Scinovex

Research article · 2025 · Full text

International Journal of Advanced Chemistry Research

Synthesis and characterization of star-shaped block copolymers via RAFT polymerization

Raul DiazPaloma Moreno

Volume 7(11) · Pages 109–112 · DOI: 10.33545/26646781.2025.v7.i11b.446 ↗

Research areasAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationBlock Copolymer Self-Assemblybiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Star-shaped polymers remain among the least predictable macromolecular architectures in terms of self-assembly, mechanical response, and solution behaviour a direct consequence of their constrained branch-point geometry. This research describes the synthesis and full characterisation of four-arm star poly (styrene)-block-poly (methyl methacrylate) (PS-b-PMMA) copolymers prepared via the reversible addition–fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) technique using a tetra-functional trithiocarbonate chain-transfer agent. Polymerisation was carried out in bulk at 70 °C with azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) as radical initiator. Kinetic sampling showed a linear increase in number-average molecular weight (Mn) with conversion, reaching 26.1 kg/mol at 93.7% conversion, while dispersity (Đ) stayed below 1.31 throughout. GPC traces exhibited monomodal distributions with no high-molecular-weight shoulder, indicating minimal star-star coupling. ¹H NMR confirmed block composition within 3% of theoretical feed ratios. DSC revealed a single broad glass transition at 112.8 °C for the star copolymer, intermediate between homopolymer PS (103.7 °C) and PMMA (121.4 °C). TGA under nitrogen showed 5% mass loss at 327 °C. These well-defined star block copolymers may find application as compatibilisers, nanopatterning templates, and rheology modifiers.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Star polymers are characterized by linear arms radiating from a single core, which gives them distinct self-assembly behavior and lower viscosities than linear polymers of the same molecular weight. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Star polymers are characterized by linear arms radiating from a single core, which gives them distinct self-assembly behavior and lower viscosities than linear polymers of the same molecular weight.

      In the paper's own words

      “Star polymers, in which several linear arms radiate from a single core, display lower melt and solution viscosities, smaller hydrodynamic radii, and distinct self-assembly behaviour compared to their linear analogues of equivalent molecular weight”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The combination of polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PS-b-PMMA) is useful for nanopatterning due to its high Flory-Huggins parameter and the fact that PMMA can be selectively etched. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The combination of polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PS-b-PMMA) is useful for nanopatterning due to its high Flory-Huggins parameter and the fact that PMMA can be selectively etched.

      In the paper's own words

      “PS-b-PMMA is a well-explored pair for nanopatterning because of the large Flory–Huggins parameter and the selective etchability of PMMA under UV or oxygen-plasma exposure”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Reversible addition-fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) polymerization is preferred for creating complex polymer architectures because it is versatile with monomers and operates under mild conditions. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Reversible addition-fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) polymerization is preferred for creating complex polymer architectures because it is versatile with monomers and operates under mild conditions.

      In the paper's own words

      “RAFT polymerisation has become the method of choice for preparing well-defined complex architectures because it tolerates a wide range of monomers, proceeds under mild conditions, and preserves chain-end functionality”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aims to address the lack of detailed kinetic and thermal characterization data for star-shaped PS-b-PMMA by synthesizing a four-arm version using a core-first approach. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aims to address the lack of detailed kinetic and thermal characterization data for star-shaped PS-b-PMMA by synthesizing a four-arm version using a core-first approach.

      In the paper's own words

      “Despite the growing literature on RAFT-derived star homopolymers, detailed kinetic and thermal characterisation data for star PS-b-PMMA are scarce. This research fills that gap by reporting the core-first synthesis of four-arm star PS-b-PMMA”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The researchers synthesized four-arm star PS-b-PMMA copolymers using a tetra-functional trithiocarbonate chain-transfer agent via RAFT polymerization. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The researchers synthesized four-arm star PS-b-PMMA copolymers using a tetra-functional trithiocarbonate chain-transfer agent via RAFT polymerization.

      In the paper's own words

      “This research describes the synthesis and full characterisation of four-arm star poly (styrene)-block-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PS-b-PMMA) copolymers prepared via the reversible addition–fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) technique using a tetra-functional trithiocarbonate chain-transfer agent.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Polymerization kinetics were monitored by taking samples at intervals, which were then analyzed using gravimetry for conversion and Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) for molecular weight. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Polymerization kinetics were monitored by taking samples at intervals, which were then analyzed using gravimetry for conversion and Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) for molecular weight.

      In the paper's own words

      “Kinetic samples were withdrawn at intervals via syringe through the septum, quenched in liquid nitrogen, and analysed by gravimetry for conversion and by GPC for molecular weight distribution.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Thermal properties were measured using Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) from -50 to 200 °C and Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) from 25 to 700 °C under nitrogen. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Thermal properties were measured using Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) from -50 to 200 °C and Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) from 25 to 700 °C under nitrogen.

      In the paper's own words

      “DSC was performed from −50 to 200 °C at 10 °C/min; Tg was taken from the midpoint of the heat capacity step during the second heating scan. TGA was recorded from 25 to 700 °C under nitrogen.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • The number-average molecular weight increased linearly with conversion, reaching 26.1 kg/mol at 93.7% conversion, with dispersity remaining under 1.31. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The number-average molecular weight increased linearly with conversion, reaching 26.1 kg/mol at 93.7% conversion, with dispersity remaining under 1.31.

      In the paper's own words

      “Kinetic sampling showed a linear increase in number-average molecular weight (Mn) with conversion, reaching 26.1 kg/mol at 93.7% conversion, while dispersity (Đ) stayed below 1.31 throughout.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • GPC analysis showed monomodal distributions without high-molecular-weight shoulders, suggesting that star-star coupling was minimal. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      GPC analysis showed monomodal distributions without high-molecular-weight shoulders, suggesting that star-star coupling was minimal.

      In the paper's own words

      “GPC traces exhibited monomodal distributions with no high-molecular-weight shoulder, indicating minimal star-star coupling.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The block composition of the copolymers was confirmed by 1H NMR to be within 3% of the theoretical feed ratios. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The block composition of the copolymers was confirmed by 1H NMR to be within 3% of the theoretical feed ratios.

      In the paper's own words

      “¹H NMR confirmed block composition within 3% of theoretical feed ratios.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The star copolymer exhibited a single glass transition temperature (Tg) of 112.8 °C, which is between the Tg of PS (103.7 °C) and PMMA (121.4 °C). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The star copolymer exhibited a single glass transition temperature (Tg) of 112.8 °C, which is between the Tg of PS (103.7 °C) and PMMA (121.4 °C).

      In the paper's own words

      “DSC revealed a single broad glass transition at 112.8 °C for the star copolymer, intermediate between homopolymer PS (103.7 °C) and PMMA (121.4 °C).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Thermal stability analysis via TGA showed a 5% mass loss at 327 °C under nitrogen. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Thermal stability analysis via TGA showed a 5% mass loss at 327 °C under nitrogen.

      In the paper's own words

      “TGA under nitrogen showed 5% mass loss at 327 °C.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The star copolymer's glass transition temperature (112.8 °C) was higher than that of the linear diblock analogue (108.3 °C). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The star copolymer's glass transition temperature (112.8 °C) was higher than that of the linear diblock analogue (108.3 °C).

      In the paper's own words

      “The star copolymer showed a single Tg at 112.8 °C, higher than the linear diblock analogue (108.3 °C).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that these star block copolymers are suitable for nanopatterning and compatibilization due to their architectural control and tunable phase behavior. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that these star block copolymers are suitable for nanopatterning and compatibilization due to their architectural control and tunable phase behavior.

      In the paper's own words

      “The combination of synthetic simplicity, architectural control, and tuneable phase behaviour makes these star block copolymers attractive for applications in compatibilisation and nanopatterning.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The authors suggest that future work should extend this synthesis method to asymmetric block compositions and higher arm numbers. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors suggest that future work should extend this synthesis method to asymmetric block compositions and higher arm numbers.

      In the paper's own words

      “Extending this approach to higher arm numbers and asymmetric block compositions is a logical next step.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗

Visual summary

3 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; charts are replotted from the paper's own table values.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (four-arm star-shaped block copolymer molecules). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Core-First Star Polymer Architecture
AI-generated conceptual illustration (four-arm star-shaped block copolymer molecules). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (four-arm star-shaped block copolymer molecules). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Core-First Star Polymer Architecture

AI-generated conceptual illustration (four-arm star-shaped block copolymer molecules). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Mn,GPC (kg/mol): 12.4 vs 24.7 vs 38.1 vs 51.6 vs 63.8
Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Mn,GPC (kg/mol): 12.4 vs 24.7 vs 38.1 vs 51.6 vs 63.8

Replotted from Table 1 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗
Replotted from source data
Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.↗ Enlarge
Tg ( °C): 4-arm star PS-b-PMMA vs Linear PS-b-PMMA
Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

Open full-size image ↗

Tg ( °C): 4-arm star PS-b-PMMA vs Linear PS-b-PMMA

Replotted from Table 2 (page 2) of the original paper. Every bar is the paper's own table value.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Molecular Weight and Dispersity Data for Star PS-b-PMMA Copolymers at Different ConversionsTable 1Page 2Thermal Properties of Star and Linear PS-b-PMMA CopolymersTable 2Page 2Number-average molecular weight and dispersity versus monomer conversion for four-arm star PS-b-PMMA prepared by RAFTFigure 1Page 3Box plot comparing glass transition temperatures of PS homopolymer, PMMA homopolymer, four-arm star PS-b-PMMA, and linearFigure 2Page 3
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

The architecture of a polymer chain linear, branched, cyclic, or star has a profound effect on its physical properties, even when the chemical composition stays the same [1] . Star polymers, in which several linear arms radiate from a single core, display lower melt and solution viscosities, smaller hydrodynamic radii, and distinct self-assembly behaviour compared to their linear analogues of equivalent molecular weight [2] . These features make star architectures appealing for applications in drug delivery, coatings, adhesives, and nanolithography [3] . RAFT polymerisation has become the method of choice for preparing well-defined complex architectures because it tolerates a wide range of monomers, proceeds under mild conditions, and preserves chain-end functionality [4] . Two strategies exist for making RAFT-based stars: the "core-first" approach, which uses a multifunctional CTA bearing several trithiocarbonate or dithioester groups, and the "arm-first" approach, which crosslinks pre-formed linear macro-CTAs [5] . The core-first route generally gives better arm-number control and narrower distributions, but star-star coupling and slow reinitiation can become issues at high conversions [6] . Block copolymer stars add further interest, since the microphase separation of incompatible blocks is modulated by the star constraint. Compared to linear diblocks, star block copolymers show shifted order-disorder transition temperatures and access to morphologies not observed in linear systems [7] . PS-b-PMMA is a well-explored pair for nanopatterning because of the large Flory-Huggins parameter and the selective etchability of PMMA under UV or oxygen-plasma exposure [8] . Despite the growing literature on RAFT-derived star homopolymers, detailed kinetic and thermal characterisation data for star PS-b-PMMA are scarce. This research fills that gap by reporting the core-first synthesis of four-arm star PS-b-PMMA, tracking polymerisation kinetics to high conversion, and comparing the thermal and molecular weight properties with linear diblock and homopolymer counterparts.

Reagents and Chemicals

Styrene (≥99%, Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) and methyl methacrylate (MMA, 99%, Sigma-Aldrich) were passed through basic alumina columns to remove inhibitors immediately before use. The tetrafunctional RAFT agent, pentaerythritol tetrakis(2-(dodecylthiocarbonothioylthio)-2methylpropionate), was synthesised in-house following the procedure of Mayadunne et al. [4] and characterised by ¹H NMR and ESI-MS (purity >97%). Azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN, 98%, Acros Organics) was recrystallised from methanol. Tetrahydrofuran (THF, HPLC grade, Scharlau, Barcelona, Spain) served as GPC eluent. Deuterated chloroform (CDCl₃, 99.8 atom% D, Euriso-Top) was used for NMR measurements [9] .

Instrumentation and Analytical Equipment

Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) was performed on a Shimadzu Prominence system fitted with a RID-20A refractive index detector and two PLgel 5 µm Mixed-C columns, using THF at 1.0 mL/min and calibrated with narrow PS standards (Polymer Laboratories). ¹H NMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker Avance III 400 MHz spectrometer at 25 °C. DSC measurements used a TA Instruments Q2000 under nitrogen at 10 °C/min. TGA was conducted on a TA Instruments Q50 at 10 °C/min under nitrogen. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was carried out on a Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS at 25 °C in THF solutions (1 mg/mL) [10] .

Material and Methods

Material and Methods

Material

The research was performed between April 2023 and September 2024 at the Department of Chemical Engineering and Polymer Technology, Universidad de Castilla de Ciencias Químicas, Sevilla, Spain. The tetrafunctional CTA was dissolved in bulk styrene at a [monomer]:[CTA]:[AIBN] molar ratio of 400:1:0.2. The reaction flask was sealed with a rubber septum, deoxygenated by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles, and immersed in an oil bath at 70 °C. After completion of the PS block (target conversion ~50%), residual styrene was removed under reduced pressure and MMA was added for the second block growth at 70 °C under identical conditions. The experimental protocol was approved by the university research committee (reference UCCQ-POL-2023-031, dated 12 March 2023).

Methods

Kinetic samples were withdrawn at intervals via syringe through the septum, quenched in liquid nitrogen, and analysed by gravimetry for conversion and by GPC for molecular weight distribution. Conversion was calculated as the mass of polymer divided by the initial monomer mass. Block composition was confirmed by ¹H NMR from the integral ratio of the aromatic PS protons (6.2-7.2 ppm) and the OCH₃ signal of PMMA (3.6 ppm). Star functionality was verified by cleaving the trithiocarbonate linkages with aminolysis (excess n-butylamine, THF, 25 °C, 24 h), followed by GPC analysis of the released linear arms. DSC was performed from -50 to 200 °C at 10 °C/min; Tg was taken from the midpoint of the heat capacity step during the second heating scan. TGA was recorded from 25 to 700 °C under nitrogen. Hydrodynamic diameters were measured by DLS at a scattering angle of 173° [11] . The star copolymer showed a single Tg at 112.8 °C, higher than the linear diblock analogue (108.3 °C). The 5% weightloss temperature of 327 °C was lower than for either homopolymer but still suitable for most processing applications.

Results

Figure 1 shows the characteristic linear evolution of Mn with conversion expected for a controlled radical process. The slight upward deviation at high conversion reflects minor star-star coupling, while the dispersity drift from 1.08 to 1.31 remains within the range considered well-controlled for RAFT systems. The box plot in Figure 2 illustrates the intermediate Tg of the star copolymer. The broader whiskers for the star sample reflect slightly greater compositional heterogeneity introduced by the sequential block growth on the multi-arm core.

Figure 2. Box plot comparing glass transition temperatures of PS homopolymer, PMMA homopolymer, four-arm star PS-b-PMMA, and linear
Box plot comparing glass transition temperatures of PS homopolymer, PMMA homopolymer, four-arm star PS-b-PMMA, and linear↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
Box plot comparing glass transition temperatures of PS homopolymer, PMMA homopolymer, four-arm star PS-b-PMMA, and linear

Box plot comparing glass transition temperatures of PS homopolymer, PMMA homopolymer, four-arm star PS-b-PMMA, and linear

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 1. Number-average molecular weight and dispersity versus monomer conversion for four-arm star PS-b-PMMA prepared by RAFT
Number-average molecular weight and dispersity versus monomer conversion for four-arm star PS-b-PMMA prepared by RAFT↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
Number-average molecular weight and dispersity versus monomer conversion for four-arm star PS-b-PMMA prepared by RAFT

Number-average molecular weight and dispersity versus monomer conversion for four-arm star PS-b-PMMA prepared by RAFT

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗

Comprehensive interpretation

Together, the kinetic, molecular weight, and thermal data demonstrate that the core-first RAFT strategy can deliver four-arm star PS-b-PMMA with controlled architecture and predictable properties. The approach is scalable, requires no metal catalysts, and maintains living character to high conversion.

Discussion

The linear relationship between Mn and conversion up to ~75% confirms that the tetrafunctional CTA mediates the polymerisation effectively and that arm growth is uniform across the four attachment points [4] . The slight deviation at high conversion resembles what Stenzel and Davis [5] observed in six-arm star poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) and was attributed to termination by combination between propagating star radicals. Our dispersity values (1.08-1.31) are comparable to or narrower than those reported by Gao and Matyjaszewski for four-arm star PS by ATRP [6] , suggesting that RAFT provides at least equivalent control for this architecture. The single Tg observed for the star copolymer contrasts with the two distinct transitions typically seen in linear PSb-PMMA of higher molecular weight, where microphase separation produces discrete PS and PMMA domains [7] . The short block lengths and star constraint in our materials evidently suppress long-range ordering, yielding a mixedphase morphology. This finding is consistent with theoretical predictions that star architecture shifts the orderdisorder transition to higher segregation strengths [8] . From a practical standpoint, the well-defined star topology, narrow dispersity, and intermediate thermal properties make these copolymers candidates for blend compatibilisation, where their branched architecture can anchor at immiscible polymer interfaces more effectively than linear diblocks of the same molecular weight [12] .

Conclusion

Four-arm star PS-b-PMMA block copolymers were prepared by core-first RAFT polymerisation using a tetrafunctional trithiocarbonate CTA. Molecular weights grew linearly with conversion, dispersity remained below 1.31, and arm cleavage by aminolysis confirmed the star topology. DSC showed a single Tg at 112.8 °C, intermediate between the parent homopolymers and higher than that of a linear PS-b-PMMA reference. TGA demonstrated adequate thermal stability with 5% mass loss at 327 °C. The combination of synthetic simplicity, architectural control, and tuneable phase behaviour makes these star block copolymers attractive for applications in compatibilisation and nanopatterning. Extending this approach to higher arm numbers and asymmetric block compositions is a logical next step.

Acknowledgement

Acknowledgements Funding SourcesFinancial support was received from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the national research programme. No specific grant numbers are disclosed. Institutional supportThe authors thank the Universidad de Castilla de Ciencias Químicas for access to polymer characterisation laboratories and GPC instrumentation.

Figures and tables from the paper

Table 1. Molecular Weight and Dispersity Data for Star PS-b-PMMA Copolymers at Different Conversions
Conversion (%)Mn,theo (kg/mol)Mn,GPC (kg/mol)ĐRh (nm)
12.43.23.51.082.1
24.76.46.81.113.4
38.19.810.31.144.7
51.613.313.91.185.8
63.816.417.11.216.9
74.319.220.41.247.8
85.222.023.61.278.6
93.724.226.11.319.3

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Molecular Weight and Dispersity Data for Star PS-b-PMMA Copolymers at Different Conversions↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Molecular Weight and Dispersity Data for Star PS-b-PMMA Copolymers at Different Conversions

Molecular Weight and Dispersity Data for Star PS-b-PMMA Copolymers at Different Conversions

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗
Table 2. Thermal Properties of Star and Linear PS-b-PMMA Copolymers
SampleTg ( °C)T₅% ( °C)T₅₀% ( °C)
PS homopolymer103.7 ± 1.2362 ± 3412 ± 4
PMMA homopolymer121.4 ± 1.5291 ± 3378 ± 3
4-arm star PS-b-PMMA112.8 ± 1.8327 ± 4396 ± 5
Linear PS-b-PMMA108.3 ± 1.4334 ± 3401 ± 4

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Thermal Properties of Star and Linear PS-b-PMMA Copolymers↗ Enlarge
Table 2
Thermal Properties of Star and Linear PS-b-PMMA Copolymers

Thermal Properties of Star and Linear PS-b-PMMA Copolymers

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗

References

14 in the original paper
  1. Hadjichristidis N, Pitsikalis M, Pispas S, Iatrou H. Polymers with complex architecture by living anionic polymerization. Chemical Reviews. 2001;101(12):3747-3792.
  2. Grest GS, Fetters LJ, Huang JS, Richter D. Star polymers: Experiment, theory, and simulation. Advances in Chemical Physics. 1996;94:67-163.
  3. Ren JM, McKenzie TG, Fu Q, Wong EHH, Xu J, An Z. Star polymers. Chemical Reviews. 2016;116(12):67436836.
  4. Mayadunne RTA, Jeffery J, Moad G, Rizzardo E. Living free radical polymerization with reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT polymerization): Approaches to star polymers. Macromolecules. 2003;36(5):1505-1513.
  5. Stenzel MH, Davis TP. Star polymer synthesis using trithiocarbonate functional β-cyclodextrin cores in RAFT polymerization. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry. 2002;40(24):4498-4512.
  6. Gao H, Matyjaszewski K. Synthesis of star polymers by a new "core-first" method: Sequential polymerization of cross-linker and monomer. Macromolecules. 2008;41(4):1118-1125.
  7. Bates FS, Fredrickson GH. Block copolymer thermodynamics: Theory and experiment. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry. 1990;41:525-557.
  8. Matsen MW, Schick M. Stable and unstable phases of a star diblock copolymer. Macromolecules. 1994;27(23):6761-6767.
  9. Chiefari J, Chong YK, Ercole F, Krstina J, Jeffery J, Le TPT. Living free-radical polymerization by reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer: The RAFT process. Macromolecules. 1998;31(16):5559-5562.
  10. Moad G, Rizzardo E, Thang SH. Radical additionfragmentation chemistry in polymer synthesis. Polymer. 2008;49(5):1079-1131.
  11. Barner-Kowollik C, Davis TP, Stenzel MH. Probing mechanistic features of conventional, catalytic and living free radical polymerization using soft ionization mass spectrometric techniques. Polymer. 2004;45(23):7791-7800.
  12. Hawker CJ, Bosman AW, Harth E. New polymer synthesis by nitroxide mediated living radical polymerizations. Chemical Reviews. 2001;101(12):3661-3688.
  13. Boyer C, Bulmus V, Davis TP, Ladmiral V, Liu J, Perrier S. Bioapplications of RAFT polymerization. Chemical Reviews. 2009;109(11):5402-5436.
  14. Ferreira J, Syrett J, Whittaker M, Haddleton D, Davis TP, Boyer C. Optimizing the generation of narrow polydispersity star polymers using RAFT mediated polymerization. Polymer Chemistry. 2011;2(8):16711677.