A review on bridging digital soil mapping and agricultural extension: Enhancing soil advisory services for sustainable farming
Abstract
The accelerating impacts of climate change and land degradation now pose a potentially devastating threat to global smallholder crop production and its contribution to food security. At present, more than 500 million smallholder farms face a combined blow from climate variability and soil erosion. Technological advancements in the sector have nevertheless been tremendous, and yet yields have levelled off, and global average arable land per capita stands at only 0.2 hectares. To this effect, the global population stands at a projected 9.8 billion by the year 2050.
Full Text
Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.
Introduction
The earth's fragile layer of soil plays an essential and foundational role in the functioning of ecosystems and global agricultural systems, yet, globally, soil resources are threatened. Climate Change and Man-made land degradation are two of the current greatest threats to the health of our planet and to Food Security. The increased frequency of extreme weather events combined with poor management practices has accelerated the decline of soil health and therefore has ultimately damaged the foundation of 95% of Food Production. As soils continue to degrade, they pose an immediate threat to the ecological services they provide to us, such as Carbon Sequestration, Water Filtration, Water Storage, Nutrient Cycling and Diversity Support, which all have tremendous economic value, infact, they cannot be replaced (IPBES, 2018) [8] . Due to their reliance on field surveys that are labor intensive and classification systems that are polygon based, traditional methods of soil assessment are beginning to be viewed as insufficient to fully address large-scale and dynamic issues related to soils. Even though they have provided substantial historic information regarding soils, traditional soil maps had poor spatial resolution and provided only limited quantitatively-measured information about individual soil properties. Additionally, traditional soil maps do not allow for the easy and efficient update of soil mapping to reflect continual changes that occur (Lagacherie et al., 2006) [2] . This is especially important for smallholder farmers to have access to site-specific, accurate information pertaining to soils, as these farmers have to manage both nutrient deficiency and water scarcity as well as salinity problems on many marginal lands. (Tittonell et al., 2010) [10] . As a response to the limitations associated with existing soil technology, and encouraged by the advancements in the digital world-all supported by the advancement of digital technologies, spatial statistics and data science within the field of soil informatics-this has created a merging of new ideas and the traditional soil science fields of soil technology. This discipline is based on the ability of scientists to collect, store, organize, analyze and interpret soil information, producing useful knowledge, but the Digital Soil Mapping (DSM) concept is a key component of soil informatics. Essentially, Digital Soil Mapping (DSM), represents a new predictive framework where statistical and www.extensionjournal.com machine learning techniques are used to combine sparse field data with numerous environmental indicators, thus allowing scientists to derive predictive soil property maps over much larger areas (Drechsel et al., 2001). The switch to continuous quantitative prediction instead of solely relying on the use of taxonomic soil classification has increased our ability to manage and monitor our soil resources at the appropriate levels for precision agriculture, and ultimately the policy level on a national scale. In this chapter, we review the world-wide demand for these new techniques and how they can promote resilient, sustainable agriculture among smallholders. The chapter begins by outlining the interaction between soil degradation, food security, and smallholders. This is followed by the creation of conceptual and technical elements of soil informatics, soil degradation, and the development of an integrated DSM framework for smallholder agriculture, and lastly, the case study from Punjab, India (which demonstrates the interactions between soil sustainability and agricultural intensification) will provide insights into the practical application of an integrated DSM framework for smallholder agriculture that can be globally adopted in the 21st century.
Soil Degradation and Smallholder Agriculture: A Global Perspective
About 84% of all farms globally are identified as smallholder farms (less than 2 ha). This type of farm provides about 35% of the total food quantity globally but provides a much larger percentage of local500 million smallholder farms in developing countries. Tropical and sub-tropical locations have the highest density of these farms and are affected by both climate change and soil degradation (Morton, 2007) [12] . The vulnerability of these farm systems can be attributed to many factors such as physical environment constraints, social/economic difficulties, inadequate access to information and technological resources. Climate Change and Climate Variability exacerbate existing soil constraints. The change in precipitation patterns from Climate Variability can increase the risk of Drought and Erosion. Climate Variability also causes changes in Temperature, which may increase mineralization of soil organic carbon (SOC) and decrease both fertility and waterholding capacity of soils (Lal, 2020). Nutrient Depletion is a widespread problem; continuous cropping without nutrient replenishment has resulted in widespread deficiencies of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium throughout sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. In addition, the erosion of topsoil from the action of water and wind exceeds natural formation by 10-100 times the global average loss of topsoil (P. et al., 2017). Secondary Salinization (due to poor Irrigation Management) has affected over 20% of the world's irrigated land, resulting in losses of up to 50% in crop yield (Qadir et al., 2014) [3] .
A key issue in how smallholder farmers make decisions and understand their agricultural support systems is the lack of accurate, timely, and spatially detailed soil data (Tittonell et al., 2010) [10] . Many countries do produce national soil surveys, but they tend to be outdated, have a relatively low level of detail (e.g., 1:1,000,000), and are based on classification systems which do not give farmers any indication as to how to manage their lands with respect to the macro-level nutrient or soil health parameters. As a result, the weak availability of reliable soil data reduces the effectiveness of fertilizer subsidy programs, extension programs, and climate change adaptation programs, leading to the use of broad and/or generic solutions which are financially and environmentally detrimental (Tittonell, 2014) [10] .
Digital Soil Mapping and Soil Informatics: Concepts and Advances
The SCORPAN model is a quantitative representation of Jenny's traditional factorial model of soil development and is considered the theoretical foundation of Digital Soil Mapping (DSM). The SCORPAN model proposal states that one should be able to estimate the value of a given soil property (S) at a location by using data from seven distinct types of influential environmental conditions. s = Other known soil properties present at the site. www.extensionjournal.com c = Climatic characteristics, e.g., temperature, rainfall. o = Organisms, including plants and people, both directly and indirectly, as a result of land-use activities. r = Relief/Topography, including elevation, slope, and curvature. p = Parent material (geologic). a = Age of the soil. n = Location/Location coordinates.
Digital Soil Mapping (DSM) uses the SCORPAN model to analyze how soils interact with the environment so that statisticians can predict the soil properties from limited sample sizes. As part of the soil information process, DSM is also an iterative process, meaning it combines many different types of data.
Study Area: Punjab, India
Punjab is located in northwestern India and is located in a region characterized by an abundance of fertile soil called Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP). The climate of the Punjab Region can be categorized as semi-arid/sub-humid with hot summers (April-June temperatures to 45 degrees Celsius / 113 degrees Fahrenheit) and cold winters (December-February temperatures between 0-4 degrees Celsius / 32-39 degrees Fahrenheit). The average total annual rainfall is generally between 400 to 700mm. Approximately 70% to 80% of the rainfall falls between July-September (monsoon season). The three primary soil orders found throughout the Punjab Region are Inceptisols, Alfisols and Aridisols with most of the parent materials being composed of alluvial deposits. The Punjab Region is comprised of three distinct Agro-Climate Zones; these are the Sub-Mountain Undulating Zone, the Central Plain Zone and the South-Western Arid Zone (Sidhu et al., 2015) [16] .
Dominant cropping systems (rice-wheat)
Punjab, an established centre of the Green Revolution in India, continues to be characterized by an extensive, irrigated rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS). Double cropping is practiced on more than 80% of the total area sown to crops in Punjab and has played a vital role in creating India's underground food security by making up a disproportionate amount of the national grain stocks. However, the RWCS relies heavily on external inputs through an extensive use of irrigation, chemical fertilizers, and pesticides. Consequently, the environmental impact of the RWCS is severe. (Chaudhary et al., 2017) [15] .
Key soil constraints: salinity, nutrient deficiencies, SOC depletion
Deficiencies and Balance in Nutrients: Many areas of the world are facing widespread deficiencies of essential nutrients due to decades of high input extraction and fertilizer use that lack potassium and micro-nutrients, while focusing on nitrogen and phosphorus. Soil tests show significant deficiencies of zinc, iron and potassium in many parts of the world, which inhibit crop yields and the nutritional quality of crops.
Depleted Soil Organic Matter (SOM)
Long-term tillage, crop residue removal, and minimizing organic matter inputs have caused significant declines in SOM levels with stocks often falling below critical levels (0.5% in heavily cropped regions). This has negative effects on soil structure, water holding capacity and microbial activity (Benbi & Brar, 2009) [13] .
Rising Salinity Levels and Alkaline Conditions
Increasingly excessive salt-depositing in less fit soils in the western arid region, based on poor drainage systems and a result of using non-potable / polluted surface groundwater. Consequently, substantial areas are becoming less productive as agriculture relies heavily on these resources.
Depletion of Groundwater
The extensive use of non-sustainable groundwater sources for ag production has resulted in extremely high levels of depletion; The consequence is twofold: the depletion of the resource, and the concentration of salts in the root zone due to the decreasing levels of the groundwater beneath the icefree portion of the RWCS.
Overview of Soil Health Card Scheme and its limitations
The SHC Scheme was first introduced in 2015 and aims to provide farmers with a soil nutrient report card including fertilizer dosage advice. Millions of cards have been provided to Punjab farmers. The scheme is praiseworthy in raising the awareness of farmers but has serious limitations: • The sampling is sparse and inconsistent (often one sample every 2-5 hectares), and therefore is unable to account for variability within the field • The analyses conducted consist largely of macronutrients (N, P, K), pH, and other variables such as SOC, bulk density, and micro-nutrients are omitted from the analyses • The recommendations that are provided are at the village or block level and not per field; and • The recommendations are only provided on a static, printed report and do not allow dynamic updates or the ability to integrate with other types of geospatial data
The lack of spatial precision and completeness in the information limits the usefulness for true precision nutrient management, creating significant demand for the highresolution, multi-attribute maps produced by DSM (Bhattacharyya et al., 2015) [14] .
Materials and Methods
The research area for this study encompasses a region located in Punjab, North West India, and consists of land that lies within the geographical boundary range 29°30′N -32°32′N latitude, 73°55′E -76°50′E longitude. This area represents the northern most tip of the Indo-Gangetic alluvial plain and occupies an approximate area of 50,362 square kilometres. The area is bordered by Pakistan to the west, Jammu and Kashmir to the north, Himachal Pradesh to the north eastern direction, and Haryana and Rajasthan to the south.The upper boundary of the study area is defined by the Satluj River, which has had a major impact on how sediments have been deposited within this region. The physiography of the study area is characterized by a continuous expanse of old and new (Quaternary), alluvium, that have been reworked as a result of uplighting (orogenic) www.extensionjournal.com processes, associated with river activity. The present landscape geomorphology has been created through a complex combination of local reworking of previously deposited sands in the form of sand bars and dunes, through aeolian processes, and subsequent flattening of sands, as well as continued transportation of sediment over long distances. The physiography of the study area has been divided into three physiographic units: the Satluj River floodplain, the older alluvial plain, and the stabilized sand dune area (southwest). Most of the parent material for soils in Punjab is alluvial and has come from either the Himalayan mountains through the Indus river system or Ganges river system (Bhattacharyya et al., 2015) [14] . These soils contain mostly calcareous and medium-fine textured material that; were created under hyperthermic temperatures and ustic(arid) moisture conditions. According to USDA Soil Taxonomy, approximately 60% of the soils in Punjab are classified as Inceptisol, 15% Entisol, 12% Alfisol and 13% Aridisol. Soil textures vary from sandy loam to silty clay loam. [16] .
Legacy Soil Data and Field Sampling
The legacy soil data used for mapping in Punjab consisted of a number of data sources including: the soil maps from the National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning (NBSS&LUP) at a 1:250,000 scale; reports from the soil surveys conducted by Punjab Agricultural University; and historical soil profile datasets containing a total of 1,247 geo-referenced soil profiles collected between 1985 and 2015. The Soil Health Card data base provided an additional 15,632 surface samples (0-15 cm depth) collected across all the districts of Punjab in the years 2015 to 2020.Field sampling was done in late October and early November of 2021-2022 during the post-harvest period using a conditioned Latin hypercube sampling design for selecting 300 sampling locations that provide a representation of the entire range of environmental covariates(Wadoux et al., 2020) [17] . Soil samples were collected using a soil core sampler from three depth intervals (0-15 cm, 15-30 cm, 30-60 cm) at each of the selected sampling locations, and 900 total soil samples were collected.Prior to laboratory analysis of soil samples were air-dried, powdered and passed through a 2.0-millimetre mesh.
Modelling Framework
Machine build a predictive model, we used several machine learning algorithms to create quantitative relationships between information about soils and the environment. The Random Forest (RF) algorithm will be our main algorithm for this study because it is proven to provide reliable results for modeling high-dimensional data, is resilient to overfitting, and demonstrates the ability to successfully identify non-linear functions without requiring a distribution of the data to begin with (Wadoux et al., 2020) [17] . The RF algorithm creates an ensemble of decision trees using bootstrap aggregation and random selection of features and makes final predictions on future data points by averaging the predictions made by each individual decision tree. For the final model, we tuned the model parameters using 10fold cross-validation to determine the best number of trees (ntree = 500) and the best number of variables that will be randomly selected to split each decision tree (mtry).
Variable importance was assessed by permuting each variable and calculating the relative increase in the mean squared error of the model when predicting on new data. This assessed the most influential environmental factors controlling each soil property.We also evaluated Support Vector Machines (SVM) with a radial basis function kernel and Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM) for comparison.
The SVM method maps input data into high dimensional feature spaces to find optimal separating hyperplanes, thus allowing for accurate identification of complex relationships between the soil and the environment (Lamichhane et al., 2019) [18] . While GBM can produce highly accurate predictive models through a sequential fitting of a new model to correct the errors of the previous model, it requires careful tuning in order to prevent overfitting. The algorithms employed were implemented in R version 4.2.1 using the caret and randomForest packages. [19] . The PTF of SOC and PAWC made it possible to develop functional soil maps and allow better irrigation scheduling and drought predictive analyses through using current data collected from SOC-BD relationships within the Punjab.
Pedotransfer functions
Three-dimensional soil property modelling
Traditional methods of mapping soil in two dimensions do not take into account the vertical variability important to the understanding of root zone processes, nutrient cycling and carbon storage. To correct for this deficiency, a 3D modelling approach based on the method was used. For each soil property, continuous depth functions using masspreserving equal-area splines were fitted to the measured depth intervals, which allows for the interpolation between the measured depth intervals while maintaining mass integrity. This interpolation method allows for the estimation of soil properties to any depth interval (e.g., 0-5cm, 5-15cm, 15-30cm, 30-60cm) over the entire study area. The spline parameters were also spatially modelled using the hybrid RK model and a separate model was calibrated for each standardized depth layer. The resulting 3D soil property maps represent both lateral and vertical variability in soil, which enables the assessment of carbon stocks by depth, management of nutrients in the root zone, and hydrologic modelling.(Minasny et al., 2017) degraded due to low cropping densities, it does have an increased risk of erosion on sloping land, resulting in soil loss and sedimentation downstream.
Results and Validation
Policy and Management Implications
The change from generalized or anecdotal evidence on soils to quantifying soil data in a spatially explicit methodology will create significant changes to the development and implementation of agricultural policy. In India, these agricultural development programs include the National Food Security Mission, the National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture, and many state-level Agricultural Development programs. Historically, these programs have used coarseresolution soil data, which has limited their ability to effectively target resources to those areas in need of intervention, and ultimately to create the most cost-effective interventions(Bhattacharyya et al., 2015) [14] . Processed DSM products that were developed as part of this study will allow for the implementation of policies in geospatially targeted areas. As India provides the second most significant agricultural subsidy after food through fertilizer subsidies (fertilizer support), DSM outputs can help reduce costs and increase effectiveness of subsidies. At present, all fertilizers are subsidized equally throughout India creating an imbalance of application of fertilizer and generating environmental issues associated with excess nitrogen used in agriculture. Therefore, developing a differential subsidy in a spatially distributed way based upon nutrient maps created from DSM would lead to increased subsidies for potash and micronutrients in areas that are deficient in these nutrients, while reducing the subsidies on nitrogen in the high-fertility regions at the same time, will lead to improved efficiency of nutrient utilization, less environmental pollution from excess nitrogen, and help to address the issues of ongoing and increasing multi-nutrient deficiency.(Gulati & Banerjee, 2015) [21] Watershed Development Programs, Soil Conservation Programs and Climate Adaptation Investments (all above) could potentially be prioritized according to degradation risk mapping methods. Degradation risk mapping was used to determine that Zone One (southwestern arid) is experiencing extreme competitive degradation on multiple levels.
Global Relevance and Transferability
The iSOIL study's integration methodology is a framework that can be applied across different agro-ecological contexts around the world, and it is not limited to a specific region. Its principles, including: integrating legacy data; targeted sampling; assembling multiple-source covariates; machine learning modeling; 3D prediction; and quantifying uncertainty, can be used universally across all regions; however, their specific implementation should account for local conditions. In Southeast Asia, intensive rice production systems experience similar issues to Punjab in terms of nutrient depletion, soil structural decline, and the development of salinity in delta regions. Therefore, the 3D mapping and depth-specific predictions associated with the iSOIL framework are important tools for understanding root zone processes within the puddled rice culture system, as well as for informing sustainable intensification of food production in the region.
In Latin America, the recent trend towards the expansion of agriculture into marginal land and the growth of precision agriculture are driving a need for more accurate and detailed soil information. The experience gained from Brazil with the development of carbon maps using DSM for agricultural planning validates the scalability of these technologies, as they are now being used to inform policies and decisions at both the national and farm levels. (Adhikari & Hartemink, 2016) [1] . The iSOIL framework (developed for temperate farming areas of North America and Europe) will modernize national soil information systems by harmonizing and integrating legacy datasets into iSOIL. The Global Soil Map project works towards the same outcome (consistent, 100 mresolution maps of soils around the world).(Arrouays et al., 2014) [5] .
Conclusion
The chapter provided a detailed case study on the use of digital soil mapping and soil informatics and how they can be applied to meet urgent soil information gaps in Punjab, Indiaa location that is at the centre of the inflection point of intensifying agricultural pressure and addressing sustainability challenges, which are common to most of the world's agriculture The iSOIL Punjab case study shows how digital soil mapping and soil informatics have developed from being only a research concept to now two well-developed operational tools that directly address soil-based information needs of the real world. The next major challenge is not only to refine the methodologies further, but also to scale these methodologies on a global basis, and to integrate them into institutional structures, so that the totality of the information generated can ultimately lead to improved soil management, increased agricultural productivity, and increased resilience for hundreds of millions of smallholder farmers that rely on healthy soils for their livelihoods and food security. Addressing this challenge requires continued commitment from researchers, policy-makers, developers, and farmers; all of whom must work together to develop the soil information systems necessary to support sustainable agriculture in the 21st century.
References
- Adhikari K, Hartemink AE. Linking soils to ecosystem services-A global review. Geoderma. 2016;262:101111.
- Lagacherie P, McBratney AB, Voltz M, editors. Digital soil mapping: an introductory perspective. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2020.
- Qadir M, Quillérou E, Nangia V, Murtaza G, Singh M, Thomas RJ, et al. Economics of salt-induced land degradation and restoration. Natural Resources Forum. 2014;38(4):282-295.
- Anonymous. Climate data of Punjab. Ludhiana: Punjab Agricultural University; 2018.
- Arrouays D, Grundy MG, Hartemink AE, et al. Global soil map: toward a fine-resolution global grid of soil properties. Advances in Agronomy. 2014;125:93-134.
- Bhatt R, Sharma M. Potassium scenario: a case study in the Kapurthala district of Punjab. Agricultural Research Journal. 2011;48:24-27.
- Bhatt R, Singh P. Location and characteristics of RRS, Kapurthala. Punjab Agricultural University; 2020. Unpublished manuscript.
- IPBES. The IPBES assessment report on land degradation and restoration. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services; 2018.
- IPCC. Climate change and land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. 2019.
- Tittonell P. Livelihood strategies, resilience and transformability in African agroecosystems. Agricultural Systems. 2014;126:3-14. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2013.10.010
- Singh G, Bhattacharyya R, Das TK, Sharma AR, Ghosh A, Das S. Soil health card scheme: a gateway for sustainable soil nutrient management. Current Science. 2020;118(2):185-191.
- Morton JF. The impact of climate change on smallholder and subsistence agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104(50):19680-19685.
- Benbi DK, Brar JS. A 25-year record of carbon sequestration and soil properties in intensive agriculture. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2009;29(2):257-265. doi:10.1051/agro:2008060
- Bhattacharyya R, Ghosh BN, Mishra PK, Mandal B, Rao CS, Sarkar D, et al. Soil degradation in India: challenges and potential solutions. Sustainability. 2015;7(4):3528-3570. doi:10.3390/su7043528
- Chaudhary VP, Singh KK, Pratibha G, Bhattacharyya R, Shamim M, Srinivas I, et al. Energy conservation and greenhouse gas mitigation under different production systems in rice cultivation. Energy. 2017;130:307-317. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.008
- Sidhu HS, Singh M, Singh Y, Blackwell J, Lohan SK, Humphreys E, et al. Development and evaluation of the Turbo Happy Seeder for sowing wheat into heavy rice residues in NW India. Field Crops Research. 2015;184:201-212. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.015
- Wadoux AMJC, Minasny B, McBratney AB. Machine learning for digital soil mapping: applications, challenges and suggested solutions. Earth-Science Reviews. 2020;210:103359.
- Lamichhane S, Kumar L, Wilson B. Digital soil mapping algorithms and covariates for soil organic carbon mapping and their applications: a review. Geoderma. 2019;352:395-413.
- Zhang Y, Schaap MG. Weighted recalibration of the Rosetta pedotransfer model with improved estimates of hydraulic parameter distributions and summary statistics (Rosetta3). Journal of Hydrology. 2017;547:39-53.
- Vågen TG, Winowiecki LA, Tondoh JE, Desta LT, Gumbricht T. Mapping of soil properties and land degradation risk in Africa using MODIS reflectance. Geoderma. 2016;263:216-225.
- Gulati A, Banerjee P. Rationalising fertiliser subsidy in India: key issues and policy options. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER); 2015. Working Paper No. 307.
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
