Scinovex

Research article · 2023 · Full text

International Journal of Geography Geology and Environment

A statistical analysis of human and environmental indicators to measure development process: A case study

Nitin PunitRajender Singh

Volume 5(1) · Pages 168–176 · DOI: 10.22271/27067483.2023.v5.i1b.158 ↗

Research areasSustainable Development and Environmental Policy

↓ Read full-text PDF9 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Human development and environmental quality are two ultimate goals that every society wants to achieve at present. The development can be considered in terms of preferably economic and social parameters. On the other hand, environment relates to the resource potential and pollution level. The focus on one of these two core issues of sustainable development ultimately leads to negligence of another. It is not very easy to decide that the emphasis should be on development process or the environmental quality. Both issues are equally important in terms of human development. However, both of these parameters of sustainability appear quite different in terms of their nature but they have mutual cause and effect relationship. High level of human or infrastructural development is generally believed to be the cause of environmental degradation and depletion of natural resources and vice versa.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Societies generally aim to achieve both high human development and high environmental quality. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Societies generally aim to achieve both high human development and high environmental quality.

      In the paper's own words

      “Human development and environmental quality are two ultimate goals that every society wants to achieve at present.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • There is a common belief that high levels of infrastructural or human development lead to the depletion of natural resources and environmental degradation. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      There is a common belief that high levels of infrastructural or human development lead to the depletion of natural resources and environmental degradation.

      In the paper's own words

      “High level of human or infrastructural development is generally believed to be the cause of environmental degradation and depletion of natural resources and vice versa.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aims to analyze how human development impacts environmental quality across all districts of Himachal Pradesh. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aims to analyze how human development impacts environmental quality across all districts of Himachal Pradesh.

      In the paper's own words

      “It aims to study the impact of human development on the environmental quality of all districts of Himachal Pradesh.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The research was conducted using data from all twelve districts of Himachal Pradesh. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The research was conducted using data from all twelve districts of Himachal Pradesh.

      In the paper's own words

      “The study is based on all twelve districts of Himachal Pradesh.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The authors selected nineteen variables, dividing them into two categories: Quality of Life (QOL) and Quality of Environment (QOE). View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The authors selected nineteen variables, dividing them into two categories: Quality of Life (QOL) and Quality of Environment (QOE).

      In the paper's own words

      “Total nineteen variables were selected and grouped into two sets: Quality of Environment (QOE) and Quality of Life (QOL).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Selection of Variables

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Quality of life was assessed using eight indicators, while environmental quality was measured using five indicators. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Quality of life was assessed using eight indicators, while environmental quality was measured using five indicators.

      In the paper's own words

      “The indicators selected for assessing the quality of life in each of the twelve districts of the Himachal Pradesh number eight in all.”

      Page 2

      “To assess the quality of environmental total five indicators were selected.”

      Page 2

      Found in: A. Human Indicators

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The mean deviation method was used to simplify multidimensional data into a single dimension to interpret the relationship between development and the environment. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The mean deviation method was used to simplify multidimensional data into a single dimension to interpret the relationship between development and the environment.

      In the paper's own words

      “The technique is applied to interpret the relationship between human development and the environment by reducing the multidimensional data into a single dimension.”

      Page 5

      Found in: Mean deviation method

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 5 ↗
    • A composite index method based on district ranking for each indicator was also employed to analyze the data. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      A composite index method based on district ranking for each indicator was also employed to analyze the data.

      In the paper's own words

      “Another statistical technique that is used to analyze the data is composite index method. The technique is very simple based on the rank allotted to each district with reference to the ranks obtained by the other districts in reference to each indicator.”

      Page 7

      Found in: Mean deviation method

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 7 ↗
  4. What they found

    • In 2010-11, Kangra and Mandi districts exhibited both high human development and high levels of environmental degradation. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      In 2010-11, Kangra and Mandi districts exhibited both high human development and high levels of environmental degradation.

      In the paper's own words

      “The high human development and high level of environmental degradation is shown by the districts of Kangra and Mandi in 2010-11.”

      Page 6

      Found in: Level of Human development and level of Environmental Degradation (2010-11)

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 6 ↗
    • Hamirpur and Lahul & Spiti were categorized as having both low human development and low environmental degradation. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Hamirpur and Lahul & Spiti were categorized as having both low human development and low environmental degradation.

      In the paper's own words

      “Hamirpur and Lahul & Spiti represent the category of low human development and low level of environmental degradation.”

      Page 6

      Found in: Study Area

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 6 ↗
    • Una district maintained its status from the previous decade, showing low human development alongside high environmental degradation. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Una district maintained its status from the previous decade, showing low human development alongside high environmental degradation.

      In the paper's own words

      “Una is still representing the same category previous decade with low human development and high level of environmental degradation.”

      Page 6

      Found in: Level of Human development and level of Environmental Degradation (2010-11)

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 6 ↗
    • Chamba was the only district identified as having medium human development and low environmental degradation. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Chamba was the only district identified as having medium human development and low environmental degradation.

      In the paper's own words

      “Chamba is the only district with medium human development and low level of environmental degradation.”

      Page 6

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 6 ↗
    • According to the composite index, no district achieved the combination of high human development and low environmental degradation. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      According to the composite index, no district achieved the combination of high human development and low environmental degradation.

      In the paper's own words

      “There is no district in the category of high human development and low level of environmental degradation (Fig 2).”

      Page 7

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 7 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that accurate assessments of human and ecosystem wellbeing depend on the strategic selection of representative indicators. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that accurate assessments of human and ecosystem wellbeing depend on the strategic selection of representative indicators.

      In the paper's own words

      “Effective assessment of ecosystem and human wellbeing relies on carefully selected indicators that represent both dimensions accurately.”

      Page 9

      Found in: Methodology

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 9 ↗

Visual summary

3 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (human settlements and natural landscapes). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Human Development vs Environmental Degradation Matrix
AI-generated conceptual illustration (human settlements and natural landscapes). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (human settlements and natural landscapes). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Human Development vs Environmental Degradation Matrix

AI-generated conceptual illustration (human settlements and natural landscapes). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 14 (page 6) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Human Composite Score (x axis) and Environmental Composite Score (y axis): Kangra vs Mandi
Replotted from Table 14 (page 6) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 14 (page 6) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Human Composite Score (x axis) and Environmental Composite Score (y axis): Kangra vs Mandi

Replotted from Table 14 (page 6) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 14 (page 6) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Human Composite Score (x axis) and Environmental Composite Score (y axis): Hamirpur vs Lahul & Spiti
Replotted from Table 14 (page 6) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 14 (page 6) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Human Composite Score (x axis) and Environmental Composite Score (y axis): Hamirpur vs Lahul & Spiti

Replotted from Table 14 (page 6) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
District-wise Literacy Rate in Himachal Pradesh (2011)Table 1Page 2District-wise urban population in Himachal PradeshTable 2Page 2District-wise Employment Statistics in Himachal PradeshTable 3Page 3District-wise Health Facilities in Himachal PradeshTable 5Page 3District-wise Telephone Connections in HimachalTable 6Page 3District-wise Schools in Himachal Pradesh (2010-11)Table 4Page 3District-wise number of Electrified Villages in HimachalTable 7Page 4District-wise Forest Land in Himachal Pradesh (2007-Table 9Page 4District-wise Deposits and Advances of ScheduledTable 8Page 4District-wise Culturable Wasteland in Himachal PradeshTable 10Page 4District wise Current Fallow Land to Total Net Sown Area in Himachal Pradesh (2007-08), (in ‘000 ha)Table 11Page 5District wise Barren and Un-culturable Land in Himachal Pradesh (2007-08), (In ‘000 ha)Table 12Page 5District wise Fertilizer Consumption in Himachal Pradesh (2010-2011), (Metric Tonnes)Table 13Page 5Mean Deviation Ranking of Human and Environmental Indicators 2010-11Table 14Page 6Environment Composite Score and Human Composite Score (2010-11)Figure 1Page 6Composite Index Ranking 2010-11Table 15Page 8Typology of districts based on Mean Deviation MethodTable 16Page 8Typology of districts based on Composite IndexTable 17Page 8Environment a Index and Human Index (2010-11)Figure 2Page 8
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

High level of human or infrastructural development is generally believed to be the cause of environmental degradation and declining rate of environment quality and natural resources. There has been a long debate between the emphasis on infrastructural development on the one hand and the supporters of better environment quality on the other. Both issues are equally important in terms of human development. Besides, both human development and environment quality have mutual cause and effect relationship. This paper attempts to contribute to this debate with an empirical analysis. The study is based on all twelve districts of Himachal Pradesh. It tries to analyze the structure of the human development with demographic and infrastructural indicators vis-a-vis the level of environmental degradation. It aims to study the impact of human development on the environmental quality of all districts of Himachal Pradesh. Besides, it also studies that in order to achieve the desired goal of development the quality of environment has been degraded in the district or not.

Study Area

The state of Himachal Pradesh has been selected as the study area. The state comprises 12 districts -Bilaspur, Chamba, Hamirpur, Kangra, Kinnaur, Kullu, Lahaul & Spiti, Mandi, Shimla, Sirmaur, Solan and Una, which are further sub-divided into tehsils and sub-tehsils. Despite its mountainous nature, the state shows diversity not only in terms of human dimensions but also in terms of environmental dimensions. On one hand, there is Shimla district which can be termed as the leading district of Himachal Pradesh because of the state capital in the district. The districts manifest itself as the hub of development activities which creates a gravitational pull not only to attract natural resources but human resources also from the neighboring districts. On the other hand, there is the district like Lahul-Spiti where the development level is very low. Therefore, the state represents drastic change in development level from one district to another. Objectives 1. To calculate composite index and component score on the basis of human and environment indicators. 2. To prepare typology of districts on the basis of composite index and component score.

Methodology

Since it is impossible to measure ecosystem or human wellbeing directly, their assessments include selected indicators of each dimension. It is very much essential to know at the start of an assessment how well a given set of indicators represents a desirable combination of human and environmental conditions. Since indicators require the collection and analysis of often large amounts of data, choosing the wrong ones can be a costly mistake (Prescott-Allen, 2001) [7] .

Selection of Variables

The selection of variables is very significant for methodology which depends on certain considerations. First is data availability as it is very crucial that only those variables should be selected to study for which the data is readily and easily available. Besides, there should be consistent availability of data for the period of study. As both the conceptsenvironmental and human dimensionsare dynamic in nature therefore a consistent availability of data is very much crucial. Consequently, it was decided first to take apart the concepts of human and environmental wellbeing to identify the features those need to be measured and those are both representative and measurable. Subsequently, two sets of variables were identified-one reflecting the human dimensions and the other showing the quality of environment. Total nineteen variables were selected and grouped into two sets: Quality of Environment (QOE) and Quality of Life (QOL).

A. Human Indicators

The indicators selected for assessing the quality of life in each of the twelve districts of the Himachal Pradesh number eight in all. These eight indicators are further subdivided into two groupshuman indicators and infrastructural indicators.

Demographic

Demographic

Percentage of Urban population to Total population

It is also referred as a positive indicator of human development. In 2011 the largest percentage of urban population was registered in Shimla district and the lowest percentage was found in Kangra. Lahul & Spiti and Kinnaur are two districts with no urban population (Table 2).

Table 2. District-wise urban population in Himachal Pradesh
DistrictTotal PopulationUrban PopulationLevel of Urbanization (%)
Bilaspur382056251266.58
Chamba518844361916.98
Hamirpur454293314136.91
Kangra1507223863595.73
Kinnaur84298----
Kullu437474412589.43
Lahul & Spiti31528----
Mandi999518626246.27
Shimla81338420150024.77
Sirmaur5301645723810.80
Solan57667010207817.70
Una521057449178.62
Total685650968870410.04

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
District-wise urban population in Himachal Pradesh↗ Enlarge
Table 2
District-wise urban population in Himachal Pradesh

District-wise urban population in Himachal Pradesh

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗

Percentage of Vacancies to total no. of applicants

Employment is always considered as the positive indicator of human development. The largest percentage of vacancies to total no. of applicants was calculated in Kinnaur district and the lowest was represented by Lahul & Spiti (Table 3).

Table 3. District-wise Employment Statistics in Himachal Pradesh
DistrictApplicants on Live RegisterVacancies NotifiedVacancies to Applicants (%)
Bilaspur522691000.19
Chamba58139900.15
Hamirpur65184870.13
Kangra1852736110.33
Kinnaur7819148318.97
Kullu49398730.15
Lahul & Spiti4234010.02
Mandi1472212280.15
Shimla928105270.57
Sirmaur4912513932.84
Solan5568115422.77
Una586115971.02
Total82576467320.02

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
District-wise Employment Statistics in Himachal Pradesh↗ Enlarge
Table 3
District-wise Employment Statistics in Himachal Pradesh

District-wise Employment Statistics in Himachal Pradesh

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗

Infrastructural Indicators

There are total five infrastructural indicators selected to show the facilities available in the state of Himachal Pradesh.

Level of Education (percentage of primary and high/ secondary schools)

However the literacy rate has already discussed in the demographic indicators but another indicator selected to study the level of education is percentage of primary and high/secondary schools. It shows the availability of education in the district. Kangra and Mandi together show the highest percentage of primary schools followed by Shimla whereas Kinnaur and Lahul & Spiti show the lowest percentage of primary schools (Table 4).

Table 4. District-wise Schools in Himachal Pradesh (2010-11)
DistrictPrimary Schools—High/Sr. Schools—
No.(%)No.(%)
Bilaspur60061276
Chamba1125101728
Hamirpur50551346
Kangra17681640819
Kinnaur1902492
Kullu74671055
Lahul & Spiti2062352
Mandi17391632616
Shimla16251530715
Sirmaur98891527
Solan76971397
Una50851407
Total107671002094100

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
District-wise Schools in Himachal Pradesh (2010-11)↗ Enlarge
Table 4
District-wise Schools in Himachal Pradesh (2010-11)

District-wise Schools in Himachal Pradesh (2010-11)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗

Medical Institutions (percentage of primary health centers and community health centers)

To represent the availability of medical facilities in the district two indicators are selected-the community health centers and the primary health centers. The highest percentage of community health centers is found in Kangra followed by Mandi and Shimla for both data years whereas Kinnaur, Lahul & Spiti and Sirmaur are the lowest. In terms of primary health centers, Kangra is the leading district followed by Shimla and Mandi in 2011 (Table 5).

Table 5. District-wise Health Facilities in Himachal Pradesh
DistrictCHC—PHC—Total
No.%No.%
Bilaspur6830736
Chamba7942949
Hamirpur5626631
Kangra1418771791
Kinnaur4521525
Kullu6817423
Lahul & Spiti3416419
Mandi1216611373
Shimla79771784
Sirmaur3436839
Solan5631736
Una5619424
Total77100453100530

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
District-wise Health Facilities in Himachal Pradesh↗ Enlarge
Table 5
District-wise Health Facilities in Himachal Pradesh

District-wise Health Facilities in Himachal Pradesh

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗

Communication (percentage of telephone connections)

Telephone connection displays the level of communication facilities available in the district. In reference to the state of Himachal Pradesh Kangra is the largest district followed by Shimla and Kullu. Lahul & Spiti and Kinnaur are the districts with lowest percentage telephone connections (Table 6).

Table 6. District-wise Telephone Connections in Himachal
DistrictTelephone ConnectionsTelephone Connections (%)
Bilaspur257255
Chamba197333.8
Hamirpur453238.8
Kangra11239021.7
Kinnaur96081.9
Kullu305135.9
Lahul & Spiti23550.5
Mandi6960613.4
Shimla8315316.1
Sirmaur256545.4
Solan5310710.3
Una404587.8
Total517625100

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
District-wise Telephone Connections in Himachal↗ Enlarge
Table 6
District-wise Telephone Connections in Himachal

District-wise Telephone Connections in Himachal

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗

Electricity (percentage of electrified villages)

Electricity facility has become the basic need of present time. The percentage of electrified villages shows whether the electricity facility is under the reach of rural people or not. In Himachal Pradesh, the data shows that the electricity is available at very good rate in villages. There are total seven districts out of twelve in Himachal Pradesh show the hundred percent availability of electricity in villages in 2011 (Table 7).

Table 7. District-wise number of Electrified Villages in Himachal
DistrictInhabited VillagesElectrified Villages% of Villages Electrified
Bilaspur965965100.00
Chamba11181118100.00
Hamirpur16351635100.00
Kangra36193619100.00
Kinnaur23421490.60
Kullu172172100.00
Lahul & Spiti28726791.29
Mandi2833283099.68
Shimla2520244997.18
Sirmaur966966100.00
Solan23882388100.00
Una75857575.86
Total174951720998.37

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
District-wise number of Electrified Villages in Himachal↗ Enlarge
Table 7
District-wise number of Electrified Villages in Himachal

District-wise number of Electrified Villages in Himachal

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 4 ↗

Banking (credit deposit ratio)

The credit deposit ratio is generally used to reveal the saving of people in the district. The largest credit deposit ratio is found in Sirmaur district whereas the lowest credit deposit ratio is shown by Lahul & Spiti and Hamirpur (Table 8).

Table 8. District-wise Deposits and Advances of Scheduled
DistrictNo. of BanksDeposits (D)Credits (C)C-D Ratio
Bilaspur56112640936.32
Chamba58108638235.17
Hamirpur71207542820.63
Kangra199589514825.24
Kinnaur2435214541.19
Kullu67161375246.62
Lahul & Spiti111513422.52
Mandi1252785108639.0
Shimla171953234936.62
Sirmaur66102191489.52
Solan1313210245976.60
Una74199970535.27
Total1053308471229639.86

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
District-wise Deposits and Advances of Scheduled↗ Enlarge
Table 8
District-wise Deposits and Advances of Scheduled

District-wise Deposits and Advances of Scheduled

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 4 ↗

Environmental Indicators

To assess the quality of environment, a set of six indicators has been selected. All six indicators of environmental quality are based on status of natural resources. The dynamic nature of environment allows us to classify the environment quality indicators. The environmental indicators which are used in the study can be categorized into positive and negative indicators based on their influence on the environment.

Positive Indicators Percentage of forest land to total geographical area

The forest, generally, implies a continuous vegetation cover whether densely or openly associated. It is regarded as a positive variable in reference to environmental quality. The proportion of forest land in a state denotes the forest resource reserved for the future. The availability of forest resource is a positive indicator of environmental quality. In terms of percentage of forest land Mandi is the largest district followed by Kangra (Table 9).

Table 9. District-wise Forest Land in Himachal Pradesh (2007-
S. No.DistrictGeographical AreaForest landForest land as % of Geographical Area
1.Bilaspur111.814.012.52
2.Chamba692.4272.039.28
3.Hamirpur110.218.316.60
4.Kangra577.7232.540.24
5.Kinnaur624.237.56.0
6.Kullu54.7NANA
7.Lahul & Spiti911.2135.414.85
8.Mandi397.8175.244.04
9.Shimla508.9130.425.62
10.Sirmaur224.848.321.48
11.Solan21.10.41.89
12.Una154.98.25.29
Total4389.71083.123.89

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
District-wise Forest Land in Himachal Pradesh (2007-↗ Enlarge
Table 9
District-wise Forest Land in Himachal Pradesh (2007-

District-wise Forest Land in Himachal Pradesh (2007-

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 4 ↗

Percentage of culturable wasteland to total geographical area

Cultural wasteland is also considered as the positive indicator of environmental quality as it implies the availability of land for expansion of agricultural activities without negative impact on the environment. The highest percentage of culturable wasteland is found in Una district whereas Lahul & Spiti display the lowest percentage (Table 10).

Table 10. District-wise Culturable Wasteland in Himachal Pradesh
S. No.DistrictGeographical AreaCulturable WastelandCulturable Wasteland as % of Geographical Area
1.Bilaspur111.86.25.54
2.Chamba692.46.40.92
3.Hamirpur110.212.211.07
4.Kangra577.729.15.03
5.Kinnaur624.23.50.56
6.Kullu54.72.44.38
7.Lahul & Spiti911.20.60.06
8.Mandi397.84.51.13
9.Shimla508.921.24.16
10.Sirmaur224.812.55.56
11.Solan21.11.46.63
12.Una154.923.214.97
Total4389.7123.22.80

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
District-wise Culturable Wasteland in Himachal Pradesh↗ Enlarge
Table 10
District-wise Culturable Wasteland in Himachal Pradesh

District-wise Culturable Wasteland in Himachal Pradesh

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 4 ↗

Percentage of current fallow land to total net sown area

The proportion of net sown area currently left under fallow land reflects the chances of natural rejuvenation of the soil without excessive chemical fertilizers. Kinnaur district shows the highest figure in this category for whereas the lowest ranked district was Chamba (Table 11).

Table 11. District wise Current Fallow Land to Total Net Sown Area in Himachal Pradesh (2007-08), (in ‘000 ha)
S. No.DistrictNet Sown AreaCurrent Fallow landCurrent fallow land as % of net sown area
1.Bilaspur30.41.75.59
2.Chamba41.72.25.28
3.Hamirpur35.84.913.69
4.Kangra116.910.08.55
5.Kinnaur7.91.721.52
6.Kullu37.23.28.60
7.Lahul & Spiti3.3NANA
8.Mandi86.49.811.34
9.Shimla67.513.119.41
10.Sirmaur40.55.212.84
11.Solan3.30.515.15
12.Una37.03.59.46
Total507.955.810.99

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
District wise Current Fallow Land to Total Net Sown Area in Himachal Pradesh (2007-08), (in ‘000 ha)↗ Enlarge
Table 11
District wise Current Fallow Land to Total Net Sown Area in Himachal Pradesh (2007-08), (in ‘000 ha)

District wise Current Fallow Land to Total Net Sown Area in Himachal Pradesh (2007-08), (in ‘000 ha)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 5 ↗

Percentage of fertilizer consumption

The percentage of fertilizer consumption is also used as a negative indicator of environmental quality because the excessive use of fertilizer results into the loss of soil fertility. Shimla and Kangra are the two largest district in terms of fertilizer consumption followed by Una and Mandi whereas Kinnaur and Lahul & Spiti are two lowest districts in reference to fertilizer consumption (Table 13).

Table 13. District wise Fertilizer Consumption in Himachal Pradesh (2010-2011), (Metric Tonnes)
S. No.DistrictTotal Fertilizer Consumption (N+P+K)% of Fertilizer Consumption
1.Bilaspur22884.15
2.Chamba13202.39
3.Hamirpur25924.70
4.Kangra894516.22
5.Kinnaur2510.46
6.Kullu50519.16
7.Lahul & Spiti4080.74
8.Mandi664612.05
9.Shimla1247722.63
10.Sirmaur35676.47
11.Solan40637.37
12.Una752513.65
Total55133100.00

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
District wise Fertilizer Consumption in Himachal Pradesh (2010-2011), (Metric Tonnes)↗ Enlarge
Table 13
District wise Fertilizer Consumption in Himachal Pradesh (2010-2011), (Metric Tonnes)

District wise Fertilizer Consumption in Himachal Pradesh (2010-2011), (Metric Tonnes)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 5 ↗

Mean deviation method

The technique is applied to interpret the relationship between human development and the environment by reducing the multidimensional data into a single dimension. Firstly, the actual data of human indicators and the environmental indicators was converted into percentages. Secondly, the mean was calculated indicator wise by adding the percentage values and dividing by the total number of districts. Subsequently, the percentage values are divided by the mean in regard to positive indicators viz, sex ratio, literacy rate, etc. for human development and forest, culturable wasteland, etc. for environmental quality. In terms of negative indicators the mean is divided by the percentage values for both types of indicators.

The calculated values of all human indicators and environmental indicators were added and divided by the total number of indicators. In other words, the calculated values were added and the sum total was divided by eight (number of variables) for human indicators and five for environmental indicators. The process is followed for all districts. Thus, the state wise composite score of both types of indicators are calculated. Then each district was assigned a rank based on its composite score where rank 1 was assigned to a state exhibiting low composite score and vice versa.

Level of Human development and level of Environmental Degradation (2010-11)

The high human development and high level of environmental degradation is shown by the districts of Kangra and Mandi in 2010-11. Shimla is still coming under the category of high human development but in terms of environmental degradation it has improved from high environmental degradation to medium environmental degradation district. Kinnaur is still ranked as the low environmental degradation district but in terms of human development it has upgraded from medium to high category (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Environment Composite Score and Human Composite Score (2010-11)
Environment Composite Score and Human Composite Score (2010-11)↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Environment Composite Score and Human Composite Score (2010-11)

Environment Composite Score and Human Composite Score (2010-11)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 6 ↗

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. District-wise Literacy Rate in Himachal Pradesh (2011)
DistrictMale Literacy Rate (%)Female Literacy Rate (%)Total Literacy Rate (%)
Bilaspur92.3978.9085.67
Chamba84.1962.1473.19
Hamirpur95.2883.4489.01
Kangra92.5580.6286.49
Kinnaur88.3771.3480.77
Kullu88.8071.0180.14
Lahul & Spiti86.9766.5077.24
Mandi91.5174.3382.81
Shimla90.7377.8084.55
Sirmaur86.7672.5579.98
Solan91.1978.0285.02
Una92.7581.6787.23
Total90.8376.6083.78

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
District-wise Literacy Rate in Himachal Pradesh (2011)↗ Enlarge
Table 1
District-wise Literacy Rate in Himachal Pradesh (2011)

District-wise Literacy Rate in Himachal Pradesh (2011)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 12. District wise Barren and Un-culturable Land in Himachal Pradesh (2007-08), (In ‘000 ha)
S. No.DistrictGeographical AreaBarren and Un-culturable LandBarren and Un-culturable land as % of Geographical Area
1.Bilaspur111.84.43.94
2.Chamba692.45.30.77
3.Hamirpur110.213.612.34
4.Kangra577.714.62.53
5.Kinnaur624.2133.321.36
6.Kullu54.71.22.19
7.Lahul & Spiti911.2415.845.63
8.Mandi397.821.05.28
9.Shimla508.915.73.09
10.Sirmaur224.88.53.78
11.Solan21.11.99.0
12.Una154.922.214.33
Total4389.7657.514.98

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
District wise Barren and Un-culturable Land in Himachal Pradesh (2007-08), (In ‘000 ha)↗ Enlarge
Table 12
District wise Barren and Un-culturable Land in Himachal Pradesh (2007-08), (In ‘000 ha)

District wise Barren and Un-culturable Land in Himachal Pradesh (2007-08), (In ‘000 ha)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 5 ↗
Table 14. Mean Deviation Ranking of Human and Environmental Indicators 2010-11
DistrictsHuman Composite Score (x axis)Environmental Composite Score (y axis)
Bilaspur35
Chamba611
Hamirpur24
Kangra129
Kinnaur1012
Kullu56
Lahul & Spiti110
Mandi93
Shimla118
Sirmaur77
Solan81
Una42

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Mean Deviation Ranking of Human and Environmental Indicators 2010-11↗ Enlarge
Table 14
Mean Deviation Ranking of Human and Environmental Indicators 2010-11

Mean Deviation Ranking of Human and Environmental Indicators 2010-11

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 6 ↗
Table 15. Composite Index Ranking 2010-11
DistrictsHuman index (x axis)Environmental index (y axis)
Bilaspur53.5
Chamba68
Hamirpur39
Kangra116
Kinnaur23.5
Kullu73
Lahul & Spiti11
Mandi94.5
Shimla127
Sirmaur810
Solan104.5
Una42

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Composite Index Ranking 2010-11↗ Enlarge
Table 15
Composite Index Ranking 2010-11

Composite Index Ranking 2010-11

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 8 ↗
Table 16. Typology of districts based on Mean Deviation Method
2010-11—Environmental Degradation——
HighMediumLow
Human DevelopmentHighKangra MandiShimlaKinnaur
MediumSolanSirmaur KulluChamba
LowUnaBilaspurHamirpur Lahul & Spiti

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Typology of districts based on Mean Deviation Method↗ Enlarge
Table 16
Typology of districts based on Mean Deviation Method

Typology of districts based on Mean Deviation Method

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 8 ↗
Table 17. Typology of districts based on Composite Index
Typology of districts based on Composite Index↗ Enlarge
Table 17
Typology of districts based on Composite Index

Typology of districts based on Composite Index

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 8 ↗
Figure 2. Environment a Index and Human Index (2010-11)
Environment a Index and Human Index (2010-11)↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Environment a Index and Human Index (2010-11)

Environment a Index and Human Index (2010-11)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 8 ↗

References

0 in the original paper

    Cited by 9

    From OpenAlex, OpenCitations and reference lists read by Scinovex

    • Reimagining Sustainable Development and Economic Performance Indicators: A Human-Centric Maslow–Bossel Blueprint ↗

      Panagiotis Panagiotopoulos, Ioannis Vardopoulos, Marco Maialetti, Clio Ciaschini, Phoebe Koundouri, Luca Salvati · Economies · 2024

      Reflecting the shift from purely quantitative economic growth to broader socio-environmental sustainability, this study proposes a framework for assessing sustainable development (SD) by integrating Maslow’s hierarchy of needs with Bossel’s classification system. As economic development increasingly emphasizes sustainability, numerous organizations and agencies, including the United Nations, have developed indicators to measure sustainable progress. However, subjective dimensions of SD, grounded in…

      ❝ 19PDF
    • Studies of hydrology, water distribution networks and transmission lines, topographic, physical and socio-economic characteristics of west Kordofan ↗

      Abdel Hamid Balla Elnour, K. Sami · International Journal of Multidisciplinary Trends · 2025

      The main objectives of the consultancy as depicted by this Article are to describe and avail Physical and Socioeconomic data/ information for the West Kordofan State project of villages and towns benefiting from the construction of detailed engineering designs for water distribution networks to supply the fourteen headquarters towns in the state, together with the design of a water transmission

      ❝ 0PDFFound by Scinovex
    • Greening the gears: A thematic analysis of sustainable supply chain practices in the Indian automobile sector ↗

      Monika Sharma, Deepak Kapur, Suveera Gill · International Journal of Research in Management · 2025

      The study presents a thematic analysis of sustainable supply chain management practices within the Indian automobile industry. Eight themes are identified in this study, including sustainability and green initiatives, supply chain resilience and management, technological innovation and integration, impact on environment and resource management, circular economy and waste management, compliance with regulatory requirements and industry standards, supplier engagement and development,

      ❝ 0PDFFound by Scinovex
    • A review of predominance of gross national income in human development index during COVID-19 crisis ↗

      Shem Otoi Sam · International Journal of Financial Management and Economics · 2025

      The study explores the role of gross national income (GNI) in the Human Development Index (HDI), a key measure of social progress tied to the Sustainable Development Goals. Using 2021 macroeconomic data from 170 countries, the analysis applies principal component analysis (PCA) and logistic regression to evaluate the relative contribution of HDI predictors: GNI, life expectancy (LE), and mean years

      ❝ 0PDFFound by Scinovex
    • The role of health for achieving sustainable development of India ↗

      Shikhar Agrawal, Vrushangi Gandhi · International Journal of Social Science and Education Research · 2025

      Healthcare is essential for human development. This study examines the impact of health indicators, such as Life Expectancy and Infant Mortality Rate, on the Human Development Index [HDI] for the years 2011-2020, and 2023-24. The study revealed that Life Expectancy has a positive impact, and the Infant Mortality Rate has a negative effect on the HDI. This paper also examines

      ❝ 0Found by Scinovex
    • Impact of digitalization on sustainable development amidst geopolitical risks ↗

      S. Vazeed Pasha · International Journal of Applied Research · 2025

      This study examines how digitalization influences sustainable development amid rising geopolitical risks. Using Environmental Performance Index (EPI) and Human Development Index (HDI) as proxies, the analysis evaluates the role of macroeconomic indicators, digital economy measures, and the Global Geopolitical Risk Index (GPRI). Findings show that digitalization enhances environmental performance and socio-economic development in both developed and developing countries, while geopolitical

      ❝ 0PDFFound by Scinovex
    • The role of evaluation smart agriculture technology to improve climate changes management in Salah al-Din Governorate

      Asmaa Zuhir Al-Hafdh, Waleed Sabar Ayed · International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social Development · 2025

      This research, aims to explain differences in the role of evaluation smart agriculture technology to improve climate changes management in Salah al-Din Governorate; comprise climate change forecasting implementation; intelligent watering implementations; insect threat & disease regulation implementations regional yield & sustainable promotion implementations, & crop management implementations. Survey was split into: two divisions first addressed personal factors; whereas latter included 40 statements throughout five scale. This study including 78 farming staffs with 20 respondent in the initia

      ❝ 0PDFOn ScinovexFound by Scinovex
    • Urban Futures: Coordinated Urbanization as a Catalyst for Ethiopia’s Development ↗

      Vivek Kumar · International Journal of Political Science and Governance · 2025

      The process of urbanization is among the most revolutionary processes that influence the social economic and political environment across the globe. Ethiopia has one of the lowest urbanization rates in Sub-Saharan Africa and the rapid urbanization process in the country is being induced by rural-to-urban migration and natural population growth. The economic growth caused by planned and well-organized urban development

      ❝ 0PDFFound by Scinovex
    • Sustainability unleashed: Supercharging economic growth through green HR strategies ↗

      Tom Janisch, Issah Gyimah · International Journal of Research in Human Resource Management · 2024

      This paper describes a semi-systematic literature review that examines how human resource professionals and scholars investigate the relationship between human resource work and green sustainable practices in organizations. The study analyzed the literature on human resources with a focus on sustainability, using the Rummler-Brache model of organizational performance as a framework. The model's nine performance variables were applied to the

      ❝ 0PDFFound by Scinovex