Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies

BMJ · 2015 · Vol. 351 · pp. h5527–h5527
Patrick M. BossuytJohannes B. ReitsmaDavid E. BrunsConstantine GatsonisPaul GlasziouLes IrwigJeroen G. LijmerDavid MoherDrummond RennieHenrica C. W. de VetHerbert Y. KresselNader RifaiRobert GolubDouglas G. AltmanLotty HooftDaniël A. KorevaarJérémie F. Cohen

Abstract

Incomplete reporting has been identified as a major source of avoidable waste in biomedical research. Essential information is often not provided in study reports, impeding the identification, critical appraisal, and replication of studies. To improve the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies, the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) statement was developed. Here we present STARD 2015, an updated list of 30 essential items that should be included in every report of a diagnostic accuracy study. This update incorporates recent evidence about sources of bias and variability in diagnostic accuracy and is intended to facilitate the use of STARD. As such, STARD 2015 may help to improve completeness and transparency in reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsDiagnostic accuracyMedical physicsComputer scienceTransparency (behavior)MedicineInformation retrievalData scienceData miningRadiologyComputer security

MeSH terms

Data AccuracyReference StandardsResearch DesignBiasPractice Guidelines as TopicDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDisclosureInformation Dissemination

Funding

  • Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Medical Research Council
Citations
3,201
FWCI
127.87
field-weighted impact
References
31
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.