Gut microbiota of agricultural insects

Introduction

Insects remain the most taxonomically diverse animal lineage on the planet, and herbivorous forms among them are responsible for a substantial share of the fifteen percent or more of

Nutritional Symbiosis and the Digestion of Recalcitrant Plant Material

Plant tissue is a poor diet by most nutritional standards, being carbon-rich, nitrogen-poor, and structurally reinforced by polymers that insect digestive enzymes alone cannot efficiently cleave. Cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin and lignin together form a barrier that has to be breached before the more labile nutrients within plant cells become accessible, and gut bacteria are now understood to be central rather than incidental to this process in several lineages. Adams et al., (2011) [6] isolated Streptomyces and Pantoea strains from the gut of the invasive woodwasp Sirex noctilio capable of hydrolysing cellulose, and comparable cellulolytic consortia have since been reported from woodboring beetles and stem-boring lepidopterans. Pectin digestion follows a more specialised route in at least one leaf beetle lineage, where Salem et al., (2020) [7] traced the pectinolytic capacity of Cassida rubiginosa to an extracellular symbiont, Stammera, housed in a purpose-built foregut organ rather than free in the midgut lumen, a compartmentalisation that argues against treating gut symbiosis as a single undifferentiated process across insect orders. Nitrogen scarcity is arguably the more consequential nutritional constraint for herbivores, and gut bacteria address it through at least two distinct routes. Atmospheric nitrogen fixation has been documented in the passalid beetle Odontotaenius disjunctus, where Ceja-Navarro et al., (2014) [8] showed that oxygen gradients along the gut create anaerobic microsites permissive for diazotrophic activity, effectively allowing the beetle to manufacture part of its own nitrogen budget. A second and arguably more widespread strategy is nitrogenous waste recycling, in which uric acid and other excretory nitrogen are salvaged and reassembled into essential amino acids; Ren et al., (2022) [9] attributed this capacity in the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis jointly to Morganella morganii and Klebsiella oxytoca. Vitamin provisioning rounds out the nutritional contribution, and here the bean bug Riptortus pedestris offers one of the more mechanistically resolved cases, with Ohbayashi et al., (2019) [10] demonstrating that its Burkholderia symbiont supplies B vitamins that the soybased diet cannot. A comparable, though strain-variable, capability has been described in ant-associated Bartonellaceae, where Bisch et al., (2018) [11] found the gene for vitamin B1 synthesis conserved across the family while the pathway for B3 was present in only one strain, a pattern that cautions against assuming functional uniformity within a bacterial family purely on the basis of taxonomic identity. What the polymer-digestion literature has not fully resolved is the relative contribution of hostencoded and microbially-encoded enzymes in species where both are present. Watanabe and Tokuda (2010) [12] argued that endogenous cellulases are more widespread across insect orders than earlier symbiosis-centred models assumed, while transcriptomic work on the Asian longhorned beetle Anoplophora glabripennis by Scully et al., (2014) [13] found gut microbial gene expression shifting substantially with host plant, implying a genuinely shared digestive burden rather than a purely host-driven process. Reconciling these positions probably requires species-by-species enzymatic fractionation rather than a single verdict applied across Coleoptera as a whole, and this remains an underexplored area relative to the volume of descriptive 16S rRNA surveys the field continues to generate. Detoxification of Plant Secondary Metabolites and Synthetic Xenobiotics. Beyond structural polymers, plants deploy an arsenal of secondary metabolites, alkaloids, terpenoids, phenolics and glucosinolates among them, specifically to deter feeding, and a recurring theme in the gut microbiota literature is that bacterial catabolism converts these compounds into forms the insect can tolerate or even exploit as a carbon source. The coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei is the bestcharacterised example of this phenomenon; Ceja-Navarro et al., (2015) [14] showed that its gut bacteria, dominated by Pseudomonas, degrade caffeine efficiently enough that axenic insects reared without the microbiota performed markedly worse on a caffeinecontaining diet. A parallel case has been built for the pine weevil Hylobius abietis, where Berasategui et al., (2017) [15] found gut bacteria not only degrading conifer diterpene acids but using them as a carbon source that measurably improved weevil fitness, converting what should be a defensive compound into a nutritional resource. Isothiocyanate degradation in a flea beetle specialised on Brassicaceae, reported by Shukla and Beran (2020) [16] , extends the same principle to a different chemical class and a different insect order, suggesting the underlying logic, bacterial cometabolism turning a deterrent into a tolerated or beneficial substrate, recurs independently across unrelated lineages rather than tracing to a single ancestral symbiosis. The same catabolic machinery that handles plant allelochemicals appears able to act on synthetic pesticides, and this is where the applied stakes of the research rise sharply. Xia et al., (2018) [17] isolated Enterococcus, Enterobacter and Serratia strains from the gut of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella and tested each against the organophosphate chlorpyrifos; only Enterococcus increased larval resistance, Serratia if anything reduced it, and Enterobacter had no measurable effect, a result that already complicates any assumption that gut bacteria act as a uniform detoxifying shield. In the oriental fruit fly, Cheng et al., (2017) [18] traced trichlorphon resistance to a Citrobacter symbiont carrying inducible hydrolase genes, while acetamiprid and imidacloprid degradation by Rhodococcus and Klebsiella isolates, respectively, has been documented by Phugare and Jadhav (2015) [19] and Phugare et al., (2013) [20] using silkworm bioassays to confirm that the bacterial metabolites themselves retained measurable, if reduced, toxicity rather than being rendered fully inert.

Insecticide Resistance

The proposition that gut microbiota drive insecticide resistance is now well established in outline, but the mechanistic detail resists the kind of generalisation that would make the phenomenon easy to exploit for control. Temperature-sensitive symbiosis illustrates the point sharply. Zhang et al., (2023) [21] compared geographically distinct strains of the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens and found microbiome composition correlating with insecticide susceptibility in a manner that shifted with rearing temperature, and field populations showed no consistent relationship between Wolbachia carriage and resistance phenotype despite laboratory evidence, from Cai et al., (2021) [22] , that Wolbachia upregulates the detoxifying cytochrome P450 gene NlCYP4CE1 under imidacloprid stress. The disconnect between a mechanistically plausible laboratory pathway and an inconsistent field correlation is not a minor caveat; it is arguably the central unresolved problem in this literature, because most practical resistance-management decisions have to be made at the field population level rather than in a controlled colony. A second complication is that gut bacteria do not uniformly detoxify; in some documented cases they activate a proinsecticide into a more potent form. Wolfe and Scharf (2022) [23] showed that antibiotic treatment of German cockroaches reduced bacterial load and simultaneously increased survival after indoxacarb exposure, meaning the intact microbiota had been converting the proinsecticide indoxacarb into the more toxic metabolite DCJW, the opposite of a protective role. Paddock et al., (2021) [24] reported a structurally analogous finding for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxin resistance in western corn rootworm, where altered bacterial community composition was linked to resistance, but through interference with toxin activation rather than through direct degradation of the toxin itself. Taken together with the diamondback moth data described above, these results support a working principle rather than a single mechanism, that the net effect of the gut microbiota on pesticide susceptibility is determined jointly by the insecticide's own mode of activation, the specific bacterial taxa present, and the physiological state of the host, and that none of these three variables can be assumed constant across populations, seasons or geography.

Immune

Modulation and Third-Trophic-Level Signalling Gut bacteria do not act only on nutrients and toxins; they also shape how the host insect interacts immunologically with itself and chemically with the wider community of plants and natural enemies around it. In the honeybee, Guo et al., (2023) [25] linked reactive oxygen species production, regulated jointly by the Immune Deficiency and Toll signalling pathways, to the maintenance of host-specific gut bacterial composition, indicating that immune surveillance is not merely a defence against pathogens but an active mechanism for curating a beneficial community. Herbivoreassociated bacteria can also be deployed offensively against the plant itself. Chung et al., (2013) [26] demonstrated that oral secretions of the Colorado potato beetle, carrying endosymbiotic bacteria, suppress jasmonic acid-mediated defences in tomato by enhancing the competing salicylic acid pathway, effectively using bacteria as a chemical weapon against the plant's own signalling network. The same bacterial volatiles that shape plant defence can cut in either direction for the herbivore at the third trophic level. Honeydew-associated bacteria from the brown planthopper elicit indirect defences in rice that recruit the herbivore's own natural enemies, as shown by Wari et al., (2019) [27] , which is disadvantageous for the insect that produced the honeydew in the first place. Conversely, Frago et al., (2017) [28] found that the aphid symbiont Hamiltonella defensa reduces the volatile signal that would otherwise attract parasitoid wasps, protecting the aphid rather than exposing it. Whether a given gut or honeydew bacterium ultimately helps or harms its insect host at this trophic interface appears to depend on the specific volatile compounds it induces and how the local community of natural enemies is tuned to detect them, and this context sensitivity mirrors the pattern already noted for insecticide resistance, reinforcing the broader conclusion that insect gut symbiosis functions as a set of conditional, ecologically contingent interactions rather than a fixed beneficial partnership.

Applications, Gaps and the Path Toward Microbiome-Informed Pest Management

The applied promise of this body of work rests on the idea that a pathway an insect depends on for host exploitation or toxin tolerance is also a pathway that can be interrupted deliberately. Paratransgenesis, in which a culturable gut symbiont is genetically engineered to secrete an antipest or anti-pathogen effector and then reintroduced to the host, has moved furthest in the mosquito system, where Wang et al., (2012) [29] and later Wang et al., (2017) [30] engineered Serratia and Pantoea strains from Anopheles mosquitoes to secrete anti-Plasmodium effectors and demonstrated reduced parasite development on feeding. The same principle has been extended tentatively into agricultural pests; Elston et al., (2020) [31] engineered a culturable strain of Serratia symbiotica isolated from the black bean aphid, establishing feasibility even though field deployment for a crop pest has not yet been achieved. Symbiont-mediated RNA interference offers a related but mechanistically distinct route, using gut bacteria as a continuous in situ source of double-stranded RNA rather than as a chemical factory; Taracena et al., (2015) [32] achieved this in the Chagas disease vector Rhodnius prolixus by modifying its symbiont Rhodococcus rhodnii, and Xu et al., (2021) [33] found that in the leaf beetle Plagiodera versicolora, the insecticidal benefit of orally delivered dsRNA arose partly from degradation products of the dsRNA itself reshaping the gut community toward pathogenic taxa, rather than solely from gene silencing, a mechanistic subtlety that complicates simple predictions about RNAi efficacy in the field. Three structural obstacles currently limit how far any of these approaches can be pushed toward routine field use. The first is culturability. Most gut bacterial taxa identified by sequencing have never been isolated in pure culture, and although culturomic approaches have expanded the recoverable fraction, Diakite et al., (2019) [34] still found that even intensive multi-medium culturing recovered only a subset of the diversity visible by metagenomics, which restricts both mechanistic testing and any engineering-based application to an unrepresentative sliver of the community. The second is the persistent gap between laboratory-adapted and field microbiomes; Gomes et al., (2020) [35] found that bacteria isolated from field-collected fall armyworm larvae metabolised multiple insecticides more actively than those from laboratory-selected resistant colonies, which raises a serious question about how much of the mechanistic literature, generated overwhelmingly on colony insects, actually generalises to the populations that resistance management programmes need to target. The third obstacle is a persistent conflation of correlation with causation in surveybased studies; sequencing a resistant population and finding an enriched bacterial taxon does not establish that the taxon caused the resistance, and axenic or gnotobiotic rearing, which would allow that causal test, remains technically difficult and has been achieved for only a limited number of pest species, a constraint discussed at length by Wu et al., (2023) [36] . Kikuchi et al., (2012) [37] demonstrated one of the clearer causal tests available in this literature, using a soil-acquired Burkholderia symbiont to confer fenitrothion resistance on the bean bug, and studies of this design, isolation, reintroduction, and functional confirmation in a defined host background, remain the standard the field should be working toward rather than the exception. Where the field appears to be converging, cautiously, is on the idea that gut microbiota manipulation is most likely to succeed as one component within an integrated resistancemanagement strategy rather than as a standalone control method. Targeting the specific bacterial taxa implicated in the bioactivation-resistance pathway described in the previous section, for instance, could in principle restore susceptibility to an insecticide that has lost field efficacy, and Xia et al., (2013) [38] had already flagged this possibility for chlorpyrifos resistance in the diamondback moth over a decade ago, yet a field-validated demonstration of deliberately engineered microbiome suppression restoring insecticide efficacy in an open agricultural setting has still not been published for any major crop pest, which remains the clearest indication that the discipline has advanced further in mechanistic description than in applied translation. [1]

Cassida rubiginosa (Coleoptera) Stammera (foregut organ)

Pectin digestion of leaf tissue Salem et al., (2020) [24] Odontotaenius disjunctus (Coleoptera)

Gut community (compartmentalised)

Atmospheric nitrogen fixation Ceja-Navarro et al., (2014) [6] Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera) Morganella morganii, Klebsiella oxytoca Nitrogenous waste recycling into amino acids Ren et al., (2022) [23] Riptortus pedestris (Hemiptera) Burkholderia insecticola B-vitamin supplementation on soy diet Ohbayashi et al., (2019) [19] Dolichoderus spp. (Hymenoptera) Bartonellaceae Essential amino acid and vitamin biosynthesis Bisch et al., (2018) [11] Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera) Diverse midgut consortium Host-plant-responsive lignocellulose processing Scully et al., (2014) [9] Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera) Pseudomonas spp.

Caffeine detoxification and utilisation Ceja-Navarro et al., (2015) Hylobius abietis (Coleoptera) Gut bacterial consortium Diterpene acid degradation and use as carbon source Berasategui et al., (2017) [3] Psylliodes chrysocephala (Coleoptera) Gut bacterial consortium Isothiocyanate detoxification Shukla and Beran (2020) [26] Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera) Enterococcus sp. Chlorpyrifos tolerance enhancement Xia et al., (2018) [36] Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera) Citrobacter sp.

Trichlorphon hydrolysis Cheng et al., (2017) [8] Bombyx mori bioassay system Rhodococcus sp. BCH2 Acetamiprid degradation Phugare and Jadhav (2015) [21] Bombyx mori bioassay system Klebsiella pneumoniae BCH1 Imidacloprid degradation Phugare et al., (2013) [22] [8] Blattella germanica Indoxacarb Native gut consortium Bioactivates proinsecticide, increasing toxicity

Wolfe and Scharf (2022) [33] Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Bt Cry toxin Altered field bacterial community Interferes with toxin activation Paddock et al., (2021) [20] Nilaparvata lugens Imidacloprid Wolbachia sp. Increases NlCYP4CE1 expression, aiding metabolism Cai et al., (2021) [5] Nilaparvata lugens (field strains) Multiple insecticides Strain-variable microbiome Correlated with susceptibility but temperature-dependent Zhang et al., (2023) [38] Riptortus pedestris Fenitrothion Burkholderia sp. (soil-acquired) Confers resistance, causally confirmed Kikuchi et al., (2012) [37] Plutella xylostella Chlorpyrifos (midgut survey)

Enterobacteriales, Pseudomonadales consortia

Correlated with resistant phenotype

Xia et al., (2013) [35] Spodoptera frugiperda (field larvae) Multiple insecticides Field-derived bacterial isolates Greater metabolic activity than lab-selected strains Gomes et al., (2020) [16]

Conclusion

The gut microbiota of agricultural insect pests is best understood not as a fixed accessory organ but as a flexible, context-sensitive extension of host metabolism whose contribution shifts with diet, insecticide chemistry, temperature and geography. Three points emerge with reasonable confidence from the body of work surveyed here. Nutritional symbiosis, spanning cellulose and pectin digestion, nitrogen fixation, waste recycling and vitamin provisioning, is mechanistically well supported and reasonably consistent across the taxa where it has been examined closely. Detoxification is equally well supported in outline but far less predictable in direction, since the same bacterial process that neutralises one compound can activate another into a more dangerous metabolite, and the same genus can raise resistance in one host species while lowering it in a close relative. Third-trophic-level and immune effects add a further layer of ecological contingency that resists reduction to a simple protective or harmful label.

References

1. Adams AS, Jordan MS, Adams SM, Suen G, Goodwin LA, Davenport KW, et al. Cellulose-degrading bacteria associated with the invasive woodwasp Sirex noctilio. ISME J. 2011;5(8):1323-1331.
2. Basset Y, Cizek L, Cuenoud P, Didham RK, Guilhaumon F, Missa O, et al. Arthropod diversity in a tropical forest. Science. 2012;338(6113):1481-1484.
3. Berasategui A, Salem H, Paetz C, Santoro M, Gershenzon J, Kaltenpoth M, et al. Gut microbiota of the pine weevil degrades conifer diterpenes and increases insect fitness. Mol Ecol. 2017;26(15):40994110.
4. Bisch G, Neuvonen MM, Pierce NE, Russell JA, Sanders JG, Vergoz V, et al. Genome evolution of Bartonellaceae symbionts of ants at the opposite ends of the trophic scale. Genome Biol Evol. 2018;10(7):16871704.
5. Cai T, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Deng X, He S, Li J, et al. Wolbachia enhances expression of NlCYP4CE1 in Nilaparvata lugens in response to imidacloprid stress. Insect Sci. 2021;28(2):355-362.
6. Ceja-Navarro JA, Nguyen NH, Karaoz U, Gross SR, Herman DJ, Andersen GL, et al. Compartmentalized microbial composition, oxygen gradients and nitrogen fixation in the gut of Odontotaenius disjunctus. ISME J. 2014;8(1):6-18.
7. Ceja-Navarro JA, Vega FE, Karaoz U, Hao Z, Jenkins S, Lim HC, et al. Gut microbiota mediate caffeine detoxification in the primary insect pest of coffee. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7618.
8. Cheng D, Guo Z, Riegler M, Xi Z, Liang G, Xu Y. Gut symbiont enhances insecticide resistance in a significant pest, the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel). Microbiome. 2017;5:13.
9. Chung SH, Rosa C, Scully ED, Peiffer M, Tooker JF, Hoover K, et al. Herbivore exploits orally secreted bacteria to suppress plant defenses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(39):15728-15733.
10. Deutsch CA, Tewksbury JJ, Tigchelaar M, Battisti DS, Merrill SC, Huey RB, et al. Increase in crop losses to insect pests in a warming climate. Science. 2018;361(6405):916-919.
11. Diakite A, Dubourg G, Dione N, Afouda P, Bellali S, Ngom II, et al. Extensive culturomics of eight healthy samples enhances metagenomics efficiency. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223543.
12. Douglas AE. The microbial dimension in insect nutritional ecology. Funct Ecol. 2009;23(1):38-47.
13. Elston KM, Leonard SP, Geng P, Bialik SB, Robinson E, Barrick JE. Engineering a culturable Serratia symbiotica strain for aphid paratransgenesis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;87(5):e02245-20.
14. Engel P, Moran NA. The gut microbiota of insects: diversity in structure and function. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013;37(5):699-735.
15. Frago E, Mala M, Weldegergis BT, Yang C, McLean A, Godfray HCJ, et al. Symbionts protect aphids from parasitic wasps by attenuating herbivore-induced plant volatiles. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1860.
16. Gomes AFF, Omoto C, Cônsoli FL. Gut bacteria of field-collected larvae of Spodoptera frugiperda undergo selection and are more diverse and active in metabolizing multiple insecticides than laboratoryselected resistant strains. J Pest Sci. 2020;93:833-851.
17. Guo L, Tang J, Tang M, Luo S, Zhou X. Reactive oxygen species are regulated by immune deficiency and Toll pathways in determining the host specificity of honeybee gut bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120(33):e2219634120.
18. Kikuchi Y, Hayatsu M, Hosokawa T, Nagayama A, Tago K, Fukatsu T. Symbiont-mediated insecticide resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(22):8618-8622.
19. Ohbayashi T, Takeshita K, Kitagawa W, Nikoh N, Koga R, Meng XY, et al. Comparative cytology, physiology and transcriptomics of Burkholderia insecticola in symbiosis with the bean bug Riptortus pedestris and in culture. ISME J. 2019;13(6):14691483.
20. Paddock KJ, Pereira AE, Finke DL, Ericsson AC, Hibbard BE, Shelby KS. Host resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis is linked to an altered bacterial community within a specialist insect herbivore. Mol Ecol. 2021;30(21):5438-5453.
21. Phugare SS, Jadhav JP. Biodegradation of acetamiprid by isolated bacterial strain Rhodococcus sp. BCH2 and toxicological analysis of its metabolites in silkworm, Bombyx mori. Clean Soil Air Water. 2015;43(2):296304.
22. Phugare SS, Kalyani DC, Gaikwad YB, Jadhav JP. Microbial degradation of imidacloprid and toxicological analysis of its biodegradation metabolites in silkworm, Bombyx mori. Chem Eng J. 2013;230:27-35.
23. Ren X, Cheng J, Wang A, Chen X. Gut symbiotic bacteria are involved in nitrogen recycling in the tephritid fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis. BMC Biol. 2022;20:201.
24. Salem H, Kirsch R, Pauchet Y, Berasategui A, Fukumori K, Moriyama M, et al. Symbiont digestive range reflects host plant breadth in herbivorous beetles. Curr Biol. 2020;30(15):2875-2886.
25. Scully ED, Geib SM, Hoover K, Tien M, Tringe SG, Barry KW, et al. Functional genomics and microbiome profiling of the Asian longhorned beetle, Anoplophora glabripennis, reveal insights into the digestive physiology and nutritional ecology of wood-feeding beetles. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:1096.
26. Shukla SP, Beran F. Gut microbiota degrades toxic isothiocyanates in a flea beetle pest. Mol Ecol. 2020;29(23):4692-4705.
27. Stork NE. How many species of insects and other terrestrial arthropods are there on Earth? Annu Rev Entomol. 2018;63:31-45.
28. Taracena ML, Oliveira PL, Almendares O, Umaña C, Lowenberger C, Dotson EM, et al. Genetically modifying the insect gut microbiota to control Chagas disease vectors through systemic RNAi. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(2):e0003358.
29. Wang S, Ghosh AK, Bongio N, Stebbings KA, Lampe DJ, Jacobs-Lorena M. Fighting malaria with engineered symbiotic bacteria from vector mosquitoes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(31):12734-12739.
30. Wang S, Dos-Santos AL, Huang W, Liu KC, Oshaghi MA, Wei G, et al. Driving mosquito refractoriness to Plasmodium falciparum with engineered symbiotic bacteria. Science. 2017;357(6358):1399-1402.
31. Wari D, Kabir MA, Mujiono K, Hojo Y, Shinya T, Tani A, et al. Honeydew-associated microbes elicit defense responses against brown planthopper in rice. J Exp Bot. 2019;70(5):1683-1696.
32. Watanabe H, Tokuda G. Cellulolytic systems in insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 2010;55:609-632.
33. Wolfe Z, Scharf M. Microbe-mediated activation of indoxacarb in the German cockroach, Blattella germanica L. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2022;188:105234.
34. Wu J, Wang Y, Wang C, Zhao J, Yang Y, Hao S, et al. Axenic and gnotobiotic insect technologies in research on host-microbiota interactions. Trends Microbiol. 2023;31(8):858-871.
35. Xia X, Zheng D, Zhong H, Qin B, Gurr GM, Vasseur L, et al. DNA sequencing reveals the midgut microbiota of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), and a possible relationship with insecticide resistance. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e68852.
36. Xia X, Sun B, Gurr GM, Vasseur L, Xue M, You M. Gut microbiota mediate insecticide resistance in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.). Front Microbiol. 2018;9:25.
37. Xu L, Zhou L, Zhao J, Li J, Fu X, Xu S, et al. Synergistic action of the gut microbiota in environmental RNA interference in a leaf beetle. Microbiome. 2021;9:98.
38. Zhang Y, Cai T, Yuan M, Li Z, Jin R, Ren Z, et al. Microbiome variation correlates with insecticide susceptibility in different geographic strains of a significant agricultural pest, Nilaparvata lugens. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2023;9:1-8.