Scinovex
article Open Access

Performance of different insecticides against Chilo partellus infestation under field conditions

International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research · 2026 · Vol. 10(8) · pp. 517–519
Kurru CharithaPradyumn SinghNeha SharmaPrashant Kumar YadavShambhu PatelNaveen .Shradha ParmarManeesha .NS Bhadauria

Abstract

The investigation conducted at RVSKVV, Gwalior, during Kharif 2024 and 2025 revealed that, among the ten treatments, Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC with 11.11% is most effective followed by Flubendiamide 20% WG with 13.89% against dead heart damage caused by sorghum spotted stem borer. And the percentage of reduction over control was maximum in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC with 76.88% followed by Flubendiamide 20% WG with 71.10%.

Full Text

Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.

Introduction

Trailing wheat, rice, maize and barley in terms of production and cultivated area, sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is a significant cereal crop in the globe (Ahmed et al., 2000) [1] . The crop is highly prized for its ability to withstand drought, use water efficiently, adapt to marginal habitats, and produce a lot of biomasses, which makes it deal for sub-Saharan Africa's semi-arid regions (Wortmann et al., 2009; Ogbaga et al., 2014) [19,12] . Sorghum is the second most important cereal in Uganda, after maize, and it plays a significant role in the production of food and animal feed (Wortmann et al., 2009) [19] . Because its stalks, leaves and grains can be used to produce liquid fuels like bioethanol and bio-oil, gaseous fuels like biohydrogen, biogas and syngas and solid products like biochar, sorghum has significant potential as a bioenergy crop in addition to its use as a food and fodder crop (Stamenkovic et al., 2020) [17] . Its economic significance and variety of uses as a C 4 crop are further enhanced by the widespread use of its biomass as animal feed (Ahmed et al., 2000; Xin et al., 2021) [1,20] . Sorghum productivity is limited by a number of biotic and abiotic stressors that can result in significant yield losses despite its versatility and numerous applications (Perumal et al., 2018; Fakrudin et al., 2021) [13,4] . Pest infestations and plant diseases are two of the most significant biotic limitations because they can negatively impact crop production and development at various stages. Sorghum is infested by a number of insect pests, including as shoot fly, stem borer, fall armyworm, aphids, ear head bugs etc. Because their larvae burrow into the stem and eat internally, damaging vascular tissues and weakening the plant, stem borers are regarded as serious pests. While an attack during the reproductive stage might result in panicle damage, poor grain growth and decreased grain yield, and infestation during the vegetative stage may provide typical signs like shot holes and dead hearts (van Rensburg and Flett 2010; Mula et al. 2011) [18,10] .

Materials and Methods

A sorghum genotype N-15 was sown in a plot size of 2.7 m x 3 m with a spacing of 45 cm x 15 cm. A total of ten treatments (Table 1) were duplicated thrice each. The spraying was done with the help of lever operated knapsack sprayer. Total two sprays were given for the management of spotted stem borer. Spraying was initiated at 45 DAE. The second spray was applied 15 days after first spray. Observations were taken at one day before spraying and 3, 7 and 14 days after spraying. The incidence of spotted stem borer (per cent dead hearts) was assessed on ten randomly selected plants in the plot at each observation interval. Treatment Details Dose (ml or g/ha) T1 Chlorantraniliprole18.5% SC @ 30 a.i/ha 150 ml T2 Quinalphos 25% EC @ 325 a.i/ha 1300 ml T3 Carbofuran3%CG @ 250 a.i/ha 8000 g T4 Chlorpyrifos20%EC @ 250 a.i/ha 1250 ml T5 Phosalone35%EC @ 400 a.i/ha 1000 g T6 Acephate75%SP @ 500 a.i/ha 500 g T7 Imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 20 a.i/ha 125 ml T8 Flonicamid 50% WG @ 75 a.i/ha 150 g T9 Flubendiamide 20% WG @ 25 a.i/ha 125 g T10 Control -

Results and Discussion

The [7] , who showed that Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC was efficient when compared to Chlorpyrifos 20 EC and Imidacloprid 75 FS. Devananda et al. (2018) [3] and Kumar and Jindal, 2015 [9] , reported that the Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC was best in reducing spotted stem borer damage. The next best treatment is Flubendiamide 20% WG followed by Carbofuran 3% CG. The present investigation is coherent with Ramesh et al.

(2023), who revealed that Flubendiamide 20% WG and Carbofuran 3% CG was efficient against C. partellus. In the same way, Kumar and Alam (2017) [8] , who noted that the Flubendiamide 480 SC and Carbofuran 3% CG was effectively by recording minimum damage caused by stem borer in maize. The results are in line with studies made by Bhaskar (2022) [2] , concluded that Flubendiamide 39.35 SC and Flonicamid 50 WG was superior to other insecticides. In addition, Kumar et al., 2017 [8] and Sohail et al., 2003 [16] , who found that Carbofuran 3% CG was best against spotted stem borer. Similar results found by Jindal et al., 2017 [5] ; Roopika et al., 2020 [15] ; Munjaji, 2020 [11] and Rani et al., 2018 [14] .

Declaration

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgement

AcknowledgementsI express our sincere thanks to Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Gwalior for providing necessary constructive help and other technical inputs during the course of experimentation.

References

  1. Ahmed MM, Sanders JH, Nell WT. New sorghum and millet cultivar introduction in Sub-Saharan Africa: impacts and research agenda. Agric Syst. 2000;64:5565.
  2. Guntur (AP): Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University; 2022. 84 p.
  3. Devananda KM, Khanpara AV, Vaja AM. Bio-efficacy of various insecticides against maize stem borer Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Crambidae: Lepidoptera) in Junagadh conditions. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2018;7(4):2011-2014.
  4. Fakrudin B, Lakshmidevamma TN, Ugalat J, Gunnaiah R, Suresh SPG, Apoorva KA, et al. Genomic designing for biotic stress resistance in sorghum. In: Kole C, editor. Genomic designing for biotic stress resistant cereal crops. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 213-255.
  5. Jindal J, Sandhu GS, Kumar R. Efficacy of some biorational insecticides against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize. Annals of Plant Protection Science. 2017;25(2):244-247.
  6. Kumar A, Kumar A, Meena RK, Punam. Field efficacy of seven insecticides against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) on maize (Zea mays L.) in Allahabad. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 2017;5:46-48.
  7. Kumar P, Singh G, Rana R, Ram M. Evaluation of efficacy of some novel chemical insecticides against stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize. Journal of Plant Development Sciences. 2015;7(3):239-242.
  8. Kumar R, Alam T. Bio-efficacy of some newer insecticides against maize stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 2017;5(6):1347-1351.
  9. Kumar R, Jindal J. Economic evaluation of biorational and conventional insecticides for the control of maize stem borer Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) Zea mays. Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 2015;7(2):644-648.
  10. Mulaa MM, Bergvinson DJ, Mugo SN, Wanyama JM, Tende RM, De Groote H, et al. Evaluation of stem borer resistance management strategies for Bt maize in Kenya based on alternative host refugia. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10:4732-4740.
  11. Munjaji PR. Varietal evaluation and management of lepidopteran insect pests of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) [thesis]. Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth; 2020. 67 p.
  12. Ogbaga CC, Stepien P, Johnson GN. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) varieties adopt strongly contrasting strategies in response to drought. Physiol Plant. 2014;152:389-401.
  13. Perumal R, Magill CW, Peterson GC, Prom LK, Bashir EM, Tesso T. Sorghum breeding for biotic stress tolerance. In: Roney B, editor. Achieving sustainable cultivation of sorghum. Volume 1: genetics, breeding and production techniques. Sawston: Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing; 2018. p. 189-226.
  14. Rani DS, Naga Satya SNCh, Kumar AK, Venkatesh MN. Economic evaluation and efficacy of various insecticides against maize stem borers. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2018;7:15-20.
  15. Roopika M, Srinivasan G, Shanthi M, Vanniarajan C. Management strategies for pink stem borer, Sesamia inferens (Walker) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera) infesting barnyard millet, Echinochloa frumentacea (Link) using botanicals. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 2020;8(6):1981-1984.
  16. Sohail A, Shahzad A, Naeem M, Ashraf MY. Determination of efficacy of cypermethrin, Regent and carbofuran against Chilo partellus Swin. and biochemical changes following their application in maize plants. Int J Agri Biol. 2003;5:30-35.
  17. Stamenkovic OS, Siliveru K, Veljkovic VB, BankovicIlic IB, Tasic MB, Ciampitti IA, et al. Production of biofuels from sorghum. Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2020;124:109769.
  18. van Rensburg JBJ, Flett BC. A review of research achievements on maize stem borer, Busseola fusca (Fuller) and Diplodia ear rot caused by Stenocarpella maydis (Berk.) Sutton. S Afr J Plant Soil. 2010;27:7480.
  19. Wortmann CS, Mamo M, Mburu C, Letayo E, Abebe G, Kayuki KC, et al. Atlas of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench): production in eastern and Southern Africa. In: Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. INTSORMIL Scientific Publications. 2009;2.
  20. Xin ZG, Wang ML, Cuevas HE, Chen JP, Harrison M, Pugh NA, et al. Sorghum genetic, genomic, and breeding resources. Planta. 2021;254:114.
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
63%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.