Role of mycorrhizal inoculation in enhancing phosphorus uptake and drought resilience in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under rainfed conditions
Abstract
Chickpea ranks among the most phosphorus-hungry grain legumes, yet P availability in West African soils seldom exceeds 8 mg/kg—well below the crop’s critical threshold. Meanwhile, the same soils harbour native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) whose hyphal networks can extend the root’s phosphorus foraging zone by several centimetres. This research tested whether seed inoculation with a commercial Rhizophagus irregularis inoculant could lift P uptake and buffer yield against mid-season drought in rainfed chickpea at the University of Cape Coast during the 2023 minor season. A factorial design crossed two AMF treatments (inoculated and non-inoculated) with three P levels (0, 20, and 40 kg P₂O₅/ha) in four replications. Inoculated plants showed 37.4% higher total P uptake, 28.6% greater root colonisation, and 22.1% more grain yield than non-inoculated controls averaged across P rates. The benefit was most pronounced at 20 kg P₂O₅/ha, where AMF inoculation closed 81% of the yield gap between 20 and 40 kg P₂O₅/ha.
Full Text
Tables and figures are in the full-text PDF.
Introduction
Phosphorus sits at the centre of a paradox in West African agriculture: soils fix most of the applied P into forms plants cannot reach, while fertiliser prices remain too high for many smallholders to apply enough to saturate those fixation sites [1,2] . Chickpea, with a critical soil P threshold of about 12 mg/kg Olsen-P, is especially vulnerable in the region's low-P Acrisols and Ferralsols [3] . And yet, these same soils contain diverse communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi whose extraradical hyphae can access P from micropores too small for root hairs [4] . Inoculation with efficient AMF strains at sowing has improved P uptake by 20-50% in pot experiments with legumes [5] . Under drought, mycorrhizal plants also tend to maintain higher leaf water potential and stomatal conductance because the hyphal network can extract water from drying soil zones beyond the root depletion zone [6] . But most inoculation trials have been conducted in controlled environments or in irrigated fields; data from truly rainfed legume systems in the humid tropics are scarce [7] . This research aimed to: (a) measure the effect of AMF inoculation on root colonisation and P uptake at three P levels, (b) assess drought resilience indicators during a mid-season dry spell, and (c) quantify the resulting grain yield advantage under rainfed conditions.
Research Area Description
The trial was conducted at the Teaching and Research Farm of the University of Cape Coast (5°7′ N, 1°17′ W), in the coastal savanna zone of Ghana, at 18 m elevation. Soils are Haplic Acrisols (FAO), sandy loam texture, pH 5.4, organic carbon 0.98%, Olsen-P 6.3 mg/kg, exchangeable K 0.19 cmol/kg. Annual rainfall averages 1,040 mm distributed bimodally; the 2023 minor season (September-December) received 314 mm, with a 12-day dry spell in the first week of November coinciding with early pod fill [8] .
Materials and Methods
Materials
Chickpea cultivar ICCV 92944 (desi type, extra-early, 85-day maturity) was sourced from ICRISAT. The commercial AMF inoculant MycoApply (Mycorrhizal Applications Inc., USA) containing Rhizophagus irregularis at 200 propagules/g was applied as a seed coating at 10 g/kg seed. Phosphorus was supplied as triple superphosphate (46% P₂O₅) at 0, 20, and 40 kg P₂O₅/ha. A basal rate of 20-0-20 kg N-K₂O/ha was applied uniformly. Rhizobium inoculant (strain CP-39) was applied to all plots to ensure adequate nodulation [9,10] .
Methods
A 2 × 3 factorial randomised complete block design with four replications gave 24 plots (3 m × 2.5 m). Factor A was AMF inoculation (with or without) and Factor B was P rate (0, 20, 40 kg P₂O₅/ha). Sowing was on 9 September 2023 at 33 plants/m² (30 × 10 cm spacing). Root colonisation was assessed at flowering (50 DAS) by the gridline-intersect method on trypan blue-stained root segments. Total P uptake was measured at maturity by digestion of whole-plant samples with HNO₃-HClO₄ followed by molybdate colorimetry. Leaf relative water content (RWC) and canopy temperature depression (CTD) were measured during the dry spell at 62 DAS. Grain yield was recorded from 4.5 m² net plots at 12% moisture. Data were analysed by two-way ANOVA in GenStat (v21) with LSD at p < 0.05 [11,12] .
Field Experimental Design
Plots were separated by 1 m alleys to prevent hyphal spread between AMF and non-AMF plots. Non-inoculated plots were sown first using separate equipment to avoid crosscontamination. Border rows (two rows on each side) were excluded from sampling. 1). The highest P uptake (15.3 kg/ha) and grain yield (1.57 t/ha) occurred with AMF + P40, but AMF + P20 (13.1 kg/ha, 1.48 t/ha) was statistically similar, suggesting diminishing returns beyond 20 kg P₂O₅/ha when AMF is present. The AMF yield advantage was largest at P0 and P20 (around 37%) and narrowed to 19.8% at P40, where higher soil P partly substituted for the mycorrhizal pathway (Table 2).
Results
A strong positive correlation (r = 0.91, p < 0.01) was observed between total P uptake and grain yield across both AMF treatments (Figure 2), confirming that P availability was the primary yield-limiting factor at this site.
Discussion
The 37% yield advantage from AMF inoculation at low P supply is consistent with meta-analyses reporting 25-45% gains for mycorrhizal grain legumes on P-deficient soils [5,13] .
Colonisation levels above 50% indicate that Rhizophagus irregularis established effectively in this Acrisol despite its low pH and organic carbon, likely because the inoculant was placed in direct contact with the seed [4] . The narrowing of AMF benefit at P40 aligns with the well-documented suppression of mycorrhizal colonisation under high P, where the plant downregulates carbon allocation to the fungal partner [14] . During the 12-day dry spell, inoculated plants maintained RWC 5-8 percentage points higher than controls and showed cooler canopy temperatures, suggesting that hyphal water uptake buffered leaf hydration [6,15] . This drought-buffering effect may partly explain why the yield advantage persisted even though the dry spell was relatively brief. A limitation of this research is the single-site, single-season design; multi-environment testing is needed to confirm inoculant performance across different Acrisol subgroups and rainfall patterns.
Limitations
This research was conducted at a single site over one season, so the genotype × environment interaction for AMF response could not be assessed. Native AMF communities were not characterised, meaning the inoculant's competitive advantage over indigenous strains remains unclear. The 12-day dry spell, while informative, was shorter than the 20-30-day droughts common in the savanna, so drought resilience findings should be interpreted conservatively.
Conclusion
Seed inoculation with Rhizophagus irregularis raised chickpea P uptake by 37.4%, root colonisation by 28.6%, and grain yield by 22.1% under rainfed conditions on a P-deficient Acrisol in coastal Ghana. The benefit was strongest at 20 kg P₂O₅/ha, where AMF closed 81% of the yield gap to the 40 kg P rate. Inoculated plants also showed better drought indicators during a mid-season dry spell. For smallholders unable to afford full P fertiliser rates, inoculation offers a low-cost complement that stretches each kilogram of applied P further.
References
- Sanchez PA, Shepherd KD, Soule MJ. Soil fertility replenishment in Africa: an investment in natural resource capital. In: Replenishing soil fertility in Africa. SSSA Special Publication; 1997;51:1-46.
- Nziguheba G, Merckx R, Palm CA. Organic residues affect phosphorus availability and maize yields in a Nitisol of western Kenya. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2000;32(4):328-339.
- Gaur PM, Tripathi S, Gowda CLL. Chickpea seed production manual. ICRISAT Technical Bulletin. 2010;1:128.
- Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. 3rd ed. London: Academic Press; 2008:1-787.
- Pellegrino E, Öpik M, Bonari E. Responses of wheat to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a meta-analysis of field studies. New Phytologist. 2015;205(2):756-767.
- Augé RM. Water relations, drought and vesiculararbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Mycorrhiza. 2001;11(1):3-42.
- Jefwa JM, Okoth S, Wachira P. Mycorrhizal inoculation effects in African cropping systems: a review. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2012;7(21):3153-3159.
- Ghana Meteorological Agency. Climatic data for Cape Coast station 2023. GMet Annual Summary; 2024.
- ICRISAT. Improved chickpea cultivars for the tropics. ICRISAT Bulletin. 2018;62:1-16.
- Mycorrhizal Applications Inc. MycoApply product specification. MycoApply Technical Sheet; 2022:1-4.
- Brundrett MC, Bougher N, Dell B. Working with mycorrhizas in forestry and agriculture. ACIAR Monograph 32; 1996:1-374.
- GenStat Committee. GenStat for Windows. 21st ed. VSN International; 2022.
- Lehmann A, Rillig MC. Arbuscular mycorrhizal contribution to copper, manganese and iron nutrition. Mycorrhiza. 2015;25(3):181-187.
- Breuillin F, Schramm J, Hajirezaei M. Phosphate systemically inhibits development of arbuscular mycorrhiza in Petunia hybrida. Plant Journal. 2010;64(6):1002-1017.
- Ruiz-Lozano JM. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and alleviation of osmotic stress. Mycorrhiza. 2003;13(6):309317.
- Jakobsen I, Abbott LK, Robson AD. External hyphae of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Trifolium subterraneum. New Phytologist. 1992;120(3):371-380.
- Koide RT, Mosse B. A history of research on arbuscular mycorrhiza. Mycorrhiza. 2004;14(3):145-163.
- Ortas I, Sari N, Akpinar C. Effect of mycorrhizal inoculation and phosphorus fertilization on growth and yield of chickpea. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2011;35:591-600.
- Gianinazzi S, Gollotte A, Binet MN. Agroecology: the key role of arbuscular mycorrhizas in ecosystem services. Mycorrhiza. 2010;20(8):519-530.
- Sawers RJH, Gutjahr C, Paszkowski U. Cereal mycorrhiza: an ancient symbiosis in modern agriculture. Trends in Plant Science. 2008;13(2):93-97.
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
