Scinovex

Research article · 2026 · Full text

International Journal of Biology Sciences

Single and combined effects of microplastics and wastewater on kidney of Cyprinus carpio

Vibhu VaidNisha Vashishat

Volume 8(3) · Pages 30–38 · DOI: 10.33545/26649926.2026.v8.i3a.592 ↗

Research areasMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyMarine Biology and Environmental Chemistry

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Rapid pace of urbanisation and industrialisation has led to accumulation of different pollutants such as domestic sewage, agricultural runoff and industrial waste in water bodies. Additionally, microplastics (MPs) are problematic due to their toxicity, environmental persistence, abundance and ability to adsorb different contaminants. Among different aquatic organisms, fishes are considered as an exceptional indicator to study water quality and well-being of aquatic ecosystem due to their sensitivity to alterations in environmental conditions. In addition, they are an important protein source; however, toxicants in them could affect health of human beings consuming them. Therefore, the current study was designed to study the combined effects of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) MPs and wastewater on histomorphology of kidney of minor carp Cyprinus carpio. The results showed that significant alterations such as paracellular spaces, damaged hematopoietic tissue, detachment of renal tubule from basal lamina, damaged renal tubules, paracellular spaces, vacuolization, necrosis and exudate were found in kidneys of fingerlings belonging to treated groups. Moreover, Organ index of kidney also indicated significant (p≤0.05) rise in different treatment groups in comparison to control group. Overall, the results concluded that the combination of LDPE MPs and wastewater effects kidneys of C. carpio fingerlings in duration and dose-dependent manner with limited reversibility following exposure.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Urbanization and industrialization have caused various pollutants, including industrial waste and domestic sewage, to accumulate in water bodies. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Urbanization and industrialization have caused various pollutants, including industrial waste and domestic sewage, to accumulate in water bodies.

      In the paper's own words

      “The rapid pace of urbanisation and industrialisation has led to the accumulation of different pollutants such as domestic sewage, agricultural runoff and industrial waste in water bodies.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Fish are highly sensitive to environmental changes, making them excellent bioindicators for assessing water quality and ecosystem health. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Fish are highly sensitive to environmental changes, making them excellent bioindicators for assessing water quality and ecosystem health.

      In the paper's own words

      “Among different aquatic organisms, fishes are considered as an exceptional indicator to study water quality and the well-being of the aquatic ecosystem due to their sensitivity to alterations in environmental conditions.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Microplastics (MPs) are a significant concern for aquatic life because they are toxic, persist in the environment, and can adsorb other contaminants. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Microplastics (MPs) are a significant concern for aquatic life because they are toxic, persist in the environment, and can adsorb other contaminants.

      In the paper's own words

      “Among plastic particles of different size groups, MPs are of increasing concern for aquatic organisms due to their toxicity, environmental persistence, abundance and ability to adsorb different contaminants”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to investigate how the combination of wastewater and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) microplastics affects the kidney structure of the minor carp, Cyprinus carpio. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to investigate how the combination of wastewater and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) microplastics affects the kidney structure of the minor carp, Cyprinus carpio.

      In the paper's own words

      “Therefore, the current study was designed to study the combined effects of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) MPs and wastewater on histomorphology of kidney of minor carp Cyprinus carpio.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • Cyprinus carpio fingerlings from a fish farm in India were used and acclimatized in 100-liter glass tanks for 14 days. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Cyprinus carpio fingerlings from a fish farm in India were used and acclimatized in 100-liter glass tanks for 14 days.

      In the paper's own words

      “C. carpio fingerlings were collected from Aujla fish company fish farm, India and acclimatized for 14 days in 100 l glass tanks.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Collection of wastewater and fingerlings

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The lethal concentration (LC50) was 64.47% for wastewater alone and 53.72% for the combination of wastewater and 2 mg/l microplastics. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The lethal concentration (LC50) was 64.47% for wastewater alone and 53.72% for the combination of wastewater and 2 mg/l microplastics.

      In the paper's own words

      “The LC50 of wastewater, determined using POLO software (Robertson et al., 2007) [20], was 64.47%. After that, the LC50 value of the combination of wastewater (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100%) and MPs (2 mg/l MPs) was found to be 53.72%.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Toxicity bioassays-Acute and Chronic

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The chronic bioassay lasted 60 days with 15 fingerlings per replicate (in triplicate), followed by a 60-day recovery period in dechlorinated water. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The chronic bioassay lasted 60 days with 15 fingerlings per replicate (in triplicate), followed by a 60-day recovery period in dechlorinated water.

      In the paper's own words

      “The experiment was performed in triplicate (n = 3) with 15 fingerlings in each replicate for 60 days (Table 1). Thereafter, the surviving fingerlings were transferred to tanks containing dechlorinated water for another 60-day recovery period.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Toxicity bioassays-Acute and Chronic

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Kidney histomorphology was analyzed using 3–5 µm serial sections stained with haematoxylin and eosin. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Kidney histomorphology was analyzed using 3–5 µm serial sections stained with haematoxylin and eosin.

      In the paper's own words

      “Serial sections (3–5 µm) were obtained using a rotary microtome, mounted on glass slides and stained with haematoxylin and eosin.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Histomorphology of kidney

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • After 60 days of exposure, all treated groups (T1-T6) showed significant kidney damage, including necrosis, exudate, and damaged renal tubules. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      After 60 days of exposure, all treated groups (T1-T6) showed significant kidney damage, including necrosis, exudate, and damaged renal tubules.

      In the paper's own words

      “Kidneys of fingerlings exposed to different groups i.e. T1-T6 for 60 days showed similar aberrations such as detachment of renal tubule from basal lamina, paracellular spaces, vacuolization, damaged hematopoietic tissue, necrosis, exudate and damaged renal tubules (Figures 4B-G).”

      Page 3

      Found in: Histomorphology of kidney

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The combined exposure of microplastics and wastewater (COMB1 and COMB2) caused more severe kidney damage than either pollutant alone. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The combined exposure of microplastics and wastewater (COMB1 and COMB2) caused more severe kidney damage than either pollutant alone.

      In the paper's own words

      “Additionally, the results indicated that the effect of exposure of COMB1 and COMB2 was more severe in kidneys than MPs and wastewater alone.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Histomorphology of kidney

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Recovery was incomplete for combined treatments (T5, T6), which still showed damaged renal tubules and hematopoietic tissue, while T1 and T2 returned to normal structures. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Recovery was incomplete for combined treatments (T5, T6), which still showed damaged renal tubules and hematopoietic tissue, while T1 and T2 returned to normal structures.

      In the paper's own words

      “After recovery period, fingerlings exposed to control, T1 and T2 showed normal structures of kidneys (Figures 5A-C). Similarly, fingerlings exposed to T3 and T4 groups revealed normal histological structure with slight aberrations such as exudate formation, detachment of renal tubule from basal lamina and vacuolization in kidney (Figures 5D-E). Alterations such as damaged hematopoietic tissue, paracellular spaces, exudate formation, vacuolization and damaged renal tubules were observed in T5 and T6 groups after recovery period (Figures 5F-G).”

      Page 3

      Found in: Histomorphology of kidney

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The kidney organ index increased significantly (p ≤ 0.05) after 60 days for all treatment groups compared to the control, except for the 1 mg/l microplastics group. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The kidney organ index increased significantly (p ≤ 0.05) after 60 days for all treatment groups compared to the control, except for the 1 mg/l microplastics group.

      In the paper's own words

      “After 60 days of exposure, organ index of kidneys of fingerlings belonging to different treatment groups increased significantly (p ≤ 0.05) in comparison to control group except fingerlings exposed to 1 mg/l MPs.”

      Page 7

      Found in: Histomorphology of kidney

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 7 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that combined LDPE microplastics and wastewater cause dose- and duration-dependent kidney damage with limited reversibility, posing long-term risks to aquatic health. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that combined LDPE microplastics and wastewater cause dose- and duration-dependent kidney damage with limited reversibility, posing long-term risks to aquatic health.

      In the paper's own words

      “The results indicated that the combination of LDPE MPs and wastewater may impact kidneys of C. carpio fingerlings in a duration- and dose-dependent manner with limited reversibility following exposure, highlighting potential long-term risks to aquatic health.”

      Page 8

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 8 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Cyprinus carpio (common carp) kidney tissue). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Synergistic Toxicity Concept
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Cyprinus carpio (common carp) kidney tissue). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Cyprinus carpio (common carp) kidney tissue). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Synergistic Toxicity Concept

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Cyprinus carpio (common carp) kidney tissue). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗

Figures & tables

From the original paper
Experimental design for chronic toxicity bioassayTable 1Page 2T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 15 days. A) Control showed renal tubules (RT)Figure 1Page 3T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 30 days. A) Control showed renal tubulesFigure 2Page 4T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 45 days. A) Control showed renal tubulesFigure 3Page 5T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 60 days. A) Control showed renal tubulesFigure 4Page 6T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to recovery period. A) Control, B) T1, C) T2, D) T3, E) T4, F) T5 and G) T6Figure 5Page 7Organ index of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings reared in different treatments after regular time intervalsFigure 6Page 8
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Water is an essential natural resource that sustains all life forms on Earth; however, the rapid pace of urbanisation and industrialisation has led to the daily discharge of about 2×10 6 tons of different pollutants including domestic sewage, agricultural runoff and industrial waste (Mahmoud et al., 2026) [14] . Wastewater contains a plethora of anthropogenic contaminants such as pharmaceutically active compounds, heavy metals, bisphenol-A, nanomaterials, organic pollutants and endocrine-disrupting chemicals (Klecka et al., 2010; Mehdi et al., 2021; Vaid and Vashishat, 2024) [12,15,23] . Among these, plastic pollution has become a pervasive environmental concern due to its persistence, mismanagement and abundance. Plastic refers to synthetic and organic polymers that are widely used in different industries due to their low production cost, durability, strength and versatility (Kumar et al., 2018) [13] . Plastic particles are categorised from macroplastics (≥ 25 mm) and mesoplastics (5-25 mm) to microplastics (MPs) (20 µm-5 mm) (Gigault et al., 2018) [5] . However, their resistance to biodegradation has led to a significant accumulation in terrestrial and aquatic environments, posing severe ecological and health risks (Rakib et al., 2022) [19] . Among plastic particles of different size groups, MPs are of increasing concern for aquatic organisms due to their toxicity, environmental persistence, abundance and ability to adsorb different contaminants (Vaid and Vashishat, 2025) [24] . Among different aquatic biota, fishes are considered as an exceptional bioindicator to study water pollution due to their sensitivity to environmental fluctuations (Cvetkovic et al., 2010; Vaid and Hundal, 2019) [4,25] . Various studies reported that MPs may induce behavioural alterations, genotoxicity, oxidative stress, histopathology and mortality (Motivarash et al., 2024) [16] . In addition, they are an important protein source and act as a sensitive indicator of overall well-being of the aquatic ecosystem (Vaid et al., 2024; Bakhasha et al., 2025) [26,2] . Among various organs, kidneys are essential excretory organs responsible for eliminating metabolic wastes and xenobiotics; however, prolonged accumulation of various toxic substances may pose significant health issues in fishes (Ortiz et al., 2003) [18] . Moreover, toxicant-induced histological and functional alterations in kidneys can disrupt homeostasis (Iqbal et al., 2004) [9] . Despite escalating concerns over water contamination, research addressing the combined effects of MPs and other contaminants on fish remains limited. Therefore, the present study was designed to study the combined effects of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) MPs and wastewater on histomorphology of kidney of minor carp Cyprinus carpio.

Materials and Methods

Materials and Methods

Collection of wastewater and fingerlings

For conducting experiments, wastewater was collected from the sewage water treatment plant, Bhattian, India. The sampling site was situated within the municipal boundaries about 11 km from Punjab Agricultural University, India. C. carpio fingerlings were collected from Aujla fish company fish farm, India and acclimatized for 14 days in 100 l glass tanks. Fingerlings were fed with commercial feed/day at 2% of body weight. Fingerlings were not fed for 24 h prior to the commencement of the experiment. The experimental protocol adhered to the standard guidelines of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD, 1992) [17] .

Preparation of MPs

Polyethylene plastic pellets (Sigma-Aldrich) were used for the preparation of MPs following the methodology described by Wong et al. (2014) [27] . Briefly, 30 pellets were pre-heated with toluene (6 ml) and Tween-20 (0.2 ml) and subjected to ultrasonication for 30 min, followed by spreading onto a Petri plate and air-drying to completion. The resulting MPs were subsequently utilised for toxicity bioassays.

Toxicity bioassays-Acute and Chronic

The acute bioassay was conducted according to the standard guidelines of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD, 1992) [17] . For lethal concentration (LC50) calculation, 2 batches (n = 7) of fingerlings each were treated with various concentrations of wastewater (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100%) and LDPE MPs (350-750 mg/l) separately for a period of 96 hours. The results showed no mortality in fingerlings exposed to MPs; thus, sub-lethal concentrations were selected based on environmentally relevant levels, i.e., 1 and 2 mg/l MPs (Rochman et al., 2017) [21] . The LC50 of wastewater, determined using POLO software (Robertson et al., 2007) [20] , was 64.47%. After that, the LC50 value of the combination of wastewater (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100%) and MPs (2 mg/l MPs) was found to be 53.72%. Chronic bioassay concentrations were selected as 1/10 th and 1/20 th of the LC50 for wastewater alone and for the combined treatment [2 mg/l MPs + wastewater (1/10 th and 1/20 th of the LC50)], respectively. The experiment was performed in triplicate (n = 3) with 15 fingerlings in each replicate for 60 days (Table 1). Thereafter, the surviving fingerlings were transferred to tanks containing dechlorinated water for another 60-day recovery period. In parallel, a control (n = 3) with 15 fingerlings in each replicate was also maintained having de-chlorinated water only.

Table 1. Experimental design for chronic toxicity bioassay
GroupsDetails of treatments
T0 (Control)Fish feed
T11 mg/l MPs + Fish feed
T22 mg/l MPs + Fish feed
T31/10th LC50 of wastewater + Fish feed
T41/20th LC50 of wastewater + Fish feed
T5 (COMB1)1/10th LC50 of wastewater + 2 mg/l MPs + Fish feed
T6 (COMB2)1/20th LC50 of wastewater + 2 mg/l MPs + Fish feed

Table text extracted from the original PDF; superscript letters are shown inline. The original table image is below.

View original table image
Experimental design for chronic toxicity bioassay↗ Enlarge
Table 1
Experimental design for chronic toxicity bioassay

Experimental design for chronic toxicity bioassay

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper tableSource PDF · page 2 ↗

Table 1: Experimental design for chronic toxicity bioassay

Table 1: Experimental design for chronic toxicity bioassay

Groups

Groups

Details of treatments T0 (Control)

Fish feed T1 1 mg/l MPs + Fish feed T2 2 mg/l MPs + Fish feed T3 1/10 th LC50 of wastewater + Fish feed T4 1/20 th LC50 of wastewater + Fish feed T5 (COMB1) 1/10 th LC50 of wastewater + 2 mg/l MPs + Fish feed T6 (COMB2) 1/20 th LC50 of wastewater + 2 mg/l MPs + Fish feed n = 3 per replicate per treatment

Histomorphology of kidney

Histomorphology of the kidney was done using the procedure of Humason (1975) [7] . Briefly, kidneys were collected and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24-48 h, processed with a gradient of ethanol, cleared in xylene and embedded in paraffin. Serial sections (3-5 µm) were obtained using a rotary microtome, mounted on glass slides and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Microscopic evaluation and image acquisition were performed using a LEICA DM5000 B light microscope equipped with a digital imaging system.

Organ index of kidney

Organ index of kidney for different groups was determined following the classification system described by Bernet et al. (1999) [3] . For each experimental group, kidneys from 3 fingerlings were analysed and 3 randomly selected histological sections per fingerling were evaluated. Histological lesions were categorised into reaction patterns. Each lesion was assigned a severity score ranging from 0 (Absent) to 6 (Severe) based on the degree of tissue damage, and an importance factor (1-3) was applied according to its pathological relevance. The total histopathological index and the organ-specific index were subsequently calculated using the formula 1, where rp, alt, a, org and w indicate reaction pattern, alteration, score value, organ and importance factor respectively.

Organ index = ∑ ∑ (a org rp alt alt rp × 𝑤 org rp alt )

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± standard error. Significant differences among treatment groups were evaluated using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test in Statistix 10.00 software, with significance set at p ≤ 0.05.

Results

Results

Histomorphology of kidney

Normal morphological structure of kidneys of C. carpio consists of renal tubules, glomerulus and hematopoietic tissue. After 15 days exposure, fingerlings belonging to control group showed renal tubules and hematopoietic tissue (Figure 1A). In case of T1 group, the morphological examination of kidneys depicted detachment of renal tubule from basal lamina, paracellular spaces and damaged hematopoietic tissue (Figure 1B). Similarly, fingerlings exposed to T2 group showed detachment of renal tubule from basal lamina, paracellular spaces, vacuolization and damaged hematopoietic tissue (Figure 1C). Likewise, fingerlings reared in T3-T6 groups for 15 days revealed detachment of renal tubule from basal lamina, paracellular spaces, enlarged spaces in lumen, vacuolization and damaged hematopoietic tissue (Figures 1D-G). The results showed increase in severity of damage with increase in the concentration of test chemicals. Similarly, fingerlings belonging to control group after 30 days showed normal renal tubules (Figure 2A). However, fingerlings reared in 1 and 2 mg/l MPs for 30 days revealed vacuolization, detachment of renal tubule from basal lamina, damaged renal tubule and damaged hematopoietic tissue in kidneys of C. carpio fingerlings (Figures 2B-C). Similar alterations were observed in kidney of fingerlings exposed to T3 and T4 groups (Figures 2D-E). Kidney of fingerlings exposed to T5 and T6 groups also indicated alterations such as detachment of renal tubule from basal lamina, paracellular spaces, vacuolization and damaged hematopoietic tissue (Figures 2F-G). Apart from these, severe renal alterations such as tubular necrosis and irregular arrangement of tubular cells, enlargement of Bowman space tissue, collapsed and degenerated glomeruli and enlarged space in lumen were also observed in T5 and T6 groups. After 45 days, normal renal tubules were found in kidney of C. carpio belonging to control group (Figures 3A).

Morphological examination of kidney of fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups i.e. T1-T6 for 45 days exhibited aberrations such as detachment of renal tubule from basal lamina, paracellular spaces, vacuolization, damaged hematopoietic tissue, necrosis, tubular necrosis, irregular arrangement of tubular cells, collapsed and degenerated glomeruli; and enlarged space in lumen (Figures 3B-G). Similarly, normal renal tubules were found in kidney of C. carpio belonging to control group (Figures 4A). Kidneys of fingerlings exposed to different groups i.e. T1-T6 for 60 days showed similar aberrations such as detachment of renal tubule from basal lamina, paracellular spaces, vacuolization, damaged hematopoietic tissue, necrosis, exudate and damaged renal tubules (Figures 4B-G). The results clearly indicated dose and durationdependent effect of LDPE MPs and wastewater on fingerlings. Additionally, the results indicated that the effect of exposure of COMB1 and COMB2 was more severe in kidneys than MPs and wastewater alone. After recovery period, less severe alterations were observed in the kidney of treatment groups indicating incomplete recovery. After recovery period, fingerlings exposed to control, T1 and T2 showed normal structures of kidneys (Figures 5A-C). Similarly, fingerlings exposed to T3 and T4 groups revealed normal histological structure with slight aberrations such as exudate formation, detachment of renal tubule from basal lamina and vacuolization in kidney (Figures 5D-E). Alterations such as damaged hematopoietic tissue, paracellular spaces, exudate formation, vacuolization and damaged renal tubules were observed in T5 and T6 groups after recovery period (Figures 5F-G).

Discussion

Kidney is an essential excretory organ and it plays a pivotal role in maintaining homeostasis (Iqbal et al., 2004) [9] . Kidneys of fish are sensitive to chemical alterations in the aquatic bodies because they are constantly exposed to chemicals dissolved in water (Hussain et al., 2019) [19] . Their roles in excretion and detoxification of toxicants from blood expose them to contaminants (Kim and Kang, 2015) [11] . Kidney plays role in excretion of metabolic waste and selective reabsorption which helps in maintaining volume and pH of various body fluids. Therefore, any alterations in histomorphology of kidney could lead to corresponding alterations in behavioural and physiological parameters (Ortiz et al., 2003) [18] . Histopathological alterations such as destructive renal tubules, necrosis and shrinkage of renal cortex were observed in the kidney of fish. Histological effects of 1, 3 and 5% of LDPE and polyethylene terephthalate MPs on kidneys of Oreochromis niloticus were studied by Ali et al. (2023) [1] . In a study conducted by Hamed et al. (2021) [6] , effects of different concentrations of MPs (1, 10 and 100 mg/l) were examined on O. niloticus juveniles for 15 days and 15 days post-exposure. Concentration dependent histopathological alterations such as vacuolated tubules, glomerular atrophy, increase in inter-tubular space, inflammatory cells, congestion of blood capillaries, loss of basophilic cytoplasm, shrinkage of convoluted tubules, deformation, vacuolization and fatty tubules were observed in kidneys of experimental groups. The results also showed alterations in kidney even after post-exposure. The results suggested that MPs cause range of alterations from biochemical alterations in single cells to lesions in entire tissue affecting vitality of fish. The degree of histological alterations in kidneys of fish O. niloticus obtained from a polluted site (downstream of Chakbandi drain) was observed by Shahid et al. (2022) [22] . Histopathological alterations such as degenerated renal tubules, necrosis, delineated lymphocytic infiltration and obliteration in Bowman's space were observed in kidneys of MPs-exposed groups. Similarly, the effects of water pollution on kidneys of fishes (Wallago attu and Cirrhinus mrigala) collected from Chenab River were studied by Hussain et al. (2019) [8] . Alterations such as dilation of glomerular capillaries, hyperaemia, degeneration of renal tubule cells, glomerulonephritis, absence of Bowman's space, vacuolization, necrosis, degeneration, hypertrophy and shrinkage of glomeruli were observed in sections of kidneys. However, fish belonging to control group showed normal histoarchitecture of kidneys. In support of the findings of the current study, histopathological alterations such as necrosis, vacuolization, hypertrophy, degeneration, dilation of glomerular capillaries and contraction of glomeruli were observed in kidneys of Channa punctatus exposed to different concentrations of wastewater (60-100%) from Tung Dhab Drain for 15 and 30 days by Kaur and Dua (2014) [10] . Zhu et al. (2019) [28] conducted the experiment to study the effects of different concentrations of polystyrene MPs (500, 1000 and 2000 µg/g) on kidneys of Oreochromis melastigma for 10 weeks. The alterations such as glomerulopathy and nephrogenesis were observed in kidneys of O. melastigma exposed to PS MPs. However, the alterations might have occurred due to leaching of additives from MPs.

Conclusion

The present study showed significant alterations such as detachment of renal tubule from basal lamina, paracellular spaces, vacuolization, damaged hematopoietic tissue, necrosis and exudate in kidneys of fingerlings belonging to treated groups. Likewise, organ index of kidney of different groups also showed a significant (p ≤ 0.05) increase in comparison to the control group except fingerlings treated with 1 mg/l MPs. Moreover, the results showed incomplete recovery in different groups compared to control group except 1 mg/l LDPE MPs. The results indicated that the combination of LDPE MPs and wastewater may impact kidneys of C. carpio fingerlings in a duration-and dosedependent manner with limited reversibility following exposure, highlighting potential long-term risks to aquatic health.

Figures and tables from the paper

Figure 1. T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 15 days. A) Control showed renal tubules (RT)
T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 15 days. A) Control showed renal tubules (RT)↗ Enlarge
Figure 1
T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 15 days. A) Control showed renal tubules (RT)

T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 15 days. A) Control showed renal tubules (RT)

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 3 ↗
Figure 2. T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 30 days. A) Control showed renal tubules
T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 30 days. A) Control showed renal tubules↗ Enlarge
Figure 2
T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 30 days. A) Control showed renal tubules

T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 30 days. A) Control showed renal tubules

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 4 ↗
Figure 3. T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 45 days. A) Control showed renal tubules
T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 45 days. A) Control showed renal tubules↗ Enlarge
Figure 3
T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 45 days. A) Control showed renal tubules

T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 45 days. A) Control showed renal tubules

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 5 ↗
Figure 4. T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 60 days. A) Control showed renal tubules
T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 60 days. A) Control showed renal tubules↗ Enlarge
Figure 4
T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 60 days. A) Control showed renal tubules

T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to different treatment groups for 60 days. A) Control showed renal tubules

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 6 ↗
Figure 5. T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to recovery period. A) Control, B) T1, C) T2, D) T3, E) T4, F) T5 and G) T6
T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to recovery period. A) Control, B) T1, C) T2, D) T3, E) T4, F) T5 and G) T6↗ Enlarge
Figure 5
T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to recovery period. A) Control, B) T1, C) T2, D) T3, E) T4, F) T5 and G) T6

T.S. of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings exposed to recovery period. A) Control, B) T1, C) T2, D) T3, E) T4, F) T5 and G) T6

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 7 ↗
Figure 6. Organ index of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings reared in different treatments after regular time intervals
Organ index of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings reared in different treatments after regular time intervals↗ Enlarge
Figure 6
Organ index of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings reared in different treatments after regular time intervals

Organ index of kidney of Cyprinus carpio fingerlings reared in different treatments after regular time intervals

Open full-size image ↗
Original paper figureSource PDF · page 8 ↗

References

16 in the original paper
  1. Kumar S, Krishnan S, Samal SK, Mohanty S, Nayak SK. Toughening of petroleum based (DGEBA) epoxy resins with various renewable resources based flexible chains for high performance applications: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2018;57(8):2711-2726.
  2. Mahmoud GAE, Taher EM, Zeinab IA, Ahmed LI, Khalefa HS. Insights on wastewater impacts on animal health and production. In: Dey S, Shah MP, editors. Microbial Applications in Industrial Wastewater Treatment. Advances in Wastewater Research. Singapore: Springer; 2026.
  3. Mehdi H, Lau SC, Synyshyn C, Salena MG, McCallum ES, Muzzatti MN, et al. Municipal wastewater as an ecological trap: effects on fish communities across seasons. Sci Total Environ. 2021;759:143430.
  4. Motivarash Y, Bhatt A, Kardani H. Microplastic (MP) occurrence in pelagic and demersal fishes of Gujarat, northwest coast of India. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2024 Mar;31(11):17239-17255.
  5. OECD. OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 1992 Jul 17.
  6. Ortiz JB, De Canales MLG, Sarasquete C. Histopathological changes induced by lindane (γ-HCH) in various organs of fishes. Sci Mar. 2003;67:53-61.
  7. Rakib MRJ, Ertaş A, Walker TR, Rule MJ, Khandaker MU, Idris AM. Macro marine litter survey of sandy beaches along the Cox's Bazar coast of Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh: land-based sources of solid litter pollution. Mar Pollut Bull. 2022 Jan;174:113246.
  8. Robertson JL, Preisler HK, Russell RM. Polo Plus, Probit and Logit Analysis: User's Guide. Version 2.0. Florida (FL): LeOra Software; 2007.
  9. Rochman CM, Parnis JM, Browne MA, Serrato S, Reiner EJ, Robson M, et al. Direct and indirect effects of different types of microplastics on freshwater prey (Corbicula fluminea) and their predator (Acipenser transmontanus). PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0187664.
  10. Shahid S, Sultana T, Sultana S, Hussain B, Al-Ghanim KA, Al-Bashir F, et al. Detecting aquatic pollution using histological investigations of the gills, liver, kidney, and muscles of Oreochromis niloticus. Toxics. 2022;10:564.
  11. Vaid V, Vashishat N. Seasonal assessment of physicochemical parameters of untreated wastewater from District Ludhiana, Punjab, India. JSSWQ. 2024;16(1):76-84.
  12. Vaid V, Vashishat N. Impact of microplastics on aquatic organisms. In: Hundal SS, Singh J, editors. Trends in Life Sciences. London (England): Rubicon Publications; 2025. p. 187-219.
  13. Vaid V, Hundal SS. Light microscopic studies to evaluate fish scales as non-invasive indicators of heavy metal-contaminated waters. Environ Monit Assess. 2019;191:1-11.
  14. Vaid V, Hundal SS, Vashishat N. Ultrastructural studies to evaluate fish scales as indicators of heavy metals in Labeo rohita. JSSWQ. 2024;16(1):118-125.
  15. Wong SL, Ngadi N, Abdullah. Study on dissolution of low density polyethylene (LDPE). Appl Mech Mater. 2014;695:695.
  16. Zhu M, Chernick M, Rittschof D, Hinton DE. Chronic dietary exposure to polystyrene microplastics in maturing Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). Aquat Toxicol. 2019;220:105396.