Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

A Feature-Enriched Completely Blind Image Quality Evaluator

IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2015 · Vol. 24(8) · pp. 2579–2591
Lin ZhangLei ZhangAlan C. Bovik

Abstract

Existing blind image quality assessment (BIQA) methods are mostly opinion-aware. They learn regression models from training images with associated human subjective scores to predict the perceptual quality of test images. Such opinion-aware methods, however, require a large amount of training samples with associated human subjective scores and of a variety of distortion types. The BIQA models learned by opinion-aware methods often have weak generalization capability, hereby limiting their usability in practice. By comparison, opinion-unaware methods do not need human subjective scores for training, and thus have greater potential for good generalization capability. Unfortunately, thus far no opinion-unaware BIQA method has shown consistently better quality prediction accuracy than the opinion-aware methods. Here, we aim to develop an opinion-unaware BIQA method that can compete with, and perhaps outperform, the existing opinion-aware methods. By integrating the features of natural image statistics derived from multiple cues, we learn a multivariate Gaussian model of image patches from a collection of pristine natural images. Using the learned multivariate Gaussian model, a Bhattacharyya-like distance is used to measure the quality of each image patch, and then an overall quality score is obtained by average pooling. The proposed BIQA method does not need any distorted sample images nor subjective quality scores for training, yet extensive experiments demonstrate its superior quality-prediction performance to the state-of-the-art opinion-aware BIQA methods. The MATLAB source code of our algorithm is publicly available at www.comp.polyu.edu.hk/~cslzhang/IQA/ILNIQE/ILNIQE.htm.

Image and Video Quality AssessmentAdvanced Image Fusion TechniquesVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceImage qualityGeneralizationQuality (philosophy)Distortion (music)Feature (linguistics)PoolingMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)

MeSH terms

AlgorithmsAnimalsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, StatisticalDatabases, Factual

Funding

  • National Science Foundation
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
Citations
1,200
FWCI
40.25
field-weighted impact
References
54
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2012 · 5,586 citations
Information Content Weighting for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2010 · 1,296 citations
Blind Image Quality Assessment: From Natural Scene Statistics to Perceptual Quality
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2011 · 1,726 citations
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2004 · 54,590 citations
FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2011 · 5,079 citations
A general regression neural network
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · 1991 · 4,446 citations
A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2006 · 2,925 citations
Blind Image Quality Assessment: A Natural Scene Statistics Approach in the DCT Domain
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2012 · 1,718 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.