Women's empowerment in livestock management through targeted veterinary extension advisory services

Introduction

What does it mean to own animals but not control them? Across Southeast Asia, women perform the bulk of daily livestock labor, feeding, cleaning, and monitoring animals, yet household decisions about selling, breeding, and treating those same animals typically rest with men [1] . This disconnect between labor contribution and decision authority has drawn increasing attention from development researchers who argue that women's empowerment in agriculture requires more than participation; it requires genuine control [2] . In Laos, livestock ownership represents a major household asset, often accounting for 30-40% of total farm wealth among rural families [3] . Women's marginal position in livestock decision-making therefore carries real economic consequences. When women lack authority to sell animals or allocate veterinary spending, household resources may not flow toward the most productive management choices [4] . Extension services have traditionally focused on technical livestock skills without addressing the gendered power dynamics that determine who applies those skills. Gender-responsive extension designs, which deliberately target women as primary recipients and address intrahousehold decision barriers, have shown promise in South Asia and East Africa [5] . But evidence from mainland Southeast Asia, where cultural norms around livestock ownership differ from African contexts, remains thin [6] . This research assessed whether targeted veterinary extension advisory services improved women's empowerment in livestock management in Luang Prabang Province, Laos. The objectives were to measure changes in management confidence, compare empowerment domain scores before and after advisory exposure, and identify which advisory components most strongly predicted empowerment gains. [7] .

Material and Methods

Material

Methods

Empowerment was measured through a modified Women's Empowerment in Livestock Index covering five domains: animal health management, breeding decisions, marketing control, feed management, and income retention. Each domain was scored on a 1-5 scale. Management confidence www.extensionjournal.com

was assessed through a separate 20-item self-efficacy questionnaire. One-way ANOVA compared confidence scores across advisory levels. Paired t-tests assessed prepost empowerment changes within the intensive advisory group. Multiple regression identified predictors of empowerment gain [8] .

Ethical Considerations

Informed verbal consent was obtained from all women participants in Lao language after community leaders facilitated introductions. Husband/household head permission was not required as a condition of participation, consistent with individual consent principles. All data were anonymized during processing. No compensation was offered beyond refreshments during group sessions. Confidence scores rose progressively with advisory intensity. The intensive group's median exceeded 75%, while the no-advisory group clustered around 25%.

Results

Variance narrowed at higher advisory levels, suggesting more consistent empowerment among intensively supported women. www.extensionjournal.com

Discussion

These results demonstrate that gender-targeted veterinary extension can shift women's management authority in meaningful ways. The empowerment gains across all five domains exceed those reported by Njuki and colleagues [9] in East African dairy systems, likely because the Laotian program was designed specifically around gender barriers rather than adding gender components to existing technical training.

The significance of husband supportiveness as a predictor echoes findings from Bangladesh, where Kabeer [10] showed that women's empowerment programs work best when male household members are engaged rather than excluded. The Luang Prabang advisory model included periodic joint sessions with husbands, which may have eased intrahousehold resistance to women's expanded decision roles [11] . Animal health training emerged as a particularly strong empowerment lever. When women gained competence in recognizing illness symptoms and administering basic treatments, they also gained household standing as knowledgeable managers rather than just labor providers [12] . This technical-to-social pathway deserves emphasis in future extension design.

Practical Applications: Veterinary extension agencies should design gender-specific advisory tracks that address both technical skills and decision-making authority. Including periodic joint sessions with male household members can reduce resistance. Animal health training should be prioritized as an entry point for broader empowerment. Women's livestock groups provide an effective delivery platform that combines technical learning with peer support for management confidence.

Conclusions: Targeted veterinary extension advisory services produced significant empowerment gains among women livestock managers in Luang Prabang Province. All five management domains improved substantially, with marketing control and animal health showing the largest changes. Advisory intensity and animal health training were the strongest predictors of empowerment. Extension services that deliberately address gender dynamics in livestock decision-making can expand women's management authority beyond their traditional labor roles. Programs should incorporate husband engagement and prioritize animal health competence as pathways to broader empowerment.

References

1. Kristjanson P, Waters-Bayer A, Johnson N, Tipilda A, Njuki J, Baltenweck I, et al. Livestock and women's livelihoods. In: Quisumbing AR, Meinzen-Dick RS, Raney TL, Croppenstedt A, Behrman JA, Peterman A, editors. Gender in agriculture. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. p. 209-233.
2. Alkire S, Meinzen-Dick R, Peterman A, Quisumbing A, Seymour G, Vaz A. The women's empowerment in agriculture index. World Dev. 2013;52:71-91.
3. Stür W, Khanh TT, Duncan A. Transformation of smallholder beef cattle production in Vietnam. Int J Agric Sustain. 2013;11(4):363-381.
4. Njuki J, Sanginga PC. Women, livestock ownership and markets: Bridging the gender gap in eastern and southern Africa. London: Routledge; 2013.
5. Galiè A, Teufel N, Korir L, Baltenweck I, Webb Girard A, Dominguez-Salas P, et al. The women's empowerment in livestock index. Soc Indic Res. 2019;142(2):799-825.
6. Phengsavanh P, Stür W. The use and potential of supplementing village pigs with Stylosanthes guianensis in Lao PDR. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2006;18(9):1-12.
7. Kumar N. Methods for community participation: A complete guide for practitioners. London: ITDG Publishing; 2002.
8. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 8th ed. Boston: Cengage; 2019. www.extensionjournal.com
9. Njuki J, Mburu S. Gender and ownership of livestock assets. In: Njuki J, Sanginga PC, editors. Women, livestock ownership and markets. London: Routledge; 2013. p. 21-38.
10. Kabeer N. Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. Dev Change. 2001;30(3):435-464.
11. Quisumbing AR, Maluccio JA. Resources at marriage and intrahousehold allocation: Evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa. Oxf Bull Econ Stat. 2003;65(3):283-327.
12. Pica-Ciamarra U, Tasciotti L, Otte J, Zezza A. Livestock assets, livestock income and rural households: Cross-country evidence from household surveys. Land Use Policy. 2015;47:129-138.
13. Doss C. Intrahousehold bargaining and resource allocation in developing countries. World Bank Res Obs. 2013;28(1):52-78.
14. Sraboni E, Malapit HJ, Quisumbing AR, Ahmed AU. Women's empowerment in agriculture: What role for food security in Bangladesh? World Dev. 2014;61:1152.
15. Young S, Oakley A, Watson R. Women and livestock management: A needs assessment in Luang Prabang Province. Lao J Agric For. 2020;42:18-34.