture content and prevent microbial contamination. Solar drying, an affordable and environmentally friendly method, effectively lowers moisture levels while maintaining nutrient integrity (Obadina et al., 2014) [8] . Mechanical drying offers greater precision and is suitable for large-scale operations, though it requires significant initial investment.
Biopesticides and Natural Preservatives
The use of biopesticides, such as neem extracts, provides an eco-friendly solution for controlling pest infestations. Tefera et al. (2011) [10] demonstrated that natural preservatives effectively reduce pest activity without leaving harmful residues, preserving the nutritional quality and safety of stored sorghum grains.
Chemical Treatments
Chemical fumigants, such as phosphine, are commonly used to control pests. While effective, excessive use of these chemicals can result in residue issues and health concerns.
Combining chemical treatments with hermetic storage or natural alternatives offers a balanced approach to grain preservation (Navarro et al., 2012) [6] .
Conclusion
Storage practices profoundly affect the nutritional biochemistry of sorghum grains, influencing their macronutrient content, bioactive compounds, and overall quality. Moisture, temperature, pest activity, and microbial contamination are the primary factors contributing to nutrient loss during storage. Advanced storage techniques, including hermetic systems, low-temperature environments, and biopesticides, have proven effective in mitigating these losses and preserving sorghum's nutritional integrity. Future research should focus on developing cost-effective and scalable storage solutions tailored to resourceconstrained settings. Integrating modern storage practices with agricultural and food systems will enhance the sustainability and resilience of sorghum production, ensuring its continued role in addressing global food security challenges.
References
- Awika JM, Rooney LW. Sorghum phytochemicals and their potential impact on human health. Phytochemistry. 2004;65(9):1199-1221.
- Beta T, Rooney LW, Marovatsanga LT, Taylor JRN. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant properties of sorghum. Cereal Chemistry. 2005;82(4):390-393.
- De Groote H, Kanampiu F, Warburton H, et al. Effectiveness of hermetic systems in controlling maize storage pests in Kenya. Journal of Stored Products Research. 2013;53:27-36.
- A Hussen. Impact of grain storage method on sorghum grain quality in Ethiopia: A review. Journal of Current Research in Food Science 2021; 2(1): 40-45
- Hell K, Mutegi C. Aflatoxin control and prevention strategies in key crops of sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2011;5(5):459-466.
- Navarro S, Noyes RT. The mechanics and physics of modern grain aeration management. Springer Science & Business Media. 2012.
- Nusrat A, Julie AP. Nutritional benefits of sorghum grains. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2018;10(7):132138.
- Obadina AO, Oyewole OB, Sanni LO, Tomlins KI. Bio-preservation of African fermented foods using lactic acid bacteria. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2014;38(2):129-136.
- Park SH, Itoh K, Sugimoto T, et al. Effects of temperature and storage duration on sorghum seed germination and nutrient content. Agricultural Science and Technology. 2012;14(5):25-30.
- Tefera T, Kanampiu F, de Groote H, et al. The metal silo: An effective grain storage technology for reducing post-harvest storage losses. Journal of Stored Products Research. 2011;47(3):210-215.
Cited by 1
From OpenAlex, OpenCitations and reference lists read by Scinovex
- Effect of Storage Duration on Sorghum Seed Quality: Seed Composition and Storage Pest Activity ↗
Nurnina Nonci, Endang Gati Lestari, Amran Muis, Syafruddin, Sri Wahyuni, Surianto Sipi et al. · Advances in Agriculture · 2026
This study aimed to determine the effect of storage duration on sorghum seed quality, specifically focusing on weight loss and storage pest infestation, under laboratory conditions. Eight different sorghum cultivars (Kawali, Numbu, Suri 4, Super 1, Soper 6, Bioguma 1, Bioguma 2 and Bioguma 3) were tested, each with an initial moisture content of 12%. The experiment used a completely…
❝ 0PDF
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
