article Open AccessTop 1% cited
Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
BMJ · 2008 · Vol. 336(7644) · pp. 601–605
Lesley Wood✉(University of Bristol)Matthias Egger(University of Bern)Lise Lotte Gluud(Copenhagen University Hospital)Kenneth F. Schulz(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)Peter Jüni(University of Bern)Douglas G. AltmanChristian Gluud(Rigshospitalet)Richard M. Martin(University of Bristol)Anthony J G Wood(University of Bristol)Jonathan A C Sterne(University of Bristol)
Abstract
The average bias associated with defects in the conduct of randomised trials varies with the type of outcome. Systematic reviewers should routinely assess the risk of bias in the results of trials, and should report meta-analyses restricted to trials at low risk of bias either as the primary analysis or in conjunction with less restrictive analyses.
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsBlindingMeta-analysisOdds ratioMedicinePsychological interventionPublication biasRandomized controlled trialEpidemiologyOddsClinical trial
MeSH terms
Double-Blind MethodMeta-Analysis as TopicBiasOdds RatioRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Funding
- Medical Research Council
Citations
2,537
FWCI
144.27
field-weighted impact
References
30
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Surgery for weight loss in adults
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · 1,505 citations
Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care
The Lancet Infectious Diseases · 2010 · 3,272 citations
Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2012 · 905 citations
CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
BMJ · 2010 · 8,953 citations
Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive—Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses
International Journal of Epidemiology · 2008 · 946 citations
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
BMJ · 2015 · 12,938 citations
CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2010 · 1,851 citations
Appraising the Quality of Medical Education Research Methods
Academic Medicine · 2015 · 758 citations
References
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
JAMA · 1995 · 5,583 citations
Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2001 · 2,318 citations
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
The Lancet · 2001 · 5,382 citations
The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2001 · 3,833 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
