Scinovex

Research article · 2025 · Full text

International Journal of Horticulture and Food Science

Cataloguing micropropagation efficiency of carrot in the Fiji volcanic islands

Rafael CostaJuliana Pereira

Volume 7(2) · Pages 149–152 · DOI: 10.33545/26631067.2025.v7.i2c.573 ↗

Research areasPlant tissue culture and regenerationFlowering Plant Growth and CultivationGrowth and nutrition in plants

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Carrot (Daucus carota L.) was among the first vegetable species to undergo somatic embryogenesis in vitro, yet commercial micropropagation of carrot remains uncommon because regeneration efficiency varies widely across genotypes and protocols. This research catalogued the micropropagation efficiency of three regeneration pathways (direct organogenesis, indirect callus-mediated organogenesis, and somatic embryogenesis) across four explant sources (hypocotyl, cotyledon, root tip, and leaf disc) for the Nantes Fancy carrot cultivar at the Rio de Janeiro College of Food Technology, Brazil, from March 2022 to January 2023. Three growth cycles were completed. Direct organogenesis from hypocotyl explants on MS medium with 2.0 mg/L BAP and 0.5 mg/L NAA produced the fastest plantlet development, reaching 22.8 mm height at 8 weeks. Somatic embryogenesis on 2,4-D-supplemented medium gave the highest multiplication rate (38.4 embryos per gram callus) but required the longest culture period (12 weeks to plantlet stage). Acclimatisation survival in the greenhouse reached 87.3% for direct organogenesis plantlets versus 72.1% for somatic embryo-derived plants. These results provide a comprehensive efficiency comparison to guide carrot micropropagation programme design.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Commercial micropropagation of carrots is not common because the efficiency of regeneration varies significantly depending on the protocols used and the genotypes of the plants. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Commercial micropropagation of carrots is not common because the efficiency of regeneration varies significantly depending on the protocols used and the genotypes of the plants.

      In the paper's own words

      “commercial micropropagation of carrot remains uncommon because regeneration efficiency varies widely across genotypes and protocols.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Different regeneration pathways offer trade-offs: direct organogenesis is more genetically stable but produces fewer plants, while somatic embryogenesis allows for high multiplication but increases the risk of genetic variation. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Different regeneration pathways offer trade-offs: direct organogenesis is more genetically stable but produces fewer plants, while somatic embryogenesis allows for high multiplication but increases the risk of genetic variation.

      In the paper's own words

      “Direct organogenesis tends to preserve genetic stability but may yield fewer propagules; somatic embryogenesis produces high multiplication rates but carries a greater risk of somaclonal variation”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The volcanic islands of Fiji are considered a potential site for carrot micropropagation due to their fertile soils and challenges with seed supply chains and geographic isolation. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The volcanic islands of Fiji are considered a potential site for carrot micropropagation due to their fertile soils and challenges with seed supply chains and geographic isolation.

      In the paper's own words

      “Fiji's volcanic islands present an interesting potential application for carrot micropropagation: isolated geography, limited seed supply chains, and fertile volcanic soils that support root crop production.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to compare the efficiency of three main regeneration pathways using various explant types to create a reference for future carrot micropropagation. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to compare the efficiency of three main regeneration pathways using various explant types to create a reference for future carrot micropropagation.

      In the paper's own words

      “This research aimed to catalogue and compare the three main regeneration pathways across multiple explant types, providing a side-by-side efficiency reference for future carrot micropropagation efforts”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • Researchers tested the Nantes Fancy carrot cultivar using four explant sources (hypocotyl, cotyledon, root tip, and leaf disc) across three regeneration pathways in Brazil between March 2022 and January 2023. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Researchers tested the Nantes Fancy carrot cultivar using four explant sources (hypocotyl, cotyledon, root tip, and leaf disc) across three regeneration pathways in Brazil between March 2022 and January 2023.

      In the paper's own words

      “This research catalogued the micropropagation efficiency of three regeneration pathways (direct organogenesis, indirect callus-mediated organogenesis, and somatic embryogenesis) across four explant sources (hypocotyl, cotyledon, root tip, and leaf disc) for the Nantes Fancy carrot cultivar at the Rio de Janeiro College of Food Technology, Brazil, from March 2022 to January 2023.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The experimental design was completely randomized, utilizing five replications of ten explants for each treatment pathway. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The experimental design was completely randomized, utilizing five replications of ten explants for each treatment pathway.

      In the paper's own words

      “Each pathway was tested independently in a completely randomised design with five replications of ten explants per treatment.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The study tested various hormone concentrations: BAP and NAA for direct organogenesis, and 2,4-D for callus induction. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study tested various hormone concentrations: BAP and NAA for direct organogenesis, and 2,4-D for callus induction.

      In the paper's own words

      “For direct organogenesis, BAP (1.0, 2.0, 3.0 mg/L) and NAA (0.1, 0.5, 1.0 mg/L) were tested. For callus induction, 2,4-D (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg/L) was used.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Material

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Plantlets were acclimatized in a greenhouse for 21 days using mist irrigation and 50% shade cloth to measure survival rates. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Plantlets were acclimatized in a greenhouse for 21 days using mist irrigation and 50% shade cloth to measure survival rates.

      In the paper's own words

      “Rooted plantlets were acclimatised in a greenhouse under 50% shade cloth with mist irrigation for 21 days, and survival was recorded.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Direct organogenesis using hypocotyl explants was the fastest method, with plantlets reaching a height of 22.8 mm after 8 weeks. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Direct organogenesis using hypocotyl explants was the fastest method, with plantlets reaching a height of 22.8 mm after 8 weeks.

      In the paper's own words

      “Direct organogenesis produced the fastest-growing plantlets, reaching 22.8 mm at 8 weeks from hypocotyl explants (Table 1).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Somatic embryogenesis provided a significantly higher multiplication rate, producing 38.4 embryos per gram of callus compared to 9.6 shoots per explant in direct organogenesis. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Somatic embryogenesis provided a significantly higher multiplication rate, producing 38.4 embryos per gram of callus compared to 9.6 shoots per explant in direct organogenesis.

      In the paper's own words

      “Somatic embryogenesis produced a mean of 38.4 embryos per gram of callus, compared to 9.6 shoots per explant from direct organogenesis.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Survival during acclimatization was highest for direct organogenesis (87.3%) and lowest for somatic embryo-derived plants (72.1%). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Survival during acclimatization was highest for direct organogenesis (87.3%) and lowest for somatic embryo-derived plants (72.1%).

      In the paper's own words

      “Direct organogenesis plantlets achieved 87.3% survival, callus-derived plantlets 79.8%, and somatic embryo-derived plantlets 72.1%.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Extraction protocol

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Plantlets from direct organogenesis had 23% more total chlorophyll than those from somatic embryogenesis, which correlated with their higher survival rate. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Plantlets from direct organogenesis had 23% more total chlorophyll than those from somatic embryogenesis, which correlated with their higher survival rate.

      In the paper's own words

      “Plantlets from direct organogenesis had 23% higher total chlorophyll than somatic embryo-derived plantlets, which correlated with their better acclimatisation survival”

      Page 2

      Found in: Extraction protocol

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The highest regeneration rates were achieved by direct organogenesis from hypocotyls (78.6%), followed by somatic embryogenesis from cotyledons (71.8%) and the callus pathway from hypocotyls (64.2%). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The highest regeneration rates were achieved by direct organogenesis from hypocotyls (78.6%), followed by somatic embryogenesis from cotyledons (71.8%) and the callus pathway from hypocotyls (64.2%).

      In the paper's own words

      “Regen. rate (%) ... Direct organogenesis Hypocotyl 78.6 ... Callus pathway Hypocotyl 64.2 ... Somatic embryo. Cotyledon 71.8”

      Page 2

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors recommend direct organogenesis for breeding programs that require a rapid supply of clonal plants. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors recommend direct organogenesis for breeding programs that require a rapid supply of clonal plants.

      In the paper's own words

      “For breeding programmes needing rapid clonal supply, direct organogenesis is recommended”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Somatic embryogenesis is recommended for seed companies that prioritize mass multiplication of plants. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      Somatic embryogenesis is recommended for seed companies that prioritize mass multiplication of plants.

      In the paper's own words

      “for seed companies needing mass multiplication, somatic embryogenesis is the better choice.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The authors state that future research is needed to test the commercial feasibility of somatic embryogenesis using bioreactor-scale production. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors state that future research is needed to test the commercial feasibility of somatic embryogenesis using bioreactor-scale production.

      In the paper's own words

      “Future work should investigate bioreactor-scale somatic embryogenesis to test commercial feasibility.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗

Visual summary

3 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (carrot (Daucus carota) plantlets and callus tissue). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Comparison of Carrot Regeneration Pathways
AI-generated conceptual illustration (carrot (Daucus carota) plantlets and callus tissue). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (carrot (Daucus carota) plantlets and callus tissue). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Comparison of Carrot Regeneration Pathways

AI-generated conceptual illustration (carrot (Daucus carota) plantlets and callus tissue). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Regen. rate (%): Direct organogenesis vs Callus pathway vs Somatic embryo.
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Regen. rate (%): Direct organogenesis vs Callus pathway vs Somatic embryo.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Height 8wk (mm): Direct organogenesis vs Callus pathway vs Somatic embryo.
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Height 8wk (mm): Direct organogenesis vs Callus pathway vs Somatic embryo.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Regeneration efficiency by pathway and explant type on optimal mediaTable 1Page 2Plantlet height development (mm) over 8 weeks in culture by regeneration pathwayFigure 1Page 2Proportional contribution of each explant type to total regenerated plantlets across all pathwaysFigure 2Page 3
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

A curious observation about carrot tissue culture: it was Steward and colleagues in 1958 who first demonstrated that a single differentiated carrot cell could regenerate an entire plant, launching the field of plant somatic embryogenesis [1] . Yet more than six decades later, carrot micropropagation hasn't become a commercial staple the way it has for banana, potato, or orchid. The gap between scientific possibility and practical application deserves a closer look. The main barrier is efficiency. Published carrot regeneration rates range from 15% to over 90%, and the pathway chosen (direct organogenesis, callus-mediated regeneration, or somatic embryogenesis) strongly influences both the speed and the genetic fidelity of the resulting plantlets [2] . Direct organogenesis tends to preserve genetic stability but may yield fewer propagules; somatic embryogenesis produces high multiplication rates but carries a greater risk of somaclonal variation [3] . Fiji's volcanic islands present an interesting potential application for carrot micropropagation: isolated geography, limited seed supply chains, and fertile volcanic soils that support root crop production. But the actual laboratory work was performed at the Rio de Janeiro College of Food Technology, Brazil, where established tissue culture infrastructure was available. This research aimed to catalogue and compare the three main regeneration pathways across multiple explant types, providing a side-by-side efficiency reference for future carrot micropropagation efforts [4] .

Material and Methods

Material and Methods

Material

Seeds of the Nantes Fancy carrot cultivar were surface-sterilised and germinated aseptically at the Rio de Janeiro College of Food Technology tissue culture laboratory, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (22.9 degrees S, 43.2 degrees W). Four explant types were prepared from 7-14 day-old seedlings: hypocotyl segments (5 mm), cotyledon pieces (5 x 5 mm), root tips (5 mm), and leaf discs (5 mm diameter). Basal medium was full-strength MS with 30 g/L sucrose and 7 g/L agar. For direct organogenesis, BAP (1.0, 2.0, 3.0 mg/L) and NAA (0.1, 0.5, 1.0 mg/L) were tested. For callus induction, 2,4-D (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg/L) was used. Somatic embryogenesis was induced by transferring 2,4-Dderived callus to hormone-free MS medium [5] .

Methods

The research ran from March 2022 to January 2023, encompassing three regeneration cycles. Each pathway was tested independently in a completely randomised design with five replications of ten explants per treatment. Cultures were maintained at 25 degrees Celsius under 16-hour photoperiod. For direct organogenesis, shoot emergence was scored at 4 and 8 weeks. For callus pathway, callus fresh weight was recorded at 4 weeks before transfer to regeneration medium (BAP 2.0 mg/L). For somatic embryogenesis, embryo counts per gram callus were recorded at 8 weeks after transfer to hormone-free medium. Plantlet height was measured weekly from week 2 to week 8. Rooted plantlets were acclimatised in a greenhouse under 50% shade cloth with mist irrigation for 21 days, and survival was recorded. Data were analysed by factorial ANOVA in SAS 9.4 [6] .

Extraction protocol

Chlorophyll and carotenoid content of regenerated plantlets was assessed as an indicator of photosynthetic competence before acclimatisation. Fresh leaf tissue (0.5 g) was extracted in 10 mL of 80% acetone at 4 degrees Celsius in darkness for 24 hours. Extracts were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 minutes, and absorbance was read at 663, 645, and 470 nm using a Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer. Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and total carotenoids were calculated using Lichtenthaler's equations. Plantlets from direct organogenesis had 23% higher total chlorophyll than somatic embryo-derived plantlets, which correlated with their better acclimatisation survival [7] . Acclimatisation survival differed significantly by pathway origin (p<0.01). Direct organogenesis plantlets achieved 87.3% survival, callus-derived plantlets 79.8%, and somatic embryo-derived plantlets 72.1%. Chlorophyll content at the time of transfer to greenhouse conditions was positively correlated with survival (r = 0.68, p<0.05).

Results

Results

Discussion

The faster growth of direct organogenesis plantlets compared to callus and somatic embryogenesis pathways confirms that avoiding a dedifferentiation phase preserves developmental momentum [2,3] . Callus-mediated regeneration adds 3-4 weeks to the production timeline without improving multiplication rate, making it the least efficient pathway for carrot unless genetic transformation via callus is the goal [8] . Somatic embryogenesis, despite its slower plantlet development, remains attractive for large-scale programmes because of its multiplication advantage. The 38.4 embryos per gram callus recorded here is within the range (25-50) reported by Zimmerman [1] for Nantes-type carrots, suggesting that genotype-specific optimisation could push this figure even higher. The lower acclimatisation survival of somatic embryoderived plantlets (72.1% versus 87.3% for direct organogenesis) aligns with reports of incomplete vascular development and reduced photosynthetic capacity in embryo-derived plants [9] . The correlation between chlorophyll content and survival suggests that assessing pigment levels before transfer could serve as a screening tool to cull weak plantlets and improve overall batch survival.

Conclusion

This research provided a systematic comparison of three carrot micropropagation pathways across four explant types. Direct organogenesis from 7-day-old hypocotyl explants on MS medium with 2.0 mg/L BAP and 0.5 mg/L NAA was the most time-efficient route, producing the tallest plantlets and the best acclimatisation survival. Somatic embryogenesis offered the highest multiplication rate but required a longer culture period and yielded lower greenhouse survival. For breeding programmes needing rapid clonal supply, direct organogenesis is recommended;

for seed companies needing mass multiplication, somatic embryogenesis is the better choice. Future work should investigate bioreactor-scale somatic embryogenesis to test commercial feasibility.

Acknowledgement

Acknowledgements Funding sourcesThis research was supported by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development through a research productivity grant. Institutional supportThe authors thank the Rio de Janeiro College of Food Technology for tissue culture facilities and greenhouse space.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. Regeneration efficiency by pathway and explant type on optimal media
PathwayBest explantRegen. rate (%)Height 8wk (mm)
Direct organogenesisHypocotyl78.622.8
Callus pathwayHypocotyl64.219.4
Somatic embryo.Cotyledon71.815.7

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Regeneration efficiency by pathway and explant type on optimal media↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Regeneration efficiency by pathway and explant type on optimal media

Regeneration efficiency by pathway and explant type on optimal media

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 1. Plantlet height development (mm) over 8 weeks in culture by regeneration pathway
Plantlet height development (mm) over 8 weeks in culture by regeneration pathway↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Plantlet height development (mm) over 8 weeks in culture by regeneration pathway

Plantlet height development (mm) over 8 weeks in culture by regeneration pathway

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 2. Proportional contribution of each explant type to total regenerated plantlets across all pathways
Proportional contribution of each explant type to total regenerated plantlets across all pathways↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Proportional contribution of each explant type to total regenerated plantlets across all pathways

Proportional contribution of each explant type to total regenerated plantlets across all pathways

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗

References

18 in the original paper
  1. Zimmerman JL. Somatic embryogenesis: a model for early development in higher plants. Plant Cell. 1993;5(10):1411-1423.
  2. Kintzios SE, Drossopoulos JB, Lymperopoulos C. Effect of vitamins and inorganic micronutrients on callus growth and somatic embryogenesis from leaves of chilli pepper. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2001;67(1):55-62.
  3. Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR. Somaclonal variation: a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1981;60(4):197-214.
  4. Baranski R. Genetic transformation of carrot (Daucus carota) and other Apiaceae species. Transgenic Plant Journal. 2008;2(1):18-38.
  5. Steward FC, Mapes MO, Mears K. Growth and organized development of cultured cells. II. Organization in cultures grown from freely suspended cells. American Journal of Botany. 1958;45(10):705708.
  6. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 9.4. Cary: SAS Institute; 2013.
  7. Lichtenthaler HK. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymology. 1987;148:350-382.
  8. Hardegger M, Sturm A. Transformation and regeneration of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Molecular Breeding. 1998;4(2):119-127.
  9. Etienne H, Berthouly M. Temporary immersion systems in plant micropropagation. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2002;69(3):215-231.
  10. Ammirato PV. Embryogenesis. In: Evans DA, Sharp WR, Ammirato PV, editors. Handbook of Plant Cell Culture, Vol 1. New York: Macmillan; 1983. p. 82-123.
  11. Nomura K, Komamine A. Identification and isolation of single cells that produce somatic embryos at a high frequency in carrot suspension cultures. Plant Physiology. 1985;79(4):988-991.
  12. De Vries SC, Booij H, Meyerink P, Huisman G, Wilde HD, Thomas TL, et al. Acquisition embryogenic potential in carrot cell-suspension cultures. Planta. 1988;176(2):196-204.
  13. Costa R, Pereira J. Tissue culture infrastructure assessment at Rio de Janeiro College of Food Technology. Brazilian Journal of Plant Biotechnology. 2021;11(2):88-95.
  14. Ikeuchi M, Sugimoto K, Iwase A. Plant callus: mechanisms of induction and repression. Plant Cell. 2013;25(9):3159-3173.
  15. Thorpe TA. History of plant tissue culture. Molecular Biotechnology. 2007;37(2):169-180.
  16. Reinert J. Uber die Kontrolle der Morphogenese und die Induktion von Adventivembryonen an Gewebekulturen aus Karotten. Planta. 1959;53:318333.
  17. Grzebelus E, Szklarczyk M, Baranski R. An improved protocol for plant regeneration from leaf-and hypocotyl-derived protoplasts of carrot. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2012;109(1):101-109.
  18. Mashayekhi K, Neumann KH. Effects of boron on somatic embryogenesis of Daucus carota. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2006;84(3):279-283.