Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity – ecosystem service management

Ecology Letters · 2005 · Vol. 8(8) · pp. 857–874

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the negative and positive effects of agricultural land use for the conservation of biodiversity, and its relation to ecosystem services, needs a landscape perspective. Agriculture can contribute to the conservation of high‐diversity systems, which may provide important ecosystem services such as pollination and biological control via complementarity and sampling effects. Land‐use management is often focused on few species and local processes, but in dynamic, agricultural landscapes, only a diversity of insurance species may guarantee resilience (the capacity to reorganize after disturbance). Interacting species experience their surrounding landscape at different spatial scales, which influences trophic interactions. Structurally complex landscapes enhance local diversity in agroecosystems, which may compensate for local high‐intensity management. Organisms with high‐dispersal abilities appear to drive these biodiversity patterns and ecosystem services, because of their recolonization ability and larger resources experienced. Agri‐environment schemes (incentives for farmers to benefit the environment) need to broaden their perspective and to take the different responses to schemes in simple (high impact) and complex (low impact) agricultural landscapes into account. In simple landscapes, local allocation of habitat is more important than in complex landscapes, which are in total at risk. However, little knowledge of the relative importance of local and landscape management for biodiversity and its relation to ecosystem services make reliable recommendations difficult.

Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesPlant and animal studiesConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementEcosystem servicesBiodiversityEnvironmental resource managementAgricultural biodiversityEcologyLand managementLand useEcosystemEcosystem managementMeasurement of biodiversity
Citations
4,307
FWCI
62.18
field-weighted impact
References
174
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
References
Foraging ranges of solitary bees
Journal of Animal Ecology · 2002 · 1,100 citations
Patch dynamics and the design of nature reserves
Biological Conservation · 1978 · 629 citations
Does organic farming benefit biodiversity?
Biological Conservation · 2004 · 1,567 citations
Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2003 · 852 citations
Post‐war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain
Journal of Applied Ecology · 2002 · 1,523 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.