Scinovex

Research article · 2025 · Full text

International Journal of Biology Sciences

Nanobiosensor development for point-of-care detection of cardiac troponin in acute myocardial infarction

Efua BoatengYaw Danso

Volume 7(8) · Pages 276–279 · DOI: 10.33545/26649926.2025.v7.i8d.655 ↗

Research areasAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsBiosensors and Analytical Detection

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Early detection of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) can mean the difference between timely reperfusion therapy and irreversible myocardial damage. This research describes a gold nanoparticle-aptamer nanobiosensor designed for point-of-care (POC) quantification of cTnI in whole blood, developed at the Ashanti College of Biological Sciences in Kumasi, Ghana, between February 2023 and November 2023. The sensor platform comprised a screen-printed carbon electrode modified with 15-nm citrate-capped gold nanoparticles onto which a 41-nucleotide DNA aptamer selective for cTnI was immobilized via thiol-gold chemistry. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measured changes in charge-transfer resistance proportional to cTnI binding. The sensor achieved a linear detection range of 0.01-100 ng/mL, a limit of detection of 0.006 ng/mL, and response time under 12 minutes. When tested against 92 clinical serum samples (46 confirmed acute myocardial infarction, 46 healthy controls), the nanobiosensor yielded 94.7% sensitivity and 93.5% specificity, outperforming a commercial lateral flow assay run in parallel (82.6% sensitivity). Reproducibility was acceptable, with inter-electrode coefficients of variation below 7.8%. These results indicate that aptamer-functionalized gold nanoparticle sensors offer a rapid, affordable alternative to laboratory-based immunoassays for cTnI detection in resource-limited clinical settings.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Early detection of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) is critical to ensure patients receive timely reperfusion therapy and avoid permanent heart muscle damage. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Early detection of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) is critical to ensure patients receive timely reperfusion therapy and avoid permanent heart muscle damage.

      In the paper's own words

      “Early detection of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) can mean the difference between timely reperfusion therapy and irreversible myocardial damage.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Standard cTnI tests require expensive equipment and centralized laboratories, which are often unavailable in rural clinics and district hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Standard cTnI tests require expensive equipment and centralized laboratories, which are often unavailable in rural clinics and district hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa.

      In the paper's own words

      “Standard clinical measurement relies on automated chemiluminescent immunoassays or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, both of which demand expensive instruments, trained operators, and sample transport to a central laboratory—requirements that many district hospitals and rural clinics in sub-Saharan Africa cannot meet”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Aptamers are preferred over antibodies for certain biosensors because they are more thermally stable, consistent between batches, and cheaper to produce. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Aptamers are preferred over antibodies for certain biosensors because they are more thermally stable, consistent between batches, and cheaper to produce.

      In the paper's own words

      “Aptamers—short single-stranded DNA or RNA sequences selected in vitro for target affinity—present several advantages over antibodies, including thermal stability, batch-to-batch consistency, and lower production cost”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to develop a gold nanoparticle-aptamer nanobiosensor for the point-of-care quantification of cTnI in whole blood. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to develop a gold nanoparticle-aptamer nanobiosensor for the point-of-care quantification of cTnI in whole blood.

      In the paper's own words

      “This research describes a gold nanoparticle-aptamer nanobiosensor designed for point-of-care (POC) quantification of cTnI in whole blood”

      Page 1

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The sensor used a screen-printed carbon electrode modified with 15-nm gold nanoparticles and a 41-nucleotide DNA aptamer specific to cTnI. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The sensor used a screen-printed carbon electrode modified with 15-nm gold nanoparticles and a 41-nucleotide DNA aptamer specific to cTnI.

      In the paper's own words

      “The sensor platform comprised a screen-printed carbon electrode modified with 15-nm citrate-capped gold nanoparticles onto which a 41-nucleotide DNA aptamer selective for cTnI was immobilized via thiol-gold chemistry.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The researchers used electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to measure changes in charge-transfer resistance, which indicated the amount of cTnI binding. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers used electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to measure changes in charge-transfer resistance, which indicated the amount of cTnI binding.

      In the paper's own words

      “Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measured changes in charge-transfer resistance proportional to cTnI binding.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The sensor was clinically validated using 92 serum samples, split equally between 46 patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction and 46 healthy controls. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The sensor was clinically validated using 92 serum samples, split equally between 46 patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction and 46 healthy controls.

      In the paper's own words

      “When tested against 92 clinical serum samples (46 confirmed acute myocardial infarction, 46 healthy controls)”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  4. What they found

    • The nanobiosensor demonstrated a linear detection range of 0.01-100 ng/mL, a limit of detection of 0.006 ng/mL, and a response time of less than 12 minutes. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The nanobiosensor demonstrated a linear detection range of 0.01-100 ng/mL, a limit of detection of 0.006 ng/mL, and a response time of less than 12 minutes.

      In the paper's own words

      “The sensor achieved a linear detection range of 0.01-100 ng/mL, a limit of detection of 0.006 ng/mL, and response time under 12 minutes.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • In clinical tests, the nanobiosensor achieved 94.7% sensitivity and 93.5% specificity, which was more sensitive than a parallel commercial lateral flow assay (82.6% sensitivity). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      In clinical tests, the nanobiosensor achieved 94.7% sensitivity and 93.5% specificity, which was more sensitive than a parallel commercial lateral flow assay (82.6% sensitivity).

      In the paper's own words

      “the nanobiosensor yielded 94.7% sensitivity and 93.5% specificity, outperforming a commercial lateral flow assay run in parallel (82.6% sensitivity).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Quality Control and Calibration

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The sensor showed acceptable reproducibility, with inter-electrode coefficients of variation below 7.8% across ten electrodes. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The sensor showed acceptable reproducibility, with inter-electrode coefficients of variation below 7.8% across ten electrodes.

      In the paper's own words

      “Inter-electrode precision was assessed across ten independently prepared electrodes (CV < 7.8%).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Quality Control and Calibration

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • When stored at 4 °C, the electrodes remained stable with less than 9% response decay at the six-week mark. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      When stored at 4 °C, the electrodes remained stable with less than 9% response decay at the six-week mark.

      In the paper's own words

      “Shelf-life was evaluated by storing modified electrodes at 4 °C and testing weekly over eight weeks; response decay remained below 9% at week six”

      Page 2

      Found in: Quality Control and Calibration

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The sensor remained accurate in 11 hemolyzed samples, matching reference immunoassay values, suggesting robustness against hemoglobin interference. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The sensor remained accurate in 11 hemolyzed samples, matching reference immunoassay values, suggesting robustness against hemoglobin interference.

      In the paper's own words

      “In this cohort, 11 samples showed visible hemolysis, yet the sensor maintained concordance with reference immunoassay values for all 11.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that the sensor is a feasible point-of-care alternative for resource-limited settings due to its low cost, minimal equipment needs, and tolerance of hemolyzed samples. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that the sensor is a feasible point-of-care alternative for resource-limited settings due to its low cost, minimal equipment needs, and tolerance of hemolyzed samples.

      In the paper's own words

      “The platform's low material cost, minimal instrumentation requirements, and tolerance of hemolyzed samples position it as a feasible POC alternative for cardiac biomarker testing in resource-constrained environments.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗

Visual summary

2 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Screen-printed carbon electrode modified with gold nanoparticles and DNA aptamers for cardiac troponin I detection). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Sensor Architecture
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Screen-printed carbon electrode modified with gold nanoparticles and DNA aptamers for cardiac troponin I detection). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Screen-printed carbon electrode modified with gold nanoparticles and DNA aptamers for cardiac troponin I detection). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Sensor Architecture

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Screen-printed carbon electrode modified with gold nanoparticles and DNA aptamers for cardiac troponin I detection). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 2 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Nanobiosensor and Lateral Flow Assay: Sensitivity vs Specificity vs Positive predictive... vs Negative predictive... vs Accuracy
Replotted from Table 2 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 2 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Nanobiosensor and Lateral Flow Assay: Sensitivity vs Specificity vs Positive predictive... vs Negative predictive... vs Accuracy

Replotted from Table 2 (page 3) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Analytical performance of the AuNP-AptamerTable 1Page 2Calibration scatter plot showing sensor response (ΔRct/Rct0 %) versus cTnI concentration on a logarithmic scale. The dashed lineFigure 1Page 2Clinical validation: nanobiosensor vs. lateral flow assay (n = 92 samples)Table 2Page 3Box plot comparing diagnostic sensitivity across four detection methods. The nanobiosensor developed in this research showed theFigure 2Page 3
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Acute myocardial infarction remains one of the leading causes of death in both high-and low-income countries, and delayed diagnosis is a major contributor to poor outcomes in settings without access to centralized laboratory testing [1] . Cardiac troponin I is the preferred biomarker for myocardial injury because of its high tissue specificity and its release kinetics, which allow detection within 3-6 hours of symptom onset [2] . Standard clinical measurement relies on automated chemiluminescent immunoassays or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, both of which demand expensive instruments, trained operators, and sample transport to a central laboratory-requirements that many district hospitals and rural clinics in sub-Saharan Africa cannot meet [3] . Nanobiosensors offer a path around these barriers. By combining biological recognition elements with nanoscale transduction surfaces, they can achieve clinically useful sensitivity in compact, low-cost formats suitable for bedside use [4] . Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are particularly attractive as electrode modifiers because of their large surface-area-to-volume ratio, excellent conductivity, and well-characterized thiol-gold self-assembly chemistry that simplifies bioreceptor attachment [5] . Aptamers-short single-stranded DNA or RNA sequences selected in vitro for target affinity-present several advantages over antibodies, including thermal stability, batch-to-batch consistency, and lower production cost [6] . Despite these advantages, few aptamer-based POC sensors for cTnI have been validated with clinical samples from African populations, where baseline health profiles and common interfering substances (e.g., hemoglobin from malaria-related hemolysis) may affect assay performance [7] .

This research describes the fabrication, analytical characterization, and clinical validation of an AuNPaptamer electrochemical biosensor for cTnI, developed and tested entirely at the Ashanti College of Biological Sciences in Kumasi, Ghana.

Material and Methods Material

Screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCEs, model DRP-110) were purchased from Metrohm DropSens (Oviedo, Spain). Citrate-stabilized gold nanoparticles (15 nm diameter, OD 1.0) were obtained from BBI Solutions (Crumlin, UK). The cTnI-selective DNA aptamer (5'-HS-C6-CGTGCAGTACGCCAACCTTTCTCATGCGCTGCCCCT CTTA-3') was custom-synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA) [8] . Recombinant human cTnI protein (≥ 95% purity) was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK) for calibration. Clinical serum samples (n = 92) were collected at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, between April and September 2023, under ethical approval from the Ashanti College Institutional Review Board (protocol AC-IRB-2023-017, approved 12 January 2023) [9] .

Reagents and Chemicals

6-Mercapto-1-hexanol (MCH, 97%), potassium ferricyanide (K3[Fe(CN)6]), potassium ferrocyanide (K4[Fe(CN)6]), phosphate-buffered saline tablets (pH 7.4), and bovine serum albumin (BSA, fraction V) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Sulfuric acid (98%, ACS grade) and hydrogen peroxide (30%) for electrode cleaning were sourced from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). All solutions were prepared with ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ•cm, Millipore Milli-Q system) [10] .

Methods

SPCEs were electrochemically cleaned by cycling in 0.5 M H2SO4 (20 cycles, -0.2 to 1.2 V, 100 mV/s). AuNPs were drop-cast (5 µL, three successive depositions with airdrying) onto the working electrode and dried at room temperature. The thiolated aptamer (1 µM in 10 mM PBS) was incubated on the AuNP-modified surface for 16 hours at 4 °C, followed by MCH backfilling (1 mM, 1 hour) to block non-specific adsorption [11] . Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out in 5 mM Fe(CN)6 3-/4-in PBS at open-circuit potential, with a frequency range of 0.1 Hz to 100 kHz and an AC amplitude of 10 mV. Charge-transfer resistance (Rct) was extracted by fitting Nyquist plots to a Randles equivalent circuit using Nova 2.1 software (Metrohm Autolab). The sensor response was defined as ΔRct/Rct0 (%), where Rct0 is the baseline resistance before cTnI addition. Calibration curves were constructed from serial dilutions of recombinant cTnI (0.01-100 ng/mL) [12] .

Quality Control and Calibration

Each calibration batch included a blank (PBS only) and three quality control concentrations (0.05, 5.0, and 50.0 ng/mL cTnI). Intra-electrode precision was determined from five consecutive measurements on a single electrode (CV < 4.1%). Inter-electrode precision was assessed across ten independently prepared electrodes (CV < 7.8%). Shelf-life was evaluated by storing modified electrodes at 4 °C and testing weekly over eight weeks; response decay remained below 9% at week six [13] . The nanobiosensor displayed a log-linear relationship between cTnI concentration and sensor response across three orders of magnitude (Table 1). The LOD of 0.006 ng/mL falls well below the clinical decision threshold of 0.04 ng/mL commonly used for ruling in myocardial infarction, suggesting adequate analytical sensitivity for emergency triage. In the clinical validation cohort (46 AMI-confirmed, 46 healthy controls), the nanobiosensor achieved 94.7% sensitivity and 93.5% specificity, compared with 82.6% and 91.3% for the lateral flow assay (Table 2). Two false negatives on the nanobiosensor occurred in patients whose cTnI levels were near the 0.04 ng/mL threshold.

Table 2. Clinical validation: nanobiosensor vs. lateral flow assay (n = 92 samples)
MetricNanobiosensorLateral Flow Assay
Sensitivity94.7%82.6%
Specificity93.5%91.3%
Positive predictive value93.6%90.5%
Negative predictive value94.6%84.0%
Accuracy94.1%87.0%

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Clinical validation: nanobiosensor vs. lateral flow assay (n = 92 samples)↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Clinical validation: nanobiosensor vs. lateral flow assay (n = 92 samples)

Clinical validation: nanobiosensor vs. lateral flow assay (n = 92 samples)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Table 1. Analytical performance of the AuNP-Aptamer
ParameterValue
Linear range0.01 - 100 ng/mL
Limit of detection (LOD)0.006 ng/mL
Limit of quantification (LOQ)0.019 ng/mL
Sensitivity (slope)12.4 ΔRct%/decade
R² (log-linear fit)0.987
Response time< 12 min
Intra-electrode CV3.2 - 4.1%
Inter-electrode CV5.4 - 7.8%
Shelf stability (6 weeks)< 9% signal loss

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Analytical performance of the AuNP-Aptamer↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Analytical performance of the AuNP-Aptamer

Analytical performance of the AuNP-Aptamer

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗

Results

Results

Discussion

The nanobiosensor's LOD of 0.006 ng/mL places it among the most sensitive aptamer-based cTnI sensors reported to date, comparable to the 0.008 ng/mL achieved by Zhang et al. using a graphene-oxide platform [14] and well below the clinical cutoff. Its response time of under 12 minutes is faster than conventional ELISA (typically 2-4 hours) and on par with high-sensitivity automated analyzers that cost orders of magnitude more. The 94.7% clinical sensitivity exceeded the lateral flow assay by 12 percentage points, likely because impedimetric detection captures small conformational changes in the aptamer upon target binding-changes too subtle to produce a visible colorimetric signal at low cTnI concentrations. The two false negatives both involved samples near the analytical threshold, a zone where any POC device would be expected to lose discrimination. A practical concern for deployment in sub-Saharan Africa is interference from hemolyzed samples. In this cohort, 11 samples showed visible hemolysis, yet the sensor maintained concordance with reference immunoassay values for all 11. This robustness may stem from the aptamer's specificity, which is less affected by hemoglobin than antibody-antigen interactions [6] . However, the sample size was modest, and larger multicenter trials that include patients with sickle cell disease and malaria parasitemia are needed before broad clinical adoption.

Conclusion

This research produced an electrochemical nanobiosensor combining gold nanoparticle electrode modification with a cTnI-selective DNA aptamer. The device achieved clinically relevant sensitivity (LOD 0.006 ng/mL), rapid response (< 12 minutes), and strong diagnostic accuracy (94.7% sensitivity, 93.5% specificity) when tested against confirmed AMI and healthy control samples from a Ghanaian hospital. The platform's low material cost, minimal instrumentation requirements, and tolerance of hemolyzed samples position it as a feasible POC alternative for cardiac biomarker testing in resource-constrained environments. Validation in larger, multicenter cohorts remains the logical next step.

Figures and tables from the paper

Figure 1. Calibration scatter plot showing sensor response (ΔRct/Rct0 %) versus cTnI concentration on a logarithmic scale. The dashed line
Calibration scatter plot showing sensor response (ΔRct/Rct0 %) versus cTnI concentration on a logarithmic scale. The dashed line↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Calibration scatter plot showing sensor response (ΔRct/Rct0 %) versus cTnI concentration on a logarithmic scale. The dashed line

Calibration scatter plot showing sensor response (ΔRct/Rct0 %) versus cTnI concentration on a logarithmic scale. The dashed line

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 2. Box plot comparing diagnostic sensitivity across four detection methods. The nanobiosensor developed in this research showed the
Box plot comparing diagnostic sensitivity across four detection methods. The nanobiosensor developed in this research showed the↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Box plot comparing diagnostic sensitivity across four detection methods. The nanobiosensor developed in this research showed the

Box plot comparing diagnostic sensitivity across four detection methods. The nanobiosensor developed in this research showed the

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗

References

14 in the original paper
  1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(3):237-269.
  2. Apple FS, Collinson PO. Analytical characteristics of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. Clin Chem. 2012;58(1):54-61.
  3. Okello E, Nkooma M, Engel ME. Point-of-care testing for cardiac biomarkers in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Int J Cardiol. 2020;314:44-50.
  4. Holzinger M, Le Goff A, Cosnier S. Nanomaterials for biosensing applications: a review. Front Chem. 2014;2:63.
  5. Pingarrón JM, Yáñez-Sedeño P, González-Cortés A. Gold nanoparticle-based electrochemical biosensors. Electrochim Acta. 2008;53(19):5848-5866.
  6. Dunn MR, Jimenez RM, Chaput JC. Analysis of aptamer discovery and technology. Nat Rev Chem. 2017;1(10):0076.
  7. Kemp M, Donovan J, Higham H, Hooper J. Biochemical interference from hemolysis in clinical laboratory testing. Ann Clin Biochem. 2008;45(1):1829.
  8. Jo H, Gu H, Jeon W, et al. Electrochemical aptasensor of cardiac troponin I for the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Anal Chem. 2015;87(19):98699875.
  9. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194.
  10. Hermanson GT. Bioconjugate Techniques. 3rd ed. Academic Press; 2013:1-1146.
  11. Liu Y, Tuleouva N, Ramanculov E, Revzin A. Aptamer-based electrochemical biosensor for interferon gamma detection. Anal Chem. 2010;82(19):8131-8136.
  12. Randviir EP, Banks CE. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy: an overview of bioanalytical applications. Anal Methods. 2013;5(5):1098-1115.
  13. Armbruster DA, Pry T. Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation. Clin Biochem Rev. 2008;29(Suppl 1):S49-S52.
  14. Zhang D, Li L, Ma C, et al. Electrochemical aptasensor for the detection of cardiac troponin I based on graphene oxide. Microchim Acta. 2019;186(3):158.