Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

Multifunctional shade-tree management in tropical agroforestry landscapes - a review

Journal of Applied Ecology · 2011 · Vol. 48(3) · pp. 619–629
Teja TscharntkeYann CloughShonil BhagwatDamayanti BuchoriHeiko FaustDietrich HertelDirk HölscherJana JuhrbandtMichael KesslerIvette PerfectoChristoph ScherberGötz SchrothEdzo VeldkampThomas Cherico Wanger

Abstract

1. Agricultural intensification reduces ecological resilience of land-use systems, whereas paradoxically, environmental change and climate extremes require a higher response capacity than ever. Adaptation strategies to environmental change include maintenance of shade trees in tropical agroforestry, but conversion of shaded to unshaded systems is common practice to increase short-term yield.
\n<br></br><br></br>
\n2. In this paper, we review the short-term and long-term ecological benefits of shade trees in coffee <i>Coffea arabica, C. canephora</i> and cacao <i>Theobroma cacao</i> agroforestry and emphasize the poorly understood, multifunctional role of shade trees for farmers and conservation alike.
\n<br></br><br></br>
\n3. Both coffee and cacao are tropical understorey plants. Shade trees in agroforestry enhance functional biodiversity, carbon sequestration, soil fertility, drought resistance as well as weed and biological pest control. However, shade is needed for young cacao trees only and is less important in
\nolder cacao plantations. This changing response to shade regime with cacao plantation age often results in a transient role for shade and associated biodiversity in agroforestry.
\n<br></br><br></br>
\n4. Abandonment of old, unshaded cacao in favour of planting young cacao in new, thinned forest sites can be named ‘short-term cacao boom-and-bust cycle’, which counteracts tropical forest conservation. In a ‘long-term cacao boom-and-bust cycle’, cacao boom can be followed by cacao bust due to unmanageable pest and pathogen levels (e.g. in Brazil and Malaysia). Higher pest densities can result from physiological stress in unshaded cacao and from the larger cacao area planted. Risk-averse farmers avoid long-termvulnerability of their agroforestry systems by keeping shade as an insurance against insect pest outbreaks, whereas yield-maximizing farmers reduce shade and aim at short-termmonetary benefits.
\n<br></br><br></br>
\n5. <i>Synthesis and applications</i>. Sustainable agroforestry management needs to conserve or create a diverse layer of multi-purpose shade trees that can be pruned rather than removed when crops mature. Incentives from payment-for-ecosystem services and certification schemes encourage
\nfarmers to keep high to medium shade tree cover. Reducing pesticide spraying protects functional agrobiodiversity such as antagonists of pests and diseases, pollinating midges determining cacao yields and pollinating bees enhancing coffee yield. In a landscape perspective, natural forest alongside agroforestry allows noncrop-crop spillover of a diversity of functionally important organisms.
\nKnowledge transfer between farmers, agronomists and ecologists in a participatory approach helps to encourage a shade management regime that balances economic and ecological needs and provides a ‘diversified food-and-cash crop’ livelihood strategy.

Cocoa and Sweet Potato AgronomyAfrican Botany and Ecology StudiesAgroforestry and silvopastoral systemsAgroforestryGeographyTree (set theory)Tropical forestTropicsForestryEcologyEnvironmental scienceBiologyMathematics
Citations
786
FWCI
61.52
field-weighted impact
References
86
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.