Scinovex
article Open Access

Evaluation of botanicals and biopesticides against diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) infesting cabbage under western Uttar Pradesh conditions

International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research · 2026 · Vol. 10(8S) · pp. 804–808
Anurag KumarRajendra SinghDV SinghGaje SinghGopal SinghMukesh KumarAshutosh PalNiraj Gupta

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during Rabi 2025-26 at the Crop Research Centre, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Modipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, to evaluate the bio-efficacy of botanicals and biopesticides against the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) on cabbage. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Block Design with seven treatments and three replications. Two foliar sprays were applied and larval populations were recorded before spraying and at 3, 7 and 14 days after each application. Among the treatments, Spinosad 45 SC was the most effective, recording the lowest mean larval population (2.44 and 1.50 larvae per five plants) with the highest reduction over control (72.88% and 85.00%) after the first and second sprays, respectively. Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki ranked second, followed by Metarhizium anisopliae, while neem-based treatments and Agniastra were comparatively less effective. The study indicates that Spinosad 45 SC, followed by Bacillus thuringiensis, can be effectively incorporated into Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programmes for sustainable management of diamondback moth in cabbage under Western Uttar Pradesh conditions.

Full Text

Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.

Introduction

Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) is one of the most widely cultivated and economically important vegetable crops worldwide. It is an important leafy vegetable grown extensively in Africa, including Ethiopia, where it serves as both a staple food and a valuable source of income for farmers. Despite its importance, cabbage productivity in Ethiopia, particularly in the Amhara Regional State, remains considerably lower than the global average. Ethiopia produces approximately 6 t ha⁻¹ of cabbage, compared with an average yield of 16 t ha⁻¹ in East Africa and 28.8 t ha⁻¹ worldwide (CSA, 2021; Habtamu & Mnuyelet, 2022) [1,2] . Several biotic and abiotic factors limit cabbage production, among which aphids are one of the most destructive insect pests. In addition to causing direct damage through sap feeding, aphids transmit nearly 50% of insect-borne plant viruses, resulting in substantial reductions in crop yield, quality and nutritional value (Gebreyohans, 2021; Opfer & McGrath, 2013) [3,4] . Severe aphid infestations have been reported to cause yield losses ranging from 36.1% to 91.2% and in extreme cases, complete crop failure (Lidet et al., 2008) [5] . In the Amhara Region of Ethiopia, cabbage aphids are considered a major production constraint, with reported yield reductions of 50-80% (Kassahun, 2018; Abdelmuhsin et al., 2022; Fiodorova et al., 2022; Zakinyan et al., 2023; Negreiros et al., 2024) [6][7][8][9][10] . Although synthetic insecticides remain the primary method for managing cabbage aphids and improving crop productivity (Iqbal et al., 2011) [11] , their indiscriminate use has resulted in insecticide resistance, pesticide residues, adverse effects on beneficial organisms and human health, environmental contamination and increased production costs (Shiberu & Mulugeta, 2016) [12] . Consequently, environmentally safe alternatives have gained increasing attention. Botanical pesticides, derived from plant materials, possess insecticidal and repellent properties while posing minimal risk to non-target organisms and the environment (Zahid et al., 2016; Mahmood et al., 2022) [13,14] . Therefore, the present

Experimental crop and design

The cabbage variety 'Golden Acre' was transplanted following the recommended agronomic practices. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Block Design (RBD) with seven treatments, including an untreated control and three replications. Each experimental plot measured 3.0 × 4.0 m, maintaining a spacing of 60 × 50 cm between rows and plants.

Treatments and application

The treatments comprised Spinosad 45 SC (160 ml ha⁻¹), Agniastra (10 L ha⁻¹), Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki (2 kg ha⁻¹), Metarhizium anisopliae (2 kg ha⁻¹), NSKE 5% (1.5 kg ha⁻¹), Nimbecidine 0.03% (2 L ha⁻¹) and an untreated control. Two foliar sprays were applied at a 15-day interval after the pest population reached the Economic Threshold Level (ETL) of 2 larvae per five plants using a knapsack sprayer.

Recording of observations

Observations on diamondback moth (P. xylostella) larval population were recorded from five randomly selected plants in each plot. Pre-treatment observations were recorded one day before spraying, while post-treatment observations were taken on the 3 rd , 7 th and 14 th day after each spray. The efficacy of treatments was assessed based on the mean larval population per plant.

Statistical analysis

The experimental data were subjected to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) after square-root transformation [√(𝑥 + 0.5)] of larval count data. Treatment means were compared at the 5% level of significance and the Incremental Cost-Benefit Ratio (ICBR) was calculated to assess the economic viability of different treatments.

Result

The (2025) [21] , Sharma et al. (2024) [22] , Prakashrao and Kumar (2022) [23] Kommoji et al. (2022) [24] , Kumar et al. (2022) [20] , who also reported efficacy of different insecticide and biopesticide in cabbage ecosystems under different agroclimatic regions of India.

Discussion

The present study revealed that all the evaluated botanicals and biopesticides significantly reduced the larval population of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) compared with the untreated control. Among the treatments, Spinosad 45 SC was the most effective, followed by Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki and Metarhizium anisopliae, whereas Nimbecidine 0.03% and NSKE 5% showed moderate efficacy and Agniastra was comparatively less effective.The superior performance of Spinosad observed in the present investigation is in close agreement with the findings of Ranjbari et al. (2011) [25] , Stanikzi et al. (2016) [26] , Dotasara et al. (2017) [27] , Gaddam et al. (2021) [28] , Prakashrao and Kumar (2022) [23] , Sharma et al. (2022) [29] and Choudhary et al. (2025) [21] , who also reported Spinosad as one of the most effective treatments against P. xylostella. Similarly, the effectiveness of Bacillus thuringiensis corroborates the reports of Vanlaldiki et al. (2013) [30] , Singh et al. (2015) [31] , Kumar et al. (2022) [20] and Sharma et al. (2024) [22] , while the moderate efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae agrees with the findings of Shehzad et al. (2021) [18] and Sapkota et al. (2022) [17] . The moderate performance of neem-based treatments is also consistent with the observations of Liang et al. (2002) [15] and Sitotaw et al. (2009) [16] .

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated that all the tested botanicals and biopesticides significantly reduced the larval population of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, compared with the untreated control. Among the evaluated treatments, Spinosad 45 SC proved to be the most effective, recording the lowest larval population and the highest reduction over control after both sprays. Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki and Metarhizium anisopliae were the next most effective treatments, whereas neem-based products and Agniastra provided moderate suppression of the pest. The findings indicate that Spinosad 45 SC, followed by Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki, can be effectively incorporated into integrated pest management (IPM) programmes for sustainable and eco-friendly management of diamondback moth in cabbage under the agro-climatic conditions of Western Uttar Pradesh.

References

  1. Central Statistical Agency (CSA). Agricultural sample survey 2018/19 volume 1: Report on area and production of major crops private peasant holdings, Meher season. Statistical Bulletin 589. Addis Ababa: Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia; 2021.
  2. Habtamu T, Mnuyelet J. Influences of inter-and intrarow spacing on the growth and head yield of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) in western Amhara, Ethiopia. Open Agric. 2022;7(1):392-400.
  3. Gebreyohans G, Yonas C, Tesfaye A, Fasil A. Management of cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae L. [Homoptera: Aphididae]) on Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata Braun) using entomopathogenic fungi and selected insecticides. SINET Ethiop J Sci. 2021;44(1):13-26.
  4. Opfer P, McGranth D. Oregon vegetables: cabbage aphid and green peach aphid. Corvallis (OR): Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University; 2013. p. 13-21.
  5. Lidet S, Gashawbeza A, Tadele T. Effect of neembased insecticides on cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae) and its predator in the central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Pest Manag J Ethiop. 2008;12:59-66.
  6. Kassahun Y. Effect of tobacco concentration (Tobaccum restica) to protect cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae) on cabbage crop (Brassica oleracea). Indian J Entomol. 2018;6:299-304.
  7. Abdelmuhsin AA, Alghamdi AA, Ibrahim NA. Evaluating the phenotypic and genotypic diversity of Plantago ciliata in the Hail Region, Saudi Arabia. Int J Vet Res Allied Sci. 2022;2(1):15-23. DOI:10.51847.
  8. Fiodorova OA, Sivkova EI, Nikonov AA. Safeguarding beef cattle from gnats and gadflies in the Southern Tyumen Region. Int J Vet Res Allied Sci. 2022;2(2):813. DOI:10.51847.
  9. Zakinyan RG, Badakhova GK, Lopteva MS, Koshkina NA, Tolokonnikov VP, Povetkin SN. The link between ixodid tick populations and climate change in the Stavropol Region. Entomol Lett. 2023;3(2):38-43. DOI:10.51847.
  10. Negreiros AB, Silva GRD, Pereira FDM, Souza BDA, Lopes MTDR, Diniz FM. Evidence of genetic diversity gradients in Melipona rufiventris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) within the Brazilian Semiarid Region. Entomol Lett. 2024;4(1):1-7. DOI:10.51847.
  11. Iqbal MF, Kahloon MH, Nawaz MR, Javaid MI. Effectiveness of some botanical extracts on wheat aphids. J Anim Plant Sci. 2011;21(1):114-115.
  12. Shiberu T, Mulugeta N. Effects of synthetic insecticides and crude botanical extracts on cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on cabbage. J Fertil Pestic. 2016;7(1):1-5.
  13. Zahid SMA, Arshad M, Murtaza G, Ali S, Aaqib M, Yousaf RW, et al. Synergistic effect of plant extracts with synthetic insecticides against citrus mealybug Planococcus citri (Pseudococcidae: Homoptera). J Agric Stud. 2016;1:1-7.
  14. Mahmood H, Shahid AM, Usama M, Nadeem E, Zafar N, Bashir R. Knowledge and perception of periodontalsystemic interactions among dental professionals. Ann Orthod Periodontics Spec. 2022;2:23-28. DOI:10.51847.
  15. Liang G, Chen W, Liu T. Effects of three neem-based insecticides on diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Crop Prot. 2002;22:333-340.
  16. Sitotaw L, Ayalew G, Tefera T. Effect of Bacillus thuringiensis, neem, and Karate on diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (Linn.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) damage on cabbage in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. East Afr J Sci. 2009;3(1):102-107.
  17. Sapkota B, Regmi R, Tiwari S, Thapa RB. Efficacy of biological and chemical insecticides against diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.) on cabbage Brassica oleracea var. capitata (Linn.). J Agric For Univ. 2022;5:95-101.
  18. Shehzad M, Tariq M, Mukhtar T, Gulzar A. On the virulence of the entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae (Ascomycota: Hypocreales), against the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Linn.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Egypt J Biol Pest Control. 2021;31:86.
  19. Sharma P, Kumawat KC, Khinchi SK, Kumar V, Prasad B. Bioefficacy of different insecticides against diamondback moth. Int J Chem Stud. 2017;5(3):891893.
  20. Kumar L, Singh DR, Umrao RS. Bio-efficacy of certain botanicals and bio-pesticides against diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Linn.) on cabbage Brassica oleracea var. capitata (Linn.) under field condition. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(7):633-638.
  21. Choudhary JK, Kumar A, Singh TK, Singh R, Shukla M, Singh S, et al. Efficacy of novel insecticides and bio-pesticides for diamond back moth (Plutella xylostella) management in cabbage. Veg Sci. 2025;52(1):191-195. DOI:10.61180/vegsci.2025.v52.i1.26.
  22. Sharma B, Chaudhary AK, Sharma NR, Khan SA, Sharma A. Bio-efficacy of different bio-pesticides in the management of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.). J Entomol Res. 2024;48(1):31-34. DOI:10.5958/0974-4576.2024.00007.0.
  23. Prakashrao KS, Kumar A. Comparative efficacy of certain chemicals and bio-pesticides against diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.) on cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.). Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(7):3396-3400.
  24. Kommoji T, Tayde AR. Efficacy of newer selected insecticides, Beauveria bassiana and neem oil against diamond back moth (Plutella xylostella) (L.) in cabbage (Brassica oleracea var capitata). Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2022;34(20):485-491. DOI:10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2031179.
  25. Ranjbari S, Safaralizadeh MH, Aramideh S. Insecticidal effect of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki on the various instars larvae of Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) under laboratory condition. Egypt Acad J Biol Sci F Toxicol Pest Control. 2011;3(1):27-32. DOI:10.21608/eajbsf.2011.17434.
  26. Stanikzi R, Thakur S. Efficacy of chemical insecticides and botanicals in the management of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) in cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.). Int J Multidiscip Res Dev. 2016;3(6):101-104.
  27. Dotasara SK, Agrawal N, Singh N, Swami D. Efficacy of some new insecticides against diamond back moth (Plutella xylostella L.) on cauliflower. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(5):1958-1963. DOI:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.605.218.
  28. Gaddam NR, Srivastava VK, Tayde AR, Tripathi A. Comparative efficacy of microbials and botanicals against diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella Linn) on cabbage. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2021;9(1):497-499.
  29. Sharma P, Sharma A. Economics of different novel insecticidal treatments against diamondback moth on cabbage. J Cell Tissue Res. 2022;22(1):7155-7158.
  30. Vanlaldiki H, Singh MP, Sarkar PK. Efficacy of ecofriendly insecticides on the management of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella Linn.) on cabbage. Bioscan. 2013;8(4):1225-1230.
  31. Singh KI, Debbarma A, Singh HR. Field efficacy of certain microbial insecticides against Plutella xylostella Linnaeus and Pieris brassicae Linnaeus under cabbagecrop-ecosystem of Manipur. J Biol Control. 2015;29(4):194-202. doi:10.18641/jbc/29/4/94913.
Insect Pest Control StrategiesEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest ControlInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlPlutella xylostellaMetarhizium anisopliaeBacillus thuringiensis var. kurstakibiopesticidescabbageintegrated pest managementspinosad
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
61%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.