A comprehensive review of tamarind processing machinery, technologies: Performance and future direction

Introduction

Tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) holds a prominent place in tropical countries, especially India, due to its extensive use as both a fruit and spice. It is consumed in various culinary forms ranging from raw fruit ingestion to incorporation in condiments, beverages, and traditional medicines (Bhadoriya et [12,11,18,22] . Tamarind is a rich source of nutrients and bioactive compounds that offer numerous health benefits, including antioxidant, antibacterial, antidiabetic, and antivenomic activities. tamarind pulp, which constitutes a substantial portion of the fruit, contains essential amino acids and phytochemicals that contribute to these properties (Bonin et al., 2023; De Caluwé et al., 2010; Muzaffar & Kumar, 2015) [18,22,57] . These characteristics not only endow tamarind with significant nutritional value but also highlight its therapeutic potential and economic importance in regions where it is widely cultivated and consumed. The broad consumption patterns combined with these bioactive properties underpin tamarind's critical role both in nutrition and traditional healthcare, thereby necessitating enhanced focus on optimized processing technologies to fully leverage these benefits. Tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) is a tropical fruit tree belonging to the Fabaceae family, widely cultivated in Asia, Africa, and South America (Shao et al., 2019) [75] . India stands as the world's largest producer and exporter of tamarind, with an annual production of approximately 300,000 tons (Nagar et al., 2022; Toscano Oviedo et al., 2024; Vasanthkumar et al., 2023) [58,82,85] . The fruit consists of 30-50% pulp, 11-30% shell fiber, and 25-40% seeds (Geethalaxmi et al., 2024) [31] . Processing tamarind into value-added products such as pulp, concentrate, powder, and various food products require sufficient mechanization to meet growing global demand. Traditional tamarind processing involves labor-intensive manual operations including dehulling, deseeding, pulp extraction, and cleaning. These methods are characterized by low efficiency, poor hygiene standards, high labor costs, and inconsistent product quality (Kumar & Bhattacharya, 2008; Nagar et al., 2022; Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023) [44,58,17] . The global tamarind extract market, valued at USD 1,456.26 million in 2024, is projected to reach USD2,511.18 million by 2034, growing at a CAGR of 5.60%, creating substantial opportunities for advanced processing technologies (Bharathi, et al., 2022; Zion Market Research, 2025; EIN Presswire, 2025) [13,92,26] . This review aims to systematically analyze the current landscape of tamarind processing machinery technologies, evaluating their performance metrics and identifying trajectories for future enhancement. By examining the engineering, mechanical, and automation aspects of tamarind processing equipment, this paper seeks to provide comprehensive insights into existing systems and emerging technological trends. This review underscores the necessity of embracing digital and intelligent innovations in tamarind processing machinery. The dual goals encompass improving operational efficiencies and ensuring sustainability, aligning with global trends towards green and smart agricultural systems.

Overview of tamarind processing operations

Tamarind processing involves several critical post-harvest operations aimed at transforming raw fruit into shelf-stable and value-added products, thereby enhancing quality, reducing losses, and increasing economic returns. The process begins with harvesting mature tamarind fruits, identified by their brittle shells and a hollow sound when pressed (Verma et al., 2024; Sudha et al., 2022) [87,79] . Following harvest, initial handling includes thorough cleaning and sorting to remove any debris or damaged pods (Verma et al., 2024) [87] . The primary unit operations in tamarind processing are crucial for preparing the pulp. Drying is an essential step that reduces moisture content, which facilitates easier deseeding and significantly extends the product's shelf life. While traditional sun drying is common, mechanical drying methods, such as using tray dryers, are increasingly employed for improved hygiene and efficiency (Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023; Rajkumar et al., 2023; Verma et al., 2024) [17,67,87] . After drying, dehulling and defibering are performed to remove the outer shell and fibers, often done manually or with specialized mechanical dehullers. Deseeding is another vital step where seeds are separated from the pulp. This process can be mechanized to significantly improve efficiency and reduce labor requirements (Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023; Sudha et al., 2022; Rajkumar et al., 2023) [17,79,67] . Finally, the processed pulp is pressed into cakes or blocks and stored under controlled conditions to maintain its quality over time (Sudha et al., 2022; Marichamy et al., 2024) [79,51] . Value addition is a key aspect of tamarind processing, leading to a diverse range of products. The processed tamarind pulp is utilized to create various food items, including juice concentrate, pulp powder, pickles, jams, syrups, candies, and chutneys (Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023; Vikram et al., 2023; Tiwari & Tomar, 2024) [17,89,81] . Beyond the pulp, by-products also hold significant value. Tamarind seeds, for instance, are processed into kernel powder, mucilage, and other industrial products (Nagar et al., 2022; Kumar & Bhattacharya, 2008; Israel & Murthy, 2019; Silverio et al., 2025) [58,44,[36][37]77] . Even the shell and fibers find utility as fuel or absorbents in various applications (Arudra, 2015; Mansingh et al., 2021) [7,50] . Technological advancements and mechanization have greatly improved the efficiency and quality of tamarind processing. The development of mechanical dehullers and deseeders has achieved efficiencies of up to 94% and 83% respectively, leading to substantial reductions in manual labor and product losses (Sudha et al., 2022; Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023) [79,17] . Furthermore, advanced drying techniques and optimized spray drying parameters contribute to enhanced product quality and increased process yield (Muzaffar & Kumar, 2015; Rajkumar et al., 2023) [57,67] . Improved storage methods, such as the use of aluminum foil and refrigeration, are also crucial for extending the shelf life and maintaining the quality of tamarind pulp (Marichamy et al., 2024) [51] . The entire value chain of tamarind processing has a significant economic impact. By increasing shelf life and reducing postharvest losses, processing and value addition contribute to higher incomes for both producers and processors (Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023; Bhavana, A. et al., 2023; Tiwari & Tomar, 2024) [17,16,81] . Moreover, initiatives involving training and technology dissemination play a vital role in empowering small-scale producers, particularly women, to actively participate in and benefit from value-added tamarind enterprises (Bhavana, A. et al., 2023; Tiwari & Tomar, 2024) [16,81] .

Engineering properties of tamarind relevant to machinery design 3.1 Physical and mechanical properties

The physical and mechanical properties of tamarind (pulp, seed, shell) is essential for designing effective processing machinery. Key parameters include moisture content, size distribution, geometric dimensions (length, width, thickness), and weight distribution. These properties provide crucial insights for resolving challenges in drying, dehulling, deseeding, and other post-harvest operations. For instance, moisture content affects drying kinetics and energy requirements, while dimensional properties influence the capacity and precision of dehulling and deseeding mechanisms. Variations in seed hardness and shape require tailored deseeder designs to minimize pulp damage while maximizing throughput. This multidimensional characterization is essential for ensuring that machines operate efficiently and produce high-quality outputs, facilitating mechanization and reducing manual labor dependence (Verma et al., 2024; Karpoora & Pandian, 2013; Bhattacharya et al., 1993) [87, 41, 44] . mechanical characteristics directly influence the design of post-harvest machinery, as understanding physical engineering properties like moisture content, size, and weight is essential for developing dehulling and deseeding equipment (Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023) [17] . The mechanical properties also determine susceptibility to damage during harvest, transportation, and storage, affecting commercial value (Verma et al., 2025) [86] . tamarind's frictional and mechanical properties reveals significant insights for engineering applications. The coefficient of static friction for tamarind seeds varies by surface material, with plywood showing the highest friction, followed by cast iron and stainless steel surfaces (Mohite et al., 2019) [56] . Similarly, velvet tamarind fruits and seeds demonstrated the lowest coefficient of static friction on stainless steel, making it the recommended construction material for processing equipment (Davies & Yusuf, 2017) [21] . These engineering properties are essential for designing post-harvest machinery including dehullers, deseeders, and processing equipment (Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023) [17] .

Chemical composition and its impact on processing

The chemical constitution of tamarind pulp, dominated by reducing sugars, pectins, fibers, and cellulose, directly influences processing modalities such as extraction, drying, and preservation (Adeola & Aworh, 2012; Sulieman et al., 2015) [5,80] . The high sugar content enhances the energy density of processed products but necessitates careful drying to avoid caramelization or microbial spoilage. Tamarind seed polysaccharides demonstrate superior gel-forming abilities compared to commercial pectin, forming gels over a wide pH range with or without acid and base, while commercial pectin requires narrow acidic conditions (Mohamed Ha et al., 2015) [55] . Quality-by-design extraction approaches have successfully isolated rhamnogalacturonan pectin from tamarind pulp with significant antioxidant activity exceeding commercial pectins (Sharma et al., 2015) [76] . Optimization studies achieved 60% pectin yield from tamarind pulp at 100 °C for 15 minutes, producing hydrogels with 300 cP viscosity suitable for various applications (Abubakar et al., 2024) [3] . Pectins are valuable for gelling and thickening functions in value-added products like jams and chutneys, thereby dictating the requirement for precise concentration controls during processing. Fiber and cellulose contribute to the physical texture and uphold the structural integrity of the final product (Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023) [17] . Additionally, the biochemical composition drives the selection of extraction technologies to preserve bioactives such as phenolic compounds, thus ensuring functional properties are retained post-processing. Furthermore, knowledge of the chemical makeup aids in selecting appropriate packaging and storage conditions to maintain quality during shelf life (Verma et al., 2024; Karpoora & Pandian, 2013; Ferreira et al., 2019) [87,41,30] . This relationship between chemical properties and machinery design underscores a critical nexus, where food science and engineering converge to optimize process outcomes.

Challenges in handling tamarind byproducts

Tamarind shell and seed residues represent significant byproducts with underexploited potential and processing challenges. Tamarind processing generates substantial shell and seed residues, constituting up to 70% of the pod weight, which are often underutilized despite their potential for value addition (Arudra, 2015; C. Nagar et al., 2022) [7,58] . The shell contains tannins that have shown promise as natural rust converters and environmentally friendly industrial chemicals, indicating a valuable secondary application beyond mere waste (Abdulmajid et al., 2019) [2] . From a circular economy perspective, valorization of these byproducts is essential to reduce waste generation, improve environmental sustainability, and add economic value. However, the heterogeneity and recalcitrant nature of such lignocellulosic biomass present technical challenges in processing, including effective size reduction, extraction, and stabilization of bioactive compounds (Mansingh et al., 2021) [50] . Advanced processing strategies and machinery capable of handling these byproducts are crucial to unlock their full potential, transforming residues into bio-based materials, antioxidants, or industrial inputs. This approach aligns with sustainable waste management and integrates agricultural residues into biorefinery frameworks, thus enhancing overall resource efficiency in tamarind processing (Nagar et al., 2022) [58] .

Current tamarind processing machinery technologies

Modern tamarind processing leverages a range of mechanical technologies to improve efficiency, product quality, and reduce labor compared to traditional manual methods.

Dehulling

Mechanical dehullers and deseeders are widely used to automate the removal of tamarind shells and seeds. Recent innovations include centrifugal impact peelers, which use mechanical force to break and separate the tamarind shell from the pulp. Such machines can process up to 180 kg/hour, greatly increasing throughput and reducing the time and effort required compared to manual peeling (Maubila et al., 2023) [53] . These machines significantly reduce manual labor and post-harvest losses, and are crucial for preparing tamarind for further processing or value addition (Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023; Sudha et al., 2022) [17,79] . Different types of tamarind dehulling and deseeding machines have been developed with varying efficiencies. Impact-type dehullers, such as the one designed at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, use rotating beaters. Oscillating-type dehullers work on reciprocating motion.

Table 1: Tamarind processing technology and machinery

Machine type Capacity Operating condition

Principle of working Efficiency Key findings References

Tamarind dehullercum-deseeder (Amit Kumar Sinha et al.) [78] 239.97-251.94 kg/h (dehulling); Impact and shear type tamarind deseeder (Karpoora Sundara Pandian et al.) [62] Not specified Moisture: 22 K. Pandey) [61] 232. 34 Tamarind powdering machine (ERIMU IVAN) [38] 0. Tamarind cover and seed separation machine (A. R. Lende & P. A. Chandak) [46] Manual tamarind seed separation machine (B V Hemanth et al.) [33] 3. 14 processing DPR (IIFPT) [35] (not specified) pulping: Power operated tamarind seed expeller [32] 23. 24

Deseeding

Deseeding is one of the most critical and labor-intensive steps in tamarind processing, given the high seed content in the fruit. Manual deseeding is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and inconsistent in quality, leading to residual seed fragments and pulp damage (Karthickumar et al. 2015) [42] . Mechanized deseeding technologies have emerged as vital tools to enhance efficiency and product quality. State-of-the-art deseeders use a combination of mechanical forces such as swinging, rotating, or vibrating motions along with designed sieves to separate seeds from pulp cleanly Various extraction methods have been studied, with hot enzymatic extraction yielding the highest pulp recovery at 92.4% using 0.5% enzyme concentration (Joshi Aa et al., 2012) [40] . [79,17] .

Drying technologies

Sorting and grading

Machine vision systems have been developed for sorting tamarind pods by shape, size, and defects using image processing. These systems achieve high sorting efficiencies (up to 94.3%) and meet export standards, supporting large-scale commercial operations (Jarimopas & Jaisin, 2008) [39] . The automated approach aims to improve processing speed, consistency, and accuracy compared to traditional manual methods (Nandi et al., 2012) [59] . A comprehensive review of automated sorting and grading systems demonstrates their importance for maintaining fruit quality and reducing labor requirements, particularly for countries dependent on fruit exports (Abbas et al., 2019; Jarimopas & Jaisin, 2008) [1,39] .

Pressing and storage technologies

Tamarind processing involves several key unit operations, with pressing being a crucial step for extracting pulp and juice concentrate for value-added products (Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023) [17] . Mechanical pressing, typically involving hydraulic or screw presses, is preferred for its efficiency and ease of operation (Benero et al., 1972) [10] . Design considerations for presses focus on achieving maximum extraction yield while preserving the integrity of bioactive compounds and preventing contamination (Donn et al., 2024) [25] . [51,83] . Innovative storage machinery and protocols, such as vacuum packing and cold storage, have been explored to extend the shelf life of tamarind products and ensure consistent quality during distribution (Septiana et al., 2018; Vasanthkumar et al., 2023) [73, 85] . The combination of optimized pressing and storage machinery is instrumental in delivering value-added tamarind products to markets

Advanced and emerging tamarind processing technology

In recent years, tamarind processing has undergone remarkable advancements, moving away from traditional practices such as sun drying and manual deseeding toward more innovative technologies that emphasize efficiency, product quality, and sustainability. These developments are directed not only at the processing of tamarind pulp but also at the utilization of underexplored by-products such as seeds, thereby maximizing value addition and minimizing waste. One of the key innovations is thermosonication, which integrates heat and ultrasound to enhance the overall quality of tamarind-based beverages. This method improves color, viscosity, and cloudiness, while simultaneously increasing antioxidant content. Additionally, thermosonication effectively inactivates spoilage enzymes and ensures microbial safety, positioning it as a strong alternative to conventional pasteurization for tamarind drinks (Oladunjoye & Olorunsola, 2025) [60] . Similarly, High Pressure Processing (HPP) has been recognized as an efficient approach for tamarind seed valorization. Compared with conventional techniques, HPP substantially increases the extraction yield of valuable polysaccharides such as xyloglucan, resulting in highquality extracts with enhanced functional properties that can be utilized across food and industrial applications (Limsangouan et al., 2020) [48] . Drying methods have also seen significant technological improvements. Mechanical and solar-assisted drying systems, such as belt-type and tray dryers, coupled with optimized drying models, have been developed to deliver faster, more hygienic, and energy-efficient drying of tamarind pulp. These innovations help to reduce the common issue of stickiness and facilitate downstream operations such as deseeding, thereby improving overall processing efficiency (Rajkumar et al., 2022; Rajkumar et al., 2023) [68,67] . Parallel progress has been made in storage and packaging, where the use of chemical additives like sulphur fumes and ascorbic acid, along with advanced packaging materials such as aluminum foil and palmyrah leaf bags, has proven effective. When applied under controlled storage conditions, these methods extend shelf life, preserve quality attributes, and strengthen the export potential of tamarind products (Marichamy et al., 2024) [51] . Alongside these processing innovations, notable attention has been given to value addition and by-product utilization. Advanced processing strategies now enable the production of diverse tamarind-based products such as ready-to-use pellets, concentrates, powders, candies, and beverages. These not only increase consumer convenience but also create expanded market opportunities in both domestic and international markets (Bidyalakshmi et [17,63,16] . Furthermore, tamarind seeds, which were previously underutilized, are increasingly being explored for their functional and industrial potential. Emerging extraction and processing technologies have enabled the development of products such as mucilage, kernel powder, and tamarind seed oil. These materials hold applications across a wide spectrum of industries, including food, pharmaceuticals, textiles, and biofuels, highlighting the versatility and economic potential of tamarind seed valorization ( [48,50,77,44,58] . Collectively, these innovations demonstrate how modern tamarind processing has evolved into a technology-driven sector that emphasizes resource efficiency, product diversification, and sustainable utilization.

Performance analysis of tamarind processing machinery 6.1 Throughput capacity and efficiency

Assessment of machinery performance often hinges on throughput capacity and processing efficiency. Comparative studies between manual and mechanized slicing machines have shown that mechanization can enhance throughput capacities by almost eightfold, substantially reducing required labor and slicing duration (Sinha et al., 2011) [78] . Processing efficiency metrics such as slicing speed, product damage rates, and juice extraction percentages provide tangible evidence of machinery effectiveness. For example, optimized machine settings at specific strokes per minute were found to balance high slicing capacity with minimal physical damage, suggesting the critical importance of tuning operational parameters for each specific crop or product form. These metrics serve as benchmarks for machinery developers and processors aiming to maximize productivity without compromising product quality (Vasanthkumar et al., 2023) [85] .

Quality parameters of processed tamarind products

Quality metrics extend beyond gross productivity to encompass the physical integrity, chemical composition, and safety of processed tamarind products. Physical damage rates of pulp and seeds reflect the mechanical suitability of processing equipment, influencing subsequent product acceptability and yield. Juice yield percentages relate to both the efficiency of pressing machinery and the preservation of chemical integrity including bioactive compounds underlying health benefits (Bayoï & Bianra, 2023; Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023) [9,17] . Microbiological contamination control remains integral, with sensory and antimicrobial tests guiding parameters that preserve organoleptic and safety standards. The implementation of Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and Standardized Operating Procedures (SOPs) in processing lines enhances consistent quality, aiding market acceptance (Lilian et al., 2023; Feitosa & Andrade, 2022) [47,29] .

Energy consumption and operational costs

Energy efficiency is a significant consideration in the adoption of tamarind processing machinery. Traditional manual methods, while low in energy input, suffer from low throughput and higher labor costs. Mechanized drying, dehulling, and deseeding machines consume energy intensively, but relative improvements in capacity and speed often result in net economic benefits (Karthickumar et al., 2015) [42] . Evaluations of energy consumption against output provide clear cost-benefit data informing machinery selection and operation strategies (Pelegrino et al. 2019; Unnikrishnan & Rao 2018) [64,84] . Consideration of environmental sustainability in reducing fossil energy use aligns with global imperatives. Optimizing process parameters such as temperature, drying time, and mechanical component design, can further reduce operational costs and ecological footprints (Majumder et al., 2022, Menon et al., 2020) [49,54] .

Technological innovations and future directions

Recent advancements in tamarind processing technologies are increasingly focused on improving efficiency, quality, and sustainability while reducing environmental impacts. Highpressure processing has shown promise in enhancing xyloglucan extraction from tamarind kernel powder, resulting in higher yields and better quality compared to conventional methods. Similarly, enzyme-assisted extraction has been utilized to improve the recovery of polysaccharides and proteins from tamarind seeds. Non-thermal processing technologies such as ultrasound, microwave, and electron beam treatments are also being explored to improve extraction efficiency while preserving heat-sensitive bioactive compounds (Geethalaxmi et [31,48,45,65] . Alongside these, energy-efficient systems including solar-powered equipment and energy recovery mechanisms are under development to reduce operational costs and energy consumption. Waste valorization has emerged as a major area of innovation, with technologies designed to convert tamarind by-products into value-added products such as biodegradable films and bioactive compounds, contributing to a circular economy model (Preethi et al., 2024; Mansingh et al., 2021) [66,50] . Future directions for tamarind processing emphasize automation and Industry 4.0 integration through the use of programmable logic controller-based precision systems, cloud-enabled remote monitoring, and modular designs that allow flexibility and scalability of operations. Closed-loop water conservation systems and minimal water processing approaches are being introduced to address sustainability concerns. In addition, multi-objective optimization of processing parameters is being pursued to balance efficiency, quality, and energy use, while a shift toward continuous rather than batch operations is expected to enhance productivity. Minimal processing approaches that preserve the natural nutritional and functional properties of tamarind are also gaining importance. Sustainability considerations drive the development of machinery powered by renewable energy sources such as solar and wind. Such designs reduce environmental impacts and operational costs, promoting adoption in rural and small-scale production contexts. Eco-friendly machinery emphasizes minimized resource input, emissions, and waste production. The creation of multifunctional machines adaptable to diverse scales of operation enhances accessibility and resource efficiency for producers, aligning with circular economy concepts applied for processing residues. Further, circular economy principles are being embedded into system design to ensure complete utilization of tamarind pulp, seeds, and husks, while low-carbon processing technologies aim to reduce the overall environmental footprint. Finally, integration with biodegradable packaging solutions derived from tamarind components presents a promising path for sustainable product development.

Economic analysis and market trends

Tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) is a versatile crop with significant economic, nutritional, and industrial value, especially in South Asia and Africa. Its market dynamics are shaped by production trends, value addition, supply chain efficiency, and the development of diverse products, all of which influence farmer incomes and industry growth.

Production trends and regional markets

Tamarind is widely cultivated in India, with major producing states including Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Madhya Pradesh, and is also important in Uganda, Senegal, and West Africa (Israel et al., 2019; Vikram et al., 2023; Sanogo et al., 2023; Buyinza et al., 2010; Masette et al., 2015; Caluwé, 2011) [36-37, 89, 71, 19, 52, 20] . Production and productivity have shown positive growth, though regional variations exist due to climate, cultivation practices, and market access (Israel et al., 2019; Buyinza et al., 2010; Sanogo et al., 2023) [36-37, 19, 71] . In India, the export market is robust, with significant earnings from processed products (Shankaracharya, 1998) [74] .

Value addition and product diversification

Value addition through processing into jams, marmalades, sauces, candies, and industrial products like Tamarind Kernel Powder (TKP) significantly increases profitability and market opportunities (Agarwal, [6, 50, 81, 36-37, 89, 74] . Training and support for women's self-help groups and small-scale entrepreneurs have demonstrated substantial income improvements through value-added tamarind products (Tiwari & Tomar, 2024) [81] . Industrial uses of tamarind by-products, such as seed oil and polysaccharides, are expanding into food, pharmaceutical, and textile sectors (Mansingh et [50,6,[36][37]74] . Processing tamarind into products like kernel powder, jams, marmalades, sauces, and beverages significantly increases market value and shelf life, boosting incomes for producers and processors (Israel & Murthy, 2019; Masette et al., 2015; Dewi et al., 2020) [36-37, 52, 24] . Industrial uses of tamarind by-products (kernel powder, mucilage, seed oil) expand market opportunities in food, pharmaceutical, and textile sectors (Israel & Murthy, 2019; Mansingh et al., 2021; Silverio et al., 2025) [36-37, 50, 77] .

Economic analysis of tamarind processing reveals

Economic analysis of tamarind processing consistently shows high financial viability, strong returns, and significant opportunities for value addition in both seed and fruit-based products. Tamarind seed processing units are financially sound, with a Net Present Value (NPV) of Rs. 15,526.68, an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 37%, a benefit-cost (B:C) ratio of 3.80, and a payback period of just 2.3 years. Processing 1 kg of tamarind seed yields 0.7 kg of valuable kernel powder, with the remainder as a by-product. The gross return per unit is Rs. 55,948, and the net return is Rs. 15,526.68, indicating robust profitability (Israel & Murthy, 2019) [36][37] . Traditional beverage processing (e.g., tamarind-turmeric drinks) is also economically feasible, with a B:C ratio of 1.42, IRR of 13-14%, and a payback period of about 2.5 years. Value addition increases returns by up to 47% per unit, though sensitivity to income fluctuations exists (Dewi et al., 2020) [24] .

Challenges and limitations in current tamarind processing machinery 9.1 Machine adaptability and standardization issues

Tamarind fruits exhibit significant variability in size, shape, and moisture content, making it difficult to design universally adaptable and standardized machinery. Most current machines are optimized for specific fruit properties, leading to inefficiencies or increased losses when processing diverse batches (Verma et al., 2024; Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023) [87,17] . The lack of standardized equipment also complicates scaling up operations and integrating machinery into different processing environments (Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023; Sudha et al., 2022) [17,79] . Engineering properties such as stickiness, density, and frictional characteristics further challenge the design of adaptable equipment for cleaning, sorting, and deseeding (Verma et al., 2024; Verma et al., 2025) [87,86] .

Technical constraints and performance bottlenecks

Technical limitations include the persistent problem of pulp stickiness, which causes clogging and requires frequent cleaning, reducing machine uptime and efficiency (Deepthi et al., 2025; Sudha et al., 2022) [23,79] . Deseeding and dehulling remain bottlenecks, as even advanced machines achieve only 83-89% efficiency and may still require manual intervention (Karthickumar et al., 2015; Sudha et al., 2022) [42,79] . Optimal performance is highly sensitive to fruit moisture content and machine settings, demanding careful control and skilled operation (Karthickumar et al., 2015) [42] . Additionally, mechanical stress can damage pulp or seeds, affecting product quality (Verma et al., 2025; Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023) [87,17] .

Economic and social barriers

High initial investment costs, limited access to modern machinery, and the need for skilled operators pose economic barriers, especially for small-scale and rural processors (Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023) [17] . Many communities rely on manual or semi-mechanized methods due to affordability and ease of use, despite lower efficiency (Sudha et al., 2022) [79] . Social factors, such as traditional processing practices and limited technical training, further hinder widespread adoption of advanced machinery (Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023) [17] .

Major challenges in tamarind processing machinery Stickiness and mechanical separation difficulties

Tamarind pulp is highly sticky, making mechanical deseeding and dehulling challenging. This often results in reliance on manual labor or inefficient traditional methods, especially for deseeding, which is a critical bottleneck in the process (Deepthi et al., 2025; Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023; Sudha et al., 2022) [23,17,79] . The stickiness also complicates cleaning and maintenance of machinery, leading to increased downtime and reduced efficiency (Deepthi et al., 2025; Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023) [23,17] .

Variability in fruit properties

Tamarind fruits vary significantly in size, shape, and moisture content, which affects the design and efficiency of processing equipment. Machines must accommodate these variations to minimize losses and ensure consistent product quality. Inadequate adaptation can lead to increased waste and suboptimal processing outcomes (Verma et al., 2024; Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023; Jarimopas & Jaisin, 2008) [87,17,39] .

Limited mechanization and efficiency

While some mechanical solutions exist (e.g., centrifugal impact peelers, dehullers, deseeders), many operations especially deseeding and pulp extraction are still labor-intensive or have low throughput. For example, even improved peelers require pre-drying and may not achieve perfect separation, and deseeding remains a challenge due to the strong attachment of seeds to the pulp (Maubila et al., 2023; Sudha et al., 2022; Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023) [53,79,17] .

Product quality and value addition constraints

Maintaining product quality during mechanical processing is difficult, as excessive force can damage the pulp or seeds. Additionally, the development of machinery for value-added products (e.g., powders, concentrates) is still limited, with optimization of drying and briquetting processes requiring further research (Bidyalakshmi et al., 2023; Muzaffar & Kumar, 2015) [17,57] .

Conclusion

Tamarind processing machinery has advanced considerably from traditional manual operations to semi-mechanized and mechanized systems, delivering notable improvements in efficiency, quality, and labor reduction. Yet, significant gaps remain in developing affordable, flexible, and scalable machines that can integrate smart control systems to enhance precision, maximize bioactive retention, and enable full-spectrum valorization of byproducts. Current technologies, while achieving dehulling efficiencies of nearly 83.98 percent and deseeding efficiencies of around 57.8 percent, still fall short of meeting the demands of large-scale industrial applications. Future progress lies in the adoption of automation, artificial intelligence, Internet of Things, machine learning, and advanced sensors to enable real-time optimization, predictive maintenance, and robust quality control. These innovations, combined with circular economy principles and renewable energy adoption, can ensure sustainable and environmentally responsible processing. Economic analyses already indicate strong profitability and growth potential, with the global tamarind extract market projected to grow at 5.60 percent CAGR, underscoring the importance of continued investment in technology development. For the tamarind sector to realize its full potential, collaborative efforts among academia, industry, and policymakers are essential. Prioritizing intelligent processing systems, sustainability, and complete utilization of tamarind components will not only improve economic returns but also strengthen food security, empower rural communities, and enhance the competitiveness of tamarind on global markets. The transition toward automated, efficient, and sustainable tamarind processing technologies marks a critical pathway for the industry's future growth and long-term viability.

References

1. Abbas HMT, Shakoor U, Khan MJ, Ahmed M, Khurshid K. Automated sorting and grading of agricultural products based on image processing. In: 2019 8 th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies (ICICT). c2019. p. 78-81. DOI:10.1109/ICICT47744.2019.9001971.
2. Abdulmajid A, Hamidon TS, Rahim AA, Hussin MH. Physicochemical studies of tamarind shell tannins as a potential green rust converter. BioResources. 2019;14(3):6863-6882. DOI:10.15376/biores.14.3.68636882.
3. Abubakar MA, Mukhtar B, Hamza AH, Imoisi C, Habu C, Sa'ad M. Optimization and characterization of pectin hydrogel from tamarind pulp: FTIR, viscosity and yield analysis. Singapore J Chem Biol. 2024;13(1):8-17. DOI:10.3923/sjcb.2024.08.17.
4. Adeniyi V, Akangbe J, Kolawole A, Ayeni M, Olorunfemi D. Women cassava processors' livelihood: implications for improved processing technology usage in Nigeria. Cogent Soc Sci. 2023;9. DOI:10.1080/23311886.2023.2191898.
5. Adeola AA, Aworh OC. A comparative evaluation of the chemical properties of wild tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) fruits in Nigeria. Food. 2012;6(1):49-57.
6. Agarwal V. Tamarind: Its economic use and industrial exploitation. Nelumbo; 2024. DOI:10.20324/JONBSI/V10/1968/76155.
7. Arudra AK. Tamarind seed processing and by-products. Agric Eng Int CIGR J. 2015;17(2):250-257.
8. Ashrafudoulla M, Ulrich M, Toushik S, Nahar S, Roy P, Mizan F, et al. Challenges and opportunities of nonconventional technologies concerning food safety. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2023;79:3-26. DOI:10.1080/00439339.2023.2163044.
9. Bayoï JR, Bianra J. Traditional processing, quality, and safety assessment of homemade "djabbe" (Tamarindus indica) juice marketed in several areas in Far North Cameroon. Food Humanit. 2023;1:1315-1330. DOI:10.1016/j.foohum.2023.09.026.
10. Benero JR, Rodríguez AJ, Collazo De Rivera A. A mechanical method for extracting tamarind pulp. J Agric Univ Puerto Rico. 1972;56(2):185-186. DOI:10.46429/jaupr.v56i2.10863.
11. Bhadoriya SS, Ganeshpurkar A, Bhadoriya RPS, Sahu SK, Patel JR. Antidiabetic potential of polyphenolic-rich fraction of Tamarindus indica seed coat in alloxan-induced diabetic rats. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2017;29(1):37-45. DOI:10.1515/jbcpp-2016-0193.
12. Bhadoriya SS, Ganeshpurkar A, Narwaria J, Rai G, Jain AP. Tamarindus indica: Extent of explored potential. Pharmacogn Rev. 2011;5(9):73-81. DOI:10.4103/09737847.79102.
13. Bharathi TN, Girish M, Girish MR, Jayaram MS. An economic analysis of production and marketing of tamarind in Srinivasapura Taluk of Kolar District, Karnataka. Mysore J Agric Sci. 2022;56(4):114-122.
14. Bhattacharya S, editor. Conventional and advanced food processing technologies. 1 st ed. Wiley; 2015. DOI:10.1002/9781118406281.
15. Bhattacharya S, Bal S, Mukherjee R, Bhattacharya S. Some physical and engineering properties of tamarind (Tamarindus indica) seed. J Food Eng. 1993;18(1):77-89. DOI:10.1016/0260-8774(93)90076-V.
16. Bhavana A, Gayathri B, Manjunatha R. Sour to sweet: Tamarind tales of empowerment adding value to women's lives. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(21):704-711. DOI:10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i214031.
17. Bidyalakshmi T, Sunita T, Kaukab S, Ravi Y. Engineering properties, processing and value addition of tamarind: A review. Int J Bio-resource Stress Manag.; 2023. DOI:10.23910/1.2023.4872a.
18. Bonin E, Avila VD, Carvalho VM, Cardoso MAP, Matos AM, Ramos AVG, et al. Study of chemical constituents, antioxidants and antimicrobial activities of Tamarindus indica L. seed. J Food Sci. 2023;88(11):4639-4652. DOI:10.1111/1750-3841.16739.
19. Buyinza M, Senjonga M, Lusiba B. Economic valuation of a tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) production system: Green money from drylands of Eastern Uganda. Small-scale For. 2010;9:317-329. DOI:10.1007/s11842-010-9118-y.
20. Caluwé E. Market chain analysis of baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) and tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) products in Mali and Benin; 2011.
21. Davies RM, Yusuf DD. Studies of physical and mechanical properties of velvet tamarind. MAYFEB J Agric Sci. 2017;2(1):36-43.
22. De Caluwé E, Halamouá K, Van Damme P. Tamarindus indica L. -A review of traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology. Afrika Focus. 2010;23(1):53-83. DOI:10.1163/2031356X-02301006.
23. Deepthi, Srinivasulu B, Bathineni V, Ibrahim ST. Tamarind: Analysing supply chain in Anantapur District, India. J Exp Agric Int. 2025;47(4):258-64. doi:10.9734/jeai/2025/v47i43374.
24. Dewi L, Mulyani S, Satriawan I. Analisis usaha agroindustri minuman tradisional kunyit asam di Paon Jamu (Curcuma domestica Val. -Tamarindus indica L.). J R Mus Assoc. 2020;8:9. DOI:10.24843/jrma.2020.v08.i01.p02.
25. Donn P, Seyyedi-Mansour S, Chamorro F, Garcia-Oliveira P, Echave J, Perez-Vazquez A, et al. Recent advances in understanding the key factors influencing pressurized liquid extraction of secondary metabolites: A comprehensive review. IECBM. 2024;1. DOI:10.3390/blsf2024035001.
26. EIN Presswire. Tamarind extract market size to exceed $2.5 billion by 2034 propelled by 5.60% CAGR; 2025 Sep 3. Available from: https://northeast.newschannelnebraska.com/story/53055563/ tamarind-extract-market-size-to-exceed-25-billion-by-2034propelled-by-560-cagrnortheast.newschannelnebraska
27. Eslami E, Carpentieri S, Pataro G, Ferrari G. A comprehensive overview of tomato processing by-product valorization by conventional methods versus emerging technologies. Foods. 2022;12. DOI:10.3390/foods12010166.
28. Fayaz G, Soleimanian Y, Mhamadi M, Turgeon S, Khalloufi S. The applications of conventional and innovative mechanical technologies to tailor structural and functional features of dietary fibers from plant wastes: A review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2022;21(3):21492199. DOI:10.1111/1541-4337.12934.
29. Feitosa J, Andrade P. Segurança dos alimentos e ferramentas da qualidade. Enciclop Biosfera. 2022;19(39). DOI:10.18677/EnciBio_2022A21.
30. Ferreira KC, Caliari M, Bento JAC, Fideles MC, Soares Júnior MS. Physical-chemical characterization and technological and thermal properties of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) from the Cerrado of Goiás, Brazil. Carpathian J Food Sci Technol. 2019;11(3):94-106. DOI:10.34302/crpjfst/2019.11.3.9.
31. Geethalaxmi M, Sunil CK, Venkatachalapathy N. Tamarind seed polysaccharides, proteins, and mucilage: Extraction, modification of properties, and their application in food. Sustain Food Technol. 2024;2(6):1670-1685. DOI:10.1039/D4FB00224E.
32. Goud VK, Udhayakumar R, Kumar GVM, Venkatachalapathy K. Development and performance evaluation of a tamarind seed expeller. Int J Trop Agric. 2016;34(6):1635-1641.
33. Hemanth BV, Mallikarjuna VR, Rao AS, Ramana MV. Design and fabrication of manual operated tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) seed separation machine. Indian Hortic J. 2016;6(1):77-79.
34. Herzyk F, Piłakowska-Pietras D, Korzeniowska M. Supercritical extraction techniques for obtaining biologically active substances from a variety of plant byproducts. Foods. 2024;13(11):1713. DOI:10.3390/foods13111713.
35. Israel KS, Murthy C, Patil BL, Hosamani RM. Study the trend in area, production and productivity of tamarind. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2019;8(5):283-289.
36. Israel K, Murthy C. Economics of tamarind seed powder processing unit in Karnataka. Int J Commer Bus Manag. 2019;12(2):67-72. DOI:10.15740/has/ijcbm/12.2/67-72.
37. Jarimopas B, Jaisin N. An experimental machine vision system for sorting sweet tamarind. J Food Eng. 2008;89(3):291-297. DOI:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.05.007.
38. Joshi A, Rb K, Ar S. Studies on standardization of enzyme concentration and process for extraction of tamarind pulp, variety Ajanta. J Food Process Technol. 2012;3(2). DOI:10.4172/2157-7110.1000141.
39. Karpoora Sundara Pandian N, Dhananchezhiyan P, Parveen S. Physical and engineering properties of tamarind fruit. Int J Sci Eng Technol. 2013;2(11):1083-1087.
40. Karthickumar P, Pandian NKS, Rajkumar P, Surendrakumar A, Balakrishnan M. Development and evaluation of a continuous type tamarind deseeder. Agric Eng. 2015;40(2):49-59.
41. Karthikeyan R, Nirmal BE, Pravin Kumar M, Pavithran NK. Design and fabrication of tamarind seed removal machine. Int J Sci Technol Res. 2019;8(12):743-747.
42. Kumar C, Bhattacharya S. Tamarind seed: Properties, processing and utilization. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2008;48:1-20. DOI:10.1080/10408390600948600.
43. Lee S, Choi W, Jun S. Conventional and emerging combination technologies for food processing. Food Eng Rev. 2016;8:414-434. DOI:10.1007/s12393-016-9145-3.
44. Lende AR, Chandak PA. Design and fabrication of tamarind cover and seed separation machine. Int J Eng Innov Technol. 2012;1(2):154-160.
45. Lilian A, Njue LG, Abong GO. Implementation of good manufacturing practices in milk processing companies in Nairobi County and microbial contamination of milk and milk products. Asian Food Sci J. 2023;22(12):11-22. DOI:10.9734/afsj/2023/v22i12687.
46. Limsangouan N, Charunuch C, Sastry S, Srichamnong W, Jittanit W. High pressure processing of tamarind (Tamarindus indica) seed for xyloglucan extraction. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2020;134:110112. DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110112.
47. Majumder P, Deb B, Gupta R, Sablani SS. A comprehensive review of fluidized bed drying: Sustainable design approaches, hydrodynamic and thermodynamic performance characteristics, and product quality. Sustain Energy Technol Assess. 2022;53:102643. DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2022.102643.
48. Mansingh BB, Binoj JS, Sai NP, Hassan SA, Siengchin S, Sanjay MR, et al. Sustainable development in utilization of Tamarindus indica L. and its by-products in industries: A review. Curr Res Green Sustain Chem. 2021;4:100207. DOI:10.1016/j.crgsc.2021.100207.
49. Marichamy M, Ponuswami V, Saraswathy S, J J. Enhancing tamarind quality and shelf-life through improved storage techniques. Plant Sci Today. 2024;11(1):64-70. DOI:10.14719/pst.3490.
50. Masette M, Ia A, Ocheng A. The commercial viability of Tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) fruit based products for improved incomes among farmers in Northern and Eastern Uganda. Afr J Food Sci Technol. 2015;6:167-76. DOI:10.14303/AJFST.2015.056.
51. Maubila J, Maliwemu E, Tobe A. Rancang bangun alat pengupas kulit buah asam (Tamarindus indica) menggunakan mekanisme centrifugal impact. Turbo J Progr Stud Tek Mesin; 2023. DOI:10.24127/trb.v12i2.2282.
52. Menon A, Stojceska V, Tassou S. A systematic review on the recent advances of the energy efficiency improvements in non-conventional food drying technologies. Trends Food Sci Technol.; 2020. DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2020.03.014.
53. Mohamed Be MH. Physicochemical properties of tamarind (Tamarindus indica) seed polysaccharides. J Food Process Technol.; 2015;6(6). Doi:10.4172/2157-7110.1000452.
54. Mohite AM, Sharma N, Mishra A. Influence of different moisture content on engineering properties of tamarind seeds. Agric Eng Int CIGR J. 2019;21(1):220-224.
55. Muzaffar K, Kumar P. Parameter optimization for spray drying of tamarind pulp using response surface methodology. Powder Technol. 2015;279:179-184. DOI:10.1016/J.POWTEC.2015.04.010.
56. Nagar CK, Dash SK, Rayaguru K. Tamarind seed: Composition, applications, and value addition: A comprehensive review. J Food Process Preserv. 2022;46(10). DOI:10.1111/jfpp.16872.
57. Nandi CS, Tudu B, Koley C. An automated machine vision based system for fruit sorting and grading. In: 2012 Sixth International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST). c2012. p. 195-200. DOI:10.1109/ICSensT.2012.6461669.
58. Oladunjoye A, Olorunsola O. Thermosonication: A veritable technique to improve the quality attribute of black velvet tamarind (Dialium guineense Wild) beverage. J Food Process Preserv; 2025. DOI:10.1155/jfpp/8884671.
59. Pandey SK. Performance evaluation of tamarind dehuller cum deseeder. Agric Eng Today. 2018;42(1):52-55.
60. Pandian KS, Rajkumar P, Visvanathan R. Development and evaluation of impact and shear type tamarind deseeder. Agric Mech Asia Afr Lat Am. 2017;48(3):53-58.
61. Pandian N, Prithya S, Kamaleeswari K, Kishore S. Development of ready to use pellets from tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) fruit pulp. Asian J Adv Agric Res; 2024. DOI:10.9734/ajaar/2024/v24i10551.
62. Pelegrino DH, Dos Santos RG, Coelho RT. Experimental evaluation of energy consumption in machine tools: A case study for a two-spindle turning center. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2019;41(10):427. DOI:10.1007/s40430-019-1921-6.
63. Picart-Palmade L, Cunault C, Chevalier-Lucia D, Belleville M, Marchesseau S. Potentialities and limits of some nonthermal technologies to improve sustainability of food processing. Front Nutr. 2019;5. DOI:10.3389/fnut.2018.00130.
64. Preethi R, NR A, Keshava Murthy PS, Reddy JP. Utilization of tamarind kernel powder for the development of bioplastic films: Production and characterization. Sustain Food Technol. 2024;2(6):1697-708. DOI:10.1039/D4FB00199K.
65. Rajkumar P, Deepa J, Rani I. Mathematical modeling on drying of tamarind fruits. J Sci Ind Res. 2023;82(6):747753. DOI:10.56042/jsir.v82i06.1913.
66. Rajkumar P, S I, J D, C IR, P S, R A, et al. Design and development of a belt type dryer for drying tamarind. Madras Agric J. 2022;109(March). DOI:10.29321/MAJ.10.000580.
67. Rani JS, Rajkumar P, Kailappan R. Design and development of a power operated tamarind huller cum deseeder. Agric Mech Asia Afr Lat Am. 2016;47(3):41-6.
68. Sanogo D, Ky-Dembele C, Camara B, Ba H, Badji M, Ngom N, et al. Growth and profitability performance of three accessions grafts and seedlings of Tamarindus indica (Fabaceae) planted in the Groundnut Basin of Senegal. Agrofor Syst. 2023;97:1323-1336. DOI:10.1007/s10457023-00827-1.
69. Satpute A, Patil P, Kulkarni M, More R. Design and fabrication of tamarind seed removal machine. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2022;9(6):1160-1165.
70. Septiana AT, Sitoresmi I, Dewi PS. Sensory evaluation, antioxidant activity and total microbial count of tamarindturmeric herbal drink during refrigerated storage at various packaging conditions. Food Res. 2018;2(4):391-397. doi:10.26656/fr.2017.2(4).030.
71. Shankaracharya N. Tamarind -chemistry, technology and uses -a critical appraisal. J Food Sci Technol Mysore. 1998;35:193-208.
72. Shao H, Zhang H, Tian Y, Song Z, Lai PFH, Ai L. Composition and rheological properties of polysaccharide extracted from tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) seed. Molecules. 2019;24(7):1218. DOI:10.3390/molecules24071218.
73. Sharma R, Kamboj S, Khurana R, Singh G, Rana V. Physicochemical and functional performance of pectin extracted by QbD approach from Tamarindus indica L. pulp. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;134:364-374. DOI:10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.07.073.
74. Silverio T, De Matos J, Almeida E, Amaral T, Silveira J. Study of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) seed mucilage extraction process using full factorial design of experiments. Observ Econ Latinoam. 2025;23(1). DOI:10.55905/oelv23n1-135.
75. Sinha AK, Patel S, Verma A. Performance evaluation studies on tamarind dehuller-cum-deseeder. J Plant Dev Sci. 2011;3(3-4):321-324.
76. Sudha P, Rajkumar P, Joice A, Sudagar I, Arulmari R. Postharvest technology of tamarind. In: Postharvest Technology -Recent Advances, New Perspectives and Applications; 2022. DOI:10.5772/intechopen.101096.
77. Sulieman AM, Alawad SM, Osman MA, Abdelmageed EA. Physicochemical characteristics of local varieties of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) in Sudan. Int J Plant Res. 2015;5(1):13-18.
78. Tiwari R, Tomar D. Value addition in tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.): An underutilized fruit in India. Int J Plant Sci. 2024;19(2):48-52. DOI:10.15740/has/ijps/19.2/48-52.
79. Toscano Oviedo MA, García Zapateiro LA, Quintana SE. Tropical fruits as a potential source for the recovery of bioactive compounds: Tamarindus indica L., Annona muricata, Psidium guajava and Mangifera indica. J Food Sci Technol. 2024;61(11):2027-2035. DOI:10.1007/s13197024-05983-5.
80. Udhayakumar K, Muthulakshmi S, Beaulah A, Vijayasamundeeswari A, Anitha T, Saraswathy S, et al. Effect of different packaging methods and storage conditions on postharvest quality and shelf-life of Manila tamarind (Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth.) var. PKM2. Plant Sci Today; 2024. DOI:10.14719/pst.4880.
81. Vasanthkumar SS, Rubika R, Sabarivasan M, Pooja UK, Udhayakumar K. Towards sustainable abundance: The advancements in tamarind production technology. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(20):1306-1319. DOI:10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i203932.
82. Verma K, Gupta SV, Patil BN, Jadhao SD. Evaluation of textural and mechanical properties of tamarind. J Appl Hortic. 2025;27(1):61-65. DOI:10.37855/jah.2025.v27i01.12.
83. Verma K, Gupta S, Patil B, Bakane P, Bharad S. Engineering properties of tamarind: A comparison between shelled and unshelled tamarind. Int J Bio-resource Stress Manag. 2024;15(1):67-74. DOI:10.23910/1.2024.5679.
84. Verma L, Yadaw K. Analysis of marketing channel of tamarind in Bastar plateau of Chhattisgarh. Agric Update; 2019. DOI:10.15740/HAS/AU/14.1/22-27.
85. Vikram B, Gautam D, Yadav R, Gaurha A, Kumar V, Omer S, et al. Tamarind cultivation, value-added products and their health benefits: A review. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(21)-4060. DOI:10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i214060.
86. Wal P, Debnath B, Sarkar D, Verma N, Rathore S, Wal A. A descriptive analysis of the nutraceutical constituents, extraction techniques, and possible health benefits of tamarind. Curr Tradit Med. 2024;10(7). DOI:10.2174/2215083810666230918142027.
87. Yahya NZ, Ishak MSA, Omar MN, Alir K. Design and fabrication of automatic tamarind deseeding machine. Perlis: Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Perlis; 2021. Technical report.
88. Zion Market Research. Tamarind extract market size, share, trends, growth analysis, 2025-2034. 2025 Aug 24. Available from: https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/report/tamarindextract-marketzionmarketresearch