Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Power output and columbic efficiencies from biofilms of <i>Geobacter sulfurreducens</i> comparable to mixed community microbial fuel cells

Environmental Microbiology · 2008 · Vol. 10(10) · pp. 2505–2514
Kelly P. NevinHanno RichterSean F. CovallaJessica JohnsonTrevor L. WoodardAmber OrloffHongfei JiaMinhai ZhangDerek R. Lovley

Abstract

It has been previously noted that mixed communities typically produce more power in microbial fuel cells than pure cultures. If true, this has important implications for the design of microbial fuel cells and for studying the process of electron transfer on anode biofilms. To further evaluate this, Geobacter sulfurreducens was grown with acetate as fuel in a continuous flow 'ministack' system in which the carbon cloth anode and cathode were positioned in close proximity, and the cation-selective membrane surface area was maximized in order to overcome some of the electrochemical limitations that were inherent in fuel cells previously employed for the study of pure cultures. Reducing the size of the anode in order to eliminate cathode limitation resulted in maximum current and power densities per m(2) of anode surface of 4.56 A m(-2) and 1.88 W m(-2) respectively. Electron recovery as current from acetate oxidation was c. 100% when oxygen diffusion into the system was minimized. This performance is comparable to the highest levels previously reported for mixed communities in similar microbial fuel cells and slightly higher than the power output of an anaerobic sludge inoculum in the same ministack system. Minimizing the volume of the anode chamber yielded a volumetric power density of 2.15 kW m(-3), which is the highest power density per volume yet reported for a microbial fuel cell. Geobacter sulfurreducens formed relatively uniform biofilms 3-18 mum thick on the carbon cloth anodes. When graphite sticks served as the anode, the current density (3.10 A m(-2)) was somewhat less than with the carbon cloth anodes, but the biofilms were thicker (c. 50 mum) with a more complex pillar and channel structure. These results suggest that the previously observed disparity in power production in pure and mixed culture microbial fuel cell systems can be attributed more to differences in the fuel cell designs than to any inherent superior capability of mixed cultures to produce more power than pure cultures.

Microbial Fuel Cells and BioremediationElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsExtraction and Separation ProcessesMicrobial fuel cellGeobacter sulfurreducensAnodeGeobacterCathodePower densityBiofilmMaterials scienceChemical engineeringElectrochemistry

MeSH terms

CarbonElectricityElectrodesOxidation-ReductionBiofilmsAcetic AcidGeobacter
Citations
542
FWCI
26.81
field-weighted impact
References
44
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Microbial Fuel Cells, A Current Review
Energies · 2010 · 436 citations
Scaling up microbial fuel cells and other bioelectrochemical systems
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · 2009 · 832 citations
Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells
Nature Reviews Microbiology · 2009 · 2,345 citations
References
Microbial Fuel Cells:  Methodology and Technology
Environmental Science & Technology · 2006 · 5,920 citations
Biofuel Cells Select for Microbial Consortia That Self-Mediate Electron Transfer
Applied and Environmental Microbiology · 2004 · 1,259 citations
Electricity Production by<i>Geobacter sulfurreducens</i>Attached to Electrodes
Applied and Environmental Microbiology · 2003 · 2,177 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.