Scinovex

Research article · 2025 · Full text

International Journal of Biology Sciences

Phytohormone crosstalk in regulating root system architecture under phosphate starvation

Milagros SucaGladys MamaniNorma Ccama

Volume 7(11) · Pages 137–139 · DOI: 10.33545/26649926.2025.v7.i11c.705 ↗

Research areasPlant nutrient uptake and metabolismPlant Parasitism and ResistancePlant Molecular Biology Research

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

"A plant's roots are its hidden intelligence," an Andean agronomist once remarked—and nowhere is this truer than when roots reshape themselves to scavenge scarce phosphate. This research examined how auxin, ethylene, cytokinin, strigolactone, and abscisic acid (ABA) interact to control root system architecture (RSA) in Arabidopsis thaliana under phosphate (Pi) starvation. Wild-type (Col-0) and hormone biosynthesis/signaling mutant lines were grown on Pi-sufficient (+ Pi, 1.25 mM KH₂PO₄) and Pi-deficient (-Pi, 0 mM) media at the Instituto de Biodiversidad Andina, Cusco, Peru, from March 2023 to September 2024. Exogenous hormone application and inhibitor treatments were used to dissect individual contributions. Pi starvation reduced primary root length by 29.8% and increased lateral root density by 47.2%. Auxin was the largest contributor to RSA remodeling (34.8% of total response), followed by ethylene (23.1%) and cytokinin (18.6%). Strigolactone mutants showed impaired lateral root induction under-Pi. These results map the hormone interaction network governing root plasticity under nutrient stress.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Phosphate is a critical but immobile macronutrient, meaning a plant's root architecture is essential for efficiently acquiring it from the soil. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Phosphate is a critical but immobile macronutrient, meaning a plant's root architecture is essential for efficiently acquiring it from the soil.

      In the paper's own words

      “Phosphate is the second most limiting macronutrient for plant growth, yet it's highly immobile in soil, making root architecture a primary determinant of acquisition efficiency”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • To survive phosphate starvation, plants typically adapt by shortening their primary root and increasing lateral roots and root hairs to better explore the phosphate-rich topsoil. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      To survive phosphate starvation, plants typically adapt by shortening their primary root and increasing lateral roots and root hairs to better explore the phosphate-rich topsoil.

      In the paper's own words

      “Under Pi starvation, plants typically shorten the primary root, proliferate lateral roots, and enhance root hair growth—a suite of responses collectively aimed at expanding the soil exploration zone in the topsoil where Pi concentrates”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Root changes are managed by various hormones: auxin and strigolactones influence branching, ethylene inhibits primary root growth, and cytokinins generally suppress lateral roots. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Root changes are managed by various hormones: auxin and strigolactones influence branching, ethylene inhibits primary root growth, and cytokinins generally suppress lateral roots.

      In the paper's own words

      “These morphological changes are coordinated by phytohormones. Auxin promotes lateral root initiation, ethylene inhibits primary root elongation, cytokinins generally suppress lateral root growth, and strigolactones modulate both root branching and interactions with mycorrhizal fungi”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study sought to quantify how five major phytohormones individually and interactively contribute to root system architecture (RSA) changes during phosphate starvation. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study sought to quantify how five major phytohormones individually and interactively contribute to root system architecture (RSA) changes during phosphate starvation.

      In the paper's own words

      “This research aimed to quantify the individual and interactive contributions of five major phytohormones to RSA changes under Pi starvation using a combination of mutant analysis, exogenous hormone application, and chemical inhibitors.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The researchers grew wild-type (Col-0) and various hormone mutant Arabidopsis lines on media with either 1.25 mM KH₂PO₄ (sufficient) or 0 mM KH₂PO₄ (deficient) in Cusco, Peru, between March 2023 and September 2024. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers grew wild-type (Col-0) and various hormone mutant Arabidopsis lines on media with either 1.25 mM KH₂PO₄ (sufficient) or 0 mM KH₂PO₄ (deficient) in Cusco, Peru, between March 2023 and September 2024.

      In the paper's own words

      “Wild-type (Col-0) and hormone biosynthesis/signaling mutant lines were grown on Pi-sufficient (+ Pi, 1.25 mM KH₂PO₄) and Pi-deficient (-Pi, 0 mM) media at the Instituto de Biodiversidad Andina, Cusco, Peru, from March 2023 to September 2024.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Materials

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The study utilized specific mutant lines to test hormone roles: aux1-7 (auxin), ein2-1 (ethylene), arr1;arr12 (cytokinin), max4-1 (strigolactone), and abi4-1 (ABA). View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study utilized specific mutant lines to test hormone roles: aux1-7 (auxin), ein2-1 (ethylene), arr1;arr12 (cytokinin), max4-1 (strigolactone), and abi4-1 (ABA).

      In the paper's own words

      “Arabidopsis thaliana lines used were Col-0 (wild type), aux1-7 (auxin influx mutant), ein2-1 (ethylene-insensitive), arr1;arr12 (cytokinin response double mutant), max4-1 (strigolactone biosynthesis), and abi4-1 (ABA-insensitive).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Materials

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The experimental design included 20 replicate plates for each genotype-treatment combination, with 5 seedlings per plate. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The experimental design included 20 replicate plates for each genotype-treatment combination, with 5 seedlings per plate.

      In the paper's own words

      “Each genotype-treatment combination had 20 replicate plates with 5 seedlings per plate.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Root parameters, including primary root length, total root length, and lateral root number and density, were measured using ImageJ with the SmartRoot plugin. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Root parameters, including primary root length, total root length, and lateral root number and density, were measured using ImageJ with the SmartRoot plugin.

      In the paper's own words

      “Root phenotyping was performed on scanned plate images using ImageJ with the SmartRoot plugin [6]. Parameters measured included primary root length, lateral root number and density, and total root length.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Phosphate starvation caused a 29.8% reduction in primary root length and a 47.2% increase in lateral root density. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Phosphate starvation caused a 29.8% reduction in primary root length and a 47.2% increase in lateral root density.

      In the paper's own words

      “Pi starvation reduced primary root length by 29.8% and increased lateral root density by 47.2%.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Total root length increased by 18.8% under phosphate starvation, indicating a shift toward horizontal soil exploration. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Total root length increased by 18.8% under phosphate starvation, indicating a shift toward horizontal soil exploration.

      In the paper's own words

      “Total root length increased by 18.8%, reflecting the shift from vertical to horizontal root exploration.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Auxin was the primary driver of root remodeling (34.8%), followed by ethylene (23.1%) and cytokinin (18.6%). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Auxin was the primary driver of root remodeling (34.8%), followed by ethylene (23.1%) and cytokinin (18.6%).

      In the paper's own words

      “Auxin was the largest contributor to RSA remodeling (34.8% of total response), followed by ethylene (23.1%) and cytokinin (18.6%).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The aux1-7 mutant had a 62% reduction in lateral root induction under phosphate starvation, showing that auxin influx is necessary for this response. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The aux1-7 mutant had a 62% reduction in lateral root induction under phosphate starvation, showing that auxin influx is necessary for this response.

      In the paper's own words

      “The aux1-7 mutant showed a 62% reduction in lateral root induction under-Pi compared to wild type, confirming that auxin influx is needed for the Pi-starvation lateral root response”

      Page 2

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Ethylene contributed 23.1% to the response, primarily by shortening the primary root, as evidenced by the ein2-1 mutant maintaining longer roots. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Ethylene contributed 23.1% to the response, primarily by shortening the primary root, as evidenced by the ein2-1 mutant maintaining longer roots.

      In the paper's own words

      “Ethylene's contribution (23.1%) came mainly through primary root shortening—the ein2-1 mutant maintained longer primary roots under-Pi”

      Page 2

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The arr1;arr12 mutant showed increased lateral rooting, confirming that cytokinins normally act to suppress lateral root formation. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The arr1;arr12 mutant showed increased lateral rooting, confirming that cytokinins normally act to suppress lateral root formation.

      In the paper's own words

      “The cytokinin response mutant arr1;arr12 showed enhanced lateral rooting under-Pi, supporting the view that cytokinins act as negative regulators of lateral root formation”

      Page 2

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The max4-1 strigolactone mutant showed an impaired ability to induce lateral roots under phosphate starvation. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The max4-1 strigolactone mutant showed an impaired ability to induce lateral roots under phosphate starvation.

      In the paper's own words

      “The max4-1 strigolactone mutant was impaired in lateral root induction”

      Page 2

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Abscisic acid (ABA) had the smallest contribution (9.8%), primarily affecting root hair regulation instead of branching. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Abscisic acid (ABA) had the smallest contribution (9.8%), primarily affecting root hair regulation instead of branching.

      In the paper's own words

      “ABA's smaller contribution (9.8%) appeared mainly through root hair regulation rather than branching architecture.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that this quantitative framework of hormone crosstalk can be used to inform crop breeding to improve phosphate acquisition efficiency. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that this quantitative framework of hormone crosstalk can be used to inform crop breeding to improve phosphate acquisition efficiency.

      In the paper's own words

      “These findings provide a quantitative framework for understanding hormone crosstalk in nutrient-stress responses and may inform breeding efforts to improve phosphate acquisition efficiency in crops.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗

Visual summary

3 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Arabidopsis thaliana root systems). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Hormone Contribution Hierarchy
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Arabidopsis thaliana root systems). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Arabidopsis thaliana root systems). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Hormone Contribution Hierarchy

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Arabidopsis thaliana root systems). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Primary root (cm): WT + Pi vs WT-Pi
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Primary root (cm): WT + Pi vs WT-Pi

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
LR density (cm⁻¹): WT + Pi vs WT-Pi
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

LR density (cm⁻¹): WT + Pi vs WT-Pi

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Root System Architecture Parameters Under + Pi and-PiTable 1Page 2Primary root length under different hormone treatments on Pi-deficient medium. Exogenous auxin on-Pi medium increased rootFigure 1Page 2Estimated relative contribution of each phytohormone toFigure 2Page 2
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

"When the soil gives little, the root must give more"-this folk wisdom captures the biological reality of root system remodeling under nutrient deficiency. Phosphate is the second most limiting macronutrient for plant growth, yet it's highly immobile in soil, making root architecture a primary determinant of acquisition efficiency [1] . Under Pi starvation, plants typically shorten the primary root, proliferate lateral roots, and enhance root hair growth-a suite of responses collectively aimed at expanding the soil exploration zone in the topsoil where Pi concentrates [2] . These morphological changes are coordinated by phytohormones. Auxin promotes lateral root initiation, ethylene inhibits primary root elongation, cytokinins generally suppress lateral root growth, and strigolactones modulate both root branching and interactions with mycorrhizal fungi [3,4] . But these hormones don't act in isolation-their crosstalk determines the net architectural outcome [5] . This research aimed to quantify the individual and interactive contributions of five major phytohormones to RSA changes under Pi starvation using a combination of mutant analysis, exogenous hormone application, and chemical inhibitors.

Materials and Methods

Materials and Methods

Materials

This research was performed at the Department of Plant Molecular Biology, Instituto de Biodiversidad Andina, Cusco, Peru, from March 2023 to September 2024. Institutional biosafety approval was obtained (IBA-IBC/2023-022). Arabidopsis thaliana lines used were Col-0 (wild type), aux1-7 (auxin influx mutant), ein2-1 (ethylene-insensitive), arr1;arr12 (cytokinin response double mutant), max4-1 (strigolactone biosynthesis), and abi4-1 (ABAinsensitive). Seeds were obtained from ABRC and the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre. Seeds were surface-sterilized and grown on vertical agar plates containing modified half-strength MS medium with either 1.25 mM KH₂PO₄ (+ Pi) or 0 mM KH₂PO₄ (-Pi) for 14 days under 16 h/8 h light at 22 °C.

Methods

Root phenotyping was performed on scanned plate images using ImageJ with the SmartRoot plugin [6] . Parameters measured included primary root length, lateral root number and density, and total root length. Exogenous hormone treatments applied to-Pi medium included: IAA (0.1 μM), ACC (10 μM, ethylene precursor), kinetin (0.5 μM), GR24 (1 μM, strigolactone analog), and ABA (1 μM). Inhibitor treatments included NPA (1 μM, auxin transport inhibitor) and AVG (5 μM, ethylene biosynthesis inhibitor). Each genotype-treatment combination had 20 replicate plates with 5 seedlings per plate. Hormone contribution to overall RSA change was estimated by comparing the magnitude of phenotypic rescue in each mutant relative to wild-type-Pi response. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (genotype × Pi status) with Tukey's post-hoc test in R. Pi starvation triggered the expected RSA remodeling: shorter primary roots, more lateral roots, and longer root hairs. Total root length increased by 18.8%, reflecting the shift from vertical to horizontal root exploration.

Results

Results

Discussion

The dominance of auxin in Pi-starvation RSA responses aligns with the known role of local auxin accumulation in lateral root primordia initiation [3] . The aux1-7 mutant showed a 62% reduction in lateral root induction under-Pi compared to wild type, confirming that auxin influx is needed for the Pi-starvation lateral root response [2] . Ethylene's contribution (23.1%) came mainly through primary root shortening-the ein2-1 mutant maintained longer primary roots under-Pi, consistent with ethylene's role in inhibiting cell elongation in the root tip [4] . The cytokinin response mutant arr1;arr12 showed enhanced lateral rooting under-Pi, supporting the view that cytokinins act as negative regulators of lateral root formation and that Pi starvation works partly by reducing cytokinin signaling [5] . The max4-1 strigolactone mutant was impaired in lateral root induction, which matches recent findings that strigolactones promote lateral root emergence through interaction with auxin transport [7] . ABA's smaller contribution (9.8%) appeared mainly through root hair regulation rather than branching architecture.

Conclusion

This research mapped the relative contributions of five phytohormones to root system architecture remodeling under phosphate starvation in Arabidopsis. Auxin was the dominant player, followed by ethylene, cytokinin, strigolactone, and ABA. The hormones act through distinct

International Journal of Biology Sciences https://www.biologyjournal.net architectural components-auxin on lateral root initiation, ethylene on primary root inhibition, cytokinin as a negative regulator, and strigolactone on root emergence. These findings provide a quantitative framework for understanding hormone crosstalk in nutrient-stress responses and may inform breeding efforts to improve phosphate acquisition efficiency in crops.

Acknowledgement

Acknowledgements Funding SourcesInternal research funds from the Instituto de Biodiversidad Andina supported this work. Institutional SupportThe authors thank the Instituto de Biodiversidad Andina for growth chamber and imaging facilities.Contributions Not Qualifying for Authorship ABRC and NASC are acknowledged for seed stock provision. Lab assistants who maintained plant cultures are thanked.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. Root System Architecture Parameters Under + Pi and-Pi
ParameterWT + PiWT-PiChange (%)p-value
Primary root (cm)12.4±1.38.7±1.1-29.8<0.001
Lateral root number7.2±1.412.8±1.9+ 77.8<0.001
LR density (cm⁻¹)0.58±0.080.85±0.11+ 47.2<0.001
Total root length (cm)28.7±3.234.1±3.8+ 18.80.007
Root hair length (mm)0.31±0.040.52±0.06+ 67.7<0.001

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Root System Architecture Parameters Under + Pi and-Pi↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Root System Architecture Parameters Under + Pi and-Pi

Root System Architecture Parameters Under + Pi and-Pi

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 1. Primary root length under different hormone treatments on Pi-deficient medium. Exogenous auxin on-Pi medium increased root
Primary root length under different hormone treatments on Pi-deficient medium. Exogenous auxin on-Pi medium increased root↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Primary root length under different hormone treatments on Pi-deficient medium. Exogenous auxin on-Pi medium increased root

Primary root length under different hormone treatments on Pi-deficient medium. Exogenous auxin on-Pi medium increased root

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 2. Estimated relative contribution of each phytohormone to
Estimated relative contribution of each phytohormone to↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Estimated relative contribution of each phytohormone to

Estimated relative contribution of each phytohormone to

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗

References

7 in the original paper
  1. Vance CP, Uhde-Stone C, Allan DL. Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytologist. 2003;157(3):423-447.
  2. Lopez-Bucio J, Cruz-Ramirez A, Herrera-Estrella L. The role of nutrient availability in regulating root architecture. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2003;6(3):280-287.
  3. Peret B, De Rybel B, Casimiro I, Benkova E, Swarup R, Laplaze L, et al. Arabidopsis lateral root development: an emerging story. Trends in Plant Science. 2009;14(7):399-408.
  4. Muday GK, Rahman A, Binder BM. Auxin and ethylene: collaborators or competitors? Trends in Plant Science. 2012;17(4):181-195.
  5. Marhava P, Bassukas AE, Zourelidou M, Kolb M, Moret B, Fastner A, et al. A molecular rheostat adjusts auxin flux to promote root protophloem differentiation. Nature. 2018;558(7709):297-300.
  6. Lobet G, Pages L, Draye X. A novel image-analysis toolbox enabling quantitative analysis of root system architecture. Plant Physiology. 2011;157(1):29-39.
  7. Ruyter-Spira C, Kohlen W, Charnikhova T, van Zeijl A, van Bezouwen L, de Ruijter N, et al. Physiological effects of the synthetic strigolactone analog GR24 on root system architecture in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 2011;155(2):721-734.