Scinovex

Research article · 2025 · Full text

International Journal of Agriculture and Nutrition

Performance of onion varieties under different organic manure combinations

Pippa ScullinBianca Lockyer

Volume 7(12) · Pages 149–152 · DOI: 10.33545/26646064.2025.v7.i12c.538 ↗

Research areasAgricultural Science and FertilizationPlant Growth and Agriculture TechniquesAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

"Feed the soil, not the plant" is an old gardener’s proverb, but how well does it hold for onion — a crop notorious for its shallow roots and heavy nutrient appetite? This research compared four onion varieties (Cream Gold, Red Baron, Creamgold Supreme, Early Pearl) grown under three organic manure regimes (farmyard manure at 20 t ha⁻¹, composted green waste at 15 t ha⁻¹, and vermicompost at 8 t ha⁻¹) on a sandy loam at Perth, Western Australia, during the 2023 winter season. Creamgold Supreme under vermicompost produced the highest marketable bulb yield (37.4 t ha⁻¹), 27.8% above the same variety under FYM. Vermicompost outperformed the other two manures for all four varieties, driven by its higher nitrogen availability and faster mineralisation in the warm Perth winter [1]. Bulb size distribution shifted toward the premium 60–80 mm grade under vermicompost (64.3% of harvest vs 48.1% under FYM). Variety × manure interaction was significant for yield (p = 0.006) and total soluble solids (p = 0.021). These data support vermicompost as the preferred organic input for high-value onion production in Mediterranean-climate regions of Western Australia.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Onions are particularly dependent on topsoil nutrients and moisture because their absorbing roots are shallow, typically located in the top 15–20 cm. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Onions are particularly dependent on topsoil nutrients and moisture because their absorbing roots are shallow, typically located in the top 15–20 cm.

      In the paper's own words

      “Onion is a shallow-rooted crop: most of its absorbing roots sit in the top 15–20 cm, which means it depends heavily on the nutrient concentration and moisture-holding capacity of the topsoil”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The organic onion market in Australia has seen annual growth of 11–14% since 2019, with consumers paying 30–50% premiums for chemical-free produce. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The organic onion market in Australia has seen annual growth of 11–14% since 2019, with consumers paying 30–50% premiums for chemical-free produce.

      In the paper's own words

      “Australia’s organic onion market has grown by 11–14% annually since 2019, driven by consumer demand for chemical-free produce and willingness to pay premiums of 30–50% over conventional”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The sandy loam soils of the Swan Coastal Plain near Perth are fast-draining and low in organic matter (0.6–1.0% C), making them highly responsive to organic amendments. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The sandy loam soils of the Swan Coastal Plain near Perth are fast-draining and low in organic matter (0.6–1.0% C), making them highly responsive to organic amendments.

      In the paper's own words

      “These soils are inherently low in organic matter (0.6–1.0% C) and drain fast, making them responsive to organic amendments that boost both nutrient supply and water retention.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to determine how different organic manure inputs affect various onion varieties with different growth habits and maturity levels under Western Australian conditions. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to determine how different organic manure inputs affect various onion varieties with different growth habits and maturity levels under Western Australian conditions.

      In the paper's own words

      “How these differences play out across onion varieties of contrasting growth habit and maturity remains poorly documented for WA conditions. This research tested that question with four commercial varieties and three organic inputs.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The experiment used a factorial randomised block design with 36 plots (4 varieties by 3 manures by 3 replications), each measuring 4 m by 3 m. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The experiment used a factorial randomised block design with 36 plots (4 varieties by 3 manures by 3 replications), each measuring 4 m by 3 m.

      In the paper's own words

      “A factorial randomised block design was used: 4 varieties × 3 manures × 3 replications (36 plots). Plot size was 4 m × 3 m.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The study tested four varieties (Cream Gold, Red Baron, Creamgold Supreme, and Early Pearl) using three manure treatments: farmyard manure (20 t ha⁻¹), composted green waste (15 t ha⁻¹), and vermicompost (8 t ha⁻¹). View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study tested four varieties (Cream Gold, Red Baron, Creamgold Supreme, and Early Pearl) using three manure treatments: farmyard manure (20 t ha⁻¹), composted green waste (15 t ha⁻¹), and vermicompost (8 t ha⁻¹).

      In the paper's own words

      “four onion varieties (Cream Gold, Red Baron, Creamgold Supreme, Early Pearl) grown under three organic manure regimes (farmyard manure at 20 t ha⁻¹, composted green waste at 15 t ha⁻¹, and vermicompost at 8 t ha⁻¹)”

      Page 1

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Harvested bulbs were categorized into three size grades: small (<40 mm), medium (40–60 mm), and premium (60–80 mm). View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Harvested bulbs were categorized into three size grades: small (<40 mm), medium (40–60 mm), and premium (60–80 mm).

      In the paper's own words

      “Bulbs were graded into three classes: small (<40 mm), medium (40–60 mm), and premium (60–80 mm).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Nutrient Input-Output Assessment

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • The highest marketable bulb yield was 37.4 t ha⁻¹, achieved by the Creamgold Supreme variety treated with vermicompost, which was 27.8% higher than the same variety treated with farmyard manure (FYM). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The highest marketable bulb yield was 37.4 t ha⁻¹, achieved by the Creamgold Supreme variety treated with vermicompost, which was 27.8% higher than the same variety treated with farmyard manure (FYM).

      In the paper's own words

      “Creamgold Supreme under vermicompost produced the highest marketable bulb yield (37.4 t ha⁻¹), 27.8% above the same variety under FYM.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Comprehensive Interpretation

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Vermicompost increased the proportion of premium-grade bulbs (60–80 mm) to 64.3% of the harvest, compared to 48.1% under FYM. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Vermicompost increased the proportion of premium-grade bulbs (60–80 mm) to 64.3% of the harvest, compared to 48.1% under FYM.

      In the paper's own words

      “Bulb size distribution shifted toward the premium 60–80 mm grade under vermicompost (64.3% of harvest vs 48.1% under FYM).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Comprehensive Interpretation

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • There was a statistically significant interaction between onion variety and manure type for both bulb yield (p = 0.006) and total soluble solids (p = 0.021). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      There was a statistically significant interaction between onion variety and manure type for both bulb yield (p = 0.006) and total soluble solids (p = 0.021).

      In the paper's own words

      “Variety × manure interaction was significant for yield (p = 0.006) and total soluble solids (p = 0.021).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Vermicompost showed the closest alignment between nutrient supply and crop uptake, with the smallest nitrogen surplus (Δ32 kg N ha⁻¹) compared to FYM (Δ68 kg N ha⁻¹). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Vermicompost showed the closest alignment between nutrient supply and crop uptake, with the smallest nitrogen surplus (Δ32 kg N ha⁻¹) compared to FYM (Δ68 kg N ha⁻¹).

      In the paper's own words

      “the surplus was smallest under vermicompost (Δ32 kg N ha⁻¹) and largest under FYM (Δ68 kg N ha⁻¹)”

      Page 2

      Found in: Nutrient Input-Output Assessment

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Total soluble solids (TSS) ranged from 10.4 to 12.8 °Brix, with the Red Baron variety consistently recording the highest values across all manure treatments. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Total soluble solids (TSS) ranged from 10.4 to 12.8 °Brix, with the Red Baron variety consistently recording the highest values across all manure treatments.

      In the paper's own words

      “TSS ranged from 10.4 to 12.8 °Brix, with Red Baron recording the highest values regardless of manure”

      Page 3

      Found in: Comprehensive Interpretation

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Although vermicompost costs more per hectare (AU$2,240) than FYM (AU$1,800), the AU$440 difference is offset by an additional 6.5 t ha⁻¹ of marketable yield. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Although vermicompost costs more per hectare (AU$2,240) than FYM (AU$1,800), the AU$440 difference is offset by an additional 6.5 t ha⁻¹ of marketable yield.

      In the paper's own words

      “the total per-hectare outlay to AU$2,240 for vermicompost vs AU$1,800 for FYM — a difference of AU$440 that is easily covered by the extra 6.5 t ha⁻¹ of marketable yield.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors recommend that Western Australian growers use vermicompost with either the Creamgold Supreme or Red Baron varieties to maximize yield and quality for the organic market. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors recommend that Western Australian growers use vermicompost with either the Creamgold Supreme or Red Baron varieties to maximize yield and quality for the organic market.

      In the paper's own words

      “Growers aiming for the organic premium market in Western Australia should pair Creamgold Supreme or Red Baron with vermicompost to maximise both tonnage and bulb quality.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The authors suggest that future research should investigate split applications of vermicompost to potentially improve the timing of nutrient availability relative to the onion's uptake. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors suggest that future research should investigate split applications of vermicompost to potentially improve the timing of nutrient availability relative to the onion's uptake.

      In the paper's own words

      “Future research should test split vermicompost applications to see whether staggering the input further improves nutrient-use synchrony with onion’s uptake pattern.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗

Visual summary

2 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (onion plants in soil). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Nutrient Synchrony Concept
AI-generated conceptual illustration (onion plants in soil). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (onion plants in soil). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Nutrient Synchrony Concept

AI-generated conceptual illustration (onion plants in soil). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
FYM (20 t ha⁻¹) and Compost (15 t ha⁻¹) and more: Cream Gold vs Red Baron vs Creamgold Supreme vs Early Pearl
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

FYM (20 t ha⁻¹) and Compost (15 t ha⁻¹) and more: Cream Gold vs Red Baron vs Creamgold Supreme vs Early Pearl

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Marketable bulb yield (t ha⁻¹) of four onion varieties under three organic manure treatmentsTable 1Page 2Distribution of bulb yield (t ha⁻¹) for four onion varieties under three organic manure treatments. Boxes show interquartile range;Figure 1Page 2Decision framework for selecting organic manure type in onion production, considering nutrient content, cost, soil improvement,Figure 2Page 3
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

"You reap what you sow" applies to onion, but you might add "and what you feed the soil beforehand." Onion is a shallow-rooted crop: most of its absorbing roots sit in the top 15-20 cm, which means it depends heavily on the nutrient concentration and moisture-holding capacity of the topsoil [2] . That makes the choice of organic amendment especially consequential more so than for deeper-rooted vegetables like tomato or capsicum. Australia's organic onion market has grown by 11-14% annually since 2019, driven by consumer demand for chemical-free produce and willingness to pay premiums of 30-50% over conventional [3] . Western Australia contributes about 12% of the national onion crop, with most production concentrated on the sandy loam soils of the Swan Coastal Plain near Perth [4] . These soils are inherently low in organic matter (0.6-1.0% C) and drain fast, making them responsive to organic amendments that boost both nutrient supply and water retention. Not all organic manures deliver the same result, however. FYM provides bulk organic matter but releases nitrogen slowly; composted green waste offers good structure but variable nutrient content; vermicompost, though more expensive per tonne, typically mineralises faster and carries a more balanced NPK ratio [5] . How these differences play out across onion varieties of contrasting growth habit and maturity remains poorly documented for WA conditions. This research tested that question with four commercial varieties and three organic inputs.

Seasonal Variation in Growing Conditions

Perth's 2023 winter season (May-October) was milder than average, with mean minimum temperatures of 9.8 °C (long-term mean 8.6 °C) and total rainfall of 612 mm (long-term 724 mm). The drier-than-normal conditions required two supplemental irrigations in August and September, each delivering 25 mm via overhead sprinklers. No frost events occurred during the trial, which favoured uninterrupted bulb expansion. The warm winter likely accelerated manure mineralisation, an effect most pronounced for vermicompost, which showed a sharp rise in soil mineral N (0-15 cm) between 4 and 8 weeks after transplanting [6] . were measured with a digital refractometer on juice from five bulbs per plot. Pungency was estimated by pyruvic acid content [7] . Data were analysed by two-way ANOVA in R (v4.3.1), with Tukey's HSD at p = 0.05.

Nutrient Input-Output Assessment

The total N, P, and K supplied by each manure (based on dry-weight nutrient analysis) were compared against the N, P, and K removed in harvested bulbs (determined by Kjeldahl and acid-digest ICP-OES). Nutrient balance (input minus output) was positive for all three manures, but the surplus was smallest under vermicompost (Δ32 kg N ha⁻¹) and largest under FYM (Δ68 kg N ha⁻¹), reflecting the closer alignment of vermicompost's mineralisation pattern with onion's uptake curve.

Results

Results

Comprehensive Interpretation

Vermicompost at just 8 t ha⁻¹ outperformed FYM at 20 t ha⁻¹ and compost at 15 t ha⁻¹ for all four varieties, indicating that nutrient availability per tonne matters more than bulk volume for shallow-rooted onion on sandy soils. Creamgold Supreme was the top-yielding variety across all manures, driven by a higher proportion of premium-grade bulbs (68.7% under vermicompost vs 51.3% under FYM). TSS ranged from 10.4 to 12.8 °Brix, with Red Baron recording the highest values regardless of manure, consistent with its known pungency profile [7] .

Discussion

The 25-28% yield advantage of vermicompost over FYM echoes results from Indian onion trials by Reddy and Reddi [8] , who attributed the benefit to vermicompost's enriched microbial community and faster N mineralisation. On Perth's sandy Arenosol, where leaching is a constant risk, the slower N release from FYM may actually work against the crop: much of the nitrogen mineralises after the onion's peak uptake window (6-10 weeks post-transplanting) and leaches below the shallow root zone [9] . The variety × manure interaction reflects differing root architectures and growth durations. Creamgold Supreme, a mid-season variety with vigorous lateral rooting, captured vermicompost's early N pulse more effectively than Early

Pearl, an early-maturing type whose root system is sparser. Red Baron, a red-skinned variety, showed less absolute yield response but maintained higher TSS, making it the preferred choice for niche organic markets that value flavour over tonnage [3] . The cost differential must be acknowledged: vermicompost at AU$280 t⁻¹ is roughly three times the price of FYM at AU$90 t⁻¹. But the lower application rate (8 vs 20 t ha⁻¹)

brings the total per-hectare outlay to AU$2,240 for vermicompost vs AU$1,800 for FYMa difference of AU$440 that is easily covered by the extra 6.5 t ha⁻¹ of marketable yield.

Conclusion

Creamgold Supreme grown with vermicompost at 8 t ha⁻¹ delivered the highest onion bulb yield (37.4 t ha⁻¹) and the best premium-grade bulb proportion on sandy loam at Perth. Vermicompost outperformed both FYM and composted green waste for all four varieties, confirming that rapid nutrient availability trumps bulk organic matter for shallowrooted onion on free-draining soils. The modest cost premium of vermicompost over FYM is offset several times by the yield gain. Growers aiming for the organic premium market in Western Australia should pair Creamgold Supreme or Red Baron with vermicompost to maximise both tonnage and bulb quality. Future research should test split vermicompost applications to see whether staggering the input further improves nutrient-use synchrony with onion's uptake pattern.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. Marketable bulb yield (t ha⁻¹) of four onion varieties under three organic manure treatments
VarietyFYM (20 t ha⁻¹)Compost (15 t ha⁻¹)Vermicompost (8 t ha⁻¹)
Cream Gold24.327.630.8
Red Baron28.731.434.6
Creamgold Supreme29.333.237.4
Early Pearl22.825.728.4
Mean26.329.532.8

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Marketable bulb yield (t ha⁻¹) of four onion varieties under three organic manure treatments↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Marketable bulb yield (t ha⁻¹) of four onion varieties under three organic manure treatments

Marketable bulb yield (t ha⁻¹) of four onion varieties under three organic manure treatments

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 1. Distribution of bulb yield (t ha⁻¹) for four onion varieties under three organic manure treatments. Boxes show interquartile range;
Distribution of bulb yield (t ha⁻¹) for four onion varieties under three organic manure treatments. Boxes show interquartile range;↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Distribution of bulb yield (t ha⁻¹) for four onion varieties under three organic manure treatments. Boxes show interquartile range;

Distribution of bulb yield (t ha⁻¹) for four onion varieties under three organic manure treatments. Boxes show interquartile range;

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 2. Decision framework for selecting organic manure type in onion production, considering nutrient content, cost, soil improvement,
Decision framework for selecting organic manure type in onion production, considering nutrient content, cost, soil improvement,↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Decision framework for selecting organic manure type in onion production, considering nutrient content, cost, soil improvement,

Decision framework for selecting organic manure type in onion production, considering nutrient content, cost, soil improvement,

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗

References

17 in the original paper
  1. Atiyeh RM, Subler S, Edwards CA, Bachman G, Metzger JD, Shuster W. Effects of vermicomposts and composts on plant growth in horticultural container media and soil. Pedobiologia. 2000;44(5):579-590.
  2. Brewster JL. Onions and other vegetable Alliums. 2nd ed. Wallingford: CAB International; 2008. p. 1-432.
  3. Australian Organic Ltd. Australian organic market report 2023. Brisbane: AOL; 2023. p. 1-64.
  4. DPIRD. Western Australian vegetable industry snapshot 2022. Perth: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development; 2023. p. 1-36.
  5. Lazcano C, Dominguez J. The use of vermicompost in sustainable agriculture: impact on plant growth and soil fertility. Soil Nutrients. 2011;10:1-23.
  6. Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Bierman P, Welch C, Metzger JD. Influences of vermicomposts on field strawberries: effects on growth and yields. Bioresource Technology. 2004;93(2):145-153.
  7. Schwimmer S, Weston WJ. Enzymatic development of pyruvic acid in onion as a measure of pungency. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1961;9(4):301-304.
  8. Reddy KC, Reddi KM. Effect of different levels of vermicompost and nitrogen on growth and yield of onion. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2010;44(3):215-219.
  9. Parfitt RL, Mackay AD, Ross DJ, Budding PJ. Effects of soil fertility on leaching losses of N, P and C in hill country. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 2009;52(1):69-80.
  10. Luo J, Wyatt J, van der Weerden TJ, Thomas SM, de Klein CAM, Li Y, Rollo M, Lindsey S, Ledgard SF, Li J, Ding W, Qin S, Zhang N, Bolan N, Kirkham MB, Bai Z, Ma L, Zhang X, Wang H, Liu H, Rys G. Potential hotspot areas of nitrous oxide emissions from grazed pastoral dairy farm systems. Advances in Agronomy. 2017;145:205-268.
  11. Singh DK, Jain SK. Performance of onion varieties under organic farming at Tarai region of Uttarakhand. Progressive Agriculture. 2013;13(1):113-117.
  12. Sharma RP, Datt N, Sharma PK. Combined application of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and farmyard manure in onion under high hills, dry temperate conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2003;73(4):225-227.
  13. Worthington V. Nutritional quality of organic versus conventional fruits, vegetables, and grains. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2001;7(2):161-173.
  14. Warman PR, AngLopez MJ. Vermicompost derived from different feedstocks as a plant growth medium. Bioresource Technology. 2010;101(12):4479-4483.
  15. Lee J. Effect of application methods of organic fertilizer on growth, soil chemical properties and microbial densities in organic bulb onion production. Scientia Horticulturae. 2010;124(3):299-305.
  16. Boyhan GE, Torrance RL, Hill CR. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium rates and fertilizer sources on yield and leaf nutrient status of short-day onions. HortScience. 2007;42(3):653-660.
  17. Fink M, Scharpf HC. N-expert -a decision support system for vegetable fertilisation. Acta Horticulturae. 2000;533:67-74.