Scinovex
article Open Access

Effect of plant growth substances on growth and yield of Nagpur mandarin

International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research · 2026 · Vol. 10(7S) · pp. 709–713
NG RathodPK NagreDH PaithankarSG BharadYV IngleDV MaliSN Kolekar

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the influence of various plant growth substances on the vegetative growth, floral parameters, yield performance and economics of eighteen-year-old Nagpur mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) trees. Based on the pooled data, major vegetative parameters namely, plant height, canopy spread and canopy volume statistically found non significant by the exogenous application of growth substances. However, the pooled leaf area showed a maximum (45.39 cm²) recorded in trees subjected to Treatment 7 (T7: CPPU 10 ppm + Urea 1% at the pea stage, followed by N-ACTA 10 ppm + Brassinolides 4 ppm + Folic acid 40 ppm applied during July, August, and September). Based on the pooled data, Treatment T7 surpassed all other treatments, recording the maximum number of fruits per plant (816.33), the highest fruit yield per plant (118.63 kg), and the highest total yield (32.86 t/ha). Highest 'A' grade fruits (163.27), as well as 'B' and 'C' grade fruits was recorded in T7.

Full Text

Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.

Introduction

In India, the Nagpur mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) occupies a premier position among cultivated loose-skinned oranges, prominently grown in the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra (Anavrat, 2017; Shraddha et al., 2024) [3] . Despite an estimated cultivation area of 1.2 to 1.4 lakh hectares in Vidarbha, the average productivity remains relatively low at 8 to 10 tonnes per hectare, which is significantly below the crop's genetic and regional potential. Maximizing the yield efficiency of mature orchards is a highly complex horticultural challenge. The transition from flowering and initial fruit set to final yield is heavily dictated by physiological factors, endogenous hormonal balances, environmental stressors, and the efficient mobilization of nutrients toward developing reproductive sinks. Under natural conditions, disturbances in the balance of endogenous growth regulators lead to reproductive losses, severely capping the final harvestable yield. To maximize yield, the exogenous application of plant growth regulators (PGRs) and phytohormones has become an important component of modern agrotechnical practices (Monselise, 1979; Almeida et al., 2004) [2,15] . Historically, compounds such as auxins (NAA, 2,4-D) and gibberellins (GA3) have been extensively utilized in the global citrus industry to improve fruit set and enhance overall production efficiency (Anthony et al., 1999; Nawaz et al., 2008) [5,16] . In recent years, new-generation growth promoters like CPPU, N-ACTA, Brassinolides, and Folic Acid have demonstrated exceptional efficacy in managing plant stress, enhancing cellular division, and optimizing the source-sink relationship. CPPU functions synergistically with endogenous auxins to profoundly enhance early cell division, plant growth, and sink strength in developing fruitlets (Zhang & Whiting, 2011; Xin Xie et al., 2024) [23,25] . Brassinolides act as potent steroidal hormones that maintain plant metabolism and developmental processes under environmental stress conditions, effectively acting to optimize yields (Roy, 1973; Peng et al., 2004) [17,19] . N-ACTA has been proven to channelize assimilate translocation directly to developing reproductive organs (Hota et al., 2017a) [10] . Furthermore, Folic acid (vitamin B9) aids in crucial nucleic acid synthesis and one-carbon metabolism necessary for vigorous early reproductive cell division (Hanson & Gregory, 2011; Abd El-Rahman et al., 2018) [1,9] .

Materials and Methods

Experimental site and weather conditions

The field experiment was conducted during year 2021 to 2023 at the experimental farm of the All India Coordinated Research Project on Fruits (Citrus), Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, Maharashtra. The site lies at 20°42' N latitude and 77°02' E longitude, with an elevation of 307.42 m above mean sea level (MSL). The experimental trial was executed on uniform, eighteen-yearold Nagpur mandarin trees that were planted at a standard spacing of 6 m × 6 m. The orchard soil consisted of medium to heavy black cotton soil, which was moderately deep, porous and possessed good drainage capabilities.

Experimental design and treatment details

The field trial was laid out using a Randomized Block Design (RBD) with 10 different treatments. These treatments were replicated three times, with two uniform trees forming a single experimental unit, resulting in 60 total trees under observation. The treatments comprised foliar applications of various growth regulators, applied initially at the pea-size stage of fruit development and subsequently at one-month intervals corresponding to July, August and September.

Treatment details

Results and Discussion

Effect on vegetative growth parameters

The pooled initial plant height across the orchard ranged (2020) [7,18] in Kinnow mandarin, who also reported limited height variations post-PGR application.

The pooled data demonstrated that the significantly highest leaf area was recorded in T 7 (45.39 cm²), closely followed by T 8 (45.24 cm²) and T 6 (45.19 cm²), whereas the untreated control recorded the lowest (39.25 cm²). The sequential application of CPPU followed by N-ACTA and Brassinolides in T 7 actively stimulated cellular division and expansion, resulting in highest leaf area increase the overall photosynthetic capability of the canopy (Atheer M.I. Al Janabi et al., 2017; Jyoti et al., 2024) [6] . [4] .

Graded fruit yield analysis:

The fruits were graded by diameter into premium "A" Grade (>7.5 cm), "B" Grade (>6.5 cm), and "C" Grade (<6.5 cm). The maximum number of premium "A" grade fruits per plant was significantly achieved in T

Leaf and soil nutrient status

Based on the pooled analysis, leaf Nitrogen ranged from 1.75% (T 10 ) to 2.20% (T 7 ), Phosphorus from 0.14% to 0.23%, and Potassium from 1.45% to 1.89%. While treatment T 7 showed higher leaf retention of all three elements, the analysis of variance confirmed that these differences were statistically non-significant.

Similarly, the final pooled status of soil available Nitrogen ranged from 205.04 to 213.01 kg/ha, available Phosphorus from 14.95 to 17.55 kg/ha, and available Potassium from 304.00 to 343.65 kg/ha. The available calcium carbonate in the soil also remained completely stable between 7.34% and 7.49%. these variations between treatments proved to be statistically non-significant.

Economic viability

Treatment T 7 yielded the highest returns by a substantial margin, achieving a highly BCR of 5.89. Despite the supplementary capital costs associated with procuring and applying these advanced new-generation growth substances, the improvements observed in total yield and the shift toward premium marketable "A" and "B" grade fruits directly resulted into larger revenues. Other treatments such as T 6 (5.67) and T 9 (5.62) also demonstrated high profitability. In contrast, the control group (T 10 ) recorded an economically inferior BCR of 2.46.

Conclusion

Treatment T 7: a targeted sequential foliar spray of CPPU (10 ppm) + Urea (1%) at the pea-size stage, followed by monthly applications of N-ACTA (10 ppm) + Brassinolides (4 ppm) + Folic acid (40 ppm) from July through September. This specific chemical formulation optimized the plant's physiological source-sink dynamics, maximizing the total number of harvested fruits per plant (816.33), the highest fruit yield per plant (118.63 kg). Treatment T 7 is economically viable benefit-cost ratio of 5.89. The application of CPPU, N-ACTA, Brassinolides, and Folic acid coordinates internal carbohydrate partitioning and provides a potent, to secure higher yields.

References

  1. Abd El-Rahman IE, El-Shazly SM, Eman AA. Improving productivity and fruit quality of mandarin trees by folic acid and boron foliar application. Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research. 2018;7(2):505515.
  2. Almeida I, Leite IM, Rodrigues JD, Ono EO. Application of plant growth regulators at pre-harvest for fruit development of 'Pera' oranges. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 2004;47(4):658-662.
  3. Anavrat V. Production and marketing constraints of Nagpur mandarin growers in Madhya Pradesh. Agriculture Update. 2017;12(3):443-447.
  4. Ansari AM, Sah A, Ahmed E, Bhagat BK. Effect of plant growth regulators on physiological fruit drop in Nagpur mandarin. Green Farming. 2008;2(1):53-54.
  5. Anthony BR, Philips DJ, Badr S, Aharoni Y. Decay control and quality maintenance after moist air heat treatment of individually plastic-wrapped nectarines. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 1999;114:946-949.
  6. Al-Janab AIM, Al-Shabani NTA. Effect of plant growth regulator and seaweed extract on some growth characteristics of sour orange rootstock. Al-Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2017;15(Special Issue).
  7. Bagri UK, Singh RS, Nagar V, Bunker RR, Omprakash, Meena S. Foliar application of plant growth regulators and micronutrients. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 2020;8(2):262-266.
  8. Bharti AS, Kanwar J, Naruka IS, Tiwari R, Gallani R, Singh O. Effect of plant growth regulators on horticultural crops. An International Journal of Life Science. 2016;11(4):2665-2668.
  9. Hanson AD, Gregory JF. Folate biosynthesis, turnover, and transport in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2011;62:105-125.
  10. Hota D, Sharma DP, Sharma N. Effect of forchlorfenuron and N-acetyl thiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid on vegetative growth and fruit set of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cv. New Castle. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2017;6(2):279282.
  11. Jhade RK, Sharma TR, Bhooriya MS, Pandey SK. Effect of plant growth regulators on fruit set, yield and quality of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 2020;8(4):2870-2874.
  12. Kanwar J, Kumar A, Patidar BK, Patidar M. Effect of foliar application of plant growth regulators and micronutrients on vegetative and reproductive growth of Nagpur mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco). Journal of the Andaman Science Association. 2024;29(1):2837.
  13. Khan AS, Shaheen T, Rajwana IA, Ahmad I, Ahmad I. Exogenous application of plant growth regulators influences the reproductive growth of Citrus sinensis Osbeck cv. Blood Red. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2014;46(1):233-238.
  14. Meena D, Bhatnagar P, Meena ML, Meena SL. Effect of foliar spray of micronutrients on growth attributes of Nagpur mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco). The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2022;11(2):1807-1813.
  15. Monselise SP. The use of growth regulators in citriculture: A review. Scientia Horticulturae. 1979;11:151-162.
  16. Nawaz MA, Ahmad W, Ahmad S, Khan MM. Role of growth regulators on pre-harvest fruit drop, yield and quality in Kinnow mandarin. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2008;40(5):1971-1981.
  17. Peng, et al. Effects of brassinolide on the physiological properties of litchi pericarp (Litchi chinensis cv. Nuomoci). Scientia Horticulturae. 2004;101:407-416.
  18. Prem K, Deepanshu, Bahadhur V. Effect of foliar application of plant growth regulators on flowering, growth, fruit set, fruit drop, yield and quality of Kinnow mandarin (Citrus reticulata). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2020;9(10):2948-2951.
  19. Roy SK. Simple and rapid methods for the estimation of total carotenoid pigments in mango. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 1973;10(1):45-46.
  20. Sheikh MK, Bhat ZA, Wani MA, Rather JA, Mir MM. Effect of foliar application of micronutrients on yield and quality of lemon (Citrus limon Burm.). International Journal of Chemical Studies. 2021;9(1):2734-2738.
  21. Bhajan S, Bagde NT, Rathod VJ, Deotale SL, Gajbhiye S. Economics of mandarin production in Nagpur district of Vidarbha region. International Journal of Research in Agronomy. 2024;7(SP-9):614-619.
  22. Uniyal S, Misra KK. Effect of plant growth regulators on fruit drop and quality of bael under Tarai conditions of Uttarakhand. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 2015;72(1):126-129.
  23. Xie X, Rahman MM, Qiao C, Guo L, Xie H, Pang R, et al. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2024;133:106383.
  24. Yaser M, Ahmad W, Ahmad S, Khan MM. The role of cellulose in the abscission of citrus leaves and fruit in relation to exogenous treatment with growth regulators. Acta Horticulturae. 2016;34:359-362.
  25. Zhang C, Whiting MD. Improving fruit size and quality of sweet cherry with plant growth regulators. HortScience. 2011;46(3):395-400.
Plant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesPlant Growth Enhancement TechniquesAgricultural Science and FertilizationCitrus reticulataNagpur mandarinCPPUfolic acidfruit yieldvegetative growthleaf areaurea
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
51%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.