Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Blind Image Quality Assessment: From Natural Scene Statistics to Perceptual Quality

IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2011 · Vol. 20(12) · pp. 3350–3364
Anush K. MoorthyAlan C. Bovik

Abstract

Our approach to blind image quality assessment (IQA) is based on the hypothesis that natural scenes possess certain statistical properties which are altered in the presence of distortion, rendering them un-natural; and that by characterizing this un-naturalness using scene statistics, one can identify the distortion afflicting the image and perform no-reference (NR) IQA. Based on this theory, we propose an (NR)/blind algorithm-the Distortion Identification-based Image Verity and INtegrity Evaluation (DIIVINE) index-that assesses the quality of a distorted image without need for a reference image. DIIVINE is based on a 2-stage framework involving distortion identification followed by distortion-specific quality assessment. DIIVINE is capable of assessing the quality of a distorted image across multiple distortion categories, as against most NR IQA algorithms that are distortion-specific in nature. DIIVINE is based on natural scene statistics which govern the behavior of natural images. In this paper, we detail the principles underlying DIIVINE, the statistical features extracted and their relevance to perception and thoroughly evaluate the algorithm on the popular LIVE IQA database. Further, we compare the performance of DIIVINE against leading full-reference (FR) IQA algorithms and demonstrate that DIIVINE is statistically superior to the often used measure of peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and statistically equivalent to the popular structural similarity index (SSIM). A software release of DIIVINE has been made available online: "http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality/DIIVINE_release.zip" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality/DIIVINE_release.zip for public use and evaluation.

Image and Video Quality AssessmentAdvanced Image Fusion TechniquesVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionDistortion (music)Image qualityScene statisticsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceRendering (computer graphics)NaturalnessPattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionIdentification (biology)
Citations
1,726
FWCI
47.66
field-weighted impact
References
71
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
A Feature-Enriched Completely Blind Image Quality Evaluator
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2015 · 1,200 citations
Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2017 · 1,062 citations
Blind Image Quality Assessment: A Natural Scene Statistics Approach in the DCT Domain
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2012 · 1,718 citations
No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2012 · 5,586 citations
References
Image information and visual quality
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2006 · 3,976 citations
Embedded image coding using zerotrees of wavelet coefficients
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 1993 · 4,817 citations
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2004 · 54,590 citations
An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2005 · 1,407 citations
Natural Image Statistics and Neural Representation
Annual Review of Neuroscience · 2001 · 2,507 citations
A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2006 · 2,925 citations
New Support Vector Algorithms
Neural Computation · 2000 · 2,793 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.