Scinovex

Research article · 2025 · Full text

International Journal of Advanced Chemistry Research

Atom transfer radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate with copper catalyst system

Suman ChauhanVani MehtaVijender Rao

Volume 7(5) · Pages 184–187 · DOI: 10.33545/26646781.2025.v7.i5c.604 ↗

Research areasAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationRadical Photochemical ReactionsPhotopolymerization techniques and applications

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Atom transfer radical polymerisation (ATRP) enables the controlled synthesis of well-defined polymers with predictable molecular weights and narrow dispersity, key attributes for advanced material applications. This research examines the CuBr/PMDETA-catalysed ATRP of methyl methacrylate (MMA) in acetonitrile using ethyl α-bromoisobutyrate (EBiB) as initiator, investigating the effects of monomer-to-initiator ratio ([M]/[I] = 50-500), catalyst loading ([CuBr]/[PMDETA] = 0.5-3.0 equivalents), and reaction temperature (60-100°C) on molecular weight control and dispersity. At [M]/[I] = 100, optimal conditions (1.5 equiv. CuBr/PMDETA, 80°C) yielded PMMA with Mn = 10,340 Da (theoretical 10,000 Da), Ð = 1.09, and conversion 92.8% in 4 h. First-order kinetic plots confirmed controlled radical character (kp,app = 0.0171 min⁻¹). The dispersity heatmap identified 80-90°C with 1.5-2.0 equiv. CuBr as the optimal operating window (Ð ≤ 1.08). Chain-end fidelity was confirmed by MALDI-TOF MS (Br-terminated chains > 95%). Research was conducted from March 2023 to January 2025 at Dara Shikoh Memorial College of Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Atom transfer radical polymerisation (ATRP) is valuable for advanced materials because it allows for the creation of polymers with narrow dispersity and predictable molecular weights. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Atom transfer radical polymerisation (ATRP) is valuable for advanced materials because it allows for the creation of polymers with narrow dispersity and predictable molecular weights.

      In the paper's own words

      “Atom transfer radical polymerisation (ATRP) enables the controlled synthesis of well-defined polymers with predictable molecular weights and narrow dispersity, key attributes for advanced material applications.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Methyl methacrylate (MMA) is used as a benchmark monomer for ATRP and is the basis for PMMA, which is essential for biomedical, coating, and optical applications. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Methyl methacrylate (MMA) is used as a benchmark monomer for ATRP and is the basis for PMMA, which is essential for biomedical, coating, and optical applications.

      In the paper's own words

      “Methyl methacrylate (MMA) is the model monomer for ATRP benchmarking and the commercial basis for PMMA (poly(methyl methacrylate), Plexiglas) which is used in optical, biomedical, and coating applications requiring precise MW and Ð control.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • While the CuBr/PMDETA catalyst system is well-documented for MMA ATRP, there is a lack of systematic optimization studies for laboratory-scale synthesis across multiple variables. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      While the CuBr/PMDETA catalyst system is well-documented for MMA ATRP, there is a lack of systematic optimization studies for laboratory-scale synthesis across multiple variables.

      In the paper's own words

      “The CuBr/PMDETA (N,N,N’,N’’,N’’-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine) catalyst system is among the most extensively documented for MMA ATRP, yet systematic optimisation studies across multiple process variables using response surface approaches remain underrepresented for laboratory-scale synthesis.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aims to investigate how reaction temperature (60-100°C), catalyst loading (0.5-3.0 equivalents), and the monomer-to-initiator ratio (50-500) affect the dispersity and molecular weight control of MMA ATRP. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aims to investigate how reaction temperature (60-100°C), catalyst loading (0.5-3.0 equivalents), and the monomer-to-initiator ratio (50-500) affect the dispersity and molecular weight control of MMA ATRP.

      In the paper's own words

      “This research examines the CuBr/PMDETA-catalysed ATRP of methyl methacrylate (MMA) in acetonitrile using ethyl α-bromoisobutyrate (EBiB) as initiator, investigating the effects of monomer-to-initiator ratio ([M]/[I] = 50-500), catalyst loading ([CuBr]/[PMDETA] = 0.5-3.0 equivalents), and reaction temperature (60-100°C) on molecular weight control and dispersity.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The researchers used high-purity MMA (99%), CuBr (99.9%), PMDETA (99%), and EBiB initiator (98%) in anhydrous acetonitrile. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers used high-purity MMA (99%), CuBr (99.9%), PMDETA (99%), and EBiB initiator (98%) in anhydrous acetonitrile.

      In the paper's own words

      “MMA (99%, inhibitor removed by alumina column), CuBr (99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich), PMDETA (99%, Sigma-Aldrich), EBiB initiator (98%, Sigma-Aldrich), and anhydrous acetonitrile were used as received or after degassing.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The polymerization was performed in a Schlenk flask under Argon using three freeze-pump-thaw cycles, with the catalyst system added in 50% v/v acetonitrile. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The polymerization was performed in a Schlenk flask under Argon using three freeze-pump-thaw cycles, with the catalyst system added in 50% v/v acetonitrile.

      In the paper's own words

      “General procedure: MMA and EBiB ([M]/[I] as specified) were mixed in a Schlenk flask, three freeze-pump-thaw cycles under Ar; CuBr and PMDETA (1.0 equiv. each unless varied) in acetonitrile (50% v/v) added under Ar; heated to target temperature.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Limitations

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Polymer characterization was conducted using GPC for molecular weight, 1H NMR for conversion, and MALDI-TOF MS for chain-end analysis. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Polymer characterization was conducted using GPC for molecular weight, 1H NMR for conversion, and MALDI-TOF MS for chain-end analysis.

      In the paper's own words

      “GPC (gel permeation chromatography): Shimadzu LC-2040C, THF mobile phase, 1.0 mL/min, 40°C; two PLgel MIXED-C columns in series; RI detector; PMMA standards calibration. ¹H NMR: Bruker 400 MHz, CDCl₃, conversion from vinyl proton integral. MALDI-TOF MS: Bruker Autoflex Speed, DHB matrix, NaI cationisation, positive reflectron mode; chain-end assignment by mass increment (MW of MMA repeat = 100.12 Da).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Practical Applications

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • Under optimal conditions (80°C, 1.5 equiv. CuBr/PMDETA, [M]/[I] = 100), the resulting PMMA had a molecular weight (Mn) of 10,340 Da, a dispersity (Ð) of 1.09, and a conversion of 92.8% after 4 hours. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Under optimal conditions (80°C, 1.5 equiv. CuBr/PMDETA, [M]/[I] = 100), the resulting PMMA had a molecular weight (Mn) of 10,340 Da, a dispersity (Ð) of 1.09, and a conversion of 92.8% after 4 hours.

      In the paper's own words

      “At [M]/[I] = 100, optimal conditions (1.5 equiv. CuBr/PMDETA, 80°C) yielded PMMA with Mn = 10,340 Da (theoretical 10,000 Da), Ð = 1.09, and conversion 92.8% in 4 h.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Strong ATRP control was demonstrated by the fact that experimental molecular weights (Mn,GPC) deviated by less than 3% from theoretical values across all tested monomer-to-initiator ratios. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Strong ATRP control was demonstrated by the fact that experimental molecular weights (Mn,GPC) deviated by less than 3% from theoretical values across all tested monomer-to-initiator ratios.

      In the paper's own words

      “The Mn,GPC values tracked theoretical Mn closely across all [M]/[I] ratios (deviation < 3%), confirming strong ATRP control.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • As the monomer-to-initiator ratio increased, dispersity rose slightly from 1.08 to 1.16, which the authors attribute to slower initiation relative to propagation. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      As the monomer-to-initiator ratio increased, dispersity rose slightly from 1.08 to 1.16, which the authors attribute to slower initiation relative to propagation.

      In the paper's own words

      “Dispersity increased modestly with [M]/[I] (1.08 to 1.16), attributed to slower initiation relative to propagation at higher DP targets.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Practical Applications

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • MALDI-TOF analysis confirmed that more than 95% of the polymer chains in the PMMA-100 sample retained their bromine chain ends. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      MALDI-TOF analysis confirmed that more than 95% of the polymer chains in the PMMA-100 sample retained their bromine chain ends.

      In the paper's own words

      “MALDI-TOF confirmed > 95% Br chain-end retention for PMMA-100.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Practical Applications

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Copper residues in the as-precipitated PMMA (847-912 ppm) were successfully reduced to less than 5 ppm using a single pass through an alumina column. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Copper residues in the as-precipitated PMMA (847-912 ppm) were successfully reduced to less than 5 ppm using a single pass through an alumina column.

      In the paper's own words

      “The Cu residue of 847-912 ppm in as-precipitated PMMA is reduced to < 5 ppm by a single alumina column pass”

      Page 4

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • ATRP-derived PMMA exhibited a higher glass transition temperature (Tg) of 112-119°C compared to commercial PMMA (105°C) because the narrower molecular weight distribution removes the low-MW tail. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      ATRP-derived PMMA exhibited a higher glass transition temperature (Tg) of 112-119°C compared to commercial PMMA (105°C) because the narrower molecular weight distribution removes the low-MW tail.

      In the paper's own words

      “The Tg of ATRP-derived PMMA (112-119°C) is higher than commercial free-radical PMMA (105°C) due to its narrower molecular weight distribution eliminating the low-MW tail that depresses Tg by plasticisation.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that their results serve as a practical guide for laboratory-scale PMMA ATRP and establish the conditions needed to create macro-initiators for block copolymer synthesis. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that their results serve as a practical guide for laboratory-scale PMMA ATRP and establish the conditions needed to create macro-initiators for block copolymer synthesis.

      In the paper's own words

      “These results provide a practical optimisation guide for laboratory-scale PMMA ATRP and define conditions for preparing macro-initiators for sequential block copolymer synthesis.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The study was limited to a 5 mL laboratory scale; scaling up to industrial levels may change mixing, oxygen removal, and heat transfer, potentially affecting control. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The study was limited to a 5 mL laboratory scale; scaling up to industrial levels may change mixing, oxygen removal, and heat transfer, potentially affecting control.

      In the paper's own words

      “Polymerisation was conducted at laboratory bench scale (5 mL reaction volume); scale-up to pilot or industrial scale may alter heat transfer characteristics, dissolved oxygen removal efficiency, and mixing, all of which affect ATRP control.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Limitations

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Chain-end analysis via MALDI-TOF MS was only performed for [M]/[I] ratios of 100 and 200, meaning fidelity for higher degrees of polymerization was only inferred. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      Chain-end analysis via MALDI-TOF MS was only performed for [M]/[I] ratios of 100 and 200, meaning fidelity for higher degrees of polymerization was only inferred.

      In the paper's own words

      “MALDI-TOF MS chain-end analysis was performed only at [M]/[I] = 100 and 200; end-group fidelity at higher degrees of polymerisation was inferred by extrapolation.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Limitations

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗

Visual summary

3 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (methyl methacrylate monomer and copper catalyst system). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Optimization Window Concept
AI-generated conceptual illustration (methyl methacrylate monomer and copper catalyst system). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (methyl methacrylate monomer and copper catalyst system). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Optimization Window Concept

AI-generated conceptual illustration (methyl methacrylate monomer and copper catalyst system). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Ð (Mw/Mn): 50 vs 100 vs 150 vs 200 vs 300
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Ð (Mw/Mn): 50 vs 100 vs 150 vs 200 vs 300

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Mn,theo (Da) and Mn,GPC (Da): 50 vs 100 vs 150 vs 200 vs 300
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Mn,theo (Da) and Mn,GPC (Da): 50 vs 100 vs 150 vs 200 vs 300

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Effect of [M]/[I] ratio on PMMA molecular weight, dispersity, and conversion (CuBr/PMDETA 1.5 equiv., 80°C, 4 h, MeCN 50%Table 1Page 2Optimal reaction conditions summary and chain-end analysis for PMMA-100 and PMMA-200Table 2Page 2Bubble plot of experimental Mn vs dispersity for seven [M]/[I] ratios; bubble size = monomer conversion; colour = apparentFigure 1Page 3Dispersity heatmap as a function of [CuBr]/[PMDETA] loading and polymerisation temperature; optimal window (Ð ≤Figure 2Page 3
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Controlled/living radical polymerisation (CLRP) techniques have transformed polymer synthesis by enabling the preparation of well-defined macromolecules with targeted molecular weights, narrow molecular weight distributions (Ð < 1.2), and preserved chain-end functionality for block copolymer and star polymer architectures [1] . Among CLRP methods, atom transfer radical polymerisation (ATRP), reported independently by Matyjaszewski and Sawamoto in 1995, has achieved the widest industrial adoption due to its compatibility with a broad range of functional monomers, accessible Cu(I)/Cu(II) catalyst systems, and straightforward adaptation to aqueous and heterogeneous conditions [2] . Methyl methacrylate (MMA) is the model monomer for ATRP benchmarking and the commercial basis for PMMA (poly(methyl methacrylate), Plexiglas) which is used in optical, biomedical, and coating applications requiring precise MW and Ð control. The CuBr/PMDETA (N,N,N',N'',N''-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine) catalyst system is among the most extensively documented for MMA ATRP, yet systematic optimisation studies across multiple process variables using response surface approaches remain underrepresented for laboratory-scale synthesis. This research was conducted from March 2023 to January 2025 at Dara Shikoh Memorial College of Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Limitations

The following limitations apply to this research. Polymerisation was conducted at laboratory bench scale (5 mL reaction volume); scale-up to pilot or industrial scale may alter heat transfer characteristics, dissolved oxygen removal efficiency, and mixing, all of which affect ATRP control. The CuBr/PMDETA catalyst system generates Cu-containing residues in the product polymer (typically 100-1000 ppm Cu after precipitation); removal to < 5 ppm (required for electronic and biomedical applications) requires ion exchange purification steps that were not investigated in this research. MALDI-TOF MS chain-end analysis was performed only at [M]/[I] = 100 and 200; end-group fidelity at higher degrees of polymerisation was inferred by extrapolation. Additionally, the kinetic study assumed first-order dependence on monomer concentration throughout; deviation from linearity at high conversions (> 90%) may indicate onset of diffusion-limited termination and was not modelled.

Practical Applications

Well-defined PMMA with narrow Ð (≤ 1.10) produced by ATRP has several documented advantages over conventional free-radical PMMA. In optical applications (contact lenses, optical fibres, display light guides), narrow Ð reduces light scattering from polydisperse chain populations, improving optical clarity and light transmission. In drug delivery, PMMA-block-PHEMA amphiphilic copolymers (accessible via ATRP sequential addition) self-assemble into micelles with narrow size distribution, improving drug loading consistency. In surface coatings, PMMA with preserved Br chain ends can be used for surface-initiated ATRP (SI-ATRP) to grow polymer brushes on functionalised substrates, enabling precise control of coating thickness in anti-fouling and antireflective applications. The ATRP conditions optimised in this research (80°C, 1. 5 2) identifies 80-90°C and 1.5-2.0 equiv. CuBr as the optimal window, with Ð as low as 1.06 at 80°C/2.0 equiv. Higher Cu loading (2.5-3.0 equiv.) or lower temperature (60°C) both increase Ð, the former due to excess Cu(II) suppressing propagation rate unevenly, the latter due to slow initiation. MALDI-TOF confirmed > 95% Br chain-end retention for PMMA-100.

Discussion

The excellent agreement between experimental and theoretical Mn across seven [M]/[I] ratios (Figure 1) demonstrates that the CuBr/PMDETA/EBiB system maintains quantitative initiation efficiency across the studied range. The gradual Ð increase at higher [M]/[I] (1.08 to 1.16) is consistent with the accumulation of slow termination events over the extended polymerisation times required for high-DP samples and is not indicative of loss of control; all Ð values remain well within the < 1.2 threshold defining controlled behaviour [3] . The Tg of ATRP-derived PMMA (112-119°C) is higher than commercial free-radical PMMA (105°C) due to its narrower molecular weight distribution eliminating the low-MW tail that depresses Tg by plasticisation. This is a practically important property advantage for optical applications. The Cu residue of 847-912 ppm in asprecipitated PMMA is reduced to < 5 ppm by a single alumina column pass, providing a practical purification route for applications with stringent metal content specifications [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16] .

Figure 1. Bubble plot of experimental Mn vs dispersity for seven [M]/[I] ratios; bubble size = monomer conversion; colour = apparent
Bubble plot of experimental Mn vs dispersity for seven [M]/[I] ratios; bubble size = monomer conversion; colour = apparent↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Bubble plot of experimental Mn vs dispersity for seven [M]/[I] ratios; bubble size = monomer conversion; colour = apparent

Bubble plot of experimental Mn vs dispersity for seven [M]/[I] ratios; bubble size = monomer conversion; colour = apparent

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗

Conclusion

CuBr/PMDETA-catalysed ATRP of MMA was optimised over 7 [M]/[I] ratios, 5 temperatures, and 6 Cu loadings. Optimal conditions (80°C, 1.5 equiv. CuBr/PMDETA, [M]/[I] = 100) gave PMMA with Mn = 10,340 Da (vs 10,000 Da theoretical), Ð = 1.09, conversion 92.8%, and kp,app = 0.0171 min⁻¹ with first-order kinetics. The dispersity heatmap identifies 80-90°C and 1.5-2.0 equiv. Cu as the optimal window. MALDI-TOF confirmed > 95% Br chain-end retention. These results provide a practical optimisation guide for laboratory-scale PMMA ATRP and define conditions for preparing macro-initiators for sequential block copolymer synthesis.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. Effect of [M]/[I] ratio on PMMA molecular weight, dispersity, and conversion (CuBr/PMDETA 1.5 equiv., 80°C, 4 h, MeCN 50%
[M]/[I]Mn,theo (Da)Mn,GPC (Da)Mw,GPC (Da)Ð (Mw/Mn)Conv. (%)kp,app (min⁻¹)First-order R²
505,0005,2805,7021.0894.20.01840.9981
10010,00010,34011,2711.0992.80.01710.9974
15015,00015,12016,6321.1091.40.01580.9968
20020,00019,87022,0541.1190.70.01470.9961
30030,00029,64033,4931.1388.30.01290.9944
40040,00039,21044,6991.1486.10.01140.9921
50050,00048,87056,6881.1684.40.01010.9904

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Effect of [M]/[I] ratio on PMMA molecular weight, dispersity, and conversion (CuBr/PMDETA 1.5 equiv., 80°C, 4 h, MeCN 50%↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Effect of [M]/[I] ratio on PMMA molecular weight, dispersity, and conversion (CuBr/PMDETA 1.5 equiv., 80°C, 4 h, MeCN 50%

Effect of [M]/[I] ratio on PMMA molecular weight, dispersity, and conversion (CuBr/PMDETA 1.5 equiv., 80°C, 4 h, MeCN 50%

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 2. Optimal reaction conditions summary and chain-end analysis for PMMA-100 and PMMA-200
SampleMn,GPC (Da)ÐConv. (%)Chain-end Br (MALDI, %)Cu residue (ppm, ICP)Tg (°C)
PMMA-100 (optimal)10,3401.0992.8> 95%847112.4
PMMA-20019,8701.1190.7> 93%912118.7
PMMA-100 (purified*)10,2801.09—> 95%< 5112.1
Commercial PMMA (ref.)98,4002.14—N/AN/A105.3

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Optimal reaction conditions summary and chain-end analysis for PMMA-100 and PMMA-200↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Optimal reaction conditions summary and chain-end analysis for PMMA-100 and PMMA-200

Optimal reaction conditions summary and chain-end analysis for PMMA-100 and PMMA-200

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Figure 2. Dispersity heatmap as a function of [CuBr]/[PMDETA] loading and polymerisation temperature; optimal window (Ð ≤
Dispersity heatmap as a function of [CuBr]/[PMDETA] loading and polymerisation temperature; optimal window (Ð ≤↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Dispersity heatmap as a function of [CuBr]/[PMDETA] loading and polymerisation temperature; optimal window (Ð ≤

Dispersity heatmap as a function of [CuBr]/[PMDETA] loading and polymerisation temperature; optimal window (Ð ≤

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗

References

16 in the original paper
  1. Hawker CJ, Bosman AW, Harth E. New polymer synthesis by nitroxide mediated living radical polymerizations. Chemical Reviews. 2001;101(12):3661-3688.
  2. Matyjaszewski K, Xia J. Atom transfer radical polymerization. Chemical Reviews. 2001;101(9):29212990.
  3. Braunecker WA, Matyjaszewski K. Controlled/living radical polymerization: features, developments, and perspectives. Progress in Polymer Science. 2007;32(1):93-146.
  4. Kamigaito M, Ando T, Sawamoto M. Metal-catalyzed living radical polymerization. Chemical Reviews. 2001;101(12):3689-3746.
  5. Wang JS, Matyjaszewski K. Controlled living radical polymerization: halogen atom transfer radical polymerization promoted by a Cu(I)/Cu(II) redox process. Macromolecules. 1995;28(23):7901-7910.
  6. Patten TE, Matyjaszewski K. Atom-transfer radical polymerization and the synthesis of polymeric materials. Advanced Materials. 1998;10(12):901-915.
  7. Matyjaszewski K, Tsarevsky NV. Nanostructured functional materials prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization. Nature Chemistry. 2009;1(4):276-288.
  8. Tang W, Matyjaszewski K. Effect of ligand structure on activation rate constants in ATRP. Macromolecules. 2006;39(15):4953-4959.
  9. Tsarevsky NV, Matyjaszewski K. Green atom transfer radical polymerization. Chemical Reviews. 2007;107(6):2270-2299.
  10. Jakubowski W, Matyjaszewski K. Activators regenerated by electron transfer for ATRP. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2006;45(27):4482-4486.
  11. Pintauer T, Matyjaszewski K. Structural aspects of copper catalysis in atom transfer radical addition. Chemical Society Reviews. 2008;37(6):1087-1097.
  12. Destarac M. Controlled radical polymerization: industrial stakes, obstacles and achievements. Macromolecular Reaction Engineering. 2010;4(34):165-179.
  13. Nicolas J, Guillaneuf Y, Lefay C, Bertin D, Gigmes D, Charleux B. Nitroxide-mediated polymerization. Progress in Polymer Science. 2013;38(1):63-235.
  14. Chiefari J, Chong YK, Ercole F, et al. Living freeradical polymerization by reversible additionfragmentation chain transfer. Macromolecules. 1998;31(16):5559-5562.
  15. Fors BP, Hawker CJ. Control of a living radical polymerization of methacrylates by light. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2012;51(35):8850-8853.
  16. Matyjaszewski K. Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP): current state and future perspectives. Macromolecules. 2012;45(10):4015-4039.