Scinovex

Research article · 2026 · Full text

International Journal of Advanced Chemistry Research

Removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewater using biochar-based adsorbents derived from agricultural biomass

Budi Santoso WijayaDewi Kusuma NingrumAgus Prasetyo HartonoSri Wahyuni Lestari

Volume 8(2) · Pages 22–26 · DOI: 10.33545/26646781.2026.v8.i2a.696 ↗

Research areasAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsHeavy Metal Pollution Remediation

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Long before activated carbon became the default industrial adsorbent, farmers were already burning crop residue and noticing that the charred remains changed how soil held water and nutrients, an observation that modern biochar research has since put on firmer scientific footing. This research converted rice husk, an abundant agricultural residue in West Java, into biochar through slow pyrolysis at 500°C and evaluated its effectiveness in removing lead, cadmium, and hexavalent chromium from synthetic industrial wastewater. Batch adsorption experiments examined the effects of contact time, biochar dosage, initial metal concentration, and solution pH on removal efficiency. Maximum removal efficiencies of 91.2%, 84.3%, and 75.6% were achieved for Pb(II), Cd(II), and Cr(VI) respectively at optimum conditions of 2.5 g/L dosage, pH 5.5, and 180 minutes contact time. Adsorption kinetics followed the pseudo-second-order model more closely than the pseudo-first-order model for all three metals, suggesting chemisorption as the dominant rate-controlling mechanism. Equilibrium data fit the Langmuir isotherm better than the Freundlich isotherm, with maximum monolayer adsorption capacities of 40.5, 33.8, and 27.4 mg/g for Pb, Cd, and Cr respectively. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy of the biochar before and after metal loading confirmed the involvement of carboxyl and hydroxyl surface functional groups in metal binding through surface complexation and ion exchange. Water quality parameters of treated wastewater, including pH, turbidity, and residual metal concentration, met local discharge standards after treatment. These findings support agricultural residue-derived biochar as an accessible, low-cost adsorbent option for industrial wastewater treatment in regions where rice husk and similar biomass residues are generated in large quantities as agricultural byproducts.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Industrial activities in Southeast Asia, including battery manufacturing and electroplating, frequently produce wastewater with heavy metal levels that exceed safe discharge limits. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Industrial activities in Southeast Asia, including battery manufacturing and electroplating, frequently produce wastewater with heavy metal levels that exceed safe discharge limits.

      In the paper's own words

      “Industrial discharge of heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, and hexavalent chromium remains a persistent environmental concern across manufacturing regions in Southeast Asia, where textile dyeing, electroplating, and battery manufacturing operations frequently generate wastewater exceeding safe discharge thresholds for these contaminants.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Standard wastewater treatments like ion exchange resins are effective but can be too expensive for smaller manufacturing operations to maintain. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Standard wastewater treatments like ion exchange resins are effective but can be too expensive for smaller manufacturing operations to maintain.

      In the paper's own words

      “Conventional treatment methods, including chemical precipitation and ion exchange resins, work reasonably well but carry ongoing chemical and operational costs that smaller manufacturing operations often struggle to sustain.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Rice husk is an abundant agricultural byproduct in Indonesia that is often wasted or burned, contributing to air pollution. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Rice husk is an abundant agricultural byproduct in Indonesia that is often wasted or burned, contributing to air pollution.

      In the paper's own words

      “Rice husk in particular is generated in enormous quantities across Indonesia as a byproduct of the country's substantial rice milling industry, and much of it is currently either burned openly, contributing to air pollution, or left to decompose without productive use.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of rice husk-derived biochar in removing lead, cadmium, and chromium from synthetic wastewater and to determine the underlying adsorption mechanisms. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of rice husk-derived biochar in removing lead, cadmium, and chromium from synthetic wastewater and to determine the underlying adsorption mechanisms.

      In the paper's own words

      “This research therefore aimed to produce biochar from rice husk through slow pyrolysis, evaluate its adsorption performance against Pb (II), Cd (II), and Cr (VI) in synthetic wastewater under varying contact time, dosage, and pH conditions, characterize the underlying adsorption mechanism through kinetic and isotherm modelling, and confirm whether treated wastewater meets applicable discharge quality standards.”

      Page 2

      Found in: International Journal of Advanced Che mis try Research 2026; 8(2): 22-26

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  3. What they did

    • Biochar was produced by pyrolyzing rice husk at 500 °C for 90 minutes in a muffle furnace under limited-oxygen conditions. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Biochar was produced by pyrolyzing rice husk at 500 °C for 90 minutes in a muffle furnace under limited-oxygen conditions.

      In the paper's own words

      “Rice husk was washed with deionized water, oven-dried at 105 °C for 24 hours, and pyrolyzed in a muffle furnace under limited-oxygen conditions at 500 °C for 90 minutes at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Synthetic wastewater was prepared with concentrations of 50 mg/L for Pb(II), 30 mg/L for Cd(II), and 40 mg/L for Cr(VI) to simulate regional industrial effluent. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Synthetic wastewater was prepared with concentrations of 50 mg/L for Pb(II), 30 mg/L for Cd(II), and 40 mg/L for Cr(VI) to simulate regional industrial effluent.

      In the paper's own words

      “Synthetic wastewater was formulated to reflect metal concentration ranges commonly reported for untreated industrial effluent in the region: 50 mg/L Pb(II), 30 mg/L Cd (II), and 40 mg/L Cr (VI), each prepared separately for single-metal batch experiments.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Baseline water quality analysis

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Adsorption tests used biochar dosages between 0.5 and 4.0 g/L and pH levels from 2.0 to 7.0, with samples shaken at 150 rpm for up to 240 minutes. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Adsorption tests used biochar dosages between 0.5 and 4.0 g/L and pH levels from 2.0 to 7.0, with samples shaken at 150 rpm for up to 240 minutes.

      In the paper's own words

      “Batch adsorption experiments were conducted by adding biochar (0.5-4.0 g/L) to 100 mL of synthetic wastewater at varying initial pH (2.0-7.0, adjusted with HCl or NaOH), and shaking at 150 rpm for up to 240 minutes at room temperature (27±2 °C).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Under optimal conditions (2.5 g/L dosage, pH 5.5, 180 min), the biochar achieved maximum removal efficiencies of 91.2% for Pb(II), 84.3% for Cd(II), and 75.6% for Cr(VI). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Under optimal conditions (2.5 g/L dosage, pH 5.5, 180 min), the biochar achieved maximum removal efficiencies of 91.2% for Pb(II), 84.3% for Cd(II), and 75.6% for Cr(VI).

      In the paper's own words

      “Maximum removal efficiencies of 91.2%, 84.3%, and 75.6% were achieved for Pb (II), Cd (II), and Cr (VI), respectively, at optimum conditions of 2.5 g/L dosage, pH 5.5, and 180 minutes contact time.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The adsorption process followed a pseudo-second-order kinetic model, indicating that chemisorption is the primary mechanism for metal removal. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The adsorption process followed a pseudo-second-order kinetic model, indicating that chemisorption is the primary mechanism for metal removal.

      In the paper's own words

      “The consistently higher R2 values for the pseudo-second-order model across all three metals indicate that chemisorption, involving valence forces through electron sharing or exchange between metal ions and biochar surface functional groups, is the dominant rate-controlling step”

      Page 3

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The data fit the Langmuir isotherm, showing maximum monolayer adsorption capacities of 40.5 mg/g for Pb, 33.8 mg/g for Cd, and 27.4 mg/g for Cr. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The data fit the Langmuir isotherm, showing maximum monolayer adsorption capacities of 40.5 mg/g for Pb, 33.8 mg/g for Cd, and 27.4 mg/g for Cr.

      In the paper's own words

      “Equilibrium data fit the Langmuir isotherm better than the Freundlich isotherm, with maximum monolayer adsorption capacities of 40.5, 33.8, and 27.4 mg/g for Pb, Cd, and Cr, respectively.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • FTIR analysis identified surface complexation with hydroxyl and carboxyl groups, ion exchange, and electrostatic attraction as the main binding mechanisms. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      FTIR analysis identified surface complexation with hydroxyl and carboxyl groups, ion exchange, and electrostatic attraction as the main binding mechanisms.

      In the paper's own words

      “Surface complexation with carboxyl and hydroxyl groups, ion exchange, and electrostatic attraction between negatively charged biochar surfaces and positively charged metal ions were identified as the principal mechanisms, supported by shifts in FTIR peak positions after metal loading.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • After treatment with the biochar, the wastewater's residual metal concentrations, turbidity, and pH complied with local discharge standards. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      After treatment with the biochar, the wastewater's residual metal concentrations, turbidity, and pH complied with local discharge standards.

      In the paper's own words

      “Water quality parameters of treated wastewater, including pH, turbidity, and residual metal concentration, met local discharge standards after treatment.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Baseline water quality analysis

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Producing rice husk biochar in small-scale kilns is estimated to cost USD 0.08-0.12 per kilogram, which is significantly cheaper than commercial activated carbon. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Producing rice husk biochar in small-scale kilns is estimated to cost USD 0.08-0.12 per kilogram, which is significantly cheaper than commercial activated carbon.

      In the paper's own words

      “A preliminary cost estimate suggests rice husk biochar production costs approximately USD 0.08-0.12 per kilogram when using existing small-scale pyrolysis kilns, considerably below the typical market cost of commercial activated carbon in the region.”

      Page 5

      Found in: Comprehensive interpretation

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 5 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that locally sourced rice husk biochar is a practical, low-cost option for treating industrial wastewater to meet discharge standards for the tested metals. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that locally sourced rice husk biochar is a practical, low-cost option for treating industrial wastewater to meet discharge standards for the tested metals.

      In the paper's own words

      “For manufacturing regions generating substantial rice husk waste alongside industrial wastewater containing heavy metals, these findings offer a practical message: a low-cost, locally sourced adsorbent can achieve removal efficiencies sufficient to bring treated water within local discharge standards, at least for the metals and conditions tested here.”

      Page 5

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 5 ↗
    • The authors state that future work is needed to test the biochar with real industrial effluent containing multiple competing ions and to study its regeneration and reuse cycles. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors state that future work is needed to test the biochar with real industrial effluent containing multiple competing ions and to study its regeneration and reuse cycles.

      In the paper's own words

      “Future research should test this biochar's performance against real industrial effluent containing multiple metals and competing ions simultaneously, and should investigate regeneration and reuse cycles to establish the adsorbent's practical operating lifetime”

      Page 5

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 5 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (biochar particles in industrial wastewater). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Adsorption Mechanism
AI-generated conceptual illustration (biochar particles in industrial wastewater). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (biochar particles in industrial wastewater). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Adsorption Mechanism

AI-generated conceptual illustration (biochar particles in industrial wastewater). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Removal efficiency of Pb(II), Cd (II), and Cr (VI) as a function of contact timeFigure 1Page 2Kinetic model parameters for Pb (II), Cd (II), and Cr (VI) adsorption onto rice husk biocharTable 1Page 3Research timeline and experimental phasesTable 2Page 3Cumulative adsorption capacity of rice husk biochar for Pb(II) as a function of dosageFigure 2Page 3Schematic illustration of proposed heavy metal adsorption mechanisms on rice husk biochar surfaceFigure 3Page 4Langmuir isotherm fit for Pb (II) adsorption onto rice husk biocharFigure 4Page 4
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

The practice of charring organic matter to improve soil quality dates back centuries in various farming traditions, though it took modern analytical chemistry to explain why charred biomass behaves so differently from its uncharred source material-namely, the dramatic increase in surface area and functional group density that pyrolysis produces. Industrial discharge of heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, and hexavalent chromium remains a persistent environmental concern across manufacturing regions in Southeast Asia, where textile dyeing, electroplating, and battery manufacturing operations frequently generate wastewater exceeding safe discharge thresholds for these contaminants. Conventional treatment methods, including chemical precipitation and ion exchange resins, work reasonably well but carry ongoing chemical and operational costs that smaller manufacturing operations often struggle to sustain. Biochar, produced by pyrolyzing agricultural residues under limited oxygen conditions, offers a potentially cheaper alternative. Rice husk in particular is generated in enormous quantities across Indonesia as a byproduct of the country's substantial rice milling industry, and much of it is currently either burned openly, contributing to air pollution, or left to decompose without productive use.

International Journal of Advanced Che mis try Research 2026; 8(2): 22-26

Previous research has demonstrated the capacity of biochar derived from various biomass sources to adsorb individual heavy metals, but comparative studies examining multiple metals simultaneously under a single set of experimental conditions, paired with detailed kinetic and isotherm modelling plus practical wastewater quality validation, remain comparatively limited for rice husk-derived biochar specifically. This research therefore aimed to produce biochar from rice husk through slow pyrolysis, evaluate its adsorption performance against Pb (II), Cd (II), and Cr (VI) in synthetic wastewater under varying contact time, dosage, and pH conditions, characterize the underlying adsorption mechanism through kinetic and isotherm modelling, and confirm whether treated wastewater meets applicable discharge quality standards.

Material and Methods

Material and Methods

Material

Rice husk was collected from a rice milling facility in the Bandung regency of West Java, Indonesia, in May 2025. Analytical-grade lead nitrate, cadmium chloride, and potassium dichromate were obtained from a certified chemical supplier for preparation of synthetic metalcontaminated wastewater. Hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide were used for pH adjustment throughout the experiments, and all solutions were prepared using deionized water.

Study area description

Rice husk sourced for this research originated from milling operations processing paddy grown within the Bandung regency, an area characterized by a tropical monsoon climate with average annual rainfall around 2000 mm and mean temperatures between 22 °C and 27 °C. This region hosts a concentration of small and medium-scale manufacturing facilities, including textile and electroplating operations, that were used as reference points for selecting representative industrial contaminant concentrations for the synthetic wastewater used in this research.

Baseline water quality analysis

Synthetic wastewater was formulated to reflect metal concentration ranges commonly reported for untreated industrial effluent in the region: 50 mg/L Pb(II), 30 mg/L Cd (II), and 40 mg/L Cr (VI), each prepared separately for single-metal batch experiments. Baseline parameters of the synthetic wastewater, including pH (6.8-7.2), turbidity (12-15 NTU), and total dissolved solids (410-460 mg/L), were measured before treatment to establish reference values against which post-treatment water quality could be compared.

Methods

Rice husk was washed with deionized water, oven-dried at 105 °C for 24 hours, and pyrolyzed in a muffle furnace under limited-oxygen conditions at 500 °C for 90 minutes at a heating rate of 10 °C/min. The resulting biochar was cooled, ground, and sieved to a particle size of 0.15-0.30 mm before use. Surface area was determined by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method, and surface functional groups were identified using FTIR spectroscopy before and after metal adsorption. Batch adsorption experiments were conducted by adding biochar (0.5-4.0 g/L) to 100 mL of synthetic wastewater at varying initial pH (2.0-7.0, adjusted with HCl or NaOH), and shaking at 150 rpm for up to 240 minutes at room temperature (27±2 °C). Samples were withdrawn at set time intervals, filtered through 0.45 µm membrane filters, and residual metal concentration was measured using atomic absorption spectroscopy. Kinetic data were fitted to pseudofirst-order and pseudo-second-order models, and equilibrium data were fitted to Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models using linear regression.

Results

Removal efficiency increased rapidly during the first 60 minutes of contact for all three metals before gradually approaching equilibrium, a pattern typical of adsorbents with a large initial density of readily accessible surface binding sites. Pb(II) reached the highest removal efficiency (91.2%) among the three metals tested, consistent with its comparatively larger ionic radius and stronger affinity for the carboxyl and hydroxyl functional groups present on the biochar surface, while Cr (VI) showed the slowest and lowest overall removal, likely reflecting its existence as an oxyanion rather than a simple cation under the tested pH range. The consistently higher R 2 values for the pseudo-secondorder model across all three metals indicate that chemisorption, involving valence forces through electron sharing or exchange between metal ions and biochar surface functional groups, is the dominant rate-controlling step rather than simple physical diffusion. The staged research design allowed characterization findings from Phase 2 to directly inform the experimental conditions selected for the batch adsorption trials conducted in Phase 3. Surface complexation with carboxyl and hydroxyl groups, ion exchange, and electrostatic attraction between negatively charged biochar surfaces and positively charged metal ions were identified as the principal mechanisms, supported by shifts in FTIR peak positions after metal loading.

The close agreement between experimental data points and the Langmuir model curve, together with a higher R 2 (0.987) compared with the Freundlich model (R 2 = 0.923), supports monolayer adsorption onto a surface with a finite number of energetically similar binding sites.

Comprehensive interpretation

Considered together, the kinetic, isotherm, mechanistic, and phased experimental results describe a reasonably coherent picture: rice husk biochar removes these three metals primarily through chemisorption onto a finite number of surface functional group sites, with performance differences across metals traceable to their differing ionic characteristics and chemical form in solution, and this mechanistic understanding directly explains why Pb (II) consistently outperformed Cd (II) and Cr (VI) across every measure examined in this research. The pseudo-second-order kinetics and Langmuir isotherm fit obtained here agree with the majority of published biocharmetal adsorption studies, reinforcing chemisorption onto a homogeneous, finite-site surface as the generally dominant mechanism across this broader class of adsorbents.

Where this research's findings diverge somewhat from certain earlier reports is in the notably lower removal efficiency for Cr (VI) relative to Pb(II) and Cd (II); some biochar studies report comparable or even higher Cr (VI) removal, a difference that may reflect variation in pyrolysis temperature and resulting surface charge characteristics across studies, since Cr (VI) speciation and biochar surface charge are both strongly pH-dependent. A plausible explanation for the dosage-dependent decline in per-gram adsorption capacity relates to particle aggregation at higher biochar loadings, which effectively reduces the surface area accessible to metal ions even as total metal removed continues to increase with more adsorbent present. These findings have a fairly direct broader implication for regions generating large volumes of rice husk waste: converting an otherwise low-value agricultural byproduct into a functional wastewater treatment material offers a plausible dual benefit of waste valorization and pollution reduction, provided the treated water quality results reported here hold up under real, rather than synthetic, industrial effluent conditions.

Economic and sustainability assessment: A preliminary cost estimate suggests rice husk biochar production costs approximately USD 0.08-0.12 per kilogram when using existing small-scale pyrolysis kilns, considerably below the typical market cost of commercial activated carbon in the region. Given the large volume of rice husk generated annually by Indonesian rice mills, sourcing raw material presents minimal supply constraints. From a sustainability standpoint, diverting rice husk from open burning, a common current disposal practice that contributes to regional air quality problems, toward biochar production for wastewater treatment offers a plausible dual environmental benefit, though a full life-cycle cost-benefit analysis incorporating pyrolysis energy input and spent biochar disposal or regeneration costs would be needed before broader economic claims could be made with confidence.

Conclusion

This research set out to evaluate whether rice husk, an abundant and currently underused agricultural residue, could be converted into an effective biochar adsorbent for removing Pb(II), Cd (II), and Cr (VI) from industrial wastewater. Results showed maximum removal efficiencies of 91.2%, 84.3%, and 75.6% for Pb (II), Cd (II), and Cr (VI), respectively, with adsorption following pseudosecond-order kinetics and Langmuir isotherm behaviour, pointing to chemisorption onto surface functional groups as the dominant removal mechanism.

For manufacturing regions generating substantial rice husk waste alongside industrial wastewater containing heavy metals, these findings offer a practical message: a low-cost, locally sourced adsorbent can achieve removal efficiencies sufficient to bring treated water within local discharge standards, at least for the metals and conditions tested here. Future research should test this biochar's performance against real industrial effluent containing multiple metals and competing ions simultaneously, and should investigate regeneration and reuse cycles to establish the adsorbent's practical operating lifetime before recommending largescale industrial adoption.

Acknowledgement

Acknowledgements Institutional supportThe authors thank the National Institute of Environmental Engineering, Bandung, for providing pyrolysis and water quality analysis facilities used throughout this research.

Figures and tables from the paper

Figure 1. Removal efficiency of Pb(II), Cd (II), and Cr (VI) as a function of contact time
Removal efficiency of Pb(II), Cd (II), and Cr (VI) as a function of contact time↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Removal efficiency of Pb(II), Cd (II), and Cr (VI) as a function of contact time

Removal efficiency of Pb(II), Cd (II), and Cr (VI) as a function of contact time

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 1. Kinetic model parameters for Pb (II), Cd (II), and Cr (VI) adsorption onto rice husk biochar
MetalPseudo-first-order R2Pseudo-second-order R2qe (mg/g, calc.)k2 (g/mg·min)
Pb(II)0.8870.99638.40.0034
Cd(II)0.8620.99132.10.0028
Cr(VI)0.8410.98426.70.0021

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Kinetic model parameters for Pb (II), Cd (II), and Cr (VI) adsorption onto rice husk biochar↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Kinetic model parameters for Pb (II), Cd (II), and Cr (VI) adsorption onto rice husk biochar

Kinetic model parameters for Pb (II), Cd (II), and Cr (VI) adsorption onto rice husk biochar

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Table 2. Research timeline and experimental phases
PhaseActivityDuration
Phase 1Rice husk collection and biochar productionMay 2025 (2 weeks)
Phase 2Biochar characterization (BET, FTIR, SEM)Late May-early June 2025 (3 weeks)
Phase 3Batch adsorption experiments (time, dosage, pH)June-July 2025 (6 weeks)
Phase 4Isotherm and kinetic modelling, data analysisAugust 2025 (3 weeks)
Phase 5Treated water quality validationSeptember 2025 (2 weeks)

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Research timeline and experimental phases↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Research timeline and experimental phases

Research timeline and experimental phases

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 2. Cumulative adsorption capacity of rice husk biochar for Pb(II) as a function of dosage
Cumulative adsorption capacity of rice husk biochar for Pb(II) as a function of dosage↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Cumulative adsorption capacity of rice husk biochar for Pb(II) as a function of dosage

Cumulative adsorption capacity of rice husk biochar for Pb(II) as a function of dosage

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of proposed heavy metal adsorption mechanisms on rice husk biochar surface
Schematic illustration of proposed heavy metal adsorption mechanisms on rice husk biochar surface↗ Enlarge
Figure 3
Schematic illustration of proposed heavy metal adsorption mechanisms on rice husk biochar surface

Schematic illustration of proposed heavy metal adsorption mechanisms on rice husk biochar surface

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 4. Langmuir isotherm fit for Pb (II) adsorption onto rice husk biochar
Langmuir isotherm fit for Pb (II) adsorption onto rice husk biochar↗ Enlarge
Figure 4
Langmuir isotherm fit for Pb (II) adsorption onto rice husk biochar

Langmuir isotherm fit for Pb (II) adsorption onto rice husk biochar

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗

References

21 in the original paper
  1. Suryanto B, Handayani R. Biochar production from agricultural residues for heavy metal remediation: a regional review. Journal of Environmental Management. 2023;332:117398.
  2. Prasetya AW, Utomo SB. Pyrolysis temperature effects on biochar surface characteristics and adsorption capacity. Bioresource Technology. 2022;348:126712.
  3. Rahayu SI, Wibowo H. Rice husk biochar for lead and cadmium removal from synthetic wastewater. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;315:128123.
  4. Zhang L, Chen Y. Chromium (VI) adsorption mechanisms on biomass-derived biochar: a mechanistic review. Chemosphere. 2020;251:126401.
  5. Kurniawan TA, Setiawan D. Comparative adsorption isotherm modelling of heavy metals on agricultural waste adsorbents. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2019;367:512-521.
  6. Nugroho FA, Wardhani P. Rice husk ash and biochar utilization in Indonesian agricultural waste management. Waste Management. 2023;158:112-121.
  7. Herawati N, Susanto B. FTIR characterization of functional group changes in metal-loaded biochar. Applied Surface Science. 2021;540:148341.
  8. Wulandari D, Santoso E. Pseudo-second-order kinetic modelling of heavy metal biosorption: a comparative analysis. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2022;46:102589.
  9. Firmansyah R, Kurnia A. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm application in biochar-based water treatment studies. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 2020;19:100862.
  10. Aditya P, Nugraha W. Cost comparison of biochar versus activated carbon for industrial wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2024;12(1):111845.
  11. Widiastuti N, Setiadi T. Slow pyrolysis conditions and their effect on biochar porosity and surface area. Fuel Processing Technology. 2019;186:70-78.
  12. Kusumawati R, Hidayat T. Industrial effluent characterization from electroplating and textile sectors in West Java. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2023;195(4):456.
  13. Purnomo AS, Wicaksono D. Ion exchange and electrostatic mechanisms in biochar-based heavy metal removal. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2021;415:129012.
  14. Salsabila F, Ramadhan I. Biochar regeneration and reuse cycles for sustained heavy metal adsorption performance. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2022;10(6):108734.
  15. Yulianto B, Kristanto D. Agricultural biomass valorization pathways in Southeast Asia: a policy perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2024;202:107392.
  16. Halim A, Rachman F. BET surface area analysis of biochar produced from various agricultural residues. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020;27:112-118.
  17. Sudrajat H, Prabowo A. Adsorption of oxyanion pollutants on carbon-based adsorbents: mechanistic considerations. Separation and Purification Technology. 2021;265:118477.
  18. Anggraini L, Wahyudi S. pH-dependent speciation of chromium and its effect on adsorptive removal efficiency. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2020;90:112-120.
  19. Maharani D, Pratiwi Y. Life-cycle cost assessment of biomass-derived adsorbents for water treatment applications. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2023;36:210-219.
  20. Wicaksana A, Riyanto B. Rice husk supply chain and utilization potential in the Indonesian rice milling industry. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2022;164:106556.
  21. Fauzi AR, Ismail N. Discharge standard compliance following biochar-based industrial wastewater treatment. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2024;58:104790.