Scinovex

Research article · 2026 · Full text

International Journal of Agriculture and Nutrition

Determination of economic injury levels and quantification of yield losses caused by Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on okra in Indonesian lowland production systems

Budi Setiawan

Volume 8(4) · Pages 148–151 · DOI: 10.33545/26646064.2026.v8.i4b.707 ↗

Research areasResearch on scale insectsInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlHemiptera Insect Studies

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

A recent field survey across five Indonesian provinces revealed that cotton mealybug infestation severity on okra had escalated by 240% between 2018 and 2023, yet the economic thresholds governing management decision-making for this pest remained undefined for tropical Southeast Asian conditions. This research established the economic injury level (EIL) and economic threshold (ET) for Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) through controlled infestation experiments at the Surabaya Institute of Agricultural Entomology, Indonesia, during 2023. Seven infestation levels (0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 mealybugs per plant) were established on okra cultivar Genie at the four-leaf stage in a completely randomized design with eight replications. Yield loss relationships were modelled using regression analysis, with EIL calculated from the damage function incorporating management costs, control efficacy, market value, and damage abatement coefficients. Results demonstrated a highly significant linear-plateau yield loss function (R² = 0.94), with yield declining at a rate of 0.148 t/ha per mealybug per plant up to the saturation threshold of 120 mealybugs. The calculated EIL was 8.4 mealybugs per plant, with the corresponding ET set at 5.6 mealybugs per plant (67% of EIL). At the EIL population, yield loss amounted to 18.4% relative to uninfested controls. These threshold values provide the first quantitative decision criteria for P. solenopsis management on okra in tropical Southeast Asian production systems.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Cotton mealybug infestation on okra in Indonesia increased by 240% from 2018 to 2023, highlighting a growing pest problem. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Cotton mealybug infestation on okra in Indonesia increased by 240% from 2018 to 2023, highlighting a growing pest problem.

      In the paper's own words

      “A recent field survey across five Indonesian provinces revealed that cotton mealybug infestation severity on okra had escalated by 240% between 2018 and 2023”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Phenacoccus solenopsis is a significant constraint to okra production globally, capable of causing yield losses between 25% and 78% under heavy infestation. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Phenacoccus solenopsis is a significant constraint to okra production globally, capable of causing yield losses between 25% and 78% under heavy infestation.

      In the paper's own words

      “The cotton mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) has become a major constraint to okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) production across tropical and subtropical regions, with yield losses ranging from 25% to 78% reported under heavy infestation conditions in various countries”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • In Indonesia, the lack of defined economic thresholds for this pest leads to subjective management decisions, which can result in either unnecessary pesticide use or delayed action. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      In Indonesia, the lack of defined economic thresholds for this pest leads to subjective management decisions, which can result in either unnecessary pesticide use or delayed action.

      In the paper's own words

      “In Indonesia... the absence of established economic thresholds has resulted in management decisions based entirely on subjective assessment of infestation severity.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to establish the yield-loss relationship, economic injury level (EIL), and economic threshold (ET) for P. solenopsis on okra in Indonesian lowland tropical conditions. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to establish the yield-loss relationship, economic injury level (EIL), and economic threshold (ET) for P. solenopsis on okra in Indonesian lowland tropical conditions.

      In the paper's own words

      “The present research addressed this critical knowledge gap by experimentally establishing the yield-loss relationship, economic injury level, and economic threshold for P. solenopsis on okra under Indonesian lowland tropical conditions.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The experiment took place during the 2023 dry season (May-October) in a screenhouse at the Surabaya Institute of Agricultural Entomology in East Java, Indonesia. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The experiment took place during the 2023 dry season (May-October) in a screenhouse at the Surabaya Institute of Agricultural Entomology in East Java, Indonesia.

      In the paper's own words

      “The research was conducted during the 2023 dry season (May-October) under screenhouse conditions at the Surabaya Institute of Agricultural Entomology, East Java Province, Indonesia”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Okra cultivar Genie was tested using a completely randomized design with eight replications across seven infestation levels: 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 mealybugs per plant. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Okra cultivar Genie was tested using a completely randomized design with eight replications across seven infestation levels: 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 mealybugs per plant.

      In the paper's own words

      “Seven infestation levels (0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 mealybugs per plant) were established on okra cultivar Genie at the four-leaf stage in a completely randomized design with eight replications.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Yield was measured by recording the total number and weight of harvested fruits per plant from approximately 50 days after sowing until the end of the crop cycle. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Yield was measured by recording the total number and weight of harvested fruits per plant from approximately 50 days after sowing until the end of the crop cycle.

      In the paper's own words

      “Yield assessment commenced at first harvest (approximately 50 days after sowing) and continued through crop senescence, recording total number and weight of harvested fruits per plant.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The EIL was calculated using a standard formula incorporating management costs, market value, damage per pest unit, control efficacy, and damage abatement. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The EIL was calculated using a standard formula incorporating management costs, market value, damage per pest unit, control efficacy, and damage abatement.

      In the paper's own words

      “The economic injury level was calculated using the standard formula: EIL = C / (V × I × D × K), where C = management cost per unit area, V = market value of crop per unit area, I = damage per unit pest per unit area, D = proportional reduction in pest population achieved by management action, and K = proportional reduction in damage per unit reduction in pest population.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • The study found a highly significant linear-plateau yield loss function (R² = 0.94), with a damage coefficient of 1.48% yield loss per mealybug per plant. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The study found a highly significant linear-plateau yield loss function (R² = 0.94), with a damage coefficient of 1.48% yield loss per mealybug per plant.

      In the paper's own words

      “Regression analysis of the linear phase yielded the equation: Yield loss (%) = 1.48 × (mealybugs per plant) + 0.62, with R² = 0.94 and P < 0.001.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The calculated economic injury level (EIL) was 8.4 mealybugs per plant, and the economic threshold (ET) was set at 5.6 mealybugs per plant. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The calculated economic injury level (EIL) was 8.4 mealybugs per plant, and the economic threshold (ET) was set at 5.6 mealybugs per plant.

      In the paper's own words

      “EIL - 8.4 mealybugs/plant Calculated ET (67% of EIL) - 5.6 mealybugs/plant Calculated”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • There is a management action window of 10-14 days between the time a population reaches the ET and the time it reaches the EIL. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      There is a management action window of 10-14 days between the time a population reaches the ET and the time it reaches the EIL.

      In the paper's own words

      “populations initiated at the ET level (5 mealybugs per plant) reached the EIL (8.4 per plant) within approximately 12 days under the experimental conditions, providing a management action window of 10-14 days between threshold detection and economic injury.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • At the EIL, fruit quality declined, with 14.2% of fruits affected by honeydew and marketable grade proportions dropping from 94.8% to 82.6% due to sooty mould. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      At the EIL, fruit quality declined, with 14.2% of fruits affected by honeydew and marketable grade proportions dropping from 94.8% to 82.6% due to sooty mould.

      In the paper's own words

      “At the EIL population of 8.4 mealybugs per plant, honeydew contamination affected 14.2% of harvested fruits and sooty mould coverage reduced the marketable grade proportion from 94.8% (uninfested) to 82.6%.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Fruit Quality Deterioration Analysis

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Sensitivity analysis showed EIL values vary from 4.1 to 16.4 mealybugs per plant depending on market value and costs, meaning a single threshold is not suitable for all contexts. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Sensitivity analysis showed EIL values vary from 4.1 to 16.4 mealybugs per plant depending on market value and costs, meaning a single threshold is not suitable for all contexts.

      In the paper's own words

      “The four-fold variation in EIL values (4.1-16.4 mealybugs per plant) across the range of economic scenarios tested demonstrates that a single threshold value cannot adequately serve all market and cost conditions”

      Page 3

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that they have provided the first experimentally validated EIL (8.4 mealybugs/plant) and ET (5.6 mealybugs/plant) for this pest on okra in tropical Southeast Asia. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that they have provided the first experimentally validated EIL (8.4 mealybugs/plant) and ET (5.6 mealybugs/plant) for this pest on okra in tropical Southeast Asia.

      In the paper's own words

      “The main contribution of this research provides the first experimentally validated economic injury level (8.4 mealybugs per plant) and economic threshold (5.6 mealybugs per plant) for Phenacoccus solenopsis on okra in tropical Southeast Asian production systems.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • Future work is needed to validate these thresholds across different seasons and locations, develop weather-driven dynamic models, and establish thresholds specifically for biological control. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      Future work is needed to validate these thresholds across different seasons and locations, develop weather-driven dynamic models, and establish thresholds specifically for biological control.

      In the paper's own words

      “Open questions remaining include the validation of threshold values across multiple seasons and geographic locations within Indonesia, the development of dynamic EIL models incorporating weather-driven population growth rates, and the establishment of corresponding thresholds for biological control-based management systems”

      Page 4

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗

Visual summary

3 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (okra plants infested with mealybugs (Phenacoccus solenopsis)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Management Action Window
AI-generated conceptual illustration (okra plants infested with mealybugs (Phenacoccus solenopsis)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (okra plants infested with mealybugs (Phenacoccus solenopsis)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Management Action Window

AI-generated conceptual illustration (okra plants infested with mealybugs (Phenacoccus solenopsis)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
0 (Control): Yield (g/plant) vs Yield Loss (%) vs Marketable (%)
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

0 (Control): Yield (g/plant) vs Yield Loss (%) vs Marketable (%)

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
20: Yield (g/plant) vs Yield Loss (%) vs Marketable (%)
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

20: Yield (g/plant) vs Yield Loss (%) vs Marketable (%)

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Impact of Phenacoccus solenopsis infestation levels onTable 1Page 2Economic injury level calculation parameters andTable 2Page 2Yield loss percentage across seven Phenacoccus solenopsisFigure 1Page 2Sensitivity analysis of EIL estimates under varyingTable 3Page 3Temporal progression of Phenacoccus solenopsisFigure 2Page 3
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

For example, a mealybug population that appears visually alarming may not warrant intervention if management costs exceed the value of prevented yield loss, while a seemingly modest infestation may justify immediate action on high-value crops with steep damage functions [1] . This principle, formalized as the economic injury level (EIL) concept by Stern and colleagues in 1959, remains the cornerstone of rational pest management decisionmaking, yet EIL values remain undefined for many pest-crop combinations in tropical production systems [2,3] . The cotton mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) has become a major constraint to okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) production across tropical and subtropical regions, with yield losses ranging from 25% to 78% reported under heavy infestation conditions in various countries [4,5] . In Indonesia, where okra cultivation supports an expanding export-oriented horticulture sector, the absence of established economic thresholds has resulted in management decisions based entirely on subjective assessment of infestation severity. This approach frequently leads to either premature application of costly pesticides at sub-economic pest densities, or delayed intervention that permits populations to exceed levels at which management can prevent significant economic loss [6] . The present research addressed this critical knowledge gap by experimentally establishing the yield-loss relationship, economic injury level, and economic threshold for P. solenopsis on okra under Indonesian lowland tropical conditions. The resulting threshold values provide quantitative criteria for evidence-based management decisions that optimize the balance between control costs and yield protection benefits.

Material and Methods

Material and Methods

Material

The research was conducted during the 2023 dry season (May-October) under screenhouse conditions at the Surabaya Institute of Agricultural Entomology, East Java Province, Indonesia (

Results

Mealybug population establishment success exceeded 85% across all infestation levels, and populations developed characteristic exponential growth patterns during the initial 30 days, followed by density-dependent stabilization. The relationship between initial infestation level and cumulative yield loss exhibited a highly significant linear-plateau pattern (Table 1). Values are mean ± SE (n = 8). Means followed by the same letter within columns are not significantly different (Tukey HSD, P < 0.05). Final population represents the mean count per plant at 60 days post-infestation. 2). The management cost (C) incorporated insecticide procurement, application labour, and sprayer depreciation. Market value (V) was based on the 2023 average farmgate price for okra in East Java Province. The sensitivity analysis demonstrates that EIL values range from 4.1 to 16.4 mealybugs per plant across realistic economic scenarios. The EIL is most sensitive to crop market value, with high-value export-grade production requiring substantially lower pest density thresholds to justify management intervention.

Table 1. Impact of Phenacoccus solenopsis infestation levels on
Initial LevelFinal Pop.Yield (g/plant)Yield Loss (%)Marketable (%)
0 (Control)0.0 ± 0.0g842.6 ± 48.4a0.094.8 ± 2.4a
528.4 ± 4.2f748.2 ± 52.6b11.288.6 ± 3.2b
1056.8 ± 8.4e652.4 ± 46.8c22.678.4 ± 4.0c
20108.6 ± 12.6d498.6 ± 42.4d40.864.2 ± 4.8d
40186.4 ± 18.2c348.2 ± 38.6e58.748.6 ± 5.2e
80284.6 ± 22.8b228.4 ± 32.4f72.932.4 ± 4.6f
160392.4 ± 28.6a186.8 ± 28.8f77.824.8 ± 3.8f

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Impact of Phenacoccus solenopsis infestation levels on↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Impact of Phenacoccus solenopsis infestation levels on

Impact of Phenacoccus solenopsis infestation levels on

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗

Discussion

The economic injury level of 8.4 mealybugs per plant established in this research represents the first experimentally derived management decision threshold for Phenacoccus solenopsis on okra in tropical Southeast Asian production systems. The corresponding economic threshold of 5.6 mealybugs per plant provides a practical action trigger that accounts for the 10-14 day management action window between detection and potential economic injury. These threshold values fill a critical knowledge gap that has prevented implementation of economically rational pest management decision-making in the Indonesian okra sector [1, 7] .

The linear-plateau damage function observed in this research conforms to the general pattern expected for sapfeeding insects, where yield loss increases proportionally with pest density until plant compensatory capacity is exhausted, beyond which additional pest pressure produces diminishing marginal damage [2,3] . The damage coefficient of 1.48% yield loss per mealybug per plant is higher than values reported for P. solenopsis on cotton (0.8-1.2% per mealybug) by Bakry et al. [8] , reflecting the greater economic sensitivity of okra as a fresh vegetable crop where both yield quantity and visual quality affect market value.

The sensitivity analysis reveals important practical considerations for threshold implementation across different production contexts. The four-fold variation in EIL values (4.1-16.4 mealybugs per plant) across the range of economic scenarios tested demonstrates that a single threshold value cannot adequately serve all market and cost conditions [9,10] . For export-oriented production, where market premiums for blemish-free fruit amplify the economic consequences of pest damage, an EIL of 4.9 mealybugs per plant would be more appropriate than the base scenario value of 8.4.

Conversely, for domestic market production facing high management costs, the higher EIL of 16.4 mealybugs per plant would prevent economically unjustified pesticide expenditure [11,12] . The 10-14 day management action window between ET detection and economic injury, while adequate for chemical intervention, may be insufficient for biological control approaches that require longer establishment periods. This temporal constraint suggests that biological control agents should be deployed preventatively or at sub-threshold population levels to ensure establishment before populations reach critical densities, rather than as reactive treatments triggered by threshold exceedance [13] .

Fruit Quality Deterioration Analysis

Beyond the direct yield quantity impacts, mealybug infestation caused progressive deterioration of fruit quality attributes with increasing pest density. At the EIL population of 8.4 mealybugs per plant, honeydew contamination affected 14.2% of harvested fruits and sooty mould coverage reduced the marketable grade proportion from 94.8% (uninfested) to 82.6%. These quality impacts amplify the economic losses beyond those captured by yield quantity alone, particularly for export-destined production where visual appearance criteria determine market access and price premiums.

Monitoring Protocol Recommendations

Based on the population dynamics data, a practical monitoring protocol was developed for ET detection. Sequential sampling of 20 plants per hectare at five-day intervals during the vegetative and early reproductive stages provides 90% probability of detecting populations at or above the ET of 5.6 mealybugs per plant. The sampling protocol focuses on the terminal three nodes and subtending leaf axils, which harbour 72.4% of the total plant population during the critical pre-threshold development phase. Implementation of this monitoring protocol would enable timely management decisions within the available 10-14 day action window.

Conclusion

The main contribution of this research provides the first experimentally validated economic injury level (8.4 mealybugs per plant) and economic threshold (5.6 mealybugs per plant) for Phenacoccus solenopsis on okra in tropical Southeast Asian production systems. The supporting evidence demonstrates that yield loss follows a linear-plateau function with a damage coefficient of 1.48% per mealybug per plant. The field significance of these findings lies in enabling rational, economically justified management decisions that replace subjective assessment with quantitative criteria. Open questions remaining include the validation of threshold values across multiple seasons and geographic locations within Indonesia, the development of dynamic EIL models incorporating weather-driven population growth rates, and the establishment of corresponding thresholds for biological control-based management systems where the longer pest suppression timeline may require modified threshold implementation strategies.

Acknowledgement

Acknowledgements D.A.P. designed the experimental framework and supervised infestation protocols, S.R.W. conducted population monitoring and yield assessments, and B.H.S. performed economic analysis and sensitivity modelling. The Surabaya Institute of Agricultural Entomology provided screenhouse facilities and insectary infrastructure. Financial support was provided by the Indonesian Ministry of Agriculture. The Indonesian Vegetable Growers Association contributed market price data.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 2. Economic injury level calculation parameters and
ParameterSymbolValueSource
Management costC1,850,000 IDR/haLocal input survey
Market valueV42,000,000 IDR/haBPS price survey 2023
Damage per pest unitI0.0148 per mealybugExperimental regression
Control efficacyD0.82Spiromesifen field trials
Damage abatementK0.90Literature consensus
EIL-8.4 mealybugs/plantCalculated
ET (67% of EIL)-5.6 mealybugs/plantCalculated

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Economic injury level calculation parameters and↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Economic injury level calculation parameters and

Economic injury level calculation parameters and

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 1. Yield loss percentage across seven Phenacoccus solenopsis
Yield loss percentage across seven Phenacoccus solenopsis↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Yield loss percentage across seven Phenacoccus solenopsis

Yield loss percentage across seven Phenacoccus solenopsis

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 3. Sensitivity analysis of EIL estimates under varying
ScenarioMarket Value (IDR/ha)Mgmt Cost (IDR/ha)EIL (mealybugs/plant)
Low value, low cost28,000,0001,200,0008.2
Low value, high cost28,000,0002,400,00016.4
Base scenario42,000,0001,850,0008.4
High value, low cost56,000,0001,200,0004.1
High value, high cost56,000,0002,400,0008.2
Export grade72,000,0001,850,0004.9

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Sensitivity analysis of EIL estimates under varying↗ Enlarge
Table 3
Sensitivity analysis of EIL estimates under varying

Sensitivity analysis of EIL estimates under varying

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 2. Temporal progression of Phenacoccus solenopsis
Temporal progression of Phenacoccus solenopsis↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Temporal progression of Phenacoccus solenopsis

Temporal progression of Phenacoccus solenopsis

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗

References

14 in the original paper
  1. Pedigo LP, Rice ME, Krell RK. Entomology and pest management. 7th ed. Long Grove (IL): Waveland Press; 2021. p. 1-784.
  2. Hodgson CJ, Abbas G, Arif MJ, Saeed S, Karar H. Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley, an invasive mealybug. Zootaxa. 2008;1913(1):1-35.
  3. Nagrare VS, Kranthi S, Biradar VK, Zade NN, Sangode V. Widespread infestation of Phenacoccus solenopsis on cotton in India. Bull Entomol Res. 2009;99(5):537541.
  4. Abbas G, Arif MJ, Saeed S, Karar H. A new invasive species of genus Phenacoccus Cockerell attacking cotton in Pakistan. Int J Agric Biol. 2009;11(2):163167.
  5. Fand BB, Tonnang HEZ, Kumar M, Kamble AL, Bal SK. A temperature-based phenology model for the mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis. Crop Prot. 2014;55:98-107.
  6. Mani M, Shivaraju C, editors. Mealybugs and their management in agricultural and horticultural crops. New Delhi: Springer India; 2016. p. 1-655.
  7. Suroshe SS, Gautam RD, Fand BB. Natural enemy complex of Phenacoccus solenopsis and its biocontrol potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci. 2020;90(4):687-700.
  8. Bakry MSM, Mohamed LHY, Shehata EA. Estimation of the cotton mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), populations and its relation to okra yield. Zool Entomol Lett. 2023;3(2):59-69.
  9. Tong HJ, Ao Y, Li ZH, Wang Y, Jiang MX. Invasion biology of the cotton mealybug: Current knowledge and future directions. J Integr Agric. 2019;18(4):758-770.
  10. Gullan PJ, Kosztarab M. Adaptations in scale insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 1997;42(1):23-50.
  11. Mahmood R, Aslam MN, Solangi GS, Samad A. Historical perspective in biological control of cotton mealybug in Pakistan. Proc Int Cotton Advis Comm. 2011;5:41-50.
  12. Arif MI, Rafiq M, Ghaffar A. Host plants of cotton mealybug. Int J Agric Biol. 2009;11(2):163-167.
  13. Fand BB, Tonnang HEZ, Kumar M, Bal SK, Singh NP, Rao DVKN, et al. Predicting climate change impact on Phenacoccus solenopsis. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e116153.
  14. Gemede HF, Ratta N, Haki GD, Woldegiorgis AZ. Nutritional quality and health benefits of okra. J Food Process Technol. 2015;6(6):458.