Relevance of Henri Fayol's principles of management in contemporary agricultural research organization: Perceptions of agricultural research service scientists

Introduction

Management is widely recognized as a critical determinant of organizational effectiveness and success. Regardless of the nature of the organization, the efficient utilization of human, financial, and physical resources depends largely on the quality of management practices adopted (Wren, 1995) [13] . Over the years, several management theories have evolved to guide organizational functioning, among which Henri Fayol's Principles of Management continue to occupy a prominent position. Fayol proposed fourteen management principles, including division of work, authority and responsibility, discipline, unity of command, unity of direction, equity, initiative, and esprit de corps, which collectively provide a framework for improving organizational efficiency, coordination, leadership, and productivity. Although these principles were formulated more than a century ago, their relevance continues to be acknowledged in contemporary organizations operating in diverse sectors (Dhanda, 2024) [4] . Many modern management practices related to strategic planning, organizational coordination, teamwork, communication, accountability, and performance monitoring are rooted in the foundational concepts advanced by Fayol. Consequently, his principles continue to serve as important reference points for understanding organizational behaviour and management effectiveness. Agricultural research organizations operate in an increasingly complex environment characterized by multidisciplinary research, stakeholder engagement, technology development, resource constraints, accountability requirements, and rapidly evolving societal needs. Effective management is therefore essential for ensuring that research outputs are generated efficiently and translated into tangible benefits for the farmers and other stakeholders. International organizations such as the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the World Bank, and the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) have consistently emphasized the importance of strategic planning, leadership, human resource management, coordination, communication, monitoring, and evaluation in enhancing the effectiveness of agricultural research systems. Notably, many of these management dimensions closely align with Fayol's classical functions of planning, organizing, coordinating, commanding, and controlling. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of organizational and managerial considerations in strengthening interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary agricultural research programmes (Merrill-Sands et al., 1991) [9] . Similarly, the ability to assess and demonstrate organizational performance has been recognized as a key challenge for agricultural research institutions worldwide (Peterson et al., 2003) [12] . Management development programmes have also been identified as effective mechanisms for enhancing leadership and managerial www.extensionjournal.com competencies among employees at different organizational levels (Gareth and Sharon, 2005) [6] . Human resource development initiatives that strengthen managerial capabilities contribute significantly to organizational effectiveness, employee motivation, and institutional performance (Mittal, 2013) [11] . Within the Indian agricultural research system, efforts have been made to improve organizational efficiency through administrative reforms and digital governance initiatives. For example, Dhaiya et al. (2026) reported that the implementation of an e-governance-based organizational management model in the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) improved efficiency in training management and approval processes. However, despite the continued relevance of management principles in organizational functioning, there is limited empirical evidence on how scientists perceive the applicability of classical management principles within agricultural research organizations. In particular, no systematic study has examined the relevance of Henri Fayol's principles of management in the context of ICAR institutes. Agricultural Research Service (ARS) scientists play a pivotal role not only in conducting research but also in managing projects, coordinating multidisciplinary teams, supervising human resources, administering research infrastructure, mobilizing external funding, and engaging with diverse stakeholders. Their perceptions can therefore provide valuable insights into the extent to which classical management principles are reflected in the functioning of agricultural research organizations and identify areas requiring managerial strengthening. The functioning of agricultural research organizations presents a unique management context characterized by multidisciplinary research, scientific autonomy, long-term research projects, external stakeholder engagement, technology dissemination, and accountability for public investments. Although Henri Fayol developed his principles in an industrial setting, several of these principles remain highly relevant to contemporary agricultural research organizations. Given the increasing complexity of agricultural research and extension systems, understanding how scientists perceive the relevance and application of these principles can provide valuable insights for strengthening organizational management, leadership development, human resource policies, and institutional performance. Assessing the extent to which Fayol's principles are reflected in the functioning of agricultural research organizations may therefore contribute to the development of more effective management strategies for achieving research excellence and societal impact. Against this background, the present exploratory study was undertaken to assess the perceptions of ARS scientists regarding the relevance of Henri Fayol's principles of management in their organization. The study also seeks to identify management dimensions that require greater attention for enhancing organizational effectiveness, employee engagement, and institutional performance in agricultural research organizations.

Methodology

The study was conducted among Agricultural Research Service (ARS) scientists working at the ICAR-Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture (ICAR-CIBA), Chennai. The institution was selected considering the accessibility of respondents, familiarity of the researcher with the organization, and the time and logistical constraints associated with data collection. ICAR-CIBA is a national research institute under the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), mandated to undertake research and provide technological support for sustainable coastal aquaculture. Established in 1987 and headquartered in Chennai, the institute undertakes multidisciplinary research encompassing technology development, dissemination, capacity building and knowledge management in brackishwater aquaculture. The organizational structure and multidisciplinary nature of research activities provided an appropriate setting for examining the perceived relevance and applicability of Henri Fayol's principles of management in an agricultural research organization.

Development of the measurement instrument

A structured questionnaire was developed based on review of relevant literature and by operationalizing each of Fayol's principles in relation to the functions and working environment of agricultural research organizations. The questionnaire consisted of 28 statements, with two statements representing each of Fayol's 14 principles. The questionnaire was content validated by subject matter specialists to ensure that it is measuring the relevance and applicability of management principles under consideration. A four-point Likert-type scale was employed to record the responses. The response categories were assigned scores ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores representing a greater degree of perceived relevance/applicability of the respective management principle. The internal consistency and reliability of the questionnaire were assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The scale yielded a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.817, indicating good internal consistency and suggesting that the items collectively provided a reliable measure of the perceived relevance and applicability of Fayol's management principles in the study organization. Primary data were collected from 40 serving ARS scientists representing different levels of service and functional responsibilities at ICAR-CIBA. The responses obtained for the 28 statements were aggregated to construct an overall Perception Index. Since each of the 28 statements was scored from 1 to 4, the maximum possible score was 112 (28 × 4), while the minimum possible score was 28 (28 × 1). The perception index for each respondent was calculated as: Perception Index (%) = (Obtained score / Maximum possible score) × 100. The index was used to indicate the overall level of perceived relevance and applicability of Fayol's principles within the organization. In addition to the overall index, the responses were examined principle-wise to identify the management principles perceived to have relatively higher or lower relevance and applicability. Descriptive statistical measures, including frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation, were used to summarize and interpret the responses.

Results and Discussion (i) Implementation of Fayol's Management Principles in ICAR Organizations

The analysis revealed that the organizational structure and functioning of ICAR institutions reflect the practical www.extensionjournal.com application of most of Henri Fayol's principles of management (Table -1). ICAR institutes are organized into specialized divisions and disciplines based on their respective mandates, thereby demonstrating the principle of division of work. Authority and responsibility are clearly distributed through a hierarchical administrative structure comprising the Director, Heads of Divisions, Project Coordinators, and Principal Investigators. Similarly, the scalar chain is evident through the reporting structure extending from scientists to institute-level authorities and ultimately to the concerned Deputy Director General at ICAR headquarters. Research planning and implementation are guided through institutional mechanisms such as the Institute Research Council, where projects are scrutinized, approved, and allocated resources. The presence of Project Monitoring and Management Units facilitates coordination across research programmes and supports unity of direction. Administrative and finance units ensure adherence to government regulations, financial discipline, and accountability. Furthermore, institutional and societal goals are prioritized over individual interests through performance appraisal and organizational accountability mechanisms. The continuity of scientific, technical, administrative, and financial personnel also reflects the principle of stability of tenure. Overall, the findings suggest that Fayol's management principles are substantially embedded within the operational framework of ICAR research organizations.

(ii) Perception of Researchers on the Relevance of Fayol's Principles

The perception analysis indicated more than half of the respondents (51.85%) perceived the principles as highly relevant, while 33.33% considered them reasonably relevant. Thus, nearly 85% of the respondents regarded Fayol's principles as relevant to highly relevant for the effective functioning of agricultural research organizations (Figure -1). The principle-wise relevance scores further demonstrated that all fourteen principles were perceived as highly relevant, with scores ranging from 75.00 to 95.75 percent (Table -3). Stability of tenure received the highest relevance score (95.75%), followed by remuneration (93.50%), unity of command (89.75%), scalar chain (88.13%), initiative (87.88%), and primacy of common interest over personal interest (87.88%). These findings suggest that respondents place considerable importance on organizational stability, fair reward systems, clear reporting relationships, and opportunities for innovation. The findings are consistent with review of studies emphasizing the importance of management systems, leadership development, competency enhancement, and organizational governance in improving institutional performance in the agricultural research organizations (Table-2). Dahiya et al. (2026) [3] , for example, reported that competency-based management and egovernance interventions contributed significantly to organizational efficiency and employee development in ICAR institutions.

(iii) Perceived Applicability and Usefulness of Fayol's Principles in Agricultural Research Organizations

The applicability assessment showed that respondents perceived all fourteen principles as useful and advantageous for the efficient functioning of agricultural research organizations (Table 4 and Figure 2). Mean applicability scores ranged from 3.06 to 3.83 on a four-point scale, indicating a consistently high level of agreement regarding their usefulness. Among the principles, stability of tenure recorded the highest mean score (3.83 ± 0.17), followed by remuneration (3.74 ± 0.26) and unity of command (3.59 ± 0.22). The high ranking of stability of tenure suggests that scientists perceive job security as an essential factor influencing long-term research planning, continuity of expertise, institutional memory, and strategic organizational growth. Similarly, respondents believed that remuneration should adequately reflect the responsibilities, effort, and contributions associated with scientific positions. The high score for unity of command highlights the importance of clear reporting relationships and coordinated task allocation in enhancing organizational efficiency. Relatively lower scores were observed for discipline (3.06 ± 0.31), team spirit and sense of belonging (3.19 ± 0.43), and authority-responsibility balance (3.22 ± 0.30). Discussions with respondents suggested that younger scientists were less inclined to view disciplinary measures alone as a driver of research productivity and innovation. Likewise, while teamwork and mutual trust were perceived to exist within the organization, respondents felt that greater efforts were required to strengthen esprit de corps, collaboration, team work and organizational belongingness. The comparatively lower rating for authority and responsibility reflecting the operational challenges arising from shortages of technical and support staff, which often compel scientists to undertake routine administrative and technical tasks in addition to their research responsibilities. Overall, the findings demonstrate that effective management practices contribute substantially to research productivity, accountability, organizational adaptability, and institutional performance. The results also reinforce observations from previous studies which emphasize the importance of leadership, coordination, resource allocation, monitoring, and stakeholder engagement in enhancing the effectiveness of agricultural research systems (Table -2). Strong coordination among researchers, extension personnel, administrators, and end-users remain essential for successful technology development, dissemination, and eventual contribution to agricultural growth, livelihood enhancement, and societal well-being. [12] -ISNAR OPAS

Agricultural Research Organizations

Planning, HRM, monitoring, organizational assessment

Effective management systems significantly improve research productivity and accountability.

ISNAR Impact

Assessment (FAO,1997) [5] National Agricultural Research Systems (NARS)

Strategic planning, HRM, information systems, institutional development Organizations with stronger management systems performed better and adapted more effectively to change. ISNAR NARS Effectiveness Studies (Anderson, 2004) [2] National Agricultural Research Systems Governance, resource allocation, coordination, extension linkages

Research effectiveness depends heavily on organizational structure, programme coordination, monitoring, and extension linkages.

Merrill-Sands et al (1991) [9] Agricultural Research Systems Client-oriented research management

Strong coordination among researchers, extension personnel, and farmers is critical for successful technology development.

Kormawa et al.

(2018) [8] African Agricultural Research Organizations Information management, leadership, organizational culture Leadership support, organizational culture, and change management determine successful institutional performance.

ICAR-NAARM Leadership

Conclusion

The study demonstrated that Henri Fayol's principles of management continue to be highly relevant and applicable in contemporary agricultural research organizations. The organizational structure, administrative systems, project management mechanisms, and accountability frameworks of ICAR institutions inherently reflect the practical application of Fayol's management principles. The scientists perceived that all fourteen principles as relevant to highly relevant for improving organizational efficiency, research productivity, and institutional effectiveness. Stability of tenure, fair remuneration, and unity of command emerged as the most valued principles, highlighting the importance of organizational continuity, motivation, and clear reporting relationships in research organizations. The relatively lower ratings for discipline, authority-responsibility balance, and esprit de corps suggest areas where organizational reforms and human resource interventions may be required.

Respondents emphasized the need for adequate technical and support staff to ensure that scientific personnel can focus on research, innovation, and knowledge generation rather than routine operational activities. The findings confirm that effective management is an important determinant of research excellence, organizational adaptability, stakeholder engagement, technology dissemination and societal impact.

Acknowledgement

AcknowledgementThe authors thankfully acknowledged the respondents of the study who spent their time with the student researcher and shared their perception. The permission kindly rendered by the Director, ICAR-CIBA to undertake this piece of work at their research institute is gratefully acknowledged.

References

1. Kumar A, Rao RVS, Ramesh P, Rao KH, Srinivasa Rao Ch. Developing research managers and leaders through management development programme in National Agricultural Research and Education System in India. Indian J Ext Educ. 2022;58(4):118-123.
2. Anderson JR. An assessment of the impact of ISNAR: 1997-2001. International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR); 2004. Available from: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/items/d94b621b-6e11-43a6a46a-66e26aef87a4
3. Dahiya S, Marwaha S, Jain NK. Effective competency enhancement in agricultural research institutions: an egovernance model. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2026;13:507. doi:10.1057/s41599-026-06572-x.
4. Dhanda K. Optimizing organizational effectiveness in higher education: an integrated application of Fayol's management principles. J Res Voc Educ. 2024;6(10):8692. doi:10.53469/jrve.2024.6(10).17.
5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Report of the fourth external programme and management review of the International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR). Rome: FAO; 1997. https://www.fao.org/4/x5804e/x5804e00.htm
6. Gareth E, Sharon T. Evaluating the impact of leadership development in a regional sport. Adv Dev Hum Resour. 2005;7(3):396-413.
7. Hatchuel A, Segrestin B. A century old and still visionary: Fayol's innovative theory of management. Eur Manag Rev. 2019;16:399-412. doi:10.1111/emre.12292.
8. Kormawa P, Baudron F, Mrema G, Kahan D. Sustainable agricultural mechanization: a framework for Africa. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2018. https://www.fao.org
9. Merrill-Sands DM, Biggs SD, Bingen RJ, Ewell PT, McAllister JL, Poats SV. Institutional considerations in strengthening on-farm client-oriented research in national agricultural research systems: lessons from a nine-country study. Exp Agric. 1991;27(3):343-373. doi:10.1017/S0014479700019335.
10. Mittal S. HRD climate in public and private sector banks. Indian J Ind Relat. 2013;49(1):123-131.
11. Peterson W, Gijsbers G, Wilks M. An organizational performance assessment system for agricultural research organizations: concepts, methods, and procedures. 2003. doi:10.22004/AG.ECON.310698.