Comparative efficiency of organic priming (Cow urine and slurry) vs. synthetic chemical treatments on seed dormancy breaking in Tamarindus indica L.: A review
Abstract
Tamarindus indica L. is an economically significant and versatile tree species widely integrated into agroforestry systems due to its medicinal, dietary, and timber value. However, its mass propagation in nurseries is severely obstructed by physical seed dormancy, primarily caused by a tough, impermeable hard seed coat that restricts water absorption and delays germination. This review paper systematically compares two different treatment process to break harder and outer layer of a seeds. Synthetic chemical treatments such as GA3, KNO3, and H2SO4 against to the organic priming methods including cow urine, cow dung slurry, and bio fertilizers in overcoming seed dormancy. The extensive analysis of existing literature shows that chemical treatments (GA3 at 200 ppm) effectively accelerate to the water uptake and ensure the earliest and high germination percentage. But they are relatively expensive and have environmental concerns. On the other hand, organic stimulants like cow urine (20-30% concentration) and cow dung slurry are very cost effective and eco-friendly alternatives. With the use of these organic agents seed germination may be slightly slower but they greatly increase seedlings vigor, establishment and environmental sustainability. The review concludes that although organic priming provides late germination and may provide less germination compared to chemical treatment, but organic priming is eco-friendly, low-cost effective and does not cause any harm to the environment.
Full Text
Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.
Introduction
This study incorporates only those investigations that specifically examined the physical dormancy of tamarind, and for which quantitative data were generated or provided regarding the effects of mechanical scarification, artificial chemical applications Tamarind is botanically known as Tamarindus indica L. and belongs to the family Fabaceae (Caesalpiniaceae). Tamarind is however originated from dry savanna region of tropical Africa. India is the highest producer, exporter and consumer of tamarind in India. In southern part of India, tamarind is a basic ingredient in diet and different recipes. In India it is known as imli. It is frequently utilized in tropical nations due to its laxative and aphrodisiac attributes (Havinga et al., 2010) [13] . It is called Indian date because of the colour of its dry pulp. It is a major crop for agroforestry system in India. The best part of the fruit tree is that it can grow and sustain even in harsh semi-arid climate. It can grow in barren land as well. It is a diploid dicotyledonous species, constituting the third biggest family of flowering plants, comprising 727 genera and 19,327 species possessing a chromosomal number of 2n = 24 (Purseglove, 1987) [22] . The Tamarindus indica, an evergreen tree, may reach heights of 30 meters and features a wide, spreading crown with a circumference of up to 12 meters (Orwa et al., 2009) [19] . The compound leaves, consisting of several small leaflets arranged in pairs along a central axis, measure between 6 and 15 cm in length and typically fold at night (Shah 2014). Emerging in pendulous clusters, its 2.5 cm diameter, pale yellow or pinkish flowers have reddish streaks (Orwa et al., 2009) [19] . The fruit typically measures 4 to 20 cm in length and is characterized by a distinctive, indehiscent pod featuring a scurfy brown exterior and a soft, acidic pulp that surrounds multiple firm, dark brown seeds (Gupta et al., 2025) [12] . Tamarind is known to possess several importance because of which it is widely utilized all over the world Kumar and Bhattacharya (2008) [15] . It can perfectly fit into agroforestry system as it is leguminous in nature. T. indica exhibits extensive antibacterial properties and is a potential source of novel antibiotic classes that may be beneficial for the treatment and management of infectious diseases (Doughari et al., 2006) [9] . Timber is used for making furniture and tool handles. Wood is also used for preparation of charcoal, oil mills, rice pounders and fuel wood. In traditional medicine, it is utilized for wound healing, abdominal pain, diarrhea, dysentery, parasite infections, fever, malaria, and respiratory issues (Bhadoriya et al., 2011) [6].
The fruit is known to possess several desirable medicinal properties. Anti-asthmatic property was reported by (Rifaatul & Khairunnisak, 2017). These are used in some Thai food recipes because of their sourness and specific aroma (Coronel et al., 1991) [7] Tamarind is used for souring curries, sauces, chutneys and certain beverages. The product prepared from tamarind flowers, leaves, roots, fruits and seeds have been extensively used in the traditional medicines in India and Africa. Processed seed powder is used in confectionery (Patel et al., 2008) [23] .
The pulp of tamarind fruit possesses a sweet and acidic flavor resulting from elevated levels of tartaric acid and reducing sugars (Caluwe et al, 2010) [8] . The commercially available dried tamarind pulp has 8 to 18% tartaric acid (2, 3-dihydroxybutanedioic acid C4H6O6, a dihydroxy carboxylic acid) and 25 to 45% reducing sugars, with glucose constituting 70% and fructose 30% (EI-Siddig, 2006) [10] . It has been recommended for use as a stabilizer in ice-cream, mayonnaise, and cheese and as an ingredient or agent in a number of pharmaceutical products, and the seed oil is said to be palatable and of culinary quality (Morton 1987) [16] . The germination of (Tamarindus indica) is often difficult because of its tough seed coat, which leads to physical dormancy (Agbogidi et al. 2007) [1] . This hard outer shell prevents water from entering the seed, making it hard for the plant to grow on its own. To fix this, treatments like mechanical scarification, acid soaking, and hot water are used to break the seed coat (Baskin 2003). These methods help in softening the seed, allowing for better and more uniform germination in the nursery (Ajiboye 2010) [2] . Tamarindus indica is a moderately large, evergreen tree, reaching larger heights of the tree and girths of 7 meters. It is a substantial evergreen tree characterized by an incredibly attractive spreading crown, planted across nearly the entire country, excluding the Himalayas and arid western parts (Muhammad and Amusa 2003) [17] . Leaves are alternately arranged, compound, consisting of 10-18 pairs of opposing leaflets; leaflets are narrowly oblong, measuring 12-32×3-11 mm, with a finely hairy petiole and rachis, and the midrib and net venation are somewhat prominent on both surfaces. The fruit is a pod, indehiscent, sub cylindrical, about 10-18 × 4 cm, either straight or curved, with a velvety, rustybrown exterior; the pod's shell is fragile, and the seeds are encased in a sticky, delicious pulp (Gupta et al., 2025) [12] .
Botanical Description and Taxonomy
Tamarindus indica is a member of the Fabaceae family and the Caesalpinioideae subfamily. It comprises 58 tribes based on its morphology.
(Sources: Wikipedia and Scientific Classification of Fruits):
Tamarind (Tamarindus indica) is a versatile tree that is spread over a wide geographical areas. As a result of that the local people gave it different names, which resulted in a great variety of its names. Although at the international level it is referred to as 'Indian date' in English, its names in Indian languages differ to a large extent for example, in Hindi and Punjabi it is known as 'Imli', in Telugu as 'Chinta', and in Tamil and Malayalam as 'Puli'. The various local names of the plant such as 'Tentuli' in Odia and 'Chinch' in Marathi indicate the establishing the plant in the regional cultures and the traditional dishes of the area.
Methodology
Seed dormancy in Tamarindus indica L. significantly affects seed germination, so breaking the seed dormancy becomes very important, which affects seed germination percentage or germination DAS. A systematic literature review has been conducted to evaluate this. (As illustrated in the systematic flow Figure 2).
Search Strategy
To conduct a scientific and deep study, many academic databases including Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Research Gate. Paper published between (1987 to 2026) were selected.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Or biological treatments. Studies focusing on medicinal properties or fruit production which did not address seed dormancy have been excluded from this comparative analysis.
Data Extraction
The selected literature was categorized into two main domains:
1. Treatments addressing specific physical dormancy problems (e.g., slow water absorption and hard seed coat).
2. Comparative performance of organic growth stimulants versus synthetic chemicals on germination parameters.
The extracted data was then systematically tabulated to facilitate a comparative discussion. [18] 2.
soaked in cow dung slurry 20-30% Improved germination as compared to untreated seeds. Eliminates the financial burden of expensive chemical fluids like KNO3 and HCL Sahu et al., (2025) [25] 3.
Seeds were soaked in cow urine 5% and distilled water as control for sixteen hours. [29] 4.
Improved
Seed were soaked in cow's urine 50/50 v/v
The leaf area was maximised by cow's urine.
The growth stimulants evaluated were IBA 100 ppm, IAA 100 ppm, ZnSO4 2%, succinic acid 1%, KCl 1%, KH2PO4 3%
Soaking in IBA 100 ppm improved the shoot and root lengths and dry weight better than the other treatments. Chemical treatments, germination was quicker and fast growth.
Cow urine and cow dung slurry is a cheap organic options and avoids buying expensive commercial growth chemicals ZnSO4, IAA, and IBA Vanangamudi, (2022) [28] Fallick et al.
Mechanical scarification
Hard seed coat, restricts rapid water uptake, Poor water imbibition delays.
Control (no soaking, no PGR) Different soaking periods GA₃ treatments Soaking + GA₃ combinations
Germination started-24 h soaking + GA₃ 200 ppm (6.9 DAS) Control (17.8 DAS) Germination Percentage-24 h soaking + GA₃ 200 ppm (95%) Control (Lowest) 24 h soaking + GA₃ @ 200 ppm was the best treatment.
Tiwari et al.
Seed coat removal
Hard (9DAS) Germination Percentage-H₂SO₄ 60%, 10 min (100%), Untreated Control ((65%) 24 h soaking + GA₃ @ 200 ppm was the best treatment.
Hard, waterimpermeable seed coat causing physical dormancy and restricting water uptake (imbibition).
Control Cold, water soaking 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, Hot water soaking 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, Sulphuric acid (H₂SO₄) Concentrated acid (≈98%) mein 5, 10 aur 15 mi, Mechanical scarification manually scratch/nick Germination Percentage-Mechanical scarification 83%, H₂SO₄ 10 min (78-80%) Hot water 10 min (65-70%), Cold water soaking (45-60%), Control (43%) Initial germination-H₂SO₄ (10 min) (8-10DAS), Mechanical scarification (9-11DAS), Hot water treatment (11-13 DAS), Control (15-18DAS) Rajamanickam et al. (2002) [24] 6. H2SO4 treatment Dormancy caused by hard impermeable seed coat.
commercial sulphuric (H2SO4) acid @ 200 ml kg⁻¹ 10-15-20 min Maximum germination obtained with H₂SO₄ treatment and hard seed percentage minimum.
Parameswari et al., (2001) [21] 7. Cow urine Hard Seed Coat (Tough outer layer, seed coat, wataer absorption, restricts water permeability).
Control (distilled water) GA₃ @ 100 ppm GA₃ @ 200 ppm GA₃ @ 300 ppm NAA @ 100 ppm NAA @ 200 ppm NAA @ 300 ppm HCl 10% (acid scarification) [14] Tiwari et al.
(2025) [27] 8. [25] Tiwari et al.
Cow
(2025) [27] 9. Biofertilizers Rigid Cellular Seed Envelope (Stony exterior shell, seed coat, wataer absorption, blocks immediate hydration.)
Control: Distilled water Chemical Treatment GA3 GA3 @ 100 ppm, GA3 @ 200 ppm, GA3 @ 300 ppm Chemical Treatment NAA NAA @ 100 ppm, NAA @ 200 ppm, NAA @ 300 ppm Acid Scarification HCl 10% Organic Treatment (Cow Urine) Cow urine 5%, Cow urine 10%, Cow urine 20% Organic Treatment (Bio-waste) Cow dung slurry (24 h soaking) GA3 @ 200 ppm: Initial germination 5.27 DAS, germination 86.67%, survival 94.67%.GA3 @ 300 ppm: Initial germination 5.67 DAS, 50% germination 15.67 DAS, germination 83.33%, survival 92.00%. Cow urine @ 20%: Germination 76.67%, survival 88.00%. Cow urine @ 10%: Germination 73.33%, survival 86.67%. Cow urine @ 5%: Germination70.00%, survival 84.00%. Cow dung slurry: Germination 66.67%, survival 82.67%. Control: Initial germination 11.67 DAS, germination 53.33%, survival 73.33%.
Yadav et al., (2025) [30] Fig
Conclusion
The outer layer of the tamarind seed, known as the seed coat, is very hard and impermeable. The problem of seed dormancy is still a major challenge in the raising seedlings process in the nurseries. This comparative challenge unveils a critical dichotomy, where synthetic chemical treatments (GA 3 , KNO 3 and H 2 SO 4 ) are highly effective in rapidly softening the outer layer of the seed and increasing germination rates, but have many drawbacks. These chemicals can cause significant environmental harm, are too expensive for many to afford, and have many other associated risks. This is in stark contrast to organic priming techniques, namely 20%, 30% and 40% solutions of cow urine and cow dung as well as bio-fertilizers, which have been found to be highly effective, eco-friendly and economically viable options. These approaches are accessible to everyone and can frequently be acquired at minimal expense or even for free. Reviews of numerous studies suggest that while seed germination might occur at a slightly slower pace when using these organic agents, they consistently produce seedlings of higher quality and promote environmental sustainability. Since they do not harm the environment in any way, it is highly advised to prioritize organic treatments over synthetic chemicals to support the extensive and sustainable agroforestry development of Tamarindus indica.
Future Scope
In the future objective of research should focus on determining the precise quantities of various organic fertilizers and evaluating different application methods. This is intended to minimize the initial delays often encountered during seed germination. Furthermore, large-scale field trials are essential to evaluate and document the growth performance of perennial plants cultivated under diverse climatic condition.
References
- Agbogidi OM, Bosah BO, Eshegbeyi OF. Effects of acid pre-treatment on the germination and seedling growth of African pear (Dacryodes edulis [G. Don] Lam. HJ). International Journal of Agricultural Research. 2007;2:952-958.
- Ajiboye AA. Dormancy and seed germination of Tamarindus indica (L). Pacific Journal of Science and Technology. 2010;11(12):463-470.
- Akinyele AO, Onokpise OU. Mediation of gene flow in tropical trees of Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Forest and Environmental Science. 2012;28(1):1-7.
- Ayala-Silva T, Gubbuk H, Gordon G. Breaking seed coat dormancy with physical and chemical methods in tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) seeds. Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico. 2013;97(1-2):87-96.
- Baskin CC. Breaking physical dormancy in seedsfocusing on the lens. New Phytologist. 2003;158(2):229-232.
- Bhadoriya SS, Ganeshpurkar A, Narwaria J, Rai G, Jain AP. Tamarindus indica: extent of explored potential. Pharmacognosy Reviews. 2011;5(9):73-81.
- Coronel RE. Tamarindus indica L. In: Verheij EWM, Coronel RE, editors. Plant Resources of South-East Asia: No. 2. Edible fruits and nuts. Wageningen: PROSEA Foundation; 1991. p. 298-301.
- De Caluwe E, Gautier K, Van Damme P. Tamarindus indica L.: a review of traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology. Afrika Focus. 2010;23(1):53-83.
- Doughari JH. Antimicrobial activity of Tamarindus indica Linn. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2006;5(2):597-603.
- El-Siddig K, Gunasena HPM, Prasad BA, Pushpakumara DKNG, Ramana KVR, Vijayanand P, et al. Tamarind: Tamarindus indica L. Fruits for the Future 5. Southampton: International Centre for Underutilised Crops; 2006.
- Fallick E, Okon Y, Epstein E, Goldmn A, Fischer M. Identification and quantification of IAA and IBA of Azospirillum brasilense inoculated with maize roots. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1989;21:147-153.
- Gupta P, Sharma D, Baghel Y, Nalini, Bargah AS. Physical and biological characteristics of Tamarindus indica: a review. International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research. 2025;9(6):416-424.
- Havinga RM, Hartl A, Putscher J, Prehsler S, Buchmann C, Vogl CR. Tamarindus indica L. (Fabaceae): patterns of use in traditional African medicine. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2010;127(3):573-588.
- Tandon K, Gurjar PKS, Lekhi R, Soni D. Effect of organic substances and plant growth regulators on seed germination and survival of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) seedlings. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2019;8(2):22702274.
- Kumar CS, Bhattacharya S. Tamarind seed: properties, processing and utilization. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2008;48(1):1-20.
- Morton JF. Tamarind. In: Fruits of warm climates. Miami: Julia F. Morton; 1987. p. 115-121.
- Muhammad S, Amusa NA. Effects of sulphuric acid and hot water treatments on seed germination of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L). African Journal of Biotechnology. 2003;2(9):276-279.
- Nishad HK, Sharma D, Bargah AS, Thakur S, Rajwade AK. Influence of pre-sowed biochemical, chemical and organic treatments to the germination, vigor and morphological growth of Tamarindus indica L. Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology. 2025;26(910):24-36.
- Orwa C, Mutua A, Kindt R, Jamnadass R, Anthony S. Agroforestry database: a tree reference and selection guide version 4.0. Nairobi: World Agroforestry Centre; 2009.
- Oyebamiji NA, Ogor AA. Some aspects of soil and seed pre-treatments on germination, growth and biomass production of Tamarindus indica seeds in the nursery. Advances in Forestry Science. 2019;6(1):555559.
- Parameswari K, Srimathi P, Malarkodi K. Standardisation of dormancy breaking treatment in tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) seeds. Legume Research. 2001;24(1):60-62.
- Purseglove JW. Tropical crops: dicotyledons. Harlow, Essex, England: Longman Scientific & Technical; New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1987.
- Patel TR, Morris GA, Ebringerová A, Vodeničarová M, Velebný V, Ortega A, et al. Global conformation analysis of irradiated xyloglucans. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2008;74(4):845-851.
- Rajamanickam C, Anbu S, Balakrishnan K. Effect of chemicals and growth regulators on seed germination in aonla (Emblica officinalis G.). South Indian Horticulture. 2002;50(1-3):211-214.
- Sahu C, Khunte SD, Dixit A, Paikra S, Toppo H, Devika. Effect of organic substances and chemicals on seed germination and survivability of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) seedling in Durg District of Chhattisgarh. International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research. 2025;9(Special Issue 9):17141716.
- Shah NC. Tamarindus indica-introduction in India and culinary, medicinal, and industrial uses. Asian AgriHistory. 2014;18(4):343-355.
- Tiwari A, Kerketta A, Khunte SD, Sao R, Dhruw SS, Verma T, et al. Influence of soaking time and PGR on seed germination and seedling growth of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.). International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research. 2025;9(Special Issue 9):1419-1423.
- Vanangamudi K. Response of tamarind (Tamarindus indica) to presowing seed treatment with growth stimulants. Journal of Tropical Forest Science. 2022;15(1):6-11.
- Vasantha PT, Vijendrakumar RC, Guruprasad TR, Mahadevamma M, Santhosh KV. Effect of biofertilizers and chemical treatments on Tamarindus indica seedling vigour. Journal of Tree Sciences. 2014;33(2):12-18.
- Yadav N, Tiwari R, Jatav R, Vasure N. Effect of different doses of bio-regulators and bio-waste on seed germination and vigour and growth of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) seedling. Plant Archives. 2025;25(Suppl. 2):1710-1717.
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
