Effect of Different Essential Oils on Mycelial Growth Inhibition of Alternaria solani

Introduction

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is the second most cultivated vegetable crop worldwide after potato, with a global production exceeding 180 million metric tons annually (FAO, 2024) [13] . India ranks second in tomato production, contributing approximately 11% of global output. However, tomato production is severely constrained by various fungal, bacterial, and viral diseases. Among these, early blight caused by Alternaria solani (Ellis and Martin) Sorauer is recognized as one of the most destructive foliar diseases, particularly in warm and humid growing regions (Nowakowska et al., 2019) [26] . The pathogen A. solani is a necrotrophic fungus belonging to the family Pleosporaceae (order Pleosporales, class Dothideomycetes). It produces characteristic large, multicellular, muriform conidia with a distinct beak. The fungus survives as mycelium, conidia, or chlamydospores in infected plant debris for up to two years, making disease management challenging (Chaube and Pundhir, 2005) [7] . Early blight symptoms typically begin as small, dark brown to black lesions on lower leaves, which expand and develop characteristic concentric rings resembling a "bull's eye" pattern. Under favorable conditions (25-30°C temperature, >90% relative humidity, and leaf wetness duration of 12-18 hours), the disease can progress rapidly, causing premature defoliation, sunscald on fruits, and yield losses ranging from 25% to as high as 78% in severe epidemics (Vloutoglou and Kalogerakis, 2000; Panthee and Chen, 2010) [27,48] . Conventional management of early blight relies heavily on synthetic fungicides belonging to various chemical groups including dithiocarbamates (mancozeb), chloronitriles (chlorothalonil), strobilurins (azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin), and triazoles (difenoconazole, tebuconazole). While effective, repeated application of these fungicides has led to several serious consequences:

(i) development of fungicide-resistant A. solani populations reported from multiple countries (Fairchild et al., 2013; Stevenson et al., 2015) [12,43] ; (ii) residual toxicity affecting non-target organisms including beneficial soil microbes and pollinators; (iii) environmental contamination of soil and water resources; and (iv) potential health risks to agricultural workers and consumers (Damalas and Eleftherohorinos, 2011) [10] . These concerns have driven the search for safer, eco-friendly alternatives. In recent years, plant-derived essential oils (EOs) have emerged as promising candidates for sustainable plant disease management. Essential oils are complex mixtures of volatile secondary metabolites, primarily terpenes and terpenoids, along with phenolic compounds, alcohols, esters, and aldehydes (Bakkali et al., 2008) [5] . They are generally recognized as safe (GRAS status) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and have demonstrated broadspectrum antimicrobial activity against numerous plant pathogenic fungi, bacteria, and nematodes (Isman, 2000; Nazzaro et al., 2013) [25,16] . The antifungal mechanism of essential oils differs fundamentally from synthetic fungicides. While synthetic fungicides typically target specific enzymes or metabolic pathways (e.g., ergosterol biosynthesis in triazoles, mitochondrial respiration in strobilurins), essential oils exert multi-site action including: (i) disruption of fungal cell membrane integrity and permeability; (ii) leakage of cellular contents (ions, ATP, nucleic acids); (iii) inhibition of cell wall synthesizing enzymes; (iv) induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to oxidative stress; and (v) interference with quorum sensing and biofilm formation (Tariq et al., 2019) [45] . This multi-target mechanism makes it less likely for fungi to develop resistance against EOs compared to single-target synthetic fungicides.Numerous in vitro studies have evaluated the antifungal activity of various essential oils against A. solani (Table 1). However, the results vary considerably depending on the essential oil source, chemical composition, concentration, exposure method, fungal isolate, and experimental conditions. A systematic comparison of different essential oils is needed to identify the most effective candidates for further development. Therefore, this review aims to: [1] compile and critically evaluate published data on in vitro mycelial growth inhibition of A. solani by different essential oils; [2] compare the efficacy of various essential oils and identify the most promising ones; [3] analyze factors affecting antifungal activity; and [4] discuss future prospects and challenges for field application.

Global Tomato Production and Economic Significance

Tomato is not only a major dietary source of vitamins (A, C, E), minerals (potassium, magnesium), and the antioxidant lycopene, but also a significant source of livelihood for millions of smallholder farmers in developing countries. Table 1 presents the major tomato-producing countries and the impact of early blight.

Disease Epidemiology and Favourable Conditions

Early blight is favored by moderate to high temperatures (25-30°C), prolonged leaf wetness (≥12 hours), high relative humidity (>90%), and poor plant nutrition (especially nitrogen deficiency). The disease is more severe in mature or senescing plants, as A. solani produces cell wall degrading enzymes (polygalacturonase, cellulase, pectinase) and host-selective toxins that are more effective on older tissues (Abada et al., 2008) [3] .The pathogen overwinters as mycelium, conidia, or chlamydospores in infected crop debris, volunteer tomato plants, and alternative hosts including potato, eggplant, and black nightshade (Solanum nigrum). Primary inoculum is dispersed by wind, splashing rain, irrigation water, insects, and contaminated farm equipment. Secondary spread occurs throughout the growing season, with conidia produced every 5-7 days under favorable conditions (Rotem, 1994) [33] . [36] .

Biology and pathogenicity of Alternaria solani Taxonomic Position and Morphological Characteristics

Pathogenicity Mechanisms

Alternaria solani employs multiple virulence factors to infect and colonize tomato tissue:

Host-Specific Toxins (HSTs)

The pathogen produces two major host-selective toxins:  Alternaric acid: A tetronic acid derivative that causes rapid chloroplast disruption, electrolyte leakage, and cell death. Alternaric acid specifically targets photosystem II, leading to inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport (Masia et al., 2016) [23] .  Zinniol: A phytotoxic compound that induces membrane damage, inhibits root growth, and causes rapid tissue necrosis (Park and Ikeda, 2008) [28] .

Cell Wall Degrading Enzymes (CWDEs)

Alternaria solani secretes a battery of CWDEs including:  Polygalacturonase (PG) -degrades pectin in middle lamella  Pectin methyl esterase (PME) -demethylates pectin  Cellulase (endo-β-1,4-glucanase) -degrades cellulose  Xylanase -degrades hemicellulose  Protease -degrades cell wall proteins These enzymes synergistically disintegrate the plant cell wall, facilitating tissue colonization and nutrient acquisition (Khasanov et al., 2022) [17] .

Melanin Production

Alternaria solani produces dark brown melanin pigment in its cell wall, which provides protection against UV radiation, host defense responses, and enhances survival in plant debris. Melanin also contributes to mechanical strength of infection structures (appressoria) and facilitates host penetration (Tsuji et al., 2020) [47] . [1] .  Pruning and staking: Removal of lower leaves (up to 30-40 cm from ground) eliminates primary infection sites. Staking improves air circulation, reduces leaf wetness duration.  Resistant varieties: Limited resistance is available in commercial cultivars. Some tolerance has been identified in wild tomato species (Solanum habrochaites, S. pimpinellifolium) and breeding lines (NC 1CS, NC 2CS, NC EBR-1). However, polygenic inheritance and linkage drag have hindered development of resistant commercial varieties (Panthee and Chen, 2010) [27] .

Symptom Description

Chemical Control

Fungicides remain the primary tool for early blight management in conventional production systems. Table 3 summarizes commonly used fungicides and their efficacy.

Problem of Fungicide Resistance:

Resistance to strobilurins (QoI fungicides) in A. solani was first reported in the USA in 2007 (Stevenson et al., 2007) [44] and subsequently confirmed in Europe, Asia, and South America. The resistance is conferred by the G143A mutation in the cytochrome b gene, which alters the fungicide binding site. Cross-resistance extends across all strobilurins (azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, kresoxim-methyl, trifloxystrobin). Resistance to succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (SDHIs) has emerged more recently, with mutations in SdhB, SdhC, and SdhD subunits reported from multiple countries (Gudmestad et al., 2013; Fairchild et al., 2013) [12,15] . Resistance to triazoles (DMI fungicides) remains less common but has been documented under high selection pressure.

Integrated Disease Management (IDM)

Modern IDM programs combine multiple tactics to reduce reliance on fungicides: [46] .

Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Generation

Essential oils induce accumulation of reactive oxygen species including superoxide anion (O₂⁻), hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), and hydroxyl radical (OH•). Elevated ROS cause oxidative damage to membrane lipids (lipid peroxidation), proteins (carbonylation), and DNA (strand breaks). Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, a marker of lipid peroxidation, increase 2-5-fold in EO-treated A. solani mycelium (Kumar et al., 2021) [18] .

Inhibition of Ergosterol Biosynthesis

Ergosterol is the major sterol component of fungal cell membranes, analogous to cholesterol in animal cells. Several essential oils (e.g., clove, oregano, thyme) inhibit enzymes in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway, particularly squalene epoxidase and C-14 demethylase (Lv et al., 2018) [22] . Reduced ergosterol content compromises membrane integrity and function.

Mitochondrial Dysfunction

Essential oils interfere with mitochondrial electron transport chain and ATP synthesis. Thymol and carvacrol inhibit NADH dehydrogenase (Complex I) and ATP synthase, leading to reduced ATP production, energy crisis, and cell death (Rao et al., 2010) [32] .

Inhibition of Cell Wall Degrading Enzymes

Essential oils suppress the production and activity of CWDEs secreted by A. solani. At sub-lethal concentrations, clove oil reduced polygalacturonase and cellulase activity by 60-75% compared to control (Sitara et al., 2008) [40] .

Chemical Classification

Based on their major chemical constituents, essential oils can be classified into four main groups:

food technique (Agar Dilution Method)

This is the most widely used method for assessing antifungal activity against mycelial growth. Molten potato dextrose agar (PDA) is cooled to 45°C and supplemented with varying concentrations of essential oil (typically 0.01-2.0 µL/mL). Tween-80 (0.05-0.1%) is added as an emulsifier. The medium is poured into sterile petri plates (90 mm diameter). After solidification, a 5 mm mycelial disc from 7-day-old A. solani culture is placed centrally. Plates are incubated at 25±2°C for 7 days. Mycelial growth diameter is measured in two perpendicular directions, and percent inhibition is calculated:

Disc Volatilization Method (vapour Phase Assay)

This method evaluates the antifungal activity of volatile EO components without direct contact. A 5 mm fungal disc is placed on PDA in a sealed petri plate. Essential oil (5-50 µL) is applied to a sterile filter paper disc (6 mm) attached to the inner surface of the lid. Plates are sealed with Parafilm and incubated. This method better represents potential fumigation applications in storage.

Broth microdilution method (for MIC/MFC))

Two-fold serial dilutions of EO (0.015-2.0 µL/mL) are prepared in 96-well microtiter plates containing potato dextrose broth (PDB). Each well is inoculated with 10 [4] conidia/mL. Plates are incubated at 25°C for 48-72 hours. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is the lowest concentration showing no visible growth. Minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) is determined by subculturing wells onto EO-free PDA.

Compiled Results from Published Studies

Structure-Activity Relationship

The superior activity of phenolic monoterpenes (thymol, carvacrol, eugenol) is attributed to:  Hydroxyl (-OH) group: Enables hydrogen bonding with membrane phospholipids and enzyme active sites  Aromatic ring: Allows delocalization of electrons and interaction with aromatic amino acids  Hydrophobicity: Facilitates partitioning into lipid bilayer  Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis revealed that the antifungal activity of EO components against Alternaria spp. is correlated with: A) Log P (octanol-water partition coefficient) > 2.

B) Presence of conjugated double bonds

Statistical Comparison

A meta-analysis of 45 independent studies (total n=328 observations) was conducted to compare EO efficacy. Oneway ANOVA revealed significant differences among EOs (F=34.27, df=9, 318, p<0.001). Post-hoc Tukey's HSD test showed: Thyme oil significantly more effective than all other EOs (p<0.01) No significant difference between clove, oregano, and cinnamon (p>0.05) All three Tier 1 EOs significantly more effective than Tier 2 and 3 EOs (p<0.001)

Concentration

Concentration is the single most important factor determining antifungal activity. The relationship typically follows a log-linear pattern:

High Volatility and Poor Residual Activity

Essential oils are volatile and degrade rapidly under field conditions. In open field trials, the protective effect of EO sprays typically lasts only 2-5 days, compared to 10-14 days for synthetic fungicides. This necessitates frequent reapplication, increasing labor and material costs.

Phytotoxicity at Effective Concentrations

The concentration required for complete fungal suppression (0.1-0.2 µL/mL) often causes phytotoxicity on tomato foliage, including leaf margin burn, chlorosis, and necrosis.

A study by Soylu et al. (2010) [42] reported 15-25% leaf damage when 0.15 µL/mL thyme oil was sprayed on tomato plants under greenhouse conditions.

Variable Quality and Standardization

Commercial essential oils vary widely in composition due to differences in plant source, chemotype, harvest time, extraction method, and adulteration. Lack of standardized quality control hampers reproducibility and commercial development.

Higher Cost Compared to Synthetic Fungicides

The cost of essential oils (₹3,000-15,000/L or 7-30/L). For large-scale field application, the cost differential is prohibitive for many farmers, particularly in developing countries.

Limited Field Validation

While over 200 in vitro studies have been published, fewer than 20 well-designed field trials have evaluated EO efficacy against early blight. Field conditions (UV radiation, rain, temperature fluctuations, leaf surface interactions) are far more complex than in vitro systems.

Nanoencapsulation Technology

Encapsulation of essential oils in nanocarriers (size 50-500 nm) offers multiple benefits:  Controlled release: Gradual release over 7-14 days  Reduced volatility: Encapsulation slows evaporation  Protection from degradation: Shielding from UV, oxygen, and heat  Reduced phytotoxicity: Lower peak concentration at leaf surface  Improved penetration: Enhanced delivery into fungal hyphae

Synergistic Combinations

Combining multiple EOs or EO with synthetic fungicides can produce synergistic effects (combined effect greater than sum of individual effects). This allows dose reduction, minimizing both cost and phytotoxicity.

Eo-eo Synergism:

Thyme + clove oil (1:1 ratio) showed synergy index (SI) = 0.45, allowing 60% dose reduction (Singh et al., 2023) [39] Oregano + lemongrass (2:1 ratio) SI = 0.52 Cinnamon + thyme (1:2 ratio) SI = 0.48

EO-synthetic fungicide synergism:

 Clove oil + mancozeb (1:10) SI = 0.38, achieving 90% inhibition at 1/4 of individual doses  Thyme oil + azoxystrobin (5:1) reduced azoxystrobin dose by 75% (Rani et al., 2023) [31] Edible Coatings for Post-Harvest Application For post-harvest control of A. solani on tomato fruits, EO incorporated into edible coatings (chitosan, alginate, pectin) offers a practical application. Formulations containing 0.5-1.0% clove oil in chitosan coating reduced fruit rot by 70-85% and extended shelf life by 10-12 days at room temperature (Lopez et al., 2021) [21] .

Integration with Biological Control Agents

Combining EOs with antagonistic microorganisms (Bacillus subtilis, Trichoderma harzianum, Pseudomonas fluorescens) may provide complementary benefits: EOs provide rapid initial reduction of pathogen population, while biocontrol agents offer longer-term suppression. However, EO concentrations must be selected to avoid harming the biocontrol agent.

Identification of Synergistic Adjuvants

Certain non-toxic adjuvants enhance EO efficacy:  Organic acids (citric acid, acetic acid at 0.1-0.5%): pH reduction and chelation  Surfactants (Tween-80, Triton X-100 at 0.05-0.1%): improved spreading and penetration  Oils (vegetable oils at 0.5-2.0%): reduced evaporation and photodegradation

Breeding for Enhanced EO Sensitivity

Genetic variation in A. solani sensitivity to EOs suggests potential for breeding or selecting EO-hypersensitive strains. Alternatively, transgenic tomato expressing EO biosynthetic pathways (e.g., eugenol synthase gene) could produce antifungal compounds in planta.

Priority Research Areas for the Next 5 Years

 Multi-location field trials with standardized EO formulations (minimum 10 locations, 3 seasons)  Development of stable, ready-to-use EO formulations with >6 months shelf life  Toxicological assessment of repeated EO exposure on non-target organisms (pollinators, soil microbes, aquatic organisms)  Economic analysis of EO-based management (costbenefit compared to conventional fungicides)  Regulatory framework for registration of EOs as botanical fungicides in major tomato-producing countries

 Significant variability exists in EO efficacy

The activity depends on multiple factors including chemical composition (phenolic > aldehyde > terpene alcohol > terpene hydrocarbon), concentration (critical dose-dependent effect), fungal isolate (2-3-fold variation in sensitivity), temperature (reduced activity above 35°C), growth medium, and application method (contact more effective than vapor).  Translation from lab to field remains challenging.

Major obstacles include high volatility (2-5-day residual activity), phytotoxicity at effective concentrations (leaf damage at >0.10 µL/mL), higher cost compared to synthetic fungicides (3-10×), lack of standardization (quality variation), and limited field validation (only 15-20 field studies to date).  Nanoencapsulation and synergistic combinations are the most promising solutions. Chitosan nanoparticles, liposomes, and nanoemulsions can extend residual activity to 10-14 days, reduce phytotoxicity by 40-60%, and lower effective concentrations by 2-4-fold.

Synergistic blends (EO-EO or EO-fungicide) allow dose reduction while maintaining efficacy.  Essential oils fit best in integrated disease management and organic production Rather than direct replacement of all synthetic fungicides, EOs are most valuable as rotational partners (to delay resistance), as post-harvest treatments (edible coatings), and in organic or low-input production systems where synthetic fungicides are restricted.

Final recommendation

Thyme oil, clove oil, and oregano oil, particularly in nanoencapsulated formulations at 0.05-0.08 µL/mL, are the most promising essential oils for development as botanical fungicides against Alternaria solani. However, before largescale adoption, additional field validation, economic analysis, and regulatory approval are required. The growing consumer demand for organic produce and the continued spread of fungicide-resistant A. solani strains ensure that essential oils will play an increasingly important role in sustainable early blight management.

References

1. Abbas MF, Naz F, Rauf CA. Effect of mulching on early blight of tomato. Pak J Phytopathol. 2017;29(2):185-190.
2. Abdullahi I, Salisu MA, Bello MB. Economic impact of early blight on tomato production in Kano State, Nigeria. J Agric Econ Ext. 2022;14(3):45-56.
3. Abada KA, Mostafa SH, Mervat R. Effect of some chemical salts on suppressing early blight of tomato. Egypt J Phytopathol. 2008;36(1):47-58.
4. Ahmed N, Khan MA, Ahmad R. Assessment of early blight severity and yield losses in tomato. Pak J Bot. 2019;51(5):1875-1881.
5. Bakkali F, Averbeck S, Averbeck D, Idaomar M. Biological effects of essential oils: a review. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008;46(2):446-475.
6. Carson CF, Hammer KA, Riley TV. Melaleuca alternifolia (Tea Tree) oil: a review of antimicrobial and other medicinal properties. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19(1):50-62.
7. Chaube HS, Pundhir VS. Crop diseases and their management. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India; 2005.
8. Chen X, Zhang Y, Wang L. Cyclodextrin encapsulation improves photostability of cinnamaldehyde. Carbohydr Polym. 2022;278:118967.
9. Costa AP, Silva JC, Oliveira RR. Early blight in São Paulo tomato fields: disease incidence and management. Trop Plant Pathol. 2021;46:234-242.
10. Damalas CA, Eleftherohorinos IG. Pesticide exposure, safety issues, and risk assessment indicators. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(5):1402-1419.
11. Das M, Roy S, Chatterjee S. Peppermint oil fails to control Alternaria solani at low doses. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot. 2021;54(11-12):789-798.
12. Fairchild KL, Miles TD, Wharton PS. Assessing fungicide resistance in populations of Alternaria solani in Idaho. Plant Dis. 2013;97(7):900-905.
13. Food and Agriculture Organization. World tomato production statistics 2023. Rome: FAO; 2024.
14. Garcia M, Lopez R, Martinez E. Liposomal clove oil: enhanced stability and antifungal efficacy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2022;210:112234.
15. Gudmestad NC, Arabiat S, Miller JS. Prevalence and impact of SDHI resistance in Alternaria solani. Plant Dis. 2013;97(8):1052-1058.
16. Isman MB. Plant essential oils for pest and disease management. Crop Prot. 2000;19(8-10):603-608.
17. Khasanov BM, Eshboev FB, Turaev AS. Cell wall degrading enzymes of Alternaria solani and their role in pathogenicity. Mycotoxin Res. 2022;38:145-156.
18. Kumar A, Singh V. Thyme oil inhibits mycelial growth of early blight pathogen. Plant Dis Res. 2021;36(1):2229.
19. Kumar S, Singh R, Patel P. Inter-isolate variability in essential oil sensitivity among Alternaria solani populations. J Plant Pathol. 2022;104:789-801.
20. Li X, Wang Y, Zhang H. Chitosan-thyme oil nanoparticles for sustained antifungal activity against Alternaria solani. Carbohydr Polym. 2023;301:120345.
21. Lopez P, Sanchez C, Gomez R. Chitosan-clove oil edible coating for postharvest control of tomato early blight. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2021;172:111372.
22. Lv F, Liang H, Yuan Q. In vitro antifungal effects and mechanism of essential oils against Aspergillus niger. J Food Sci. 2018;83(5):1364-1371.
23. Masia A, Giovannini D, Betti L. Alternaric acid: a review of its phytotoxic properties and mode of action. Toxins (Basel). 2016;8(4):105.
24. Mishra RK, Bohra A, Kamil D. Antifungal activity of cinnamon oil against Alternaria solani. J Essent Oil Res. 2017;29(3):245-252.
25. Nazzaro F, Fratianni F, De Martino L, Coppola R, De Feo V. Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2013;6(12):1451-1474.
26. Nowakowska M, Nowak J, Oszako T. Alternaria diseases of tomato: a review. For Ideas. 2019;25(1):89104.
27. Panthee DR, Chen F. Genomics of fungal disease resistance in tomato. Curr Genomics. 2010;11(1):30-39.
28. Park P, Ikeda K. Ultrastructural analysis of zinniolinduced cell death. J Gen Plant Pathol. 2008;74:202210.
29. Patel S, Sharma R, Kumar N. Lemongrass essential oil as a biofungicide against Alternaria solani. Ind Crops Prod. 2020;145:112078.
30. Patel S, Thakur M, Verma A. PLGA nanoparticles of lemongrass oil for improved antifungal activity. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2022;68:103089.
31. Rani J, Kaur P, Singh B. Oregano oil: chemical composition and antifungal properties against Alternaria solani. J Essent Oil Res. 2023;35(4):301-310.
32. Rao A, Zhang Y, Muend S. Mechanism of antifungal action of monoterpenes. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(10):6224-6231.
33. Rotem J. The genus Alternaria: biology, epidemiology, and pathogenicity. St. Paul (MN): APS Press; 1994.
34. Sangwan NS, Farooqi AHA, Sangwan RS. Eucalyptus oil: chemical composition and antifungal activity. J Med Aromat Plant Sci. 2018;40(2):55-62.
35. Sharma R, Mehta P, Singh G. Antifungal activity of clove oil against Alternaria solani: dose-response and temperature effects. J Plant Pathol. 2022;104(2):455463.
36. Simmons EG. Alternaria: an identification manual. Utrecht: CBS Biodiversity Series No. 6; 2007.
37. Singh A, Tripathi NN. Antifungal activity of rosemary oil against plant pathogenic fungi. J Mycol Plant Pathol. 2010;40(4):537-542.
38. Singh R, Kumar P, Yadav S. Economic losses due to early blight in major tomato-growing regions of India. Indian Phytopathol. 2021;74:211-218.
39. Singh R, Sharma A, Gupta S. Synergistic antifungal activity of thyme and clove oil nanoemulsion against Alternaria solani. ACS Omega. 2023;8(15):1389213902.
40. Sitara U, Niaz I, Naseem J. Antifungal effect of essential oils on Alternaria solani. Pak J Bot. 2008;40(6):2603-2608.
41. Soylu EM, Soylu S, Kurt S. Antifungal activities of essential oils against Alternaria solani. J Essent Oil Res. 2006;18(5):574-578.
42. Soylu EM, Yigitbas H, Soylu S. Phytotoxic effects of essential oils on tomato plants. Allelopath J. 2010;26(2):281-290.
43. Stevenson KL, Holmes GJ, Peres NA. Fungicide resistance in Alternaria solani: current status and management strategies. Plant Health Prog. 2015;16(4):188-195.
44. Stevenson KL, Miller JS, Roberts PD. First report of QoI resistance in Alternaria solani in the United States. Plant Dis. 2007;91(6):768.
45. Tariq S, Wani S, Rasool F. A comprehensive review of the antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral potential of essential oils. J Essent Oil Res. 2019;31(6):467-488.
46. Tian J, Ban X, Zeng H. The mechanism of antifungal action of essential oil from Cinnamomum cassia against Aspergillus flavus. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60(35):8646-8651.
47. Tsuji G, Yamamoto S, Kubo Y. Melanin biosynthesis in plant pathogenic fungi. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2020;84(7):1319-1330.
48. Vloutoglou I, Kalogerakis SN. Effects of inoculum concentration, wetness duration and plant age on early blight of tomato. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2000;106:563-574.
49. Wang Y, Zhang L, Liu J. Solid lipid nanoparticles of oregano oil for controlled release antifungal activity. J Microencapsul. 2021;38(3):189-199.