Scinovex

Research article · 2025 · Full text

International Journal of Biology Sciences

Biodiversity assessment of freshwater zooplankton communities in Himalayan glacial lakes

Tenzin DeshpandePhurba LakhaniSonam Rajan

Volume 7(11) · Pages 158–160 · DOI: 10.33545/26649926.2025.v7.i11c.735 ↗

Research areasAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyPolar Research and Ecology

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

If zooplankton diversity declines predictably with altitude in Himalayan glacial lakes, then climate-driven changes in glacial meltwater input could reshape these communities from the top down—this was the working hypothesis behind the present research. This research assessed zooplankton community composition, abundance, and diversity across eight glacial lakes spanning an elevation gradient from 2,800 to 4,200 m in Sikkim, northeastern India. Monthly sampling was conducted from May to October 2023 at the Sikkim Institute of Biological Sciences, Gangtok. A total of 47 zooplankton taxa were identified, including 22 Rotifera, 14 Cladocera, and 11 Copepoda. Species richness declined sharply with altitude, from 24 taxa at 2,800 m to 7 taxa at 4,200 m. Shannon diversity index (H') dropped from 2.87 at the lowest site to 1.21 at the highest (r =-0.98, p

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Himalayan glacial lakes are extreme freshwater environments characterized by cold temperatures, low nutrient levels (oligotrophic), and high UV exposure. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Himalayan glacial lakes are extreme freshwater environments characterized by cold temperatures, low nutrient levels (oligotrophic), and high UV exposure.

      In the paper's own words

      “Himalayan glacial lakes are among the most extreme freshwater environments on Earth: cold, oligotrophic, UV-exposed, and subject to dramatic seasonal shifts as glacial meltwater pulses through them”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Zooplankton are critical to these ecosystems because they link primary producers to higher trophic levels like fish and birds, and their community structure serves as an indicator of overall environmental conditions. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Zooplankton are critical to these ecosystems because they link primary producers to higher trophic levels like fish and birds, and their community structure serves as an indicator of overall environmental conditions.

      In the paper's own words

      “Zooplankton sit at a pivotal position in these food webs, linking primary producers to fish and waterbirds, and their community structure reflects integrated environmental conditions in ways that single physical or chemical measurements cannot”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • There is a lack of systematic zooplankton diversity surveys in the eastern Himalayas compared to the western Himalayas or the Tibetan Plateau. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      There is a lack of systematic zooplankton diversity surveys in the eastern Himalayas compared to the western Himalayas or the Tibetan Plateau.

      In the paper's own words

      “Yet systematic surveys of zooplankton diversity across elevation gradients in the eastern Himalayas remain rare, with most available data coming from the western Himalayan states or the Tibetan Plateau”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to assess zooplankton diversity, abundance, and composition across eight glacial lakes in Sikkim along an elevation gradient and determine which environmental variables drive these variations. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to assess zooplankton diversity, abundance, and composition across eight glacial lakes in Sikkim along an elevation gradient and determine which environmental variables drive these variations.

      In the paper's own words

      “This research aimed to survey zooplankton diversity, abundance, and community composition across eight glacial lakes on an elevation gradient in Sikkim and to identify the environmental variables driving community variation.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The study examined eight glacial lakes in Sikkim, India, ranging in elevation from 2,800 to 4,200 meters. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study examined eight glacial lakes in Sikkim, India, ranging in elevation from 2,800 to 4,200 meters.

      In the paper's own words

      “This research assessed zooplankton community composition, abundance, and diversity across eight glacial lakes spanning an elevation gradient from 2,800 to 4,200 m in Sikkim, northeastern India.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Sampling was performed monthly between May and October 2023. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Sampling was performed monthly between May and October 2023.

      In the paper's own words

      “Monthly sampling was conducted from May to October 2023 at the Sikkim Institute of Biological Sciences, Gangtok.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Zooplankton were collected using vertical tows with a 55-μm mesh net from the surface down to 10 meters at three stations per lake. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Zooplankton were collected using vertical tows with a 55-μm mesh net from the surface down to 10 meters at three stations per lake.

      In the paper's own words

      “Monthly sampling at each lake was conducted by collecting vertical tows with a 55-μm mesh plankton net from 10 m depth to the surface at three stations per lake.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The researchers concurrently measured several environmental parameters, including water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, total dissolved solids, chlorophyll-a, and Secchi depth. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers concurrently measured several environmental parameters, including water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, total dissolved solids, chlorophyll-a, and Secchi depth.

      In the paper's own words

      “Environmental parameters—water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, total dissolved solids, chlorophyll-a, and Secchi depth—were measured concurrently using standard methods”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The study used Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) to relate community composition to environmental variables and Pearson's r to correlate diversity indices with altitude. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study used Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) to relate community composition to environmental variables and Pearson's r to correlate diversity indices with altitude.

      In the paper's own words

      “Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) in CANOCO v5 tested relationships between zooplankton community composition and environmental variables. Correlation between diversity indices and altitude used Pearson's r.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • The study identified 47 zooplankton taxa in total, consisting of 22 Rotifera, 14 Cladocera, and 11 Copepoda. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The study identified 47 zooplankton taxa in total, consisting of 22 Rotifera, 14 Cladocera, and 11 Copepoda.

      In the paper's own words

      “A total of 47 zooplankton taxa were identified, including 22 Rotifera, 14 Cladocera, and 11 Copepoda.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Species richness declined by 71% as altitude increased, dropping from 24 taxa at 2,800 m to 7 taxa at 4,200 m. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Species richness declined by 71% as altitude increased, dropping from 24 taxa at 2,800 m to 7 taxa at 4,200 m.

      In the paper's own words

      “Species richness dropped from 24 taxa at 2,800 m to 7 taxa at 4,200 m—a 71% decline over a 1,400 m elevation range.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Sampling Site Characterization

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The Shannon diversity index (H') showed a strong negative correlation with altitude, decreasing from 2.87 at the lowest site to 1.21 at the highest site. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The Shannon diversity index (H') showed a strong negative correlation with altitude, decreasing from 2.87 at the lowest site to 1.21 at the highest site.

      In the paper's own words

      “Shannon diversity index (H') dropped from 2.87 at the lowest site to 1.21 at the highest (r =-0.98, p<0.001).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Sampling Site Characterization

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Zooplankton abundance peaked in July for all lakes, with low-altitude lakes reaching 687 individuals L⁻¹ and high-altitude lakes reaching 412 individuals L⁻¹. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Zooplankton abundance peaked in July for all lakes, with low-altitude lakes reaching 687 individuals L⁻¹ and high-altitude lakes reaching 412 individuals L⁻¹.

      In the paper's own words

      “Zooplankton abundance peaked in July across all lakes, with low-altitude lakes reaching 687 individuals L⁻¹ compared to 412 at high altitude.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • CCA explained 68.4% of the variance in community composition, identifying water temperature, chlorophyll-a, and dissolved oxygen as the strongest environmental predictors. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      CCA explained 68.4% of the variance in community composition, identifying water temperature, chlorophyll-a, and dissolved oxygen as the strongest environmental predictors.

      In the paper's own words

      “Canonical correspondence analysis explained 68.4% of the total variance in zooplankton community composition across the first two axes. Water temperature (axis 1 loading: 0.87), chlorophyll-a (0.74), and dissolved oxygen (0.69) were the strongest environmental predictors.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Sampling Site Characterization

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Community composition shifted with altitude, with Rotifera dominating lower-altitude lakes and Copepoda becoming more prominent at higher elevations. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Community composition shifted with altitude, with Rotifera dominating lower-altitude lakes and Copepoda becoming more prominent at higher elevations.

      In the paper's own words

      “Rotifera dominated the lower-altitude communities while Copepoda became proportionally more important at higher elevations.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Sampling Site Characterization

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that these findings provide a quantitative baseline to monitor how climate warming and glacial retreat may alter zooplankton communities in the future. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that these findings provide a quantitative baseline to monitor how climate warming and glacial retreat may alter zooplankton communities in the future.

      In the paper's own words

      “These results establish a quantitative baseline for monitoring how ongoing glacial retreat and climate warming may reshape zooplankton communities in high-altitude Himalayan lakes.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗

Visual summary

3 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Freshwater zooplankton (Rotifera and Copepoda) in Himalayan glacial lakes). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Altitude Gradient and Biodiversity Shift
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Freshwater zooplankton (Rotifera and Copepoda) in Himalayan glacial lakes). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Freshwater zooplankton (Rotifera and Copepoda) in Himalayan glacial lakes). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Altitude Gradient and Biodiversity Shift

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Freshwater zooplankton (Rotifera and Copepoda) in Himalayan glacial lakes). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Taxa (S): Khecheopalri vs Menmecho vs Samiti vs Gurudongmar-S vs Cholamu-Upper
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Taxa (S): Khecheopalri vs Menmecho vs Samiti vs Gurudongmar-S vs Cholamu-Upper

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
H': Khecheopalri vs Menmecho vs Samiti vs Gurudongmar-S vs Cholamu-Upper
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

H': Khecheopalri vs Menmecho vs Samiti vs Gurudongmar-S vs Cholamu-Upper

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Zooplankton Diversity Metrics Across the ElevationTable 1Page 2Seasonal zooplankton abundance patterns at three elevation categories. All lakes peaked in July, coinciding with maximum waterFigure 1Page 2Shannon diversity index plotted against altitude for all eight glacial lakes. Bubble size represents species richness (S). The strongFigure 2Page 2
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

If biodiversity follows elevation in the Himalayas the way it does in most mountain systems, then the highest glacial lakes should harbor the fewest species-a prediction that, if confirmed, has practical consequences for predicting how climate change will reshape these ecosystems. Himalayan glacial lakes are among the most extreme freshwater environments on Earth: cold, oligotrophic, UV-exposed, and subject to dramatic seasonal shifts as glacial meltwater pulses through them [1] . Zooplankton sit at a pivotal position in these food webs, linking primary producers to fish and waterbirds, and their community structure reflects integrated environmental conditions in ways that single physical or chemical measurements cannot [2] . Yet systematic surveys of zooplankton diversity across elevation gradients in the eastern Himalayas remain rare, with most available data coming from the western Himalayan states or the Tibetan Plateau [3,4] . Sikkim, wedged between Nepal and Bhutan, contains over 300 glacial lakes spanning a 2,000 m elevation range within a compact geographic areaideal for testing how altitude shapes community composition while minimizing confounding regional effects [5] . This research aimed to survey zooplankton diversity, abundance, and community composition across eight glacial lakes on an elevation gradient in Sikkim and to identify the environmental variables driving community variation. (4,200 m). Monthly sampling at each lake was conducted by collecting vertical tows with a 55-μm mesh plankton net from 10 m depth to the surface at three stations per lake.

Methods

Zooplankton samples were preserved in 4% buffered formalin and identified to the lowest practical taxonomic level under a Leica S9i stereomicroscope using keys by Koste [6] for Rotifera and Dussart and Defaye [7] for Copepoda. Abundance was expressed as individuals per liter. Species richness (S), Shannon diversity index (H'), Simpson's dominance index (D), and Pielou's evenness (J') were calculated for each lake-month combination. Environmental parameters-water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, total dissolved solids, chlorophyll-a, and Secchi depth-were measured concurrently using standard methods [8] . Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) in CANOCO v5 tested relationships between zooplankton community composition and environmental variables. Correlation between diversity indices and altitude used Pearson's r.

Sampling Site Characterization

The eight study lakes ranged in surface area from 0.8 ha (Cholamu-Upper) to 12.4 ha (Khecheopalri) and in maximum depth from 4.2 m to 28.7 m. All lakes were fed primarily by glacial meltwater, with supplementary precipitation input during the monsoon months (June-September). Water temperatures during the sampling season ranged from 2.1 °C at Cholamu-Upper in May to 14.8 °C at Khecheopalri in July. Conductivity was uniformly low (12-48 μS/cm), reflecting the dilute glacial source water.

Chlorophyll-a concentrations followed the altitude gradient, from 3.7 μg/L at the lowest site to 0.4 μg/L at the highest. Species richness dropped from 24 taxa at 2,800 m to 7 taxa at 4,200 m-a 71% decline over a 1,400 m elevation range. Shannon diversity showed a near-perfect negative linear relationship with altitude (r =-0.98, p<0.001). Rotifera dominated the lower-altitude communities while Copepoda became proportionally more important at higher elevations. Canonical correspondence analysis explained 68.4% of the total variance in zooplankton community composition across the first two axes. Water temperature (axis 1 loading: 0.87), chlorophyll-a (0.74), and dissolved oxygen (0.69) were the strongest environmental predictors. High-altitude communities were associated with low temperature and chlorophyll-a, while lower-altitude assemblages correlated with warmer, more productive conditions.

Results

Results

Discussion

The sharp decline in zooplankton diversity with altitudelosing roughly one taxon for every 60 m of elevation gained-matches the pattern reported for Himalayan lakes in Ladakh and Nepal, though the gradient appears steeper in Sikkim, possibly due to the greater moisture input from the Bay of Bengal monsoon that supports higher productivity at lower altitudes [3,4] . The dominance of Rotifera at lower elevations likely reflects warmer temperatures and greater food availability from phytoplankton blooms, while the shift toward Copepoda at higher elevations is consistent with their cold-tolerance adaptations and lower metabolic rates [2] . The July abundance peak across all elevations coincides with the monsoon onset, when increased nutrient runoff and warming stimulate primary production [1] . Water temperature emerging as the strongest CCA predictor is consistent with the known thermal sensitivity of zooplankton metabolism and reproduction [5] . As Himalayan glaciers retreat and meltwater contributions shift, these lakes may warm, potentially allowing lower-elevation taxa to colonize higher sites-a process already documented in European alpine lakes [9] . These baseline data are needed to detect such changes.

Conclusion

This research documented a strong negative relationship between zooplankton diversity and altitude across eight Himalayan glacial lakes in Sikkim. Species richness dropped from 24 taxa at 2,800 m to 7 at 4,200 m, with Shannon diversity declining nearly linearly. Water temperature, chlorophyll-a, and dissolved oxygen were the primary environmental drivers of community composition. The July abundance peak reflects monsoon-driven productivity across all elevations. These results establish a quantitative baseline for monitoring how ongoing glacial retreat and climate warming may reshape zooplankton communities in high-altitude Himalayan lakes.

Acknowledgement

Acknowledgements Funding SourcesInternal research funds from the Sikkim Institute of Biological Sciences supported this work. Institutional SupportThe authors thank the Sikkim Institute of Biological Sciences for laboratory and field logistics support, and the Sikkim State Biodiversity Board for research permits.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. Zooplankton Diversity Metrics Across the Elevation
LakeElev. (m)Taxa (S)H'DJ'RotiferaCrustacea
Khecheopalri2,800242.870.910.841212
Menmecho3,000212.640.890.821110
Samiti3,400172.180.840.7798
Gurudongmar-S3,800121.720.760.6966
Cholamu-Upper4,20071.210.640.6234

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Zooplankton Diversity Metrics Across the Elevation↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Zooplankton Diversity Metrics Across the Elevation

Zooplankton Diversity Metrics Across the Elevation

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 1. Seasonal zooplankton abundance patterns at three elevation categories. All lakes peaked in July, coinciding with maximum water
Seasonal zooplankton abundance patterns at three elevation categories. All lakes peaked in July, coinciding with maximum water↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Seasonal zooplankton abundance patterns at three elevation categories. All lakes peaked in July, coinciding with maximum water

Seasonal zooplankton abundance patterns at three elevation categories. All lakes peaked in July, coinciding with maximum water

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 2. Shannon diversity index plotted against altitude for all eight glacial lakes. Bubble size represents species richness (S). The strong
Shannon diversity index plotted against altitude for all eight glacial lakes. Bubble size represents species richness (S). The strong↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Shannon diversity index plotted against altitude for all eight glacial lakes. Bubble size represents species richness (S). The strong

Shannon diversity index plotted against altitude for all eight glacial lakes. Bubble size represents species richness (S). The strong

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 2 ↗

References

9 in the original paper
  1. Mani MS. Ecology and Biogeography of High Altitude Insects. The Hague: Springer; 1968.
  2. Sharma S, Sharma RC. Zooplankton diversity in Himalayan wetlands. Research Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2008;2(5):382-393.
  3. Bhat NA, Wanganeo A, Raina R. Zooplankton assemblage in Dal Lake, Srinagar, Kashmir with regard to trophic status. Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment. 2014;6(1):1-7.
  4. Tartari GA, Tartari G, Mosello R. Water chemistry of high altitude lakes in the Khumbu and Imja Kola valleys (Nepalese Himalayas). Memorie dell'Istituto Italiano di Idrobiologia. 1998;57:51-76.
  5. Manca M, Comoli P. Biomass estimates of freshwater zooplankton from length-carbon regression equations. Journal of Limnology. 2000;59(1):15-18.
  6. Koste W. Rotatoria. Die Radertiere Mitteleuropas. Berlin: Gebruder Borntraeger; 1978.
  7. Dussart BH, Defaye D. Introduction to the Copepoda. Guides to the Identification of Microinvertebrates of Continental Waters of the World. 2001;16:1-344.
  8. APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 23rd ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2017.
  9. Winder M, Schindler DE. Climatic effects on the phenology of lake processes. Global Change Biology. 2004;10(11):1844-1856.