Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Generalized Overlap Measures for Evaluation and Validation in Medical Image Analysis

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 2006 · Vol. 25(11) · pp. 1451–1461
William R. CrumÓscar CámaraDavid Hill

Abstract

Measures of overlap of labelled regions of images, such as the Dice and Tanimoto coefficients, have been extensively used to evaluate image registration and segmentation algorithms. Modern studies can include multiple labels defined on multiple images yet most evaluation schemes report one overlap per labelled region, simply averaged over multiple images. In this paper, common overlap measures are generalized to measure the total overlap of ensembles of labels defined on multiple test images and account for fractional labels using fuzzy set theory. This framework allows a single "figure-of-merit" to be reported which summarises the results of a complex experiment by image pair, by label or overall. A complementary measure of error, the overlap distance, is defined which captures the spatial extent of the nonoverlapping part and is related to the Hausdorff distance computed on grey level images. The generalized overlap measures are validated on synthetic images for which the overlap can be computed analytically and used as similarity measures in nonrigid registration of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain images. Finally, a pragmatic segmentation ground truth is constructed by registering a magnetic resonance atlas brain to 20 individual scans, and used with the overlap measures to evaluate publicly available brain segmentation algorithms.

Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesImage and Object Detection TechniquesArtificial intelligenceSegmentationGround truthHausdorff distanceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Image segmentationImage registrationMeasure (data warehouse)Similarity (geometry)

MeSH terms

AlgorithmsBrainHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingPattern Recognition, AutomatedQuality Assurance, Health CareSensitivity and SpecificitySubtraction TechniqueReproducibility of ResultsInformation Storage and Retrieval
Citations
797
FWCI
12.95
field-weighted impact
References
52
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
A survey on evaluation methods for image segmentation
Pattern Recognition · 1996 · 1,048 citations
Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods
NeuroImage · 2000 · 8,608 citations
Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 1994 · 1,264 citations
MRI simulation-based evaluation of image-processing and classification methods
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 1999 · 706 citations
Comparing images using the Hausdorff distance
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · 1993 · 4,396 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.