Scinovex

Research article · 2025 · Full text

International Journal of Biology Sciences

Bacteriophage therapy as an alternative strategy against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

Katlego Tshabang

Volume 7(8) · Pages 295–298 · DOI: 10.33545/26649926.2025.v7.i8d.660 ↗

Research areasBacteriophages and microbial interactionsAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaAntimicrobial agents and applications

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

A hospital in Pietermaritzburg reported a cluster of ventilator-associated pneumonia cases caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-Kp) that failed standard antibiotic salvage therapy—prompting the search for non-antibiotic alternatives. This research isolated and characterized five lytic bacteriophages (φKp-01 through φKp-05) from municipal wastewater and assessed their efficacy against 30 clinical CR-Kp isolates in vitro. Work was conducted at the uMgeni University of Biological Sciences between August 2022 and December 2023. Phage φKp-03 demonstrated the broadest host range (infecting 26 of 30 isolates, 86.7%) and the highest efficiency of plating (EOP = 0.94 on the reference resistant strain). Time-kill assays showed a 4.3-log reduction in viable CR-Kp counts within 4 hours at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. φKp-03 remained stable across pH 4-10 and at temperatures up to 55 °C. Biofilm penetration assays revealed a 71.8% reduction in established biofilm biomass at 24 hours. Combining φKp-03 with sub-inhibitory meropenem (2 µg/mL) produced a synergistic 5.7-log reduction, significantly exceeding phage alone (p

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-Kp) is a critical-priority pathogen with dwindling treatment options due to increasing resistance to drugs like colistin. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-Kp) is a critical-priority pathogen with dwindling treatment options due to increasing resistance to drugs like colistin.

      In the paper's own words

      “Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae is now classified as a critical-priority pathogen by the World Health Organization, and treatment options shrink further as colistin resistance spreads through mobile genetic elements [2].”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Bacteriophage therapy is a potential alternative because it targets specific bacteria without harming healthy flora, amplifies itself at the infection site, and can potentially restore antibiotic effectiveness. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Bacteriophage therapy is a potential alternative because it targets specific bacteria without harming healthy flora, amplifies itself at the infection site, and can potentially restore antibiotic effectiveness.

      In the paper's own words

      “Phage therapy offers several advantages: narrow host range limits collateral damage to commensal flora, self-amplification at the infection site reduces dosing frequency, and bacterial resistance to phages often involves surface receptor modifications that restore antibiotic susceptibility [3].”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to isolate lytic phages from wastewater and evaluate their host range, stability, genomics, biofilm penetration, and synergy with antibiotics against clinical CR-Kp isolates. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to isolate lytic phages from wastewater and evaluate their host range, stability, genomics, biofilm penetration, and synergy with antibiotics against clinical CR-Kp isolates.

      In the paper's own words

      “This research isolated lytic phages from Pietermaritzburg municipal wastewater, characterized their host range, stability, genomics, and biofilm-penetration capacity, and tested phage-antibiotic synergy against clinical CR-Kp isolates recovered from the uMgeni University of Biological Sciences referral network.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The research was carried out at the uMgeni University of Biological Sciences from August 2022 to December 2023. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The research was carried out at the uMgeni University of Biological Sciences from August 2022 to December 2023.

      In the paper's own words

      “Work was conducted at the uMgeni University of Biological Sciences between August 2022 and December 2023.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Material

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Phage-antibiotic synergy (PAS) was tested by combining the lead phage φKp-03 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 with a sub-inhibitory concentration of meropenem (2 µg/mL). View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Phage-antibiotic synergy (PAS) was tested by combining the lead phage φKp-03 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 with a sub-inhibitory concentration of meropenem (2 µg/mL).

      In the paper's own words

      “PAS experiments combined φKp-03 (MOI 10) with sub-MIC meropenem (2 µg/mL).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The genome of the lead phage was sequenced using Illumina MiSeq, assembled with SPAdes v3.15, and annotated using Pharokka. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The genome of the lead phage was sequenced using Illumina MiSeq, assembled with SPAdes v3.15, and annotated using Pharokka.

      In the paper's own words

      “Whole-genome sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq (2 × 300 bp), assembled with SPAdes v3.15, and annotated with Pharokka [9].”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Among five isolated phages, φKp-03 was the most effective, infecting 86.7% (26/30) of isolates with an efficiency of plating (EOP) of 0.94, a 22-minute latent period, and a burst size of 187 PFU/cell. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Among five isolated phages, φKp-03 was the most effective, infecting 86.7% (26/30) of isolates with an efficiency of plating (EOP) of 0.94, a 22-minute latent period, and a burst size of 187 PFU/cell.

      In the paper's own words

      “φKp-03 infected the most isolates (26/30, 86.7%) with the highest EOP (0.94), shortest latent period (22 min), and largest burst size (187 PFU/cell) (Table 1).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Theoretical Background

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • At an MOI of 10, φKp-03 achieved a 4.3-log reduction in viable CR-Kp bacteria within 4 hours. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      At an MOI of 10, φKp-03 achieved a 4.3-log reduction in viable CR-Kp bacteria within 4 hours.

      In the paper's own words

      “Time-kill assays showed a 4.3-log reduction in viable CR-Kp counts within 4 hours at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The lead phage φKp-03 demonstrated stability across a pH range of 4 to 10 and at temperatures reaching 55 °C. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The lead phage φKp-03 demonstrated stability across a pH range of 4 to 10 and at temperatures reaching 55 °C.

      In the paper's own words

      “φKp-03 remained stable across pH 4-10 and at temperatures up to 55 °C.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Treatment with φKp-03 at an MOI of 100 for 24 hours reduced established biofilm biomass by 71.8%. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Treatment with φKp-03 at an MOI of 100 for 24 hours reduced established biofilm biomass by 71.8%.

      In the paper's own words

      “assays showed a 71.8% reduction in established biofilm biomass after 24-hour phage treatment at MOI 100.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Combining φKp-03 with sub-MIC meropenem resulted in a 5.7-log reduction in viable counts, which was 1.4 logs greater than the reduction achieved by the phage alone. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Combining φKp-03 with sub-MIC meropenem resulted in a 5.7-log reduction in viable counts, which was 1.4 logs greater than the reduction achieved by the phage alone.

      In the paper's own words

      “φKp-03 + Meropenem 5.7 ± 0.4 < 0.001”

      Page 2

      “The combination of φKp-03 with sub-MIC meropenem produced a 5.7-log reduction—1.4 logs greater than phage alone—confirming synergy (Table 2).”

      Page 3

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • φKp-03 was identified as a Siphoviridae phage with a 48.6-kb genome that contains no known genes for virulence or antibiotic resistance. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      φKp-03 was identified as a Siphoviridae phage with a 48.6-kb genome that contains no known genes for virulence or antibiotic resistance.

      In the paper's own words

      “Whole-genome sequencing classified φKp-03 as a Siphoviridae phage with a 48.6-kb genome free of known virulence or antibiotic-resistance genes.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that φKp-03 is a promising candidate for treating CR-Kp due to its broad host range, ability to penetrate biofilms, and synergy with meropenem. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that φKp-03 is a promising candidate for treating CR-Kp due to its broad host range, ability to penetrate biofilms, and synergy with meropenem.

      In the paper's own words

      “This research identified φKp-03 as a lytic bacteriophage with broad host range, strong biofilm-penetration capacity, and synergistic activity with meropenem against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The study's results are limited to in vitro conditions and do not account for in vivo factors such as pharmacokinetics, immune clearance, or the development of phage resistance. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The study's results are limited to in vitro conditions and do not account for in vivo factors such as pharmacokinetics, immune clearance, or the development of phage resistance.

      In the paper's own words

      “These findings are limited to in vitro conditions and cannot predict in vivo pharmacokinetics, immune clearance of phage particles, or the emergence of phage-resistant bacterial subpopulations during treatment.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Limitations

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Because φKp-03 did not lyse four of the isolates, the authors suggest that phage cocktails may be necessary to overcome specific bacterial resistance mechanisms. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      Because φKp-03 did not lyse four of the isolates, the authors suggest that phage cocktails may be necessary to overcome specific bacterial resistance mechanisms.

      In the paper's own words

      “The four CR-Kp isolates not lysed by φKp-03 may carry receptor mutations or restriction-modification systems that would require phage cocktail strategies to overcome [10].”

      Page 3

      Found in: Limitations

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗

Visual summary

2 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria and bacteriophages). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Phage-Antibiotic Synergy Mechanism
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria and bacteriophages). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria and bacteriophages). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Phage-Antibiotic Synergy Mechanism

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria and bacteriophages). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Log₁₀ Reduction: Untreated control vs Meropenem 2 µg/mL alone vs φKp-03 MOI 10 alone vs φKp-03 + Meropenem
Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Log₁₀ Reduction: Untreated control vs Meropenem 2 µg/mL alone vs φKp-03 MOI 10 alone vs φKp-03 + Meropenem

Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Host range and lytic performance of five isolated phagesTable 1Page 2Phage-antibiotic synergy: log reduction in CR-Kp viable counts at 4 hoursTable 2Page 2Efficiency of plating of five phages against the carbapenem-resistant reference strain compared with the sensitive propagation host.Figure 1Page 2Radar chart comparing six performance parameters for φKp-03 (lead candidate) and φKp-04. φKp-03 outperformed on lytic activity,Figure 2Page 3
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

In 2017 a woman in Nevada died from a Klebsiella pneumoniae infection resistant to all 26 antibiotics available in the United States-a case that became a stark example of the postantibiotic era's arrival [1] . Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae is now classified as a critical-priority pathogen by the World Health Organization, and treatment options shrink further as colistin resistance spreads through mobile genetic elements [2] . Against this backdrop, bacteriophages-viruses that specifically infect and lyse bacteria-have reemerged as a therapeutic option after decades of neglect in Western medicine. Phage therapy offers several advantages: narrow host range limits collateral damage to commensal flora, self-amplification at the infection site reduces dosing frequency, and bacterial resistance to phages often involves surface receptor modifications that restore antibiotic susceptibility [3] . Clinical case reports and compassionate-use programmes have documented successful phage treatment of multidrug-resistant infections in lungs, bones, and prosthetic joints [4] . Yet systematic characterization of phage candidates against local CR-Kp strains remains limited, particularly in sub-Saharan African clinical settings. This research isolated lytic phages from Pietermaritzburg municipal wastewater, characterized their host range, stability, genomics, and biofilm-penetration capacity, and tested phage-antibiotic synergy against clinical CR-Kp isolates recovered from the uMgeni University of Biological Sciences referral network.

Theoretical Background

Lytic phages follow a strictly virulent replication cycle: they adsorb to specific bacterial surface receptors (typically lipopolysaccharide or outer membrane proteins in Gramnegatives), inject genomic DNA, hijack the host's transcriptional and translational machinery, assemble progeny virions, and lyse the host cell to release 50-200 new particles per burst [5] . This cycle takes 20-40 minutes for most Klebsiella phages under optimal conditions. Phage-antibiotic synergy (PAS) occurs when sub-inhibitory antibiotic concentrations stress bacteria-causing filamentation or membrane destabilization-thereby increasing phage adsorption or accelerating lysis [6] . PAS has been demonstrated for βlactams, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides paired with various phages, though the mechanism appears compoundspecific.

Material and Methods

Material and Methods

Material

Thirty clinical CR-Kp isolates (carbapenem MIC ≥ 16 µg/mL by broth microdilution) were obtained from the culture collection at the Department of Medical Microbiology, uMgeni University of Biological Sciences. Isolates had been recovered from blood (n = 12), respiratory specimens (n = 10), and urine (n = 8) between 2020 and 2022. Wastewater samples (10 L) for phage isolation were collected from the Msunduzi River treatment works, Pietermaritzburg, in August 2022 [7] . K. pneumoniae ATCC 13883 served as the propagation host.

Methods

Phage isolation followed the double-agar overlay method: filtered wastewater supernatant (0.22-µm PES membrane) was mixed with log-phase host bacteria in soft agar and plated on LB agar. Individual plaques were picked, triplepurified, and amplified to high-titer stocks (> 10⁹ PFU/mL). Host range was determined by spot testing on all 30 CR-Kp isolates; efficiency of plating was calculated for each phage-host pair. Time-kill kinetics were measured at MOIs of 0.1, 1, and 10, sampling at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours. pH stability (3-12) and thermal stability (4-70 °C, 1-hour incubation) were assessed by titer enumeration [8] . Biofilm assays used 48-hour pre-formed biofilms in 96-well plates; phage was added at MOI 100 and biomass measured by crystal violet staining after 24 hours. PAS experiments combined φKp-03 (MOI 10) with sub-MIC meropenem (2 µg/mL). Whole-genome sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq (2 × 300 bp), assembled with SPAdes v3.15, and annotated with Pharokka [9] . Statistical comparisons used one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc tests (α = 0.05). The combination of φKp-03 with sub-MIC meropenem produced a 5.7-log reduction-1.4 logs greater than phage alone-confirming synergy (Table 2). Biofilm penetration assays showed a 71.8% reduction in established biofilm biomass after 24-hour phage treatment at MOI 100.

Table 2. Phage-antibiotic synergy: log reduction in CR-Kp viable counts at 4 hours
TreatmentLog₁₀ Reductionp vs. Control
Untreated control0.0—
Meropenem 2 µg/mL alone0.4 ± 0.2> 0.05
φKp-03 MOI 10 alone4.3 ± 0.3< 0.001
φKp-03 + Meropenem5.7 ± 0.4< 0.001
φKp-03 + Meropenem vs. phage alone—< 0.001

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Phage-antibiotic synergy: log reduction in CR-Kp viable counts at 4 hours↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Phage-antibiotic synergy: log reduction in CR-Kp viable counts at 4 hours

Phage-antibiotic synergy: log reduction in CR-Kp viable counts at 4 hours

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗

Results

Results

Limitations

These findings are limited to in vitro conditions and cannot predict in vivo pharmacokinetics, immune clearance of phage particles, or the emergence of phage-resistant bacterial subpopulations during treatment. The four CR-Kp isolates not lysed by φKp-03 may carry receptor mutations or restriction-modification systems that would require phage cocktail strategies to overcome [10] . Animal infection models are the logical next step before any clinical application.

Discussion

φKp-03's broad host range (86.7%) compares favorably with phage cocktails described in the literature, many of which use three to five phages to achieve similar coverage [11] . Its Siphoviridae classification and genome analysis-no integrases, no toxin genes, no antibiotic-resistance determinants-support its safety profile for potential therapeutic use, consistent with international phage-therapy guidelines that mandate absence of lysogeny and virulence markers [12] . The synergistic effect with meropenem is likely explained by the PAS mechanism: sub-inhibitory β-lactam exposure causes cell filamentation in Klebsiella, increasing the surface area available for phage adsorption and effectively amplifying the lytic cycle [6] . The practical implication is that phage therapy need not fully replace antibiotics but may restore efficacy of otherwise ineffective drugs when used in combination.

Conclusion

This research identified φKp-03 as a lytic bacteriophage with broad host range, strong biofilm-penetration capacity, and synergistic activity with meropenem against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae. The phage's genome is free of virulence or resistance genes, supporting its candidacy for further preclinical evaluation. These results add to the evidence base for phage therapy as a practical complement to conventional antibiotics in managing multidrug-resistant infections.

Acknowledgement

Acknowledgements Funding SourcesThis research was supported by departmental operating funds at the uMgeni University of Biological Sciences. Institutional SupportThe author thanks the Department of Medical Microbiology for culture collections and sequencing platform access. Contributions Not Qualifying for AuthorshipThe author acknowledges Dr. Sipho Ndlovu for assistance with wastewater sampling logistics and Mr. Thabo Mokoena for bioinformatics pipeline support.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. Host range and lytic performance of five isolated phages
PhageHosts Lysed% RangeEOP (ref)Burst SizeLatent (min)
φKp-0119/3063.30.8712428
φKp-0214/3046.70.629832
φKp-0326/3086.70.9418722
φKp-0411/3036.70.417635
φKp-0521/3070.00.7814226

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Host range and lytic performance of five isolated phages↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Host range and lytic performance of five isolated phages

Host range and lytic performance of five isolated phages

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 1. Efficiency of plating of five phages against the carbapenem-resistant reference strain compared with the sensitive propagation host.
Efficiency of plating of five phages against the carbapenem-resistant reference strain compared with the sensitive propagation host.↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Efficiency of plating of five phages against the carbapenem-resistant reference strain compared with the sensitive propagation host.

Efficiency of plating of five phages against the carbapenem-resistant reference strain compared with the sensitive propagation host.

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 2. Radar chart comparing six performance parameters for φKp-03 (lead candidate) and φKp-04. φKp-03 outperformed on lytic activity,
Radar chart comparing six performance parameters for φKp-03 (lead candidate) and φKp-04. φKp-03 outperformed on lytic activity,↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Radar chart comparing six performance parameters for φKp-03 (lead candidate) and φKp-04. φKp-03 outperformed on lytic activity,

Radar chart comparing six performance parameters for φKp-03 (lead candidate) and φKp-04. φKp-03 outperformed on lytic activity,

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗

References

17 in the original paper
  1. Chen L, Todd R, Kiehlbauch J, et al. Notes from the field: pan-resistant New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamaseInternational Journal of Biology Sciences https://www.biologyjournal.net producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(1):33.
  2. Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(3):318-327.
  3. Abedon ST, Kuhl SJ, Blasdel BG, Kutter EM. Phage treatment of human infections. Bacteriophage. 2011;1(2):66-85.
  4. Schooley RT, Biswas B, Gill JJ, et al. Development and use of personalized bacteriophage-based therapeutic cocktails to treat a patient with a disseminated resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61(10):e00954-17.
  5. Comeau AM, Tétart F, Trojet SN, et al. Phageantibiotic synergy (PAS): β-lactam and quinolone antibiotics stimulate virulent phage growth. PLoS One. 2007;2(8):e799.
  6. Kropinski AM, Mazzocco A, Waddell TE, et al. Enumeration of bacteriophages by double agar overlay plaque assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;501:69-76.
  7. Adams MH. Bacteriophages. Interscience Publishers; 1959.
  8. Bouras G, Nepal R, Houber GN, et al. Pharokka: a fast scalable bacteriophage annotation tool. Bioinformatics. 2023;39(1):btac776.
  9. Labrie SJ, Samson JE, Moineau S. Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(5):317-327.
  10. Chan BK, Abedon ST, Loc-Carrillo C. Phage cocktails and the future of phage therapy. Future Microbiol. 2013;8(6):769-783.
  11. Pirnay JP, Blasdel BG, Bretaudeau L, et al. Quality and safety requirements for sustainable phage therapy products. Pharm Res. 2015;32(7):2173-2179.
  12. Gordillo Altamirano FL, Barr JJ. Phage therapy in the postantibiotic era. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32(2):e00066-18.
  13. Clokie MR, Millard AD, Letarov AV, Heaphy S. Phages in nature. Bacteriophage. 2011;1(1):31-45.
  14. Hatfull GF, Dedrick RM, Schooley RT. Phage therapy for antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Annu Rev Med. 2022;73:197-211.
  15. Oechslin F. Resistance development to bacteriophages occurring during bacteriophage therapy. Viruses. 2018;10(7):351.
  16. Torres-Barceló C, Hochberg ME. Evolutionary rationale for phages as complements of antibiotics. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24(4):249-256.
  17. Loc-Carrillo C, Abedon ST. Pros and cons of phage therapy. Bacteriophage. 2011;1(2):111-114.