Scinovex
article Open Access

Influence of microbial consortia and integrated nitrogen management on growth, productivity and economic performance of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)

International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research · 2026 · Vol. 10(8S) · pp. 965–970

Abstract

To evaluate the influence of different methods of microbial consortia application and integrated nitrogen management on the growth, productivity and economics of Kharif sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). Field experiment laid out in a factorial Randomized Block Design (RBD) with 16 treatment combinations (four methods of microbial consortia application × four levels of integrated nitrogen management) replicated thrice. Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, Naini Agricultural Institute, Faculty of Agriculture, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences (SHUATS), Prayagraj-211007 (U.P.), India, during Kharif 2024 and Kharif 2025. Sorghum variety Amarnath 2000 was sown at 12 kg seed ha-1 with a recommended fertilizer dose of 80-40-40 kg N-P-K ha-1. Microbial consortia were applied as seed treatment (30 g kg-1 seed), soil application (2.5 kg/50 kg FYM), a combination of both, or omitted (control), each combined with four nitrogen management schedules (100% urea; 50% urea + 50% FYM; 50% urea + 50% vermicompost; 50% urea + 25% FYM + 25% vermicompost). Plant height, Leaf Area Index (LAI) and dry weight were recorded at periodic intervals, and cost of cultivation, gross returns, net returns and Benefit-Cost (B:C) ratio were computed. Data for both years were pooled and analyzed using ANOVA appropriate for RBD. The combined application of seed treatment and soil application of microbial consortia with 50% N through urea + 25% N through FYM + 25% N through vermicompost (T12) produced the tallest plants (190.44 cm at 75 DAS; 239.16 cm at 100 DAS, pooled), the highest LAI (4.84 and 3.92) and the greatest dry weight (100.67 g and 122.94 g plant-1), significantly superior to all other treatments (CD, p = 0.05). The lowest values for these growth parameters were recorded under the no-consortia control with 100% N through urea (T13). Economic analysis showed that although T12 gave the highest gross and net returns, the combined seed treatment + soil application of consortia with 100% N through urea (T9) returned the highest benefit-cost ratio (2.64), reflecting its comparatively lower input cost. Combined seed and soil application of microbial consortia, integrated with a balanced organic-inorganic nitrogen schedule, improved the growth and productivity of Kharif sorghum over sole chemical fertilization or the absence of microbial consortia. Growers aiming to maximize plant growth and biomass may adopt the combined consortia application with 50% urea + 25% FYM + 25% vermicompost (T12), while those prioritizing economic return per unit investment may prefer combined consortia application with 100% urea (T9).

Full Text

Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.

Introduction

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is among the most important dryland cereals of the semi-arid and sub-humid tropics, valued as a source of food, fodder and raw material for the starch and bio-energy industries. Its inherent drought tolerance and adaptability to marginal soils make it a dependable crop for resource-constrained rainfed and irrigated cropping systems across India (Reddy et al., 2023) [9] . Nitrogen is the single most yield-limiting nutrient in sorghum production, yet continuous reliance on inorganic nitrogen sources such as urea can deteriorate soil physical and biological properties over time, raise input costs and reduce nitrogen-use efficiency. Integrated nutrient management, in which urea is judiciously combined with organic sources such as farmyard manure (FYM) and vermicompost (VC), has been advocated as a means of sustaining soil fertility while maintaining productivity, since organic amendments improve soil organic carbon, microbial activity and slow-release nutrient availability alongside the readily available nitrogen supplied by urea. Microbial consortia, comprising complementary nitrogenfixing, phosphate-solubilizing and other plant-growthpromoting microorganisms, offer a complementary route to improving nutrient-use efficiency. Seed treatment ensures early rhizosphere colonization, whereas soil application through an FYM carrier extends microbial establishment throughout the root zone; the combination of both methods has been reported to produce more consistent gains in growth and yield attributes than either method alone (Kavya et al., 2020) [5] . Similar synergistic effects of microbial inoculation with organic amendments on growth and biomass accumulation have been documented in Kharif sorghum under rainfed conditions (Kakde et al., 2020) [4] and in other cereals receiving integrated nutrient sources (Tshering et al., 2023; Negi et al., 2022) [7,11] . While the individual effects of microbial consortia and of integrated nitrogen management on sorghum have received attention, information on their combined, factorial influence on growth, dry matter accumulation and, importantly, the economics of cultivation remains limited under the specific agro-climatic conditions of the middle Gangetic plains. The present study was therefore undertaken to evaluate the influence of four methods of microbial consortia application, in combination with four integrated nitrogen management schedules, on the growth, productivity and economic performance of Kharif sorghum, with a view to identifying the most agronomically and economically efficient combination for the region.

Materials and Methods

Experimental site and period

The field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2024 and Kharif 2025 at the Research Farm of Naini Agricultural Institute, Faculty of Agriculture, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences (SHUATS), Prayagraj-211007 (U.P.), India. The experimental site is located at approximately 25.4°N latitude and 81.8°E longitude at an altitude of about 98 m above mean sea level, representing the subtropical, sub-humid agro-climatic conditions of the middle Gangetic plains.

Soil characteristics

The pre-experimental soil of the experimental site was analyzed for its physico-chemical properties (0-15 cm depth); the soil was neutral in reaction, non-saline, low in organic carbon and available nitrogen, and medium in available phosphorus, potassium and zinc in both years (Table 1). Glass electrode pH meter (Jackson, 1973) [3] 6.8 6.9 Electrical conductivity (dS m-1) EC meter 0.20 0.21 Organic carbon (%)

Walkley and Black (1934) [12] 0.41 0.43 Available N (kg ha-1)

Subbiah and Asija (1956) [10] 220.7 221.4 Available P (kg ha-1)

Olsen et al. (1954) [8] 11.85 12.61 Exchangeable K (kg ha-1)

Flame photometer (Jackson, 1958) [2] 236.75 235.2 Available Zn (mg kg-1) DTPA extractant, AAS (Lindsay and Norvell, 1978) [6] 0.65 0.59

Experimental design and treatments

The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Block Design (RBD) with 16 treatment combinations and 3 replications, giving a total of 48 plots. Each plot measured 3 m × 3 m (9 m2). The gross experimental area was 607.6 m 2 , and the net experimental area was 432 m 2 . The sorghum variety Amarnath 2000 was sown at a seed rate of 12 kg ha-1 on 28 June in both seasons. The recommended dose of fertilizer was 80-40-40 kg N-P-K ha-1.

The 16 treatment combinations consisted of a factorial combination of four microbial consortia application methods (Factor A) and four integrated nitrogen management levels (Factor B), as detailed below: Factor A -Methods of Microbial Consortia Application: A1, Seed treatment @ 30 g kg-1 seed; A2, Soil application @ 2.5 kg/50 kg FYM; A3, Seed treatment + soil application (combined); A4, No consortia (control). Factor B -Integrated Nitrogen Management: B1, 100% N through urea; B2, 50% N through urea + 50% N through FYM; B3, 50% N through urea + 50% N through vermicompost (VC); B4, 50% N through urea + 25% N through FYM + 25% N through VC.

Crop management

Pre-sowing irrigation was applied on 21 June, followed by ploughing, harrowing and levelling on 23 June. The microbial consortia for soil application were mixed with FYM (2.5 kg consortia/50 kg FYM) on 27 June. Seed treatment was carried out on the day of sowing (28 June). Full doses of phosphorus and potassium were applied as basal doses, while nitrogen was applied in two splits-50% as basal and 50% as top dressing at 30 DAS. Thinning and gap filling were done at 10 DAS. Irrigation was applied at 21, 85 and 100 DAS. The crop was harvested at 120 DAS (26 October) in both years.

Observations recorded

Growth parameters, plant height (cm), dry weight (g plant-1), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR, g m-2 day-1) and relative growth rate (RGR, g g-1 day-1)-were recorded at 25, 50, 75 and 100 DAS. Post-harvest observations included length of head (cm), number of grains per head, test weight (g), grain yield (kg ha-1), stover yield (kg ha-1) and harvest index (%). Economics were computed in terms of cost of cultivation, gross returns, net returns and benefit-cost (B:C) ratio. Post-harvest soil samples (0-15 cm depth) were analyzed for pH, EC, available nitrogen (Subbiah and Asija, 1956) [10] and organic carbon (Walkley and Black, 1934) [12] .

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed statistically using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) appropriate for RBD. The significance of treatment differences was tested at the p = 0.05

International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research https://www.biochemjournal.com probability level. Critical differences (CD) were calculated wherever the F-test was significant. Pooled analysis was performed for the two seasons (2024 and 2025). To facilitate interpretation of the overall treatment effects, pooled values presented in the tables were computed as the arithmetic mean of the two years. These pooled means are descriptive averages and were not subjected to a formal combined analysis of variance.

Results and Discussion

Plant Height

Plant height at 75 and 100 DAS (pooled over 2024 and 2025) was significantly influenced by the different combinations of microbial consortia and integrated nitrogen management (Table 1). Among the treatments, the combined seed treatment and soil application of microbial consortia along with 50% nitrogen through urea + 25% nitrogen through farmyard manure (FYM) + 25% nitrogen through vermicompost (VC) (T12) recorded the maximum plant height of 190.44 cm at 75 DAS and 239.16 cm at 100 DAS, which was significantly superior to all other treatments. This was closely followed by T11 (188.98 and 229.17 cm) and T10 (185.99 and 227.49 cm), indicating that the combined application of microbial consortia with integrated organic and inorganic nitrogen sources consistently enhanced vegetative growth. In contrast, the lowest plant height was observed under the no-consortia treatment receiving 100% nitrogen through urea (T13), recording 145.50 cm and 199.08 cm at 75 and 100 DAS, respectively. The gradual increase in plant height from the no-consortia treatments (T13-T16) to seed treatment alone (T1-T4), soil application alone (T5-T8), and finally the combined seed and soil application treatments (T9-T12) clearly demonstrates the cumulative positive effect of microbial inoculation integrated with balanced nitrogen management on crop growth. The superior plant height observed under T12 may be attributed to the synergistic interaction between microbial consortia and integrated nutrient sources, which enhanced nutrient availability, stimulated root proliferation, and improved rhizosphere microbial activity. Microbial inoculants facilitate nutrient solubilization, biological nitrogen and the production of plant growthpromoting substances such as auxins, gibberellins, and cytokinin's, thereby promoting cell division and elongation. Simultaneously, the integration of FYM and vermicompost with urea ensured a continuous and balanced supply of nutrients, improved soil organic carbon, moisture retention, and microbial biomass, thereby creating a favorable environment for sustained plant growth throughout the crop cycle. Conversely, the comparatively lower plant height recorded under the sole urea application without microbial consortia (T13) may be associated with lower nutrient use efficiency, reduced microbial activity, and the absence of a sustained nutrient release pattern. These findings are in agreement with those of Kakde et al. (2020) [4] , who reported enhanced vegetative growth in sorghum following microbial inoculation integrated with organic nutrient sources. Similar improvements in plant height under integrated nitrogen management involving organic amendments and inorganic fertilizers have also been documented by Reddy et al. (2023) [9] and Kavya et al.

(2020) [5] , who attributed these responses to improved nutrient synchronization, enhanced soil biological activity, and better nutrient uptake throughout the crop growth period.

Leaf Area Index (LAI)

A similar trend was observed for leaf area index (LAI) at both 75 and 100 DAS (Table 2), where significant differences among treatments were recorded. The combined application of seed treatment and soil application of microbial consortia along with 50% nitrogen through urea + 25% nitrogen through farmyard manure (FYM) + 25% nitrogen through vermicompost (T12) produced the highest LAI values of 4.84 at 75 DAS and 3.92 at 100 DAS. This treatment was statistically superior to all other treatments, indicating that the integrated use of microbial consortia with balanced organic and inorganic nitrogen sources effectively enhanced canopy development. The next highest LAI was recorded under T11 (4.66 and 3.77), followed by T10 (4.46 and 3.60), demonstrating the positive response of sorghum to the combined inoculation of microbial consortia and integrated nutrient management. In contrast, the lowest LAI values (3.45 and 2.77) were observed in the treatment without microbial consortia receiving 100% nitrogen through urea (T13), highlighting the limited effectiveness of sole inorganic nitrogen application in promoting leaf development.

The marked improvement in LAI under T12 can be attributed to the synergistic effects of microbial consortia and integrated nitrogen sources, which enhanced nutrient availability, stimulated root growth, improved rhizosphere microbial activity, and ensured a sustained release of nutrients throughout the crop growth period. The combined application of FYM and vermicompost likely improved soil physical properties, moisture retention, and microbial diversity, while microbial inoculants enhanced nutrient solubilization and biological nitrogen fixation. These processes collectively promoted greater leaf initiation, expansion, and photosynthetic surface area, thereby contributing to superior vegetative growth. Conversely, the absence of microbial inoculation in T13 resulted in comparatively lower nutrient use efficiency and reduced leaf expansion, leading to significantly lower LAI. Similar beneficial effects of integrating microbial consortia with organic and inorganic nutrient sources on canopy development and leaf area have been reported in sorghum and other cereal crops by Kavya et al. (2020) [5] and Tshering et al. (2023) [11] .

Dry Weight

Dry matter accumulation exhibited a trend similar to that observed for plant height and leaf area index, with significant differences among the microbial consortia and integrated nitrogen management treatments at both 75 and 100 DAS (Table 3). The combined seed treatment and soil application of microbial consortia supplemented with 50% nitrogen through urea + 25% nitrogen through farmyard manure (FYM) + 25% nitrogen through vermicompost (VC) (T12) produced the highest dry matter accumulation of 100.67 g plant⁻¹ at 75 DAS and 122.94 g plant⁻¹ at 100 DAS, which was significantly superior to all other treatments. This was followed by T11 (93.57 and 116.41 g plant⁻¹) and T10 (88.83 and 114.19 g plant⁻¹), indicating that the combined application of microbial consortia with integrated nutrient management consistently promoted biomass production. In contrast, the lowest dry matter accumulation was recorded under the no-consortia treatment receiving 100% nitrogen through urea (T13), with values of 70.44 g plant⁻¹ and 100.63 g plant⁻¹ at 75 and 100 DAS, respectively. The progressive increase in dry matter accumulation from the no-consortia treatments to singlemethod microbial application and finally to the combined seed and soil application treatments demonstrates the beneficial effect of integrating microbial inoculants with balanced nitrogen sources. The greater biomass accumulation under T12 may be attributed to the synergistic effects of microbial consortia and integrated organic-inorganic nitrogen management, which enhanced nutrient mineralization, improved uptake efficiency, and stimulated root growth and rhizosphere microbial activity. The balanced combination of urea, FYM, and vermicompost ensured both immediate and sustained nutrient availability throughout the crop growth period, while the microbial consortia enhanced nutrient solubilization and the production of plant growth-promoting substances, resulting in increased photosynthetic efficiency and assimilate production. Improved canopy development, as reflected by higher plant height and leaf area index under the same treatment, likely contributed to greater interception of solar radiation and enhanced dry matter partitioning into vegetative tissues. Conversely, the lower biomass recorded under sole urea application without microbial inoculation (T13) may be associated with comparatively lower nutrient use efficiency, reduced microbial activity, and less favorable soil biological conditions. These findings are in agreement with Kakde et al. (2020) [4] , who reported enhanced dry matter production in sorghum under microbial consortia integrated with organic nutrient sources. Similar improvements in biomass accumulation through the combined use of microbial inoculants and integrated nutrient management have also been reported in cereal crops by Negi et al. (2022) [7] and Ibarra-Villarreal et al. (2023) [1] .

Economics

Cost of cultivation increased progressively with the addition of organic sources (FYM and vermicompost) and with the intensity of microbial consortia application, being lowest under the no-consortia control with 100% urea (T13, INR 36,123.0 ha-1) and highest under the combined consortia application with 50% urea + 50% vermicompost (T7, INR 56,871.5 ha-1) (Table 5). Gross and net returns, however, rose consistently with the combined seed + soil application of consortia, and were maximum under T12 (50% urea + 25% FYM + 25% VC), reflecting the higher biomass and yield attributes recorded for this treatment. Despite this, the benefit-cost ratio-which weighs returns against the cost incurred-was highest under the combined consortia application with 100% N through urea (T9, B:C = 2.64), followed by the no-consortia control with 100% urea (T13, B:C = 2.12) and the soil-applied consortia with 100% urea (T5, B:C = 2.34). Treatments involving vermicompost and FYM substitution (T2-T4, T6-T8, T10-T12, T14-T16), while agronomically superior in growth parameters, returned comparatively lower B:C ratios because of the added cost of organic inputs relative to the marginal gain in returns. This cost-return trade-off between purely ureabased nitrogen management and organic-substituted integrated nutrient management is consistent with findings that combining biofertilizers with a full or near-full dose of inorganic fertilizer, rather than substituting a large share of nitrogen with costlier organic manures, tends to maximize the benefit-cost ratio even where absolute yields are somewhat lower (Kavya et al., 2020) [5] .

Conclusion

Combined seed treatment and soil application of microbial consortia, integrated with a balanced organic-inorganic nitrogen schedule (50% N through urea + 25% N through FYM + 25% N through vermicompost), consistently produced the greatest plant height, leaf area index and dry matter accumulation in Kharif sorghum over both years of study, confirming a synergistic effect of combined microbial inoculation and integrated nutrient management on crop growth. However, from an economic standpoint, combining both consortia application methods with 100% N through urea gave the highest benefit-cost ratio, indicating that the additional cost of organic amendments did not proportionately translate into higher returns per rupee invested. Growers prioritizing maximum vegetative growth and biomass may therefore adopt the combined consortia application with 50% urea + 25% FYM + 25% vermicompost, while those prioritizing economic efficiency may prefer combined consortia application with 100% urea. Further multi-location trials incorporating yield attributes and post-harvest soil health parameters are recommended to validate these findings across seasons and soil types.

Ethical issues

The study did not involve human participants or animal subjects. The authors have no ethical concerns to disclose.

Consent

Ethical approval

Not applicable, as the study did not involve human participants or animal subjects.

Competing interests

Authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Acknowledgement

AcknowledgementsThe authors are grateful to the Department of Agronomy, Naini Agricultural Institute, Faculty of Agriculture, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences (SHUATS), Prayagraj, for providing the necessary facilities and resources for conducting this research.

References

  1. Ibarra-Villarreal AL, Villarreal-Delgado MF, ParraCota FI, Yepez EA, Guzmán C, Gutierrez-Coronado MA, et al. Effect of a native bacterial consortia on growth, yield and grain quality of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum) under different nitrogen rates in the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Plant Signal Behav. 2023;18(1):2219837.
  2. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1958.
  3. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.; 1973.
  4. Kakde NA, M, Hanwate GR, Gourkhede PH. Influence of microbial consortia on the yield of Kharif sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and soil parameters under rainfed conditions. Indian J Dryland Agric Res Dev. 2020;35(2):54-56.
  5. Kavya Y, Trimurtulu N, Gopal AV. Effect of microbial consortia on soil enzymatic activities of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] rhizosphere under glass house conditions. Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(2):1047-1050.
  6. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1978;42(3):421-428.
  7. Negi R, Kaur T, Devi R, Kour D, Yadav AN. Assessment of nitrogen-fixing endophytic and mineral solubilizing rhizospheric bacteria as multifunctional microbial consortia for growth promotion of wheat and wild wheat relative Aegilops kotschyi. Heliyon. 2022;8(12):e12579. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12579.
  8. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture; 1954. USDA Circular No. 939.
  9. Reddy KS, Rao CP, Luther MM, Prasad PRK. Evaluating the efficacy of inorganic fertilizers and biofertilizer consortia for enhanced crop yield and nutrient uptake in sorghum. Emerg Life Sci Res. 2023;9:332-339.
  10. Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci. 1956;25(8):259-260.
  11. Tshering K, Rengel Z, Storer P, Solaiman ZM. Novel rock mineral fertiliser application with microbial consortia inoculant enhances growth, yield and grain protein content of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in sandy soil. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2023;69(10):17341749.
  12. Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37(1):29-38.
Agricultural Science and FertilizationAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop ManagementAgronomic Practices and Intercropping Systemsvermicompostsorghummicrobial consortiaintegrated nitrogen managementureasoil applicationleaf area indexbenefit-cost ratioseed treatmentplant growth
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
60%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.