Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Is My Network Module Preserved and Reproducible?

PLoS Computational Biology · 2011 · Vol. 7(1) · pp. e1001057–e1001057
Peter LangfelderRui LuoMichael C. OldhamSteve Horvath

Abstract

In many applications, one is interested in determining which of the properties of a network module change across conditions. For example, to validate the existence of a module, it is desirable to show that it is reproducible (or preserved) in an independent test network. Here we study several types of network preservation statistics that do not require a module assignment in the test network. We distinguish network preservation statistics by the type of the underlying network. Some preservation statistics are defined for a general network (defined by an adjacency matrix) while others are only defined for a correlation network (constructed on the basis of pairwise correlations between numeric variables). Our applications show that the correlation structure facilitates the definition of particularly powerful module preservation statistics. We illustrate that evaluating module preservation is in general different from evaluating cluster preservation. We find that it is advantageous to aggregate multiple preservation statistics into summary preservation statistics. We illustrate the use of these methods in six gene co-expression network applications including 1) preservation of cholesterol biosynthesis pathway in mouse tissues, 2) comparison of human and chimpanzee brain networks, 3) preservation of selected KEGG pathways between human and chimpanzee brain networks, 4) sex differences in human cortical networks, 5) sex differences in mouse liver networks. While we find no evidence for sex specific modules in human cortical networks, we find that several human cortical modules are less preserved in chimpanzees. In particular, apoptosis genes are differentially co-expressed between humans and chimpanzees. Our simulation studies and applications show that module preservation statistics are useful for studying differences between the modular structure of networks. Data, R software and accompanying tutorials can be downloaded from the following webpage: http://www.genetics.ucla.edu/labs/horvath/CoexpressionNetwork/ModulePreservation.

Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network AnalysisMental Health Research TopicsPairwise comparisonComputer scienceNetwork analysisCorrelationBiological networkAdjacency matrixBiologyComputational biologyArtificial intelligenceData mining

MeSH terms

AnimalsBrainFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsGene ExpressionMice
Citations
1,066
FWCI
11.71
field-weighted impact
References
60
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis
BMC Bioinformatics · 2008 · 28,332 citations
Geometric Interpretation of Gene Coexpression Network Analysis
PLoS Computational Biology · 2008 · 898 citations
Objective Criteria for the Evaluation of Clustering Methods
Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1971 · 5,849 citations
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Nature · 1998 · 42,581 citations
KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
Nucleic Acids Research · 1999 · 32,330 citations
Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis
Choice Reviews Online · 1991 · 10,616 citations
KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
Nucleic Acids Research · 2000 · 38,352 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.