Scinovex

Research article · 2025 · Full text

International Journal of Horticulture and Food Science

Characterizing climate resilience traits of pumpkin in the Loire valley

Ramesh ChandraLata Deshmukh

Volume 7(2) · Pages 170–173 · DOI: 10.33545/26631067.2025.v7.i2c.578 ↗

Research areasClimate change impacts on agricultureGenetics and Plant BreedingAdvances in Cucurbitaceae Research

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

A surprising fact about pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.) is that despite being classified as a warm-season crop, some landraces from semi-arid zones display remarkable tolerance to both drought and waterlogging, yet the physiological basis of this dual resilience remains poorly characterised. This research investigated drought and waterlogging tolerance mechanisms in 12 pumpkin accessions at the Coimbatore Research Institute of Applied Horticulture, Tamil Nadu, India, from June 2021 to May 2023. Accessions were subjected to three water regimes (well-watered control, drought stress at 40% field capacity, and waterlogging for 14 days) in a split-plot design. Relative water content, proline accumulation, chlorophyll fluorescence, root aerenchyma formation, and fruit yield were measured. Drought stress reduced mean yield by 41.3% across accessions, but three landraces (CM-7, CM-11, CM-14) maintained yields above 75% of their well-watered performance. These tolerant accessions showed 2.4-fold higher proline accumulation and maintained Fv/Fm ratios above 0.72 under stress. Under waterlogging, the same three accessions developed extensive root aerenchyma (porosity above 18%) and sustained vine growth. These findings identify physiological markers for dual-stress screening in pumpkin breeding programmes targeting climate-vulnerable production zones.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Tropical vegetable production zones are projected to face an increase in both frequent droughts and intense flooding within a single growing season. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Tropical vegetable production zones are projected to face an increase in both frequent droughts and intense flooding within a single growing season.

      In the paper's own words

      “Climate models project that many tropical vegetable production zones will experience both more frequent droughts and more intense flooding events within the same growing season [2].”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The Loire Valley in France is a target area for this research because it is a temperate region increasingly affected by winter flooding and summer drought. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The Loire Valley in France is a target area for this research because it is a temperate region increasingly affected by winter flooding and summer drought.

      In the paper's own words

      “The Loire Valley of France was chosen as the target application zone because it represents a temperate production area increasingly exposed to summer drought and winter flooding.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Pumpkin landraces from West Africa and Central America's semi-arid zones have untapped breeding potential due to centuries of informal selection for drought survival. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Pumpkin landraces from West Africa and Central America's semi-arid zones have untapped breeding potential due to centuries of informal selection for drought survival.

      In the paper's own words

      “Cucurbita moschata landraces from semi-arid zones of Central America and West Africa have been informally selected for drought survival over centuries, creating genetic resources with untapped potential for formal breeding [1].”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to find pumpkin accessions that can tolerate both drought and waterlogging and to understand the physiological mechanisms that allow this resilience. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to find pumpkin accessions that can tolerate both drought and waterlogging and to understand the physiological mechanisms that allow this resilience.

      In the paper's own words

      “This research aimed to identify pumpkin accessions with dual stress tolerance and to characterise the physiological mechanisms underpinning that resilience [5].”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The study tested 12 pumpkin accessions at the Coimbatore Research Institute of Applied Horticulture in India between June 2021 and May 2023. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study tested 12 pumpkin accessions at the Coimbatore Research Institute of Applied Horticulture in India between June 2021 and May 2023.

      In the paper's own words

      “This research investigated drought and waterlogging tolerance mechanisms in 12 pumpkin accessions at the Coimbatore Research Institute of Applied Horticulture, Tamil Nadu, India, from June 2021 to May 2023.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Plants were subjected to three water regimes: a well-watered control (80% field capacity), drought stress (40% field capacity for 21 days), and waterlogging (submerged for 14 days). View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Plants were subjected to three water regimes: a well-watered control (80% field capacity), drought stress (40% field capacity for 21 days), and waterlogging (submerged for 14 days).

      In the paper's own words

      “Three water regimes were applied: well-watered control (maintained at 80% field capacity), drought stress (reduced to 40% field capacity from 30 days after sowing for 21 days), and waterlogging (pots submerged to soil surface level for 14 days from 30 days after sowing).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The researchers measured leaf relative water content, proline levels, chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm), and root aerenchyma porosity to assess stress responses. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers measured leaf relative water content, proline levels, chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm), and root aerenchyma porosity to assess stress responses.

      In the paper's own words

      “Relative Water Content (RWC) of leaves was measured gravimetrically at stress onset, midpoint, and recovery. Leaf proline was quantified by the acid-ninhydrin method at 520 nm. Chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm) was measured using a portable fluorometer pre-dawn. Root aerenchyma porosity was assessed on cross-sections at 5 cm from root tip using image analysis software.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Across all tested accessions, drought stress caused an overall mean yield reduction of 41.3%. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Across all tested accessions, drought stress caused an overall mean yield reduction of 41.3%.

      In the paper's own words

      “Drought stress reduced mean yield by 41.3% across accessions”

      Page 1

      “Overall mean 3,080 1,810 1,920 41.3”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • African landraces were the most drought-tolerant group, with a yield reduction of only 22.8%, whereas Indian landraces and improved varieties saw reductions of 46.5% and 46.3%, respectively. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      African landraces were the most drought-tolerant group, with a yield reduction of only 22.8%, whereas Indian landraces and improved varieties saw reductions of 46.5% and 46.3%, respectively.

      In the paper's own words

      “African landraces showed the smallest drought yield reduction at 22.8%, compared to 46.5% for Indian landraces and 46.3% for improved varieties (Table 1).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Climatic and environmental conditions during the research

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Three African landraces (CM-7, CM-11, and CM-14) demonstrated high drought tolerance by maintaining over 75% of their control yield. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Three African landraces (CM-7, CM-11, and CM-14) demonstrated high drought tolerance by maintaining over 75% of their control yield.

      In the paper's own words

      “three landraces (CM-7, CM-11, CM-14) maintained yields above 75% of their well-watered performance.”

      Page 1

      “Three specific accessions (CM-7, CM-11, CM-14, all of African origin) retained over 75% of control yield under drought.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Climatic and environmental conditions during the research

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Tolerant accessions accumulated 8.7 micromoles/g of proline under drought, which is 2.4 times higher than the 3.6 micromoles/g found in sensitive accessions. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Tolerant accessions accumulated 8.7 micromoles/g of proline under drought, which is 2.4 times higher than the 3.6 micromoles/g found in sensitive accessions.

      In the paper's own words

      “Proline accumulation in tolerant accessions reached 8.7 micromoles per gram fresh weight under drought, 2.4 times higher than sensitive accessions (3.6 micromoles/g).”

      Page 3

      Found in: Climatic and environmental conditions during the research

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Tolerant accessions maintained chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm) ratios above 0.72, while sensitive accessions dropped below 0.61. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Tolerant accessions maintained chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm) ratios above 0.72, while sensitive accessions dropped below 0.61.

      In the paper's own words

      “Fv/Fm ratios remained above 0.72 in tolerant accessions but fell below 0.61 in sensitive ones.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Climatic and environmental conditions during the research

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Under waterlogging, the dual-tolerant accessions (CM-7, CM-11, CM-14) developed root aerenchyma porosity exceeding 18%, whereas most Indian landraces remained below 8%. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Under waterlogging, the dual-tolerant accessions (CM-7, CM-11, CM-14) developed root aerenchyma porosity exceeding 18%, whereas most Indian landraces remained below 8%.

      In the paper's own words

      “Root aerenchyma porosity under waterlogging exceeded 18% in CM-7, CM-11, and CM-14, compared to below 8% in most Indian landraces.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Climatic and environmental conditions during the research

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors concluded that West African landraces CM-7, CM-11, and CM-14 possess dual tolerance to drought and waterlogging, keeping over 75% of their control yield under both conditions. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors concluded that West African landraces CM-7, CM-11, and CM-14 possess dual tolerance to drought and waterlogging, keeping over 75% of their control yield under both conditions.

      In the paper's own words

      “This research identified three West African pumpkin landraces (CM-7, CM-11, CM-14) with dual tolerance to drought and waterlogging, maintaining over 75% of control yield under both stresses.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The authors recommend using root aerenchyma formation, chlorophyll fluorescence stability, and proline accumulation as reliable markers for screening stress tolerance in pumpkin. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors recommend using root aerenchyma formation, chlorophyll fluorescence stability, and proline accumulation as reliable markers for screening stress tolerance in pumpkin.

      In the paper's own words

      “Proline accumulation, chlorophyll fluorescence stability, and root aerenchyma formation emerged as reliable physiological markers for stress tolerance screening.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗

Visual summary

2 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Dual Stress Resilience Concept
AI-generated conceptual illustration (pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Dual Stress Resilience Concept

AI-generated conceptual illustration (pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo)). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Drought red.(%): Indian landraces vs African landraces vs Improved vars.
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Drought red.(%): Indian landraces vs African landraces vs Improved vars.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Mean fruit yield (g/plant) and yield reduction (%) underTable 1Page 2Relative water content trajectory over 12 months for well-watered and drought-stressed treatments (mean across accessions)Figure 1Page 2Relative performance (% of control) of five growth and yield traits under drought stress averaged across all accessionsFigure 2Page 3
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Here is a surprising fact: pumpkin, a crop most people associate with Halloween decorations and autumn pie, may be one of the best candidates for climate-resilient vegetable production in the tropics. Cucurbita moschata landraces from semi-arid zones of Central America and West Africa have been informally selected for drought survival over centuries, creating genetic resources with untapped potential for formal breeding [1] . Climate models project that many tropical vegetable production zones will experience both more frequent droughts and more intense flooding events within the same growing season [2] . Crops that can tolerate both extremes will be disproportionately valuable. For pumpkin, drought tolerance involves osmotic adjustment, stomatal regulation, and deep root penetration, while waterlogging tolerance requires aerenchyma formation and anaerobic metabolism in roots [3,4] . Whether the same accessions can perform well under both stresses is an open question. The Loire Valley of France was chosen as the target application zone because it represents a temperate production area increasingly exposed to summer drought and winter flooding. But the actual experimental work was performed at the Coimbatore Research Institute of Applied Horticulture, India, where both the germplasm and controlled stress facilities were available. This research aimed to identify pumpkin accessions with dual stress tolerance and to characterise the physiological mechanisms underpinning that resilience [5] .

Material and Methods

Material and Methods

Material

Twelve C. moschata accessions were sourced from the National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, and the Coimbatore institute's own germplasm collection. Accessions included six Indian landraces (CM-1 through CM-6), three West African landraces (CM-7 through CM-9), and three improved varieties (CM-10 through CM-12, plus CM-13 and CM-14 as additional African landraces). Seeds were sown in 50-litre pots filled with a 3:1 mix of red loam soil and farmyard manure at the institute's greenhouse complex in Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India (11.0 degrees N, 76.9 degrees E, elevation 411 m). The research site experiences a tropical semi-arid climate with mean annual temperature of 27.4 degrees Celsius and rainfall of 657 mm [6] .

Methods

The research ran from June 2021 to May 2023 at the Coimbatore Research Institute of Applied Horticulture, covering four crop cycles. Three water regimes were applied: well-watered control (maintained at 80% field capacity), drought stress (reduced to 40% field capacity from 30 days after sowing for 21 days), and waterlogging (pots submerged to soil surface level for 14 days from 30 days after sowing). A split-plot design with water regime as the main plot and accession as the subplot was used, with four replications. Relative Water Content (RWC) of leaves was measured gravimetrically at stress onset, midpoint, and recovery. Leaf proline was quantified by the acid-ninhydrin method at 520 nm. Chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm) was measured using a portable fluorometer pre-dawn. Root aerenchyma porosity was assessed on cross-sections at 5 cm from root tip using image analysis software. Vine length, leaf area, fruit set, individual fruit weight, and total yield per plant were recorded. Data were analysed by split-plot ANOVA in SAS 9.4 with LSD at p<0.05 [7] .

Climatic and environmental conditions during the research

Greenhouse temperature during the research period ranged from 22.8 to 38.4 degrees Celsius, with relative humidity between 45% and 82%. During drought stress treatments, soil moisture in stressed pots dropped to 37-42% of field capacity by day 14, verified by gravimetric sampling. Waterlogging treatments maintained a standing water level of 1-2 cm above the soil surface throughout the 14-day submersion period. Dissolved oxygen in waterlogged pots declined from 6.8 mg/L to 1.2 mg/L within 5 days, confirming hypoxic root zone conditions [8] . Water regime (F = 48.3, p<0.001), accession (F = 14.7, p<0.001), and their interaction (F = 6.2, p<0.001) all significantly affected yield. African landraces showed the smallest drought yield reduction at 22.8%, compared to 46.5% for Indian landraces and 46.3% for improved varieties (Table 1). Three specific accessions (CM-7, CM-11, CM-14, all of African origin) retained over 75% of control yield under drought. Proline accumulation in tolerant accessions reached 8.7 micromoles per gram fresh weight under drought, 2.4 times higher than sensitive accessions (3.6 micromoles/g). Fv/Fm ratios remained above 0.72 in tolerant accessions but fell below 0.61 in sensitive ones. Root aerenchyma porosity under waterlogging exceeded 18% in CM-7, CM-11, and CM-14, compared to below 8% in most Indian landraces.

Table 1. Mean fruit yield (g/plant) and yield reduction (%) under
CategoryControlDroughtWaterlogDrought red.(%)
Indian landraces2,8401,5201,68046.5
African landraces3,1202,4102,28022.8
Improved vars.3,4801,8701,94046.3
Overall mean3,0801,8101,92041.3

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Mean fruit yield (g/plant) and yield reduction (%) under↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Mean fruit yield (g/plant) and yield reduction (%) under

Mean fruit yield (g/plant) and yield reduction (%) under

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗

Results

Results

Discussion

The superior drought performance of West African pumpkin landraces likely reflects centuries of selection pressure in Sahelian environments where seasonal drought is the norm [1, 9] . The 2.4-fold proline advantage in tolerant accessions is consistent with the role of proline as both an osmolyte and a reactive oxygen species scavenger under water deficit [3] . The maintenance of Fv/Fm above 0.72 indicates that photosystem II remained functional in tolerant genotypes, while the decline below 0.61 in sensitive accessions signals photoinhibition and possible irreversible damage to the light-harvesting complex [10] . The dual tolerance of CM-7, CM-11, and CM-14 to both drought and waterlogging is noteworthy and may be linked to their root plasticity. The ability to rapidly form aerenchyma under hypoxic conditions while also maintaining deep root penetration under drought suggests a flexible root developmental programme controlled by common regulatory pathways 11] . These accessions deserve priority in breeding programmes targeting areas with erratic rainfall.

Conclusion

This research identified three West African pumpkin landraces (CM-7, CM-11, CM-14) with dual tolerance to drought and waterlogging, maintaining over 75% of control yield under both stresses. Proline accumulation, chlorophyll fluorescence stability, and root aerenchyma formation emerged as reliable physiological markers for stress tolerance screening. These markers can be integrated into early-generation selection protocols to accelerate the development of climate-resilient pumpkin cultivars for vulnerable production zones including the Loire Valley and similar temperate regions facing increased weather extremes.

Acknowledgement

Acknowledgements

Figures and tables from the paper

Figure 1. Relative water content trajectory over 12 months for well-watered and drought-stressed treatments (mean across accessions)
Relative water content trajectory over 12 months for well-watered and drought-stressed treatments (mean across accessions)↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Relative water content trajectory over 12 months for well-watered and drought-stressed treatments (mean across accessions)

Relative water content trajectory over 12 months for well-watered and drought-stressed treatments (mean across accessions)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 2. Relative performance (% of control) of five growth and yield traits under drought stress averaged across all accessions
Relative performance (% of control) of five growth and yield traits under drought stress averaged across all accessions↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Relative performance (% of control) of five growth and yield traits under drought stress averaged across all accessions

Relative performance (% of control) of five growth and yield traits under drought stress averaged across all accessions

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗

References

14 in the original paper
  1. Lira-Saade R. Estudios Taxonomicos y Ecogeograficos de las Cucurbitaceae Latinoamericanas de Importancia Economica. Rome: IPGRI; 1995.
  2. IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021.
  3. Ashraf M, Foolad MR. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007;59(2):206-216.
  4. Colmer TD, Voesenek LACJ. Flooding tolerance: suites of plant traits in variable environments. Functional Plant Biology. 2009;36(8):665-681.
  5. Chandra R, Deshmukh L. Cucurbit germplasm characterization at Coimbatore Research Institute. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 2021;78(3):278-285.
  6. India Meteorological Department. Climate Normals for Coimbatore 1991-2020. Pune: IMD; 2022.
  7. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 9.4. Cary: SAS Institute; 2013.
  8. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil. 1973;39(1):205-207.
  9. Achigan-Dako EG, Fanou N, Kouke A, Avohou H, Vodouhe RS, Ahanchede A. Evaluation of vegetable squash Cucurbita moschata accessions for their agronomic and nutritional value in Benin. Fruits. 2006;61(4):223-231.
  10. Baker NR. Chlorophyll fluorescence: A probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2008;59:89-113.
  11. Evans DE. Aerenchyma formation. New Phytologist. 2004;161(1):35-49.
  12. Blum A. Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential: Are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2005;56(11):1159-1168.
  13. Ferrante A, Mariani L. Agronomic management for enhancing plant tolerance to abiotic stresses: High and low values of temperature, light intensity, and relative humidity. Horticulturae. 2018;4(3):21.
  14. Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2009;29(1):185-212.