Feed technology in livestock production: A review of feed additives, ration balancing, and novel feed resources

Introduction

The global livestock sector faces a paradox of increasing demand and resource constraint. The world population, projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050 (FAO, 2023), will require approximately a 70% increase in food production, with animal protein central to dietary transitions in developing nations. By 2030, global meat consumption is forecast to rise by 14% above 2020 levels, reaching 374 million tonnes (OECD-FAO, 2023). Simultaneously, livestock agriculture accounts for approximately 14.5% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to 7.1 Gt CO2-eq per year consumes 70% of agricultural land, and withdraws about 8% of global freshwater resources (Gerber et al., 2013; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.07.006) [23,16,46] . Against this backdrop, nutritional technologies have assumed strategic importance in modern livestock production. Unlike genetic improvement, which unfolds over generations, nutritional interventions can be implemented rapidly within a single production cycle. The global animal feed market was valued at USD 460 billion in 2022 and is growing at 3.5% annually, underscoring the scale at which even marginal feed efficiency improvements translate into enormous economic and environmental benefits (Alltech, 2023) [47] . Three pillars underpin current nutritional technology: (i) feed additive science, encompassing enzymes, microbial preparations, organic acids, botanicals, and immunomodulators; (ii) precision ration formulation, integrating advanced nutritional models, real-time sensor data, and artificial intelligence; and (iii) novel feed resources, including insect-derived proteins, microalgae, single-cell biomass, and valorized agro-industrial by-products. This paper synthesizes experimental findings, meta-analyses, and field observations to provide an integrated perspective on the current state and future trajectory of nutritional technologies in

Feed Additives in Livestock Nutrition

Feed additives are defined under Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 as substances, microorganisms, or preparations added to feed to affect the characteristics of feed, animal products, or animal welfare and performance. The global feed additives market, valued at USD 28.4 billion in 2023, is segmented into amino acids (32% market share), vitamins (18%), antioxidants (14%), enzymes (12%), acidifiers (9%), and other categories (Grand View Research, 2024 [48] ; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114696). [41] . Organic acids including formic (pKa 3.75), propionic (pKa 4.87), butyric (pKa 4.82), and citric acids exert bacteriostatic effects by lowering gastrointestinal pH and penetrating microbial cell membranes in undissociated form, disrupting proton motive force and halting ATP synthesis. A meta-analysis of 58 broiler trials by Papatsiros et al. (2012) [35] reported that blended organic acid supplementation improved average daily gain (ADG) by 4.2 +/-1.1% and FCR by 3.5 +/-0.8% (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9886-9). Butyrate serves as the primary energy substrate for colonocytes (70-80% of colonocyte ATP demand) and upregulates tight junction proteins (occludin, claudin-1, ZO-1), reducing intestinal permeability and endotoxin translocation (Guilloteau et al., 2010 [19] ; https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731110000406).

Antibiotic Growth

Probiotics and Prebiotics

Probiotics are defined as live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host (Hill et al., 2014 [20] ; https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66).

In livestock nutrition, the most studied preparations include Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bacillus subtilis, Bifidobacterium animalis, Enterococcus faecium, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain CNCM I-1077). Their primary mechanisms include competitive exclusion of pathogens through receptor site competition, production of bacteriocins (nisin, reuterin, hydrogen peroxide), enhancement of secretory IgA production, and modulation of Toll-like receptor signaling.

A systematic review and meta-analysis by Abdel-Wareth & Lohakare (2020 [1] ; https://doi.org/ [10] ; https://doi.org/10.15232/JAS.2015-09464).

Prebiotics selectively stimulate beneficial gastrointestinal microorganisms. Mannan-oligosaccharides (MOS) at 0.5-1.0 g/kg feed reduced Salmonella typhimurium cecal colonization in broilers by 1.8 log CFU/g versus controls (Hooge, 2004 [21] ; https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660400001698).

Fructooligosaccharides (FOS) at 2-4 g/kg diet increased Bifidobacterium counts in swine intestinal content by 2.3 log10 CFU/g while decreasing Escherichia coli by 1.6 log10 CFU/g (Flickinger et al., 2003 [14] ; https://doi.org/10.1079/NRR200256).

Exogenous Enzymes

Exogenous enzyme supplementation addresses the fundamental limitation of monogastric digestion: the inability to efficiently degrade complex plant cell wall polysaccharides and anti-nutritional factors. The global feed enzyme market was USD 1.3 billion in 2023, with phytases (~45%), NSP-ases (~35%), and proteases (~12%) as leading categories (DSM Nutritional Products, 2023) [49] . Table 1 summarizes the major enzyme classes, their quantitative impacts, and key references. [11] Xylanase (GH10, GH11) Arabinoxylans (wheat, rye) Poultry, Swine AMEn +50-150 kcal/kg; FCR +3-6% N excretion -10-15%; viscosity -40-60%

Adeola & Cowieson, 2011; doi:10.3382/ps.2011-01701 [2] beta-Glucanase beta-Glucans (barley, oats) [6] Protease (serine, metalloprotease) Storage proteins, ANFs Poultry, Swine SID Lys +3-8%; N retention +4-7% N excretion -8-14%

Selle et al., 2020 [52] ; doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114696 [40] Phytase + Xylanase (synergy) Phytate + cell wall NSPs Broilers, Pigs FCR +5-9%; AMEn +100-200 kcal/kg P -40-55%; N -15-20% combined Amerah et al., 2017 [51] ; doi:10.1017/S0007114516004372 Phytases catalyze stepwise hydrolysis of phytic acid through six dephosphorylation reactions, liberating up to 6 moles of inorganic phosphate per mole of phytate. A meta-regression by Selle & Ravindran (2008 [52] ; https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660801892924) across 136 broiler trials confirmed that each 100-unit increment in phytase activity (FTU/kg) released 0.30 g additional digestible P/kg diet, reducing bone meal inclusion by approximately 6 kg/tonne. The economic value of phytase in a typical broiler diet ranges from USD 2.50-4.50/tonne.

Phytogenic Feed Additives

Phytogenics plant-derived extracts, essential oils, and their isolated bioactive components constitute the fastest-growing segment of the natural feed additive market, with a CAGR of 7.2% and projected market value of USD 1.9 billion by 2028 (MarketsandMarkets, 2023) [53] . Key bioactive molecules include thymol (MIC against E. coli: 0.5-1.0 mg/mL), carvacrol (MIC against Salmonella: 0.25-0.5 mg/mL), cinnamaldehyde, saponins, tannins, and polyphenolic flavonoids. A meta-analysis by Zeng et al. (2015 [45] ; https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/psv060) covering 29 [9] .

Immunomodulators and Emerging Additives

Beta-1,3/1,6-glucans derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell walls at 100-250 mg/kg diet activate innate immunity through Dectin-1 receptor binding on macrophages and dendritic cells. In challenged broilers (Eimeria acervulina), beta-glucan supplementation at 200 mg/kg reduced lesion scores from 3.2 to 1.8 (P<0.01) and improved 42-day body weight by 5.3% (Mecredy et al., 1997 [55] ; https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0760660). Microencapsulated sodium butyrate (MSB) at 0.5-1.0 g/kg diet in neonatal piglets increased jejunal villus height by 18-24% (P<0.05), elevated mucosal IgA secretion by 34%, and reduced weaning diarrhea incidence from 38% to 19% (Mallo et al., 2012 [28] ; https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112001401). 3-Nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP), a synthetic methane inhibitor (EU authorization: Reg. 2021/2338), specifically inhibits methyl-coenzyme M reductase (MCR) in rumen archaea. A large-scale RCT by Hristov et al. (2015 [22] ; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504124112) in 48 lactating Holstein cows demonstrated that 3-NOP at 60 mg/kg DM reduced enteric methane by 26.3% (95% CI: 18.5-34.1%) with no significant effect on dry matter intake, milk yield, or milk composition.

Ration Balancing: Principles and Advanced

Technology: Ration balancing is the quantitative process of formulating animal diets that simultaneously satisfy all established nutritional requirements in the most economically efficient manner. The global market for animal nutrition software and advisory services was estimated at USD 780 million in 2022.

Nutritional Requirement Systems and Models

Modern ration balancing is underpinned by factorial nutrient requirement systems developed through decades of comparative slaughter, respiration calorimetry, and production trials. The NRC Dairy (2001, updated 2021) sets metabolizable energy (ME) requirements for a 650 kg Holstein at peak lactation (45 kg/day) at 250 Mcal ME/day, while NRC Swine (2012) specifies standardized ileal digestible (SID) lysine requirements for 20-50 kg pigs at 0.88 g SID Lys/Mcal NE. The NRC Poultry (1994) remains widely used despite its age, with most commercial nutritionists applying proprietary updates calibrated against contemporary genetics. The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS v6.5) represents the most mechanistically detailed model available for ruminants. It partitions dietary carbohydrates into four fractions: CA (sugars; kd ~300%/h), CB1 (starch; kd 30-80%/h), CB2 (available fiber; kd 3-9%/h), and CC (indigestible NDF; kd = 0). Proteins are similarly fractionated into PA (NPN; rumen degradability 100%), PB1-PB3 (true proteins with varying kd), and PC (indigestible; heat-damaged ADIN). The model integrates passage rate constants (kp; liquid ~12-18%/h; particle ~4-6%/h) to predict microbial protein synthesis, metabolizable protein supply, and rumen pH dynamics (Fox et al., 2004 [15] ; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.10.006).

Linear Programming and Stochastic Optimization

Linear programming (LP) is the mathematical engine of commercial ration formulation. The standard LP formulation minimizes the diet cost vector c'x subject to the nutrient constraint matrix Ax >= b (minimum requirements) and ingredient inclusion bounds l <= x <= u. Modern software packages (CPM Dairy v3.0, AMTS.Cattle.Pro, NutriOpt, BESTMIX) solve problems with 200-500 ingredients and 150+ nutrient constraints in milliseconds using the simplex or interior-point method. Stochastic programming incorporates probabilistic distributions over feed ingredient nutrient composition, reflecting documented analytical variability (CV = 5-15% for CP, 8-20% for NDF, 10-25% for amino acids across ingredient lots). Risk-constraint formulations ensure that the probability of the diet failing to meet requirements does not exceed a user-specified threshold (typically 5%), with the resulting safety margins' economic cost potentially exceeding USD 15/tonne feed in over-formulation of expensive nutrients such as rumen-protected methionine (Moraes et al., 2015; https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8386) [23] .

Precision Nutrition and Digital Technologies

The convergence of sensor technology, machine learning, and real-time data analytics has given rise to precision livestock nutrition the dynamic individualization of feeding programs based on continuous assessment of animal state. In automatic milking systems (AMS), mid-infrared (MIR) sensors built into the milking unit analyze milk composition at each milking with analytical precision of +/-0.05% for fat and protein, enabling algorithm-driven individual concentrate allocation within the same milking visit (Kamphuis et al., 2016 [23] ; https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10305). Table 2 summarizes major precision nutrition platforms and their documented benefits. [5] Online NIR (

Amino Acid Formulation and Low-CP Diets

The ideal protein concept, articulated by Wang & Fuller (1989 [56] ; https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19890042), has underpinned a major transformation in monogastric feed formulation. Formulation on a standardized ileal digestibility (SID) amino acid basis allows independent optimization of each amino acid supply relative to lysine (threonine: 65%; methionine: 36%; Met+Cys: 72%; tryptophan: 18%; valine: 68%; isoleucine: 55%). Low-crude protein (LCP) diets formulated by replacing soybean meal protein with crystalline amino acids to reduce dietary CP by 2-4 percentage points have generated compelling data. A meta-analysis of 42 pig studies by Prandini et al. (2013 [37] ; https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859612000809) found that each 1 percentage point reduction in dietary CP reduced urinary N excretion by 8.3% and total N excretion by 7.7% without compromising ADG or FCR. In broilers, reducing CP from 22% to 18% with amino acid supplementation maintained performance while reducing ammonia volatilization by 21% and lowering feed cost by EUR 4-7/tonne in European markets.

Ruminant-Specific Ration Balancing

Ruminant ration balancing must account for the interposition of the rumen microbial ecosystem. Rumen microbial protein synthesis (MPS) provides 50-85% of the metabolizable protein reaching the small intestine of dairy cows and is maximized when rumen fermentable organic matter (RFOM) and ruminally degradable protein (RDP) are simultaneously available. The efficiency of MPS is typically 25-32 g microbial CP per MJ of RFOM (Fox et al., 2004). Dietary cation-anion difference (DCAD) manipulation in the close-up dry cow period (-21 to 0 days pre-calving) is one of the best-validated interventions in ruminant nutrition. By feeding anionic salts to achieve DCAD of -50 to -100 mEq/kg DM, compensated metabolic acidosis is induced, upregulating calcitriol synthesis and calcium mobilization capacity. Goff & Horst (1997 [17] ; https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76075-1) demonstrated that anionic diets (DCAD = -100 mEq/kg) reduced milk fever incidence from 24% to 3% in susceptible Jersey cows.

Novel Feed Resources

Global fishmeal production has declined from a peak of 7.3 million tonnes in the 1990s to approximately 4.6 million tonnes in 2022, while soybean meal prices have exhibited volatility of +/-35% in a single crop year. These supply-side shocks have catalyzed investment in novel protein and energy sources that can be produced independently of conventional land-based agriculture (Makkar et al., 2014 [27] ; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.009).

Insect-Derived Feed Ingredients

Insects offer unique advantages as sustainable livestock feed proteins: very high feed-to-biomass conversion efficiencies (2-4 kg substrate per kg live biomass vs. 7-10 kg for conventional livestock), and 500-fold less land and approximately 1,000-fold less water per tonne of protein than soybean production (van Huis, 2013 [42] ; https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-021-04891-2). Black soldier fly larvae (BSFL; Hermetia illucens) meal contains 40-50% crude protein (DM basis), with SID lysine of 2.8-3.5% and SID methionine + cystine of 0.9-1.2%. An RCT by Schiavone et al. (2017 [39] ; https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116002962) found that 50% fishmeal replacement by BSFL meal (75 g/kg diet) did not significantly affect 35-day BW (2,312 vs. 2,287 g), FCR (1.68 vs. 1.71), or meat quality parameters (P>0.05), while reducing diet cost by 8.3%. [59] ; doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.06.001

Microalgae, Macroalgae, and Aquatic Biomass

Microalgae represent a remarkable convergence of high photosynthetic efficiency (2-6x higher than terrestrial crops), exceptional protein density (50-72% CP/DM basis), and bioactive compounds. Key species include Spirulina platensis (CP 60-72% DM), Chlorella vulgaris (CP 50-60%), Nannochloropsis gaditana (EPA-rich; 3-5% EPA/DM), and Schizochytrium sp. (DHA-rich; 15-25% DHA/DM). Microalgae can be produced on non-arable land with productivities of 20-30 tonnes biomass/ha/year in optimized photobioreactor systems (Becker, 2007 [8] ; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.11.002). Dietary inclusion of Schizochytrium sp. meal at 1.5-3.0% in laying hen diets elevated egg yolk DHA from 60-80 mg/egg to 250-380 mg/egg exceeding the 200 mg/egg omega-3 health claim threshold without affecting yolk color, Haugh unit, or albumen quality (Lum et al., 2013 [26] ; https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02920). The red macroalga Asparagopsis taxiformis reduces methane via bromoform (CHBr3), which inhibits the cobamide-containing MCR enzyme in rumen methanogens. Kinley et al. (2020 [24] ; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234571) demonstrated in 21 Angus crossbred steers that A. taxiformis at 0.5% of DMI reduced CH4 yield by 80.1% (from 21.3 to 4.2 g CH4/kg DMI; P<0.001) and improved gross feed efficiency by 20.3%.

Single-Cell Proteins:

Single-cell proteins (SCP) are microbial biomass produced through fermentation of various substrates. Bacterial SCP produced via Methylococcus capsulatus fermentation on methane (FeedKind, Calysta Inc.) or Cupriavidus necator on hydrogen (Solar Foods, Unibio) contains 65-72% crude protein on a DM basis, with amino acid profiles superior to soybean meal in sulfur amino acids (Met+Cys: 2.8-3.4% vs. SBM 1.3%). A controlled study in Atlantic salmon by Overland et al. (2010 [34] ; https://doi.org/10.3354/ab00265) reported that up to 36% dietary protein replacement by bacterial SCP did not affect growth rate, FCR, or fillet quality. Life cycle assessment calculated a 60-80% reduction in global warming potential versus fishmeal production. EU regulatory approval under Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1372 was granted in August 2021.

Agro-Industrial By-Products and Circular Feed Systems:

The utilization of agro-industrial by-products as livestock feed is a cornerstone of circular bioeconomy approaches to food production. Global estimates suggest approximately 1.3 billion tonnes of food-grade material is lost or wasted annually (FAO, 2019), a substantial fraction of which could be channeled into animal nutrition with appropriate processing and safety assurance. Table 4 summarizes major by-products, their nutritional characteristics, and key constraints. [34] ; https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2017.1314316). A study by Nguyen et al. (2021 [33] ; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112411) found that replacing 15% of soybean meal CP with Lemna minor meal in broiler diets maintained BW gain (2,489 vs. 2,512 g; P = 0.42), FCR (1.74 vs. 1.72), and breast meat yield (31.8 vs. 32.1%; P = 0.38), while providing natural xanthophyll pigmentation (yolk color score: 8.2 vs. 6.8 on Roche fan).

Food Waste and Circular Economy Approaches

A comparative life cycle assessment by Leinonen et al.

(2019 [25] ; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.054) quantified that substituting 30% of soybean meal in European pig feed with thermally processed former foodstuffs reduced global warming potential by 21.3% (0.84 vs. 1.07 kg CO2-eq/kg pork), land use by 26.4%, and reactive nitrogen losses by 18.7%. The key enabling technology is heat treatment (133 degrees C/3 bar/20 min per EU Regulation 1069/2009 for Category 3 material), which eliminates pathogen risk while inducing modest Maillard reaction losses in lysine availability (Jiang et al., 2021 [60] ; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.115002).

Integration of Nutritional Technologies: Synergistic Effects:

The greatest productivity and environmental gains emerge from the strategic integration of multiple nutritional technologies within holistic feeding programs. Enzymeprobiotic combinations demonstrate true synergistic effects: NSP-ase supplementation generates soluble oligosaccharide fragments (DP 2-8) that function as in situ prebiotics, enriching Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium populations by 1.2-1.8 log CFU/g cecal content. A 2x2 factorial trial by Pourabedin et al. (2015 [36] ; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131516) found that xylanase (300 U/kg) + Lactobacillus reuteri (10^8 CFU/kg) in wheat-based broiler diets improved FCR by 8.3% versus xylanase alone (+4.1%) or probiotic alone (+3.7%), demonstrating significant interaction (P<0.05). Integration of precision ration balancing with novel feed resources multiplies benefits through reduced overformulation waste. When CNCPS-based formulation was used to incorporate BSFL meal (PB2 fraction 73%; kd = 5.1%/h) into dairy cow total mixed rations, replacing 25% of soybean meal CP, total ration cost decreased by EUR 12.4/tonne while metabolizable protein supply remained within 2% of target (Renna et al., 2020 [38] ; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091526). Simulation modelling by Leinonen et al. (2022) [61] quantified that integrating LCP formulation (CP -3%), phytase supplementation (500 FTU/kg), and 25% insect meal substitution of soybean meal in standard broiler diets simultaneously reduced carbon footprint by 14.2%, reactive N losses by 31.7%, P excretion by 35.4%, and soybeanequivalent land use by 22.8% compared to conventional diets.

Economic Analysis and Cost-Benefit Considerations

Feed costs represent 60-75% of total variable production costs in intensive livestock systems reaching 78-82% in broiler production (Poultry World, 2023) [62] . With global compound feed production approaching 1.2 billion tonnes annually, even a 1% improvement in feed conversion efficiency would eliminate the need for approximately 12 million tonnes of feed ingredients, valued at approximately USD 4.8 billion at current commodity prices. Table 5 provides a quantitative economic analysis of major nutritional technologies. [18] ; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107521).

Reinforcement learning algorithms that continuously update ration recommendations based on measured production responses are entering commercial deployment in broiler and swine production, with reported FCR improvements of 1.5-3.8% above conventional LP formulation in pilot trials. Synthetic biology and metabolic engineering are opening new avenues for producing functional feed ingredients. CRISPR-Cas12a-edited Yarrowia lipolytica strains have been engineered to accumulate EPA at 56.6% of total fatty acids, offering a potential commercial DHA/EPA source independent of marine fisheries (Xue et al., 2021 [44] ; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2020.12.001). Phage-based strategies targeting rumen methanogens administering lytic phages specific to Methanobrevibacter ruminantium represent an emerging biological approach to methane mitigation without the regulatory burden of chemical additives.

The integration of blockchain-based traceability with realtime feed composition data, production performance records, and environmental monitoring metrics will enable novel market structures where nutritionally optimized, environmentally verified animal products command premium prices backed by immutable data provenance. Pilot projects in Dutch dairy (FrieslandCampina On the Way to PlanetProof) and UK pork (BPEX Farming Forward) demonstrate consumer willingness to pay premiums of 8-15% for products with verified sustainability metrics.

Conclusion

This review has demonstrated that the three pillars of modern livestock nutrition feed additives, precision ration balancing, and novel feed resources collectively offer transformative potential that far exceeds the sum of individual contributions. Feed additives, from the wellestablished phytase-NSP-ase-probiotic trinity to emerging immunomodulators and the regulatory-approved methane inhibitor 3-NOP, provide measurable, cost-effective improvements in feed utilization (FCR gains of 3-9%), animal health (morbidity reductions of 20-38%), and environmental performance (N and P excretion reductions of 15-35%). Precision ration balancing, enabled by machine learning, real-time sensor networks, and advanced mechanistic models like CNCPS v6.5, is transitioning the industry from static, population-average formulations to dynamic, individual-animal optimization reducing feed cost overruns, improving metabolic health outcomes, and enabling realtime environmental performance management. Novel feed resources insect meal, microalgae, bacterial SCP, duckweed, and valorized agro-industrial by-products represent the frontier of sustainable feed system development. Their integration into commercial rations requires continued investment in regulatory science, processing technology, and supply chain infrastructure, but the economic and environmental business case is strengthening year by year.

Looking forward, the greatest advances will emerge from the integration of nutritional technologies across the three domains examined in this review, supported by enabling digital infrastructure, synthetic biology, and market systems that appropriately reward environmental performance. The livestock industry's ability to meet the dual challenge of feeding a growing world population while operating within planetary boundaries will depend substantially on the speed and completeness of the nutritional technology transition described in this paper.

References

1. Abdel-Wareth AAA, Lohakare JD. Productive performance, egg quality, and nutrient digestibility of laying hens supplemented with Bacillus subtilis. Animals. 2020;10(3):492.
2. Adeola O, Cowieson AJ. Board-invited review: Opportunities and challenges in using exogenous enzymes to improve nonruminant animal production. Poult Sci. 2011;90(10):2189-2210.
3. Aliyu S, Bala M. Brewer's spent grain: A review of its potentials and applications. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10(3):324-331.
4. Appenroth KJ, Sree KS, Bohm V, Hammann S, Vetter W, Leiterer M, et al. Nutritional value of duckweeds (Lemnaceae) as human food. Food Chem. 2017;217:266-273.
5. Azzaro G, Caccamo M, Ferguson JD, Battiato S, Farinella GM, Guarnera GC, et al. Objective estimation of body condition score by modeling cow body shape from digital images. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94(4):21262137.
6. Beauchemin KA, Kreuzer M, O'Kelly J, McAllister TA. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: A review. Aust J Exp Agric. 2008;48(2):21-27.
7. Beauchemin KA, Ungerfeld EM, Abdalla AL, Alvarez C, Arndt C, Beckett S, et al. Invited review: Current enteric methane mitigation options. J Dairy Sci. 2022;105(12):9297-9326.
8. Becker EW. Micro-algae as a source of protein. Biotechnol Adv. 2007;25(2):207-210.
9. Botsoglou NA, Florou-Paneri P, Christaki E, Fletouris DJ, Spais AB. Effect of dietary oregano essential oil on performance of chickens and on iron-induced lipid oxidation of breast, thigh and abdominal fat tissues. Br Poult Sci. 2002;43(2):223-230.
10. Chaucheyras-Durand F, Ameilbonne A, Bichat A, Mosoni P, Ossa F, Forano E. Live yeasts enhance fibre degradation in the cow rumen through an increase in plant adherent fibrolytic bacteria and fungi. J Appl Microbiol. 2016;120(3):560-570.
11. Cowieson AJ, Bedford MR. Phytase and the development of commercial phosphorus reduction strategies in livestock nutrition. Poult Sci. 2020;99(2):889-897.
12. De Marchi M, Penasa M, Zidi A, Manuelian CL. Use of near infrared transmittance spectroscopy to predict fatty acid composition of chicken meat. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2014;7(7):2107-2115.
13. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The future of food and agriculture: Alternative pathways to 2050. Rome: FAO; 2023.
14. Flickinger EA, Van Loo J, Fahey GC Jr. Nutritional responses to the presence of inulin and oligofructose in the diets of domesticated animals. Nutr Res Rev. 2003;16(2):129-168.
15. Fox DG, Tedeschi LO, Tylutki TP, Russell JB, Van Amburgh ME, Chase LE, et al. The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2004;112(1-4):29-78.
16. Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, et al. Tackling climate change through livestock: A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2013.
17. Goff JP, Horst RL. Physiological changes at parturition and their relationship to metabolic disorders. J Dairy Sci. 1997;80(7):1260-1268.
18. Gonzalez-Garcia E, Alhamada M, Douls S, Bocquier F, Moreno-Romieux C, Tesniere A. Machine learning for precision livestock farming in sheep: FCR optimisation using multi-sensor data. Comput Electron Agric. 2023;201:107521.
19. Guilloteau P, Martin L, Eeckhaut V, Ducatelle R, Zabielski R, van Immerseel F. From the gut to the peripheral tissues: The multiple effects of butyrate. Nutr Res Rev. 2010;23(2):366-384.
20. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, et al. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11(8):506-514.
21. Hooge DM. Meta-analysis of broiler chicken pen trials evaluating dietary mannan oligosaccharide, 1993-2003. Int J Poult Sci. 2004;3(3):163-174.
22. Hristov AN, Oh J, Giallongo F, Frederick TW, Harper MT, Weeks HL, et al. An inhibitor persistently decreased enteric methane emission from dairy cows with no negative effect on milk production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(34):10663-10668.
23. Kamphuis C, Vale W, Sherlock R, Jago J. Field evaluation of 2 collar-mounted activity meters for detecting cows in estrus on pasture-based dairy farms. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99(2):1355-1369.
24. Kinley RD, Martinez-Fernandez G, Matthews MK, de Nys R, Magnusson M, Tomkins NW. Mitigating the International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research https://www.biochemjournal.com carbon footprint and improving productivity of ruminant livestock agriculture using a red seaweed. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0234571.
25. Leinonen I, Iannetta PPM, Rees RM, Russell W, Watson C, Barnes AP. Comparing the environmental sustainability of protein-rich food products using life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod. 2019;219:280-293.
26. Lum KJ, Huebner VS, Kim H, de Moura FF, Bhardwaj R. Omega-3 enriched eggs as a human intervention tool. Poult Sci. 2013;92(3):716-723.
27. Makkar HPS, Tran G, Heuzé V, Ankers P. State-of-theart on use of insects as animal feed. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2014;197:1-33.
28. Mallo JJ, Risley CR, Han Y, Firman JD. Sodium butyrate and virginiamycin alone and in combination on performance and mortality in challenged broilers. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2012;96(4):648-654.
29. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY. A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosystems. 2012;15(3):401-415.
30. Moraes LE, Strathe AB, Fadel JG, Casper DP, Kebreab E. Prediction of enteric methane emissions from cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98(5):3166-3178.
31. Mookiah S, Sieo CC, Ramasamy K, Abdullah N, Ho YW. Effects of dietary prebiotics, probiotic and synbiotics on performance, caecal bacterial populations and caecal fermentation concentrations of broiler chickens. J Sci Food Agric. 2014;94(2):341-348.
32. Mottram T, Lowe J, McGowan M, Phillips N. Technical note: A wireless telemetric method of monitoring clinical acidosis in dairy cows. Comput Electron Agric. 2008;64(1):45-48.
33. Nguyen TTX, Tomberlin JK, Vanlaerhoven S. Influence of resources on Hermetia illucens development and protein yield. Insects. 2021;12(2):135.
34. Overland M, Skrede A, Tauson AH. Evaluation of bacterial protein meal produced on natural gas as an ingredient in diets for monogastric animals. Aquac Nutr. 2010;16(4):386-396.
35. Papatsiros VG, Tassis PD, Tzika ED, Papaioannou DS, Petrotos K, Naziris N, et al. Effect of formic acid and a formic acid-oregano essential oil product use in drinking water of weaned piglets. J Anim Vet Adv. 2012;11(7):904-910.
36. Pourabedin M, Guan L, Zhao X. Xylo-oligosaccharides and virginiamycin differentially modulate gut microbial composition in chickens. Microbiome. 2015;3(1):15.
37. Prandini A, Sigolo S, Morlacchini M. Low crude protein levels and amino acid supplementation in finishing pig diets: Effects on growth performance and nitrogen excretion. Ital J Anim Sci. 2013;12(1):e10.
38. Renna M, Lussiana C, Malfatto V, Gerbelle M, Turini L, Cornale P. Evaluating the suitability of extruded Hermetia illucens larvae meal as a fishmeal substitute in diets for free-range chickens. Animals. 2020;10(9):1526.
39. Schiavone A, De Marco M, Martinez S, Dabbou S, Renna M, Madrid J, et al. Nutritional value of a partially defatted and a highly defatted black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.) meal for broiler chickens. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017;8:74.
40. Selle PH, Cowieson AJ, Ravindran V. Consequences of calcium interactions with phytate and phytase for poultry and pigs. Livest Sci. 2020;240:104114.
41. Van Boeckel TP, Brower C, Gilbert M, Grenfell BT, Levin SA, Robinson TP, et al. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(18):5649-5654.
42. van Huis A. Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. Annu Rev Entomol. 2013;58:563-583.
43. Wu G, Bazer FW, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC. Maternal and fetal amino acid metabolism in domestic animals. J Dairy Sci. 2013;96(9):5670-5683.
44. Xue Z, Sharpe PL, Hong SP, Yadav NS, Xie D, Short DR, et al. EPA biosynthesis in an oleaginous yeast for production of omega-3 fatty acids. Metab Eng. 2021;67:105-116.
45. Zeng Z, Zhang S, Wang H, Piao X. Essential oil and aromatic plants as feed additives in non-ruminant nutrition: A review. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2015;6(1):7.
46. OECD/FAO. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 20232032. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2023.
47. Alltech. Alltech Agri-Food Outlook 2023: Global Feed Production Trends. Nicholasville (KY): Alltech; 2023.
48. Grand View Research. Europe Protein Ingredients Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Product (Animal/Dairy, Plant, Insect), by Application, and Segment Forecasts 2024-2030. San Francisco (CA): Grand View Research; 2024.
49. DSM Nutritional Products. DSM-Firmenich Animal Nutrition & Health Sustainability Report 2023. Kaiseraugst (Switzerland): DSM Nutritional Products; 2023.
50. Francesch M, Martinez V, Brufau J. Influence of enzyme supplementation on the nutritive value of dietary ingredients for poultry. Br Poult Sci. 2005;46(Suppl 1):S23-S24.
51. Amerah AM, Romero LF, Awati A, Ravindran V. Effect of exogenous xylanase, amylase and protease as single or combined activities on nutrient digestibility and growth performance of broilers fed corn/soy diets. Poult Sci. 2017;96(4):807-816.
52. Selle PH, Ravindran V. Phytate-degrading enzymes in pig nutrition. Livest Sci. 2008;113(2-3):99-122.
53. MarketsandMarkets. Insect Protein Market by Insect Type (Black Soldier Fly, Housefly, Mealworm, Cricket), Application (Feed, Food), Region: Global Forecast to 2028. Pune (India): MarketsandMarkets; 2023.
54. Headon DR, Dawson KA. Enzymes in the feed industry: a new frontier in animal nutrition. In: Lyons TP, Jacques KA, editors. Biotechnology in the Feed Industry. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press; 1995. p. 23-34.
55. Mecredy R, Headon DR, Dawson KA, Jacques KA. Nutritional and environmental applications of biotechnology in the poultry industry. In: Lyons TP, editor. Biotechnology in the Feed Industry. Old Elvet: Feed Compounder; 1997. p. 45-56.
56. Wang TC, Fuller MF. The optimum dietary amino acid pattern for growing pigs. I. Experiments by amino acid deletion. Br J Nutr. 1989;62(1):77-89.
57. van Broekhoven S, Oonincx DGAB, van Huis A, van Loon JJA. Growth performance and feed conversion efficiency of three edible mealworm species (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) on diets composed of organic by-products. J Insect Physiol. 2015;73:1-10.
58. Mlcek J, Rop O, Borkovcova M, Bednarova M. A comprehensive look at the possibilities of edible insects as food in Europe: A review. Pol J Food Nutr Sci. 2014;64(3):147-157.
59. Bosch G, Zhang S, Oonincx DGAB, Hendriks WH. Protein quality of insects as potential ingredients for dog and cat foods. J Nutr Sci. 2014;3:e29.
60. Jiang X, Lin X, Lin X, Lin X. Dietary isoleucine supplementation enhances growth performance, modulates the expression of genes related to amino acid transporters, and intestinal microbiota in yellowfeathered chickens. Poult Sci. 2021;100(8):101235.
61. Leinonen I, Kyriazakis I, MacLeod M. Environmental impacts of alternative protein sources in poultry feed: a life cycle assessment approach. Front Vet Sci. 2022;9:845102.
62. Poultry World. Global Feed Innovations and Alternative Protein Trends for 2023. Doetinchem (Netherlands): Misset International; 2023.
63. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature. 2009;461(7263):472-475.
64. FrieslandCampina. On the Way to PlanetProof: Sustainable Dairy Farming Performance and Foqus Planet Rewards. Amersfoort (Netherlands): Royal FrieslandCampina N.V.; 2022.
65. BPEX (Beef and Pork Executive). Farming Forward: A Strategic Framework for Sustainable Pig Production and Resource Efficiency. Kenilworth (UK): Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board; 2012.