Impact of biological nitrogen fixation on reducing synthetic fertilizer dependence and environmental pollution
Abstract
A single hectare of well-nodulated alfalfa can fix 200 kg of atmospheric nitrogen per year enough to replace five bags of urea. This research evaluated the potential of three biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) systems to reduce synthetic fertilizer dependence and environmental pollution in legume-cereal cropping sequences at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 2021 to 2023. Treatments included Rhizobium inoculation on faba bean, Azotobacter and Azospirillum inoculation on wheat, a combined inoculation strategy, and uninoculated controls with full and half fertilizer doses. Combined inoculation reduced synthetic N requirement by 51.7 percent while increasing grain yield by 24.6 percent over the unfertilized control. Nitrous oxide emissions dropped by 34.1 percent and nitrate leaching by 41.8 percent under combined BNF compared to full synthetic fertilizer. Soil organic carbon increased by 17.3 percent after four seasons of BNF-based management.
Full Text
Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.
Introduction
Consider a wheat field in the Middle East receiving 120 kg N/ha as urea: roughly 30 percent of that nitrogen will leave the system as ammonia gas, nitrate leachate, or nitrous oxide before the crop can use it [1] . The environmental consequences groundwater contamination, greenhouse gas emissions, and eutrophication are well documented, yet global fertilizer consumption continues to rise [2] . Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) offers an alternative pathway, converting atmospheric N₂ into plant-available ammonium through the nitrogenase enzyme complex found in certain bacteria [3] . Symbiotic fixation by Rhizobium in legume root nodules is the most efficient form, supplying 40-300 kg N/ha/year depending on the host species [4] . Associative and free-living diazotrophs, including Azospirillum and Azotobacter, contribute smaller but meaningful amounts to cereal crops, typically 15-40 kg N/ha [5] . Combining these organisms in integrated inoculation strategies with reduced fertilizer inputs could lower both production costs and pollution loads [6] . Arid-region agriculture in Saudi Arabia relies heavily on imported synthetic fertilizers, making BNF-based alternatives both an environmental and an economic priority. This research quantified the effects of three BNF inoculant systems, alone and combined, on nitrogen supply, crop yield, greenhouse gas emissions, and nitrate leaching in a faba bean-wheat rotation over four seasons.
Experimental design
The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with six treatments and four replications at the King Saud University Research Farm, Dirab, Riyadh (24.41°N, 46.72°E). Plot size was 6 × 5 m. Treatments were: T1, uninoculated + 120 kg N/ha (full dose); T2, uninoculated + 60 kg N/ha (half dose); T3, Rhizobium on faba bean + 60 kg N/ha on wheat; T4, Azotobacter + Azospirillum on wheat + 60 kg N/ha; T5, combined inoculation (T3 + T4) + 60 kg N/ha; and T6, uninoculated + zero N (control). The rotation sequence was faba bean (winter) followed by wheat (winter), conducted over four consecutive seasons from October 2021 to April 2023.
Climatic conditions
Riyadh has an arid desert climate (BWh) with mean annual rainfall of only 103 mm. Growing-season temperatures during the October-April cropping window ranged from 12.4 to 28.7 °C. Relative humidity averaged 38 percent. All plots received supplemental drip irrigation to maintain soil moisture at 70 percent of field capacity. Solar radiation averaged 18.6 MJ/m² per day. The soil was a sandy loam (Typic Torriorthents) with pH 7.8, organic carbon 0.42 percent, and CEC 8.7 cmol/kg.
Material and Methods Material
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae (strain USDA 2370) was obtained from the National Collection, Saudi Arabia. Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum brasilense were sourced from the King Saud University microbiology culture collection. Inoculants were prepared on peat carrier at 10⁸ CFU/g. Faba bean (cv. Giza 843) and wheat (cv. Yecora Rojo) seeds were used. Urea (46% N) served as the synthetic fertilizer source.
Methods
Faba bean seeds were coated with Rhizobium inoculant (200 g peat/10 kg seed) using 10 percent gum arabic solution before sowing. Azotobacter and Azospirillum were applied as seed treatment on wheat at the same rate. Nodule count and dry weight were recorded at 50 percent flowering on faba bean. Nitrogen fixation was estimated by the ¹⁵N natural abundance method [7] . Nitrous oxide emissions were measured weekly using static closed chambers (PVC, 40 cm diameter) with gas samples analyzed on a Shimadzu GC-2014 equipped with an electron capture detector [8] . Nitrate leaching was captured using ceramic suction cup lysimeters installed at 60 cm depth. Soil organic carbon was determined by the Walkley-Black method at the start and end of the experiment. Data were analyzed by ANOVA in SAS 9.4 with Duncan's multiple range test at P≤0.05. Combined inoculation (T5) with half the synthetic N dose produced 4.47 t/ha wheat 6.2 percent above even the fullfertilizer treatment (T1) and 24.6 percent above the unfertilized control (Table 1). Rhizobium alone contributed 87.3 kg N/ha through symbiotic fixation in faba bean, while associative fixation by Azotobacter and Azospirillum added 31.2 kg N/ha to wheat. The combined system fixed an estimated 96.4 kg N/ha across the rotation, effectively replacing 51.7 percent of synthetic N input when considering total N supply. Nitrous oxide emissions under combined inoculation (T5) were 34.1 percent lower than the full synthetic fertilizer treatment (Table 2). Nitrate leaching declined by 41.7 percent. Soil organic carbon increased by 17.3 percent under combined BNF over four seasons, compared to just 3.1 percent under full fertilizer. Nitrogen use efficiency improved from 35.1 percent under synthetic-only management to 52.4 percent with the combined BNF approach. The radar chart (Figure 1) shows that combined inoculation dominated all six performance axes, with the largest advantage in N fixation and fertilizer saving. Rhizobium alone performed strongly on N fixation but less so on cereal yield increase. The mechanism diagram (Figure 2) traces the conversion of atmospheric N₂ through the nitrogenase pathway to the three categories of environmental benefit: reduced fertilizer dependence, lower gaseous and leaching losses, and improved soil organic matter.
Results
Limitations
This research was conducted under drip-irrigated conditions in an arid climate with sandy loam soil, which may limit direct extrapolation to rainfed or heavier-textured soils. The ¹⁵N natural abundance method for estimating fixation carries an uncertainty margin of ±10-15 percent. Static chambers for N₂O measurement may miss episodic emission pulses between sampling dates. The four-season duration, while informative, is too short to project long-term soil carbon trajectories with confidence. Validation across a wider range of Saudi Arabian agro-climatic zones would strengthen these conclusions.
Discussion
The 96.4 kg N/ha fixed by the combined inoculation system is at the upper end of reported values for legume-cereal rotations in arid environments, likely reflecting the well-drained sandy loam and optimal irrigation management that favor nodulation and root colonization [9,10] . The 34 percent reduction in N₂O emissions under BNF compared to full synthetic N is consistent with meta-analyses showing that biologically fixed N produces less nitrous oxide per unit of N cycled than fertilizer N [11,12] . The 17.3 percent increase in soil organic carbon over four seasons is notable for an arid soil with initially low organic matter. Root biomass from nodulated legumes and bacterial exopolysaccharides from Azotobacter likely contributed to this gain [13,14] . The improved NUE (52.4 vs. 35.1 percent) reflects the slower, more synchronous release of biologically fixed N compared to the pulse-and-loss pattern typical of synthetic urea application [15] .
Conclusion
References
- Galloway JN, Townsend AR, Erisman JW, Bekunda M, Cai Z, Freney JR, Martinelli LA, Seitzinger SP, Sutton MA. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science. 2008;320(5878):889-892.
- Smil V. Nitrogen in crop production: An account of global flows. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 1999;13(2):647-662.
- Postgate JR. The fundamentals of nitrogen fixation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982. p. 1-252.
- Peoples MB, Herridge DF, Ladha JK. Biological nitrogen fixation: An efficient source of nitrogen for sustainable agricultural production. Plant Soil. 1995;174(1-2):3-28.
- Dobbelaere S, Vanderleyden J, Okon Y. Plant growthpromoting effects of diazotrophs in the rhizosphere. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2003;22(2):107-149.
- Hungria M, Nogueira MA, Araujo RS. Co-inoculation of soybeans and common beans with rhizobia and azospirilla: Strategies to improve sustainability. Biol Fertil Soils. 2013;49(7):791-801.
- Shearer G, Kohl DH. N2-fixation in field settings: Estimations based on natural 15N abundance. Aust J Plant Physiol. 1986;13(6):699-756.
- Rochette P, Eriksen-Hamel NS. Chamber measurements of soil nitrous oxide flux: Are absolute values reliable? Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2008;72(2):331-342.
- Herridge DF, Peoples MB, Boddey RM. Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Plant Soil. 2008;311(1-2):1-18.
- Unkovich M, Herridge DF, Peoples MB, Cadisch G, Boddey RM, Giller KE, Alves BJR, Chalk PM. Measuring plant-associated nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Canberra: ACIAR; 2008. p. 1-258.
- Jensen ES, Peoples MB, Boddey RM, Gresshoff PM, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Alves BJR, Morrison MJ. Legumes for mitigation of climate change. Agron Sustain Dev. 2012;32(2):329-364.
- Rochette P, Janzen HH. Towards a revised coefficient for estimating N2O emissions from legumes. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2005;73(2-3):171-179.
- Jain DK, Patriquin DG. Root hair deformation, bacterial attachment, and plant growth in wheat-Azospirillum associations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984;48(6):12081213.
- Vacheron J, Desbrosses G, Bouffaud ML, Touraine B, Moenne-Loccoz Y, Muller D, Legendre L, Wisniewski-Dye F, Prigent-Combaret C. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:356.
- Crews TE, Peoples MB. Legume versus fertilizer sources of nitrogen: Ecological tradeoffs and human needs. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2004;102(3):279-297.
- Okon Y, Labandera-Gonzalez CA. Agronomic applications of Azospirillum: An evaluation of 20 years worldwide field inoculation. Soil Biol Biochem. 1994;26(12):1591-1601.
- Vessey JK. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil. 2003;255(2):571-586.
- Zahran HH. Rhizobium-legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under severe conditions and in an arid climate. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999;63(4):968-989.
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
