Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Games with Incomplete Information Played by “Bayesian” Players, I–III: Part I. The Basic Model

Management Science · 2004 · Vol. 50(12_supplement) · pp. 1804–1817
John C. Harsanyi

Abstract

(This article originally appeared in Management Science, November 1967, Volume 14, Number 3, pp. 159–182, published by The Institute of Management Sciences.) The paper develops a new theory for the analysis of games with incomplete information where the players are uncertain about some important parameters of the game situation, such as the payoff functions, the strategies available to various players, the information other players have about the game, etc. However, each player has a subjective probability distribution over the alternative possibilities. In most of the paper it is assumed that these probability distributions entertained by the different players are mutually “consistent,” in the sense that they can be regarded as conditional probability distributions derived from a certain “basic probability distribution” over the parameters unknown to the various players. But later the theory is extended also to cases where the different players' subjective probability distributions fail to satisfy this consistency assumption. In cases where the consistency assumption holds, the original game can be replaced by a game where nature first conducts a lottery in accordance with the basic probability distribution, and the outcome of this lottery will decide which particular subgame will be played, i.e., what the actual values of the relevant parameters will be in the game. Yet, each player will receive only partial information about the outcome of the lottery, and about the values of these parameters. However, every player will know the “basic probability distribution” governing the lottery. Thus, technically, the resulting game will be a game with complete information. It is called the Bayes-equivalent of the original game. Part I of the paper describes the basic model and discusses various intuitive interpretations for the latter. Part II shows that the Nash equilibrium points of the Bayes-equivalent game yield “Bayesian equilibrium points” for the original game. Finally, Part III considers the main properties of the “basic probability distribution.”

Game Theory and Voting SystemsGame Theory and ApplicationsSports Analytics and PerformanceLotteryOutcome (game theory)Bayesian gameMathematical economicsExtensive-form gameComplete informationProbability distributionConsistency (knowledge bases)Stochastic gameConditional probability
Citations
2,172
FWCI
271.28
field-weighted impact
References
28
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
A Grammar of Institutions
American Political Science Review · 1995 · 1,331 citations
References
COUNTERSPECULATION, AUCTIONS, AND COMPETITIVE SEALED TENDERS
The Journal of Finance · 1961 · 7,278 citations
The Bargaining Problem
Econometrica · 1950 · 7,802 citations
Contributions to the theory of games.
Journal of the Franklin Institute · 1960 · 1,837 citations
Two-Person Cooperative Games
Econometrica · 1953 · 3,192 citations
Equilibrium points in <i>n</i> -person games
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 1950 · 7,211 citations
Agreeing to Disagree
The Annals of Statistics · 1976 · 2,455 citations
Job Market Signaling
The Quarterly Journal of Economics · 1973 · 14,536 citations
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
The Quarterly Journal of Economics · 1970 · 22,315 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.