Efficacy of different herbicides and fertility levels on weed dynamics and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in S-E Rajasthan
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2023-24 and rabi 2024-25 at Research Farm, Agricultural Research Station, Kota. The experiment was laid out in split plot design comprising eight weed control treatments in main plots and three fertility levels in sub-plots. Results showed that two hand weeding at 30 & 45 DAS, tank mix of pyroxasulfone 85% WG @ 127.5 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha and pinoxaden 5.1% EC @ 45 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha resulted in better weed control of monocot, dicot weeds and sedges as compared to other treatments and weedy check. On pooled basis, these treatments significantly reduced weed density and weed dry matter at 45, 90 DAS and at harvest of total monocot, dicot weeds and sedges as compared to weedy check. Two hand weeding at 30 & 45 DAS resulted in highest weed control efficiency of total weeds at 45, 90 DAS and at harvest (96.46%, 87.94% and 85.29%), followed by pyroxasulfone 85% WG @ 127.5 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha (89.94%, 83.04% and 78.91%) and pinoxaden 5.1% EC @ 45 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha (88.06%, 82.52% and 78.12%) which were at par with each other. On pooled basis, two hand weeding at 30 and 45 DAS, pyroxasulfone 85% WG @ 127.5 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha and pinoxaden 5.1% EC @ 45 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha as post-emergence at 35 DAS resulted significantly higher grain yield (59.47, 56.19 and 55.57 q/ha, respectively) and straw yield (79.91, 76.86 and 72.63 q/ha, respectively). Fertility level of 125% and 150% NPK were at par and significantly resulted higher growth parameters and yields as compared to 100% NPK.
Full Text
Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.
Introduction
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is major cereal crop worldwide after rice. In India it is second most important crop which is grown in area of about 32.8 million ha and production of 1117.9 million ton. Wheat infestation has become serious threat in production of wheat causing yield reduction upto. Wheat is infested with both grassy and broad-leaved weeds viz. Phalaris minor, Avena fatua, Cyperus rotundus, Cynodon dactylon and broad leaved weeds i.e. Chenopodium album, Chenopodium murale, Fumaria parviflora, Melilotus indica, Anagallis arvensis, Cirsium arvense, Lathyrus aphaca, Convolvulus arvensis and Vicia hirsute etc., depending upon the adopted agronomic practices, soil types, weed control techniques and cropping system followed. Weeds pose great menace majorly in irrigated wheat where frequent irrigations promote fast growing of weeds. Hence, proper weed management is required for the weed control and sustainable production of wheat. Herbicides are the potent tools to control the weed flora in wheat. Since, cultural methods of weed control are difficult to adopt due to high cost and unavailability of labour. Herbicides like 2,4-D and isoproturon have been continuously used in wheat since many times, but they either control grassy or broad-leaved weeds. Phalaris minor has developed multiple resistance against isoproturon and Avena fatua to clodinafop. In order to overcome this problem herbicide mixtures can prove to be better option as they allow broad spectrum of weed control. Apart from weed control measures, nutrient management also plays an important role in enhancing the productivity of wheat. Studies showed that continuous use of recommended dose of fertilizers, there's no any significant increase in productivity of wheat. Thus, it is essential to promote the use of appropriate combination and levels of NPK to enhance wheat yield. Fertility levels also affect the weeds and crop weed interference. Efficient nutrient management can improve crop growth and production allowing them to compete with the weeds. Therefore, there need to be synergy between weed and nutrient management. For this efficient use of newer herbicide mixtures and optimum fertility levels need to be evaluated for sustainable production of wheat crop.
Methodology
A field experiment was conducted for two years at Research farm, ARS, Ummedganj, Kota (Agriculture University, Kota) during rabi 2023-24 and rabi 2024-25. Split plot design was used for laying out the experiment with three replications. Treatments consisted of eight weed control measures in main plot (W1: Weedy check, W2: Two hand weeding at 30 & 45 DAS, W3: 2,4-D (ester) @ 500 g a.i./ha, W4: Isoproturon @ 1.25 kg a.i./ha, W5: Clodinafop propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% WP @ 52 g a.i./ha, W6: Mesosulfuron methyl 3% @ 12 g a.i./ha + iodosulfuron 0.6% WG 2.4 g a.i./ha @ 400 g/ha, W7: Pinoxaden 5.1% EC @ 45 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha and W8: Pyroxasulfone 85% WG @ 127.5 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha) as post-emergence at 30-35 DAS and three fertility levels in subplot (F1: 100% RDF, F2: 125% RDF and F3: 150% RDF). All the herbicides were sprayed using the knapsack sprayer fitted with flat-fan nozzle with a spray volume of 500 l/ha water. The fertilizer treatments were applied as basal dose of urea, SSP and MOP and top dressing of urea. The variety of test crop used was Raj 4079 with seed rate of 100 kg/ha. Weeds were counted using the 0.5 m 2 quadrate. Weed control efficiency was calculated using the following formula:
where, Xweed dry matter in control plot Yweed dry matter in treated plot
Results
Effect on weed density
A perusal of data presented in Table 1 indicate that on pooled basis the weed density at 45, 90 DAS and at harvest of total monocots, dicots and sedges was significantly affected by different weed control treatments. Two hand weeding at 30 and 45 DAS resulted in minimum weed density of all weed flora (3.03/m 2 at 45 DAS, 6.04/m 2 at 90 DAS and 6.41/m 2 at harvest). This may be due to the strategic interruption of weed life cycle during the critical period of crop-weed competition in wheat. Two hand weeding eliminates the initial weed flush and at later stages wheat being the fast-growing crop suppress the weeds by smothering effect. The single herbicides like isoproturon and 2,4-D effectively controlled either grassy or broad-leaved weeds, respectively. While herbicide mixtures provide broad spectrum of weed control controlling all type of weed flora. Among herbicide mixtures, tank mix application of pyroxasulfone 85% WG @ 127.5 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha resulted in significantly lower weed density (60.9/m 2 at 45 DAS, 8.22/m 2 at 90 DAS and 8.25/m 2 at harvest), which was comparable to pinoxaden 5.1% EC @ 45 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha (6.65/m 2 at 45 DAS, 8.37/m 2 at 90 DAS and 8.44/m 2 at harvest), and were significant to other treatments and weedy check. Maximum weed density of monocots, dicot weeds and sedges was observed in weedy check, at all stages (13.88/m 2 at 45 DAS, 14.77/m 2 at 90 DAS and 14.58/m 2 at harvest). However, density of weeds was not affected due to different fertility levels. Similar findings were reported by Pisal et al. (2013) [8] , Gupta et al. (2019) [3] and Bagri et al. (2023) [1] .
Effect on weed dry matter
The data presented in Table 2 shows that on pooled basis, two hand weeding at 30 and 45 DAS resulted in minimum weed dry matter at 45, 90 DAS and at harvest (5.90, 29.47 and 43.64 g/m 2 , respectively). Total weed dry matter was significantly reduced due to application of pyroxasulfone 85% WG @ 127.5 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha (16.95, 41.67 and 62.56 g/m 2 , respectively) which was at par to pinoxaden 5.1% EC @ 45 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha at 45, 90 DAS and at harvest (19.86, 42.89 and 65.05 g/m 2 respectively). Since, sole herbicides like isoproturon and 2,4-D controlled only single type of weed i.e. grassy or broad-leaved weeds, herbicide mixtures proved to be better in weed control by reducing the weed dry matter of all type of weed flora. The superior performance of herbicide mixtures may be attributed to the complementary modes of action of the two herbicides. It can be seen from the data that increasing fertility levels significantly affect the weed dry matter. The recommended dose of fertilizer (100% RDF) resulted in lower weed dry matter than compared to 125% and 150% RDF. This may be due to the fact that higher fertility levels contributed more in weed biomass than control. These results are similar to the findings of Katara et al. (2015) [4] and Meena et al. (2019) [6] .
Effect on weed control efficiency
Table 2 indicates that all the weed control measures significantly affected weed control efficiency such that maximum weed control efficiency of total weeds was observed under two hand weeding at 30 and 45 DAS at 45, 90 DAS and at harvest (96.46, 87.94 and 85.29%, respectively). Tank mix application of pyroxasulfone 85% WG @ 127.5 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha resulted in significantly higher weed control efficiency at all stages (89.84, 83.04 and 78.91%, respectively) and was was at par to pinoxaden 5.1% EC @ 45 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha (88.06, 82.52 and 78.12%, respectively). These mixture herbicides were superior in controlling weeds as they control broad spectrum of weeds than other herbicides and weedy check. The result substantiated the findings of Sasode et al. (2017) [10] Mishra et al. (2023) [7] and Lamani et al. (2024) [5] .
Effect on yield and economics
It can be inferred from data presented in Table 1 that on a pooled basis, the highest grain and straw yields (59.47 and 79.91 q/ha, respectively) were achieved through two hand weedings at 30 and 45 days after sowing (DAS), followed closely by herbicide mixtures of pyroxasulfone + metsulfuron methyl and pinoxaden + metsulfuron methyl, which performed with statistical equivalence. These results, supported by the findings of Kaur et al. (2014), indicate that herbicide combinations provide superior yield over sole applications. Regarding soil fertility, the 150% NPK treatment produced the maximum grain (53.07 q/ha) and straw yield (69.70 q/ha), though it remained statistically comparable to the 125% NPK level (50.49 and 65.66 q/ha). Both elevated fertility levels significantly outperformed the control, aligning with observations reported by Saquib et al. (2012), Sarita et al. (2022) [9] , and Puniya et al. (2023). While two hand weedings at 30 and 45 DAS produced the highest yield, maximum B:C ratio was achieved through tankmix of pyroxasulfone 85% WG + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP (3.03), closely followed by the pinoxaden 5.1% EC + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP (2.95). These chemical treatments were statistically comparable to one another and significantly outperformed both the weedy check and other treatments in terms of profitability. This is primarily attributed to the higher labor costs associated with manual weeding. Similar results were quoted by Choudhari et al. (2017) and Sarita et al. (2022) [9] .
Conclusion
From two year study it can be concluded that wheat was infested with wide variety of weed flora and on pooled basis two hand weeding at 30 and 45 DAS resulted in minimum weed density and weed dry matter at 45, 90 DAS and at harvest, followed by pyroxasulfone 85% WG @ 127.5 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha and pinoxaden 5.1% EC @ 45 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha. Similarly, among herbicidal treatments, significantly higher weed control efficiency was observed with pyroxasulfone 85% WG @ 127.5 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha, which was at par with pinoxaden 5.1% EC @ 45 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha. Mixture herbicides provide broad spectrum weed control. On pooled basis, two hand weeding at 30 and 45 DAS, pyroxasulfone 85% WG @ 127.5 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha and pinoxaden 5.1% EC @ 45 g a.i./ha + metsulfuron methyl 20% WP @ 4 g a.i./ha as post-emergence at 35 DAS resulted significantly higher grain yield (59.47, 56.19 and 55.57 q/ha, respectively) and straw yield (79.91, 76.86 and 72.63 q/ha, respectively). Fertility level of 125% and 150% NPK were at par and significantly resulted higher growth parameters and yields as compared to 100% NPK.
control treatments on weed flora, nutrient uptake by weeds and wheat crop. Agricultural Science Digest. 2013;33(1):47-51. 9. Sarita, Singh I, Mehriya ML, Samota MK. A study of wheat-weed response and economical analysis to fertilization and post-emergence herbicides under arid climatic conditions. Frontiers in Agronomy. 2022;4:914091. 10. Sasode DS, Gupta V, Joshi E, Arora A, Dixit JP, Panse R.
Management of diverse weed flora of wheat by herbicide combinations. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2017;49(2):147-150.
References
- Bagri US, Kasana BS, Mohaniya LS, Bagri PK, Mitoliya V. Effect of different post emergence herbicides on weeds and yield of black wheat. The Pharma Innovation. 2023;12(5):4368-4370.
- Chaudhari DD, Patel VJ, Patel HK, Mishra A, Patel BD, Patel RB. Assessment of pre-mix broad spectrum herbicides for weed management in wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2017;49(1):33-35.
- Gupta A, Yadav SS, Yadav LR, Gupta AK. Weed management and fertility levels influence on weed growth and performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2019;8(4):2038-2044.
- Katara P, Kumar S, Rana SS. Influence of pinoxaden in combination with other herbicides on nutrient depletion by weeds in wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2015;47(4):371-375.
- Lamani KD, Rathod N, Reddy UG. Efficacy of preemergent herbicides against diverse weed flora in wheat crop in Northern Transition Zone of Karnataka in South India. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2024;56(2):151-158.
- Meena V, Kaushik MK, Dotaniya ML, Meena BP, Das H. Bio-efficacy of ready mix herbicides on weeds and productivity in late-sown wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2019;51:344-351.
- Mishra H, Tripathi A, Bhayankar, Pal RP, Singh RS. Effect of fertility levels and weed management practices on weed species and weed dry matter accumulation. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science. 2023;35(16):342-351.
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
